1
|
Tajane SV, Thakur A, Acharya S, Chakrabarti P, Dey S. On the abundance and importance of AXXXA sequence motifs in globular proteins and their involvement in C βC β interaction. J Struct Biol 2024; 216:108129. [PMID: 39343152 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2024.108129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
The AXXXA and GXXXG motifs are frequently observed in helices, especially in membrane proteins. The motif GXXXG is known to stabilize helix-helix association in membrane proteins via CαHO bonding. AXXXA sequence motif additionally stabilizes the folded state of proteins. We found 27,000 and 18,000 occurrences of AXXXA and GXXXG motifs in a non-redundant set of 6000 obligate homodimeric (OD) complexes. Interestingly, this is less pronounced in transient homodimers (TD) and heterodimers (HetD). On average each obligate homodimer contains four AXXXA motifs, it is 2 and 3.5 for HetD and TD, respectively. Focusing on the binding surface it is seen that 27 % of the ODs contain at least one AXXXA motif at the interface, whereas it is 17 % and 15 % for HetD and TD respectively. AXXXA predominantly stabilizes the OD quaternary structure via the side chain CβCβ interactions. This interaction is energetically favorable and is found to be a major driving force for OD quaternary structure stability. Cβ-Cβ interactions are observed ∼6 times higher than the known CαHO interaction for helix-helix stabilization. Two additional new interactions of CβO and OO are observed at the AXXXA containing interface regions. The occurrence of the motif gets drastically reduced if any of the terminal Ala residues are replaced by Gly. Our findings show the importance of AXXXA in providing stability to the quaternary structure through specific hydrophobic interactions and the specificity of the Ala residue at motif termini. The knowledge gained can be used for designing synthetic proteins of improved stability and for designing peptide-based therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Vilas Tajane
- Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 62, Nagaur Road, Karwar 342030, Rajasthan, India
| | - Abhilasha Thakur
- Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 62, Nagaur Road, Karwar 342030, Rajasthan, India
| | - Srijita Acharya
- Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 62, Nagaur Road, Karwar 342030, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - Sucharita Dey
- Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, NH 62, Nagaur Road, Karwar 342030, Rajasthan, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geist JL, Lee CY, Strom JM, de Jesús Naveja J, Luck K. Generation of a high confidence set of domain-domain interface types to guide protein complex structure predictions by AlphaFold. Bioinformatics 2024; 40:btae482. [PMID: 39171834 PMCID: PMC11361816 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION While the release of AlphaFold (AF) represented a breakthrough for the prediction of protein complex structures, its sensitivity, especially when using full length protein sequences, still remains limited. Modeling success rates might increase if AF predictions were guided by likely interacting protein fragments. This approach requires available sets of highly confident protein-protein interface types. Computational resources, such as 3did, infer interacting globular domain types from observed contacts in protein structures. Assessing the accuracy of these predicted interface types is difficult because we lack hand-curated reference sets of verified domain-domain interface (DDI) types. RESULTS To improve protein complex modeling of DDIs by AF, we manually inspected 80 randomly selected DDI types from the 3did resource to generate a first reference set of DDI types. Identified cases of DDI type nonapproval (40%) primarily resulted from inaccurate Pfam domain matches, crystal contacts, and synthetic protein constructs. Using logistic regression, we predicted a subset of 2411 out of 5724 considered DDI types in 3did to be of high confidence, which we subsequently applied to 53 000 human-protein interactions to predict DDIs followed by AF modeling. We obtained highly confident AF models for 604 out of 1129 predicted DDIs. Of note, for 47% of them no confident AF structural model could be obtained using full length protein sequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION Code is available at https://github.com/KatjaLuckLab/DDI_manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chop Yan Lee
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB) gGmbH, Mainz 55128, Germany
| | | | - José de Jesús Naveja
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB) gGmbH, Mainz 55128, Germany
- 3rd Medical Department, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
- University Cancer Center, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
| | - Katja Luck
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB) gGmbH, Mainz 55128, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shor B, Schneidman-Duhovny D. Integrative modeling meets deep learning: Recent advances in modeling protein assemblies. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024; 87:102841. [PMID: 38795564 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
Recent progress in protein structure prediction based on deep learning revolutionized the field of Structural Biology. Beyond single proteins, it also enabled high-throughput prediction of structures of protein-protein interactions. Despite the success in predicting complex structures, large macromolecular assemblies still require specialized approaches. Here we describe recent advances in modeling macromolecular assemblies using integrative and hierarchical approaches. We highlight applications that predict protein-protein interactions and challenges in modeling complexes based on the interaction networks, including the prediction of complex stoichiometry and heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Shor
- The Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. https://twitter.com/ben_shor
| | - Dina Schneidman-Duhovny
- The Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao H, Petrey D, Murray D, Honig B. ZEPPI: Proteome-scale sequence-based evaluation of protein-protein interaction models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2400260121. [PMID: 38743624 PMCID: PMC11127014 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2400260121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
We introduce ZEPPI (Z-score Evaluation of Protein-Protein Interfaces), a framework to evaluate structural models of a complex based on sequence coevolution and conservation involving residues in protein-protein interfaces. The ZEPPI score is calculated by comparing metrics for an interface to those obtained from randomly chosen residues. Since contacting residues are defined by the structural model, this obviates the need to account for indirect interactions. Further, although ZEPPI relies on species-paired multiple sequence alignments, its focus on interfacial residues allows it to leverage quite shallow alignments. ZEPPI can be implemented on a proteome-wide scale and is applied here to millions of structural models of dimeric complexes in the Escherichia coli and human interactomes found in the PrePPI database. PrePPI's scoring function is based primarily on the evaluation of protein-protein interfaces, and ZEPPI adds a new feature to this analysis through the incorporation of evolutionary information. ZEPPI performance is evaluated through applications to experimentally determined complexes and to decoys from the CASP-CAPRI experiment. As we discuss, the standard CAPRI scores used to evaluate docking models are based on model quality and not on the ability to give yes/no answers as to whether two proteins interact. ZEPPI is able to detect weak signals from PPI models that the CAPRI scores define as incorrect and, similarly, to identify potential PPIs defined as low confidence by the current PrePPI scoring function. A number of examples that illustrate how the combination of PrePPI and ZEPPI can yield functional hypotheses are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiqing Zhao
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY10032
| | - Donald Petrey
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY10032
| | - Diana Murray
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY10032
| | - Barry Honig
- Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY10032
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY10032
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY10032
- Zuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY10027
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Catoiu EA, Mih N, Lu M, Palsson B. Establishing comprehensive quaternary structural proteomes from genome sequence. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.24.590993. [PMID: 38712217 PMCID: PMC11071507 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.24.590993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
A critical body of knowledge has developed through advances in protein microscopy, protein-fold modeling, structural biology software, availability of sequenced bacterial genomes, large-scale mutation databases, and genome-scale models. Based on these recent advances, we develop a computational framework that; i) identifies the oligomeric structural proteome encoded by an organism's genome from available structural resources; ii) maps multi-strain alleleomic variation, resulting in the structural proteome for a species; and iii) calculates the 3D orientation of proteins across subcellular compartments with residue-level precision. Using the platform, we; iv) compute the quaternary E. coli K-12 MG1655 structural proteome; v) use a dataset of 12,000 mutations to build Random Forest classifiers that can predict the severity of mutations; and, in combination with a genome-scale model that computes proteome allocation, vi) obtain the spatial allocation of the E. coli proteome. Thus, in conjunction with relevant datasets and increasingly accurate computational models, we can now annotate quaternary structural proteomes, at genome-scale, to obtain a molecular-level understanding of whole-cell functions. Significance Advancements in experimental and computational methods have revealed the shapes of multi-subunit proteins. The absence of a unified platform that maps actionable datatypes onto these increasingly accurate structures creates a barrier to structural analyses, especially at the genome-scale. Here, we describe QSPACE, a computational annotation platform that evaluates existing resources to identify the best-available structure for each protein in a user's query, maps the 3D location of actionable datatypes ( e.g. , active sites, published mutations) onto the selected structures, and uses third-party APIs to determine the subcellular compartment of all amino acids of a protein. As proof-of-concept, we deployed QSPACE to generate the quaternary structural proteome of E. coli MG1655 and demonstrate two use-cases involving large-scale mutant analysis and genome-scale modelling.
Collapse
|
6
|
Schweke H, Pacesa M, Levin T, Goverde CA, Kumar P, Duhoo Y, Dornfeld LJ, Dubreuil B, Georgeon S, Ovchinnikov S, Woolfson DN, Correia BE, Dey S, Levy ED. An atlas of protein homo-oligomerization across domains of life. Cell 2024; 187:999-1010.e15. [PMID: 38325366 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Protein structures are essential to understanding cellular processes in molecular detail. While advances in artificial intelligence revealed the tertiary structure of proteins at scale, their quaternary structure remains mostly unknown. We devise a scalable strategy based on AlphaFold2 to predict homo-oligomeric assemblies across four proteomes spanning the tree of life. Our results suggest that approximately 45% of an archaeal proteome and a bacterial proteome and 20% of two eukaryotic proteomes form homomers. Our predictions accurately capture protein homo-oligomerization, recapitulate megadalton complexes, and unveil hundreds of homo-oligomer types, including three confirmed experimentally by structure determination. Integrating these datasets with omics information suggests that a majority of known protein complexes are symmetric. Finally, these datasets provide a structural context for interpreting disease mutations and reveal coiled-coil regions as major enablers of quaternary structure evolution in human. Our strategy is applicable to any organism and provides a comprehensive view of homo-oligomerization in proteomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Schweke
- Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Martin Pacesa
- Laboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tal Levin
- Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Casper A Goverde
- Laboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Prasun Kumar
- School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK; School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK; Bristol BioDesign Institute, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK; Max Planck-Bristol Centre for Minimal Biology, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK
| | - Yoan Duhoo
- Protein Production and Structure Characterization Core Facility (PTPSP), School of Life Sciences, École polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lars J Dornfeld
- Laboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Dubreuil
- Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Sandrine Georgeon
- Laboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sergey Ovchinnikov
- John Harvard Distinguished Science Fellowship Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Derek N Woolfson
- School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK; School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK; Bristol BioDesign Institute, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK; Max Planck-Bristol Centre for Minimal Biology, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK.
| | - Bruno E Correia
- Laboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Sucharita Dey
- Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
| | - Emmanuel D Levy
- Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu X, Bonvin AMJJ. DeepRank-GNN-esm: a graph neural network for scoring protein-protein models using protein language model. BIOINFORMATICS ADVANCES 2024; 4:vbad191. [PMID: 38213822 PMCID: PMC10782804 DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Motivation Protein-Protein interactions (PPIs) play critical roles in numerous cellular processes. By modelling the 3D structures of the correspond protein complexes valuable insights can be obtained, providing, e.g. starting points for drug and protein design. One challenge in the modelling process is however the identification of near-native models from the large pool of generated models. To this end we have previously developed DeepRank-GNN, a graph neural network that integrates structural and sequence information to enable effective pattern learning at PPI interfaces. Its main features are related to the Position Specific Scoring Matrices (PSSMs), which are computationally expensive to generate, significantly limits the algorithm's usability. Results We introduce here DeepRank-GNN-esm that includes as additional features protein language model embeddings from the ESM-2 model. We show that the ESM-2 embeddings can actually replace the PSSM features at no cost in-, or even better performance on two PPI-related tasks: scoring docking poses and detecting crystal artifacts. This new DeepRank version bypasses thus the need of generating PSSM, greatly improving the usability of the software and opening new application opportunities for systems for which PSSM profiles cannot be obtained or are irrelevant (e.g. antibody-antigen complexes). Availability and implementation DeepRank-GNN-esm is freely available from https://github.com/DeepRank/DeepRank-GNN-esm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaotong Xu
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandre M J J Bonvin
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lensink MF, Brysbaert G, Raouraoua N, Bates PA, Giulini M, Honorato RV, van Noort C, Teixeira JMC, Bonvin AMJJ, Kong R, Shi H, Lu X, Chang S, Liu J, Guo Z, Chen X, Morehead A, Roy RS, Wu T, Giri N, Quadir F, Chen C, Cheng J, Del Carpio CA, Ichiishi E, Rodriguez‐Lumbreras LA, Fernandez‐Recio J, Harmalkar A, Chu L, Canner S, Smanta R, Gray JJ, Li H, Lin P, He J, Tao H, Huang S, Roel‐Touris J, Jimenez‐Garcia B, Christoffer CW, Jain AJ, Kagaya Y, Kannan H, Nakamura T, Terashi G, Verburgt JC, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Fujuta H, Sekijima M, Kihara D, Khan O, Kotelnikov S, Ghani U, Padhorny D, Beglov D, Vajda S, Kozakov D, Negi SS, Ricciardelli T, Barradas‐Bautista D, Cao Z, Chawla M, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Yin R, Cheung M, Guest JD, Lee J, Pierce BG, Shor B, Cohen T, Halfon M, Schneidman‐Duhovny D, Zhu S, Yin R, Sun Y, Shen Y, Maszota‐Zieleniak M, Bojarski KK, Lubecka EA, Marcisz M, Danielsson A, Dziadek L, Gaardlos M, Gieldon A, Liwo A, Samsonov SA, Slusarz R, Zieba K, Sieradzan AK, Czaplewski C, Kobayashi S, Miyakawa Y, Kiyota Y, Takeda‐Shitaka M, Olechnovic K, Valancauskas L, Dapkunas J, Venclovas C, Wallner B, Yang L, Hou C, He X, Guo S, Jiang S, Ma X, Duan R, Qui L, Xu X, Zou X, Velankar S, Wodak SJ. Impact of AlphaFold on structure prediction of protein complexes: The CASP15-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2023; 91:1658-1683. [PMID: 37905971 PMCID: PMC10841881 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 54, the 5th joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round offered 37 targets, including 14 homodimers, 3 homo-trimers, 13 heterodimers including 3 antibody-antigen complexes, and 7 large assemblies. On average ~70 CASP and CAPRI predictor groups, including more than 20 automatics servers, submitted models for each target. A total of 21 941 models submitted by these groups and by 15 CAPRI scorer groups were evaluated using the CAPRI model quality measures and the DockQ score consolidating these measures. The prediction performance was quantified by a weighted score based on the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group among their five best models. Results show substantial progress achieved across a significant fraction of the 60+ participating groups. High-quality models were produced for about 40% of the targets compared to 8% two years earlier. This remarkable improvement is due to the wide use of the AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold2-Multimer software and the confidence metrics they provide. Notably, expanded sampling of candidate solutions by manipulating these deep learning inference engines, enriching multiple sequence alignments, or integration of advanced modeling tools, enabled top performing groups to exceed the performance of a standard AlphaFold2-Multimer version used as a yard stick. This notwithstanding, performance remained poor for complexes with antibodies and nanobodies, where evolutionary relationships between the binding partners are lacking, and for complexes featuring conformational flexibility, clearly indicating that the prediction of protein complexes remains a challenging problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F. Lensink
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR8576 – UGSF – Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et FonctionnelleLilleFrance
| | - Guillaume Brysbaert
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR8576 – UGSF – Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et FonctionnelleLilleFrance
| | - Nessim Raouraoua
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR8576 – UGSF – Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et FonctionnelleLilleFrance
| | - Paul A. Bates
- Biomolecular Modeling LaboratoryThe Francis Crick InstituteLondonUK
| | - Marco Giulini
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo V. Honorato
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Charlotte van Noort
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Joao M. C. Teixeira
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
- Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science – ChemistryUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ren Kong
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Hang Shi
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Xufeng Lu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Shan Chang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information EngineeringJiangsu University of TechnologyChangzhouChina
| | - Jian Liu
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Zhiye Guo
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Xiao Chen
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Alex Morehead
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Raj S. Roy
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Tianqi Wu
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Nabin Giri
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Farhan Quadir
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Chen Chen
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | | | - Eichiro Ichiishi
- International University of Health and Welfare (IUHV Hospital)Nasushiobara‐CityJapan
| | - Luis A. Rodriguez‐Lumbreras
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vida y del Vino (ICVV)CSIC ‐ Universidad de La Rioja ‐ Gobierno de La RiojaLogronoSpain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Juan Fernandez‐Recio
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vida y del Vino (ICVV)CSIC ‐ Universidad de La Rioja ‐ Gobierno de La RiojaLogronoSpain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Ameya Harmalkar
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Lee‐Shin Chu
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Sam Canner
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Rituparna Smanta
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jeffrey J. Gray
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Program in Molecular BiophysicsJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Hao Li
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Peicong Lin
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Jiahua He
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Huanyu Tao
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Sheng‐You Huang
- School of PhysicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
| | - Jorge Roel‐Touris
- Protein Design and Modeling Lab, Dept. of Structural BiologyMolecular Biology Institute of Barcelona (IBMB‐CSIC)BarcelonaSpain
| | | | | | - Anika J. Jain
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Yuki Kagaya
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Harini Kannan
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
- Dept. of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of BiosciencesIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
| | - Tsukasa Nakamura
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Genki Terashi
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Jacob C. Verburgt
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Yuanyuan Zhang
- Dept. of Computer SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Zicong Zhang
- Dept. of Computer SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Hayato Fujuta
- Dept. of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of BiosciencesIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
| | | | - Daisuke Kihara
- Dept. of Computer SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
- Dept. of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Surendra S. Negi
- Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular BiophysicsUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonTexasUSA
| | | | | | - Zhen Cao
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohit Chawla
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)Saudi Arabia
- Department of Chemistry and BiologyUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
| | | | - Rui Yin
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Melyssa Cheung
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Johnathan D. Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Jessica Lee
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Brian G. Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology ResearchRockvilleMarylandUSA
- Dept. of Cell Biology and Molecular GeneticsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Ben Shor
- School of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Tomer Cohen
- School of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Matan Halfon
- School of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | | | - Shaowen Zhu
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
| | - Rujie Yin
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
| | - Yuanfei Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
- Department of Computer Science and EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationTexasUSA
- Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Translational Medical SciencesTexas A&M UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuta Miyakawa
- School of PharmacyKitasato UniversityMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuomi Kiyota
- School of PharmacyKitasato UniversityMinato‐kuTokyoJapan
| | | | - Kliment Olechnovic
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Lukas Valancauskas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Justas Dapkunas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Ceslovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
| | - Bjorn Wallner
- Bioinformatics Division, Department of Physics, Chemistry, and BiologyLinkoping UniversityLinköpingSweden
| | - Lin Yang
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
- School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic EngineeringThe University of SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Chengyu Hou
- School of Electronics and Information EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Xiaodong He
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
- Shenzhen STRONG Advanced Materials Research Institute Col, LtdShenzhenPeople's Republic of China
| | - Shuai Guo
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Shenda Jiang
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Xiaoliang Ma
- National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments, Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
| | - Rui Duan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Liming Qui
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research CenterUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
- Dept. of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
- Dept. of BiochemistryUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
- Institute for Data Science and InformaticsUniversity of MissouriColumbiaMissouriUSA
| | - Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe, European Molecular Biology LaboratoryEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI)HinxtonCambridgeUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vakser IA. Prediction of protein interactions is essential for studying biomolecular mechanisms. Proteomics 2023; 23:e2300219. [PMID: 37667816 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.202300219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
Structural characterization of protein interactions is essential for our ability to understand and modulate physiological processes. Computational approaches to modeling of protein complexes provide structural information that far exceeds capabilities of the existing experimental techniques. Protein structure prediction in general, and prediction of protein interactions in particular, has been revolutionized by the rapid progress in Deep Learning techniques. The work of Schweke et al. (Proteomics 2023, 23, 2200323) presents a community-wide study of an important problem of distinguishing physiological protein-protein complexes/interfaces (experimentally determined or modeled) from non-physiological ones. The authors designed and generated a large benchmark set of physiological and non-physiological homodimeric complexes, and evaluated a large set of scoring functions, as well as AlphaFold predictions, on their ability to discriminate the non-physiological interfaces. The problem of separating physiological interfaces from non-physiological ones is very difficult, largely due to the lack of a clear distinction between the two categories in a crowded environment inside a living cell. Still, the ability to identify key physiologically significant interfaces in the variety of possible configurations of a protein-protein complex is important. The study presents a major data resource and methodological development in this important direction for molecular and cellular biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|