Rahim S, Bhayo AM, Siddiqui GU, Maalik A, Memon N, Shah MR, Malik MI. The selectivity of poly(2-vinylpyridine-block-methyl methacrylate) copolymer films: an AFM study.
RSC Adv 2019;
9:16455-16466. [PMID:
35516396 PMCID:
PMC9064383 DOI:
10.1039/c9ra00831d]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, the surface morphologies of poly(2-vinyl pyridine-block-methyl methacrylate), P(2VP-MMA), copolymer films were analyzed by atomic force microscopy. P(2VP-MMA) samples varying in total molar mass and individual block length were evaluated for variations in the surface morphologies of films cast from toluene on Si wafers. The incorporation of AuNPs into the polymer domain significantly influenced the surface morphology of the films. Variations in the surface morphology as a function of the polarity of the casting solvent were also examined. In this context toluene (a non-polar solvent), chloroform (of intermediate polarity) and ethyl acetate (a polar solvent) were employed as casting solvents. Toluene is a good solvent for PMMA compared to P2VP, chloroform has no preferential solvation, while ethyl acetate is a good solvent for P2VP compared to PMMA. The morphology of the films cast on substrates of distinctly different polarities, such as mica, Si wafers, and HOPG, were studied to appraise their selectivity. Finally, a detailed study of the effects of thermal annealing on the surface morphologies of P(2VP-MMA) and P(2VP-MMA)-AuNPs was conducted.
In this study, the surface morphologies of poly(2-vinyl pyridine-block-methyl methacrylate), P(2VP-MMA), copolymer films were analyzed by atomic force microscopy.![]()
Collapse