Kleemiss F, Wieduwilt EK, Hupf E, Shi MW, Stewart SG, Jayatilaka D, Turner MJ, Sugimoto K, Nishibori E, Schirmeister T, Schmidt TC, Engels B, Grabowsky S. Similarities and Differences between Crystal and Enzyme Environmental Effects on the Electron Density of Drug Molecules.
Chemistry 2021;
27:3407-3419. [PMID:
33090581 PMCID:
PMC7898524 DOI:
10.1002/chem.202003978]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The crystal interaction density is generally assumed to be a suitable measure of the polarization of a low-molecular weight ligand inside an enzyme, but this approximation has seldomly been tested and has never been quantified before. In this study, we compare the crystal interaction density and the interaction electrostatic potential for a model compound of loxistatin acid (E64c) with those inside cathepsin B, in solution, and in vacuum. We apply QM/MM calculations and experimental quantum crystallography to show that the crystal interaction density is indeed very similar to the enzyme interaction density. Less than 0.1 e are shifted between these two environments in total. However, this difference has non-negligible consequences for derived properties.
Collapse