1
|
Guzzetti S, Morentin Gutierrez P. An integrated modelling approach for targeted degradation: insights on optimization, data requirements and PKPD predictions from semi- or fully-mechanistic models and exact steady state solutions. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2023; 50:327-349. [PMID: 37120680 PMCID: PMC10460745 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-023-09857-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
The value of an integrated mathematical modelling approach for protein degraders which combines the benefits of traditional turnover models and fully mechanistic models is presented. Firstly, we show how exact solutions of the mechanistic models of monovalent and bivalent degraders can provide insight on the role of each system parameter in driving the pharmacological response. We show how on/off binding rates and degradation rates are related to potency and maximal effect of monovalent degraders, and how such relationship can be used to suggest a compound optimization strategy. Even convoluted exact steady state solutions for bivalent degraders provide insight on the type of observations required to ensure the predictive capacity of a mechanistic approach. Specifically for PROTACs, the structure of the exact steady state solution suggests that the total remaining target at steady state, which is easily accessible experimentally, is insufficient to reconstruct the state of the whole system at equilibrium and observations on different species (such as binary/ternary complexes) are necessary. Secondly, global sensitivity analysis of fully mechanistic models for PROTACs suggests that both target and ligase baselines (actually, their ratio) are the major sources of variability in the response of non-cooperative systems, which speaks to the importance of characterizing their distribution in the target patient population. Finally, we propose a pragmatic modelling approach which incorporates the insights generated with fully mechanistic models into simpler turnover models to improve their predictive ability, hence enabling acceleration of drug discovery programs and increased probability of success in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Guzzetti
- DMPK, Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reddy SP, Alontaga AY, Welsh EA, Haura EB, Boyle TA, Eschrich SA, Koomen JM. Deciphering Phenotypes from Protein Biomarkers for Translational Research with PIPER. J Proteome Res 2023; 22:2055-2066. [PMID: 37171072 PMCID: PMC11636645 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Liquid chromatography-multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (LC-MRM) has widespread clinical use for detection of inborn errors of metabolism, therapeutic drug monitoring, and numerous other applications. This technique detects proteolytic peptides as surrogates for protein biomarker expression, mutation, and post-translational modification in individual clinical assays and in cancer research with highly multiplexed quantitation across biological pathways. LC-MRM for protein biomarkers must be translated from multiplexed research-grade panels to clinical use. LC-MRM panels provide the capability to quantify clinical biomarkers and emerging protein markers to establish the context of tumor phenotypes that provide highly relevant supporting information. An application to visualize and communicate targeted proteomics data will empower translational researchers to move protein biomarker panels from discovery to clinical use. Therefore, we have developed a web-based tool for targeted proteomics that provides pathway-level evaluations of key biological drivers (e.g., EGFR signaling), signature scores (representing phenotypes) (e.g., EMT), and the ability to quantify specific drug targets across a sample cohort. This tool represents a framework for integrating summary information, decision algorithms, and risk scores to support Physician-Interpretable Phenotypic Evaluation in R (PIPER) that can be reused or repurposed by other labs to communicate and interpret their own biomarker panels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eric A. Welsh
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eric B. Haura
- Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - John M. Koomen
- Molecular Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haymond A, Davis JB, Espina V. Proteomics for cancer drug design. Expert Rev Proteomics 2019; 16:647-664. [PMID: 31353977 PMCID: PMC6736641 DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2019.1650025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Signal transduction cascades drive cellular proliferation, apoptosis, immune, and survival pathways. Proteins have emerged as actionable drug targets because they are often dysregulated in cancer, due to underlying genetic mutations, or dysregulated signaling pathways. Cancer drug development relies on proteomic technologies to identify potential biomarkers, mechanisms-of-action, and to identify protein binding hot spots. Areas covered: Brief summaries of proteomic technologies for drug discovery include mass spectrometry, reverse phase protein arrays, chemoproteomics, and fragment based screening. Protein-protein interface mapping is presented as a promising method for peptide therapeutic development. The topic of biosimilar therapeutics is presented as an opportunity to apply proteomic technologies to this new class of cancer drug. Expert opinion: Proteomic technologies are indispensable for drug discovery. A suite of technologies including mass spectrometry, reverse phase protein arrays, and protein-protein interaction mapping provide complimentary information for drug development. These assays have matured into well controlled, robust technologies. Recent regulatory approval of biosimilar therapeutics provides another opportunity to decipher the molecular nuances of their unique mechanisms of action. The ability to identify previously hidden protein hot spots is expanding the gamut of potential drug targets. Proteomic profiling permits lead compound evaluation beyond the one drug, one target paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Haymond
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University , Manassas , VA , USA
| | - Justin B Davis
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University , Manassas , VA , USA
| | - Virginia Espina
- Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, George Mason University , Manassas , VA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guerin M, Gonçalves A, Toiron Y, Baudelet E, Pophillat M, Granjeaud S, Fourquet P, Jacot W, Tarpin C, Sabatier R, Agavnian E, Finetti P, Adelaide J, Birnbaum D, Ginestier C, Charafe-Jauffret E, Viens P, Bertucci F, Borg JP, Camoin L. Development of parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)-based quantitative proteomics applied to HER2-Positive breast cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:33762-33777. [PMID: 30333908 PMCID: PMC6173470 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction treatments targeting the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2/ERBB2) have improved the natural history of HER2-positive breast cancer. However, except HER2 protein expression and gene amplification, there is no predictive biomarker to guide the HER2-targeted therapies. We developed Parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) a powerful approach, to quantify and evaluate key proteins involved in the HER2 pathway and/or anti-HER2 treatment sensitivity. Results in BCLs, PRM measurements correlated with western blot immunocytochemistry and transcriptomic data. At baseline, higher expression of HER2, EGFR, PTEN and HER3 but lower expression of phospho-HER2 correlated with trastuzumab sensitivity. Under trastuzumab, PRM demonstrated a decrease in HER2 and an increase in phospho-HER2, which correlated with drug sensitivity. The opposite was observed under lapatinib. HER2 quantification was also correlated with immunohistochemistry in PDXs and clinical breast cancer samples. Discussion in conclusion, PRM-based assay, developed to quantify proteins of the HER2 pathway in breast cancer samples revealed a large magnitude of expression, which may have relevance in terms of treatment sensitivity. Materials and Methods we first evaluated PRM in term of sensitivity, linearity and reproducibility. PRM was then applied to breast cancer cell lines (BCLs) including BCLs exposed to anti-HER2 agents, patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and frozen breast cancer samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Guerin
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Predictive Oncology Team, Marseille, France
| | - Yves Toiron
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| | - Emilie Baudelet
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| | - Matthieu Pophillat
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| | - Samuel Granjeaud
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| | - Patrick Fourquet
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| | - William Jacot
- IRCM, INSERM, Institut Régional du Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier, France
| | - Carole Tarpin
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Predictive Oncology Team, Marseille, France
| | - Emilie Agavnian
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Anatomo-pathology, Marseille, France
| | - Pascal Finetti
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Predictive Oncology Team, Marseille, France
| | - José Adelaide
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Predictive Oncology Team, Marseille, France
| | - Daniel Birnbaum
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Predictive Oncology Team, Marseille, France
| | - Christophe Ginestier
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Epithelial Stem Cells and Cancer Team, Marseille, France
| | - Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Anatomo-pathology, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Epithelial Stem Cells and Cancer Team, Marseille, France
| | - Patrice Viens
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Predictive Oncology Team, Marseille, France
| | - François Bertucci
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Predictive Oncology Team, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Paul Borg
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| | - Luc Camoin
- Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille Proteomics, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen Y, Britton D, Wood ER, Brantley S, Fournier M, Wloch M, Williams VL, Johnson J, Magliocco A, Pike I, Koomen JM. Quantification of Breast Cancer Protein Biomarkers at Different Expression Levels in Human Tumors. Methods Mol Biol 2018; 1788:251-268. [PMID: 29243084 PMCID: PMC7771335 DOI: 10.1007/7651_2017_113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring (LC-SRM) mass spectrometry has developed into a versatile tool for quantification of proteins with a wide range of applications in basic science, translational research, and clinical patient assessment. This strategy uniquely complements traditional pathology approaches, like hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The multiplexing capabilities offered by mass spectrometry are currently unmatched by other techniques. However, quantification of biomarkers in tissue specimens without the other data obtained from H&E-stained slides or IHC, including tumor cellularity or percentage of positively stained cells inter alia, may not provide as much information that is needed to fully understand tumor biology or properly assess the patient. Therefore, additional characterization of the tissue proteome is needed, which in turn requires the ability to assess protein markers across a wide range of expression levels from a single sample. This protocol provides an example of multiplexed analysis in breast tumor tissue quantifying specific biomarkers, specifically estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and the HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with other proteins that can report on tissue content and other aspects of tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Chen
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth R Wood
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Michelle Fournier
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marek Wloch
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vonetta L Williams
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Johnson
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anthony Magliocco
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ian Pike
- Proteome Sciences, plc, Cobham, UK
| | - John M Koomen
- Molecular Oncology/Proteomics SRB3, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|