Patient perspectives on falls in persons with multiple sclerosis

Examination of Risk Factors Associated With Falls and Injurious Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Nationwide Study

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update on risk factors associated with falls and injurious falls among people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in the United States.

DESIGN

Nationwide cross-sectional web-based survey.

SETTING

Community setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult PwMS (n=965).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed self-report surveys of demographics, clinical data, concerns about falling, occurrence of falls, factors associated with falls, and injurious falls in the past 6 months. Participants also completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of depression, pain interference, and physical function, and the Fatigue Severity Scale.

RESULTS

The most common self-reported factors associated with falls included personal factors such as poor balance (75%), muscle weakness (54%), and/or fatigue (35%), environmental factors such as general surface conditions (37%) and/or distraction (15%), and activities-related factors such as urgency to complete a task (35%) and/or multitasking (27%). Logistic regression analyses indicated that higher fatigue severity (OR=1.19, P<.01) and higher pain interference (OR=1.02, P<.01) were associated with higher odds of experiencing at least 1 fall. Any level of concern, even minimal concern about falling was also significantly associated with a higher odd of experiencing at least 1 fall (ORs range 2.78 - 3.95, all P<.01). Fair to very high concerns about falling compared with no concern about falling (ORs range=5.17 - 10.26, all P<.05) was significantly associated with higher odds of sustaining an injurious fall.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest falls prevention approaches in PwMS should be multifactorial and include personal, environmental, and activities-related factors. Particular attention on fatigue, pain, and concern about falling may be needed to reduce incidence of falls and injurious falls in this population.

Scale development to evaluate differences between concern about falling and fear of falling: the concern and fear of falling evaluation

Purpose

Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience fear of falling (FOF), which is associated with negative health and quality-of-life consequences. Prior research has used FOF and concern about falling (CAF) interchangeably, but persons with MS report that CAF and FOF represent separate constructs that lie on a continuum. Unfortunately, no scale exists to understand the differences between CAF and FOF. Therefore, we developed a novel questionnaire, the Concern and Fear of Falling Evaluation (CAFFE), in which respondents rank their CAF and FOF on a continuum across various activities. This study aims to describe the scale development process and examine its psychometric properties.

Methods

In a single online survey, MS participants responded to demographic questionnaires, indicated whether they experience CAF and FOF, and completed the CAFFE. Psychometric evaluation of the CAFFE involved internal consistency, split-half cross validation, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results

Out of 1,025 respondents, 64.6% reported CAF and 47.2% reported FOF. The EFA yielded a two-factor solution encompassing activities in open (factor 1) and closed environments (factor 2). The CFA replicated this two-factor solution and the CAFFE demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.98).

Conclusion

The 27-item CAFFE is a highly reliable and valid measure capturing the tipping point at which point CAF moves to FOF. Future research should seek to define the tipping point from the MS community, as CAF may be an adaptive mechanism, whereas FOF may be a maladaptive behavior.

A concept analysis of fear of falling in older adults: insights from qualitative research studies

BACKGROUND

Fear of falling is a persistent concern about falls that commonly occur in older adults. Recently, it has been argued that fear of falling doesn't simply mean a state of low falls efficacy, but is a concept distinct from falls efficacy. However, the two concepts are still indistinguishable. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the unique characteristics of the fear of falling. This study aims to analyze the concept of 'fear of falling' faced by older adults.

METHODS

This study is designed as a concept analysis. A concept analysis was conducted by Walker & Avant's eight-step concept analysis method. A total of 16 pieces of literature were selected by inclusion and exclusion criteria from those published in Pubmed and Scopus between 1993 and 2022 on 8 November 2022.

RESULTS

Two antecedents, four attributes, and five consequences were identified. Apprehension caused by the unpredictable nature of falls, unease related to one's vulnerability, high vigilance-related to the environment, and concern about potential harm after fall events were presented as attributes of fear of falling in older adults. There were two antecedents of fear of falling which were awareness of falls and near falls, and direct/indirect experience about falls and near falls. As consequences of fear of falling, protective effect, activities curtailment, reduction in radius of living, restricted freedom, and limited social activities were reported.

CONCLUSION

It was confirmed that falls and the fear-inducing process were fused to constitute the unique characteristics of the fear of falling. This can be presented as an important basis for future research on the fear of falling or dealing with various aspects of the fear of falling in the clinical field.

Self-management of falls in people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Falls are common in people with multiple sclerosis. There is rising interest in how the multifactorial and chronic nature of fall risk among people with multiple sclerosis can be addressed through self-management. Thus, the aims were to investigate the extent and the scope of publications on self-management of falls in people with multiple sclerosis, and to identify how the concept of self-management was defined and used.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search in Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science and PsycInfo was conducted to identify publications until July 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Published methodological guidance was followed. Articles targeting: (1) people with multiple sclerosis, (2) falls, and (3) self-management were selected. Of 1656 records, 203 publications were assessed for eligibility, of which 173 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 16 publications did not contain empirical data. The type of publication, study focus, and study design was extracted. If applicable, key findings, self-management tasks and skills, and the definition of self-management were extracted.

RESULTS

Fourteen original articles met all inclusion criteria. Ten articles represented six different fall prevention interventions. Three publications were randomized controlled trials. Self-management content was variable and not comprehensive in nature. None of the 14 publications included a self-management definition.

CONCLUSION

The limited number of original articles and the even fewer intervention studies show that the research on self-management of falls in people with multiple sclerosis is in its infancy. To progress in the research area of self-management of falls, a more robust, consensus-based description of self-management frameworks and activities is needed.

Neurorehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis-A Review of Present Approaches and Future Considerations

Multiple sclerosis is an increasingly prevalent disease, representing the leading cause of non-traumatic neurological disease in Europe and North America. The most common symptoms include gait deficits, balance and coordination impairments, fatigue, spasticity, dysphagia and an overactive bladder. Neurorehabilitation therapeutic approaches aim to alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life through promoting positive immunological transformations and neuroplasticity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current treatments for the most debilitating symptoms in multiple sclerosis, identify areas for future improvement, and provide a reference guide for practitioners in the field. It analyzes the most cited procedures currently in use for the management of a number of symptoms affecting the majority of patients with multiple sclerosis, from different training routines to cognitive rehabilitation and therapies using physical agents, such as electrostimulation, hydrotherapy, cryotherapy and electromagnetic fields. Furthermore, it investigates the quality of evidence for the aforementioned therapies and the different tests applied in practice to assess their utility. Lastly, the study looks at potential future candidates for the treatment and evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis and the supposed benefits they could bring in clinical settings.