Multifaceted psychosocial intervention program for breast cancer patients after first recurrence: feasibility study

Brief collaborative care intervention to reduce perceived unmet needs in highly distressed breast cancer patients: randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Our newly developed brief collaborative care intervention program has been suggested to be effective in reducing breast cancer patients' unmet needs and psychological distress; however, there has been no controlled trial to investigate its effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the program in relation to patients' perceived needs and other relevant outcomes for patients including quality of life, psychological distress and fear of recurrence (Clinical trial register; UMIN-CTR, Clinical registration number; R5172).

METHODS

Fifty-nine highly distressed breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy were randomly assigned either to a treatment as usual group or to a collaborative care intervention, consisting of four sessions that mainly included assessment of the patients' perceived needs, learning skills of problem-solving treatment for coping with unmet needs and psycho-education provided by trained nurses supervised by a psycho-oncologist.

RESULTS

Although >80% of the eligible patients agreed to participate, and >90% of participants completed the intervention, there were no significant differences with regard to patients' needs, quality of life, psychological distress and fear of recurrence, both at 1 and 3 months after intervention.

CONCLUSION

Newly developed brief collaborative care intervention program was found to be feasible and acceptable. The trial, however, failed to show the effectiveness of the program on patients' relevant subjective outcomes. Further intervention program having both brevity and sufficient intensity should be developed in future studies.

Impact of the mental health and dynamic referral for oncology (MHADRO) program on oncology patient outcomes, health care utilization, and health provider behaviors: A multi-site randomized control trial

OBJECTIVE

The MHADRO assesses psychosocial and medical needs, provides tailored feedback reports, and connects patients to mental health providers. This study examined the MHADRO's effect on patient outcomes, health care utilization, and oncology provider documentation and behaviors.

METHODS

836 patients were part of a multi-site RCT and assessments were conducted at baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The intervention group engaged in less emergency calls to providers. There were no differences in psychosocial outcomes at follow up assessments. Providers of patients in the intervention group were more likely to: document psychosocial symptoms and history; refer to psychosocial services; encourage support groups; seek psychological evaluations during visits. Patients who agreed to a mental health referral had decreased hospitalizations, increased mental health care interactions, and stronger ratings of counseling potential benefits. This group also reported increased psychosocial distress at all follow-up assessments.

CONCLUSION

The MHADRO may increase access to mental health care, lessen utilization, and improve providers' management of psychosocial needs, but does not appear to impact overall functioning over time.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Providers are encouraged to consider incorporating programs, like the MHADRO, into patient care as they may have the potential to impact screening and management of patients' psychosocial needs.

Unmet needs of non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors in Korea: prevalence, correlates, and associations with health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs among non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors in Korea and to identify their association with health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

Participants were 826 NHL survivors from three hospitals in South Korea diagnosed at least 24 months prior to participating (mean, 6.3 years; range, 2.1-20.9 years). We used self-reported questionnaires, including the Need Scale for Cancer Patients Undergoing Follow-up Care (NS-C) developed in Korea and the EORTC QLQ-C30. We defined an unmet need as a moderate to high level of unmet need in the NS-C response scale.

RESULTS

Among six domains, unmet need prevalence ranged from 1.7% to 38.3%. Most commonly reported domains with unmet needs were 'treatment and prognosis' (38.3%) and 'keeping mind under control' (30.5%). The three most frequently reported individual unmet needs were 'being informed about prevention of recurrence' (50.7%), 'being informed about prevention of metastasis' (49.7%), and 'having self-confidence of overcoming cancer' (42.7%). Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that younger age, being unmarried, and low monthly income were associated with unmet needs of multiple domains. Participants with unmet needs demonstrated significantly poorer HRQOL, and the most clinically meaningful differences were found in social function and emotional function.

CONCLUSIONS

Korean NHL survivors have substantial unmet needs, especially those who are younger, unmarried, and have a lower income. Initiating supportive care programs for meeting unmet needs may enhance their HRQOL. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Difference of patient's perceived need in breast cancer patients after diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference of patients' perceived needs after cancer diagnosis. Differences in quality of life and psychological distress were also examined.

METHODS

Ambulatory breast cancer patients who were randomly selected participated in this study. The patients were asked to complete the Short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey, which covers five domains of need (health system and information, psychological, physical, care and support and sexuality needs), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C 30 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 408 patients were enrolled and distributed into four groups [Group 1 (N = 115)], within 1 year of diagnosis; Group 2 [N = 105], 1-3 years since diagnosis; Group 3 [N = 94], >3 years since diagnosis; and Group 4 [N = 94], recurrence). Significant differences were observed in total, psychological, physical and daily living, and patient care and support needs, as well as in quality of life, whereas there were no significant differences in health system and information, sexuality needs and psychological distress. In general, Groups 1 and 4 had a higher need level and lower quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' perceived needs and quality of life may vary according to time since cancer diagnosis and the presence of cancer recurrence. The findings suggest that different care for supporting breast cancer survivors after diagnosis should be recommended, and that the time since diagnosis and/or the presence of recurrence may be relevant indicators for providing optimal and individualized care.

Test of mindfulness and hope components in a psychological intervention for women with cancer recurrence

OBJECTIVE

Psychological interventions can attenuate distress and enhance coping for those with an initial diagnosis of cancer, but there are few intervention options for individuals with cancer recurrence. To address this gap, we developed and tested a novel treatment combining Mindfulness, Hope Therapy, and biobehavioral components.

METHOD

An uncontrolled, repeated measures design was used. Women (N = 32) with recurrent breast or gynecologic cancers were provided 20 treatment sessions in individual (n = 12) or group (n = 20) formats. On average, participants were middle aged (M = 58) and Caucasian (81%). Independent variables (i.e., hope and mindfulness) and psychological outcomes (i.e., depression, negative mood, worry, and symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder) were assessed pre-treatment and 2, 4, and 7 months later. Session-by-session therapy process (positive and negative affect, quality-of-life) and mechanism (use of intervention-specific skills) measures were also included.

RESULTS

Distress, anxiety, and negative affect decreased, whereas positive affect and mental-health-related quality-of-life increased over the course of treatment, as demonstrated in mixed-effects models with the intent-to-treat sample. Both hope and mindfulness increased, and use of mindfulness skills was related to decreased anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

This treatment was feasible to deliver and was acceptable to patients. The trial serves as preliminary evidence for a multi-component intervention tailored to treat difficulties specific to recurrent cancer. The blending of the components was novel as well as theoretically and practically consistent. A gap in the literature is addressed, providing directions for testing interventions designed for patients coping with the continuing stressors and challenges of cancer recurrence.

An early structured psychoeducational intervention in patients with breast cancer: results from a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of breast cancer in Italy is high, like in most Western countries, the role of psychosocial support in disease management and outcome is incompletely understood. A structured psychoeducational group intervention has been shown by Fawzy (J Psychosom Res. 1999, 45:191-200) to increase psychological well-being and natural killer immunological reactivity in patients with melanoma, with decreased relapse rate and prolonged survival time.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the present study were to assess the feasibility of Fawzy's intervention by preliminary evaluation of its usefulness on a sample of women with early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

Psychological reaction to the disease and its possible modification by the psychoeducational treatment were determined with the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale at the time of study recruitment and at the end of the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients participated in the study. Rate of participation and adherence to the intervention were 83% and 100%, respectively. A significant reduction in anxious preoccupation was observed in treated patients, whereas the other coping strategies identified by the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale were not significantly modified.

CONCLUSION

The results support the feasibility of the intervention. In particular, the reduction in anxious preoccupation, characterizing the early phase of adaptation to breast cancer, may be the target for psychosocial intervention including specific nursing contributions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results obtained encourage investigating in more depth and with adequate methodology the role of psychoeducational group support for patients with early-stage breast cancer. In particular, they suggest that more attention should be given to the early phase, which follows the communication of cancer diagnosis and precedes the beginning of chemotherapy, which seems to be characterized by anxious preoccupation. A further indication resulting from the study and development of psychoeducational groups for patients with cancer is the opportunity to include cancer nursing among the topics that are addressed during psychoeducational group meetings because it seems to have been neglected in the available studies despite its evident relevance in cancer care.

Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers

Background

Up to one-third of people affected by cancer experience ongoing psychological distress and would benefit from screening followed by an appropriate level of psychological intervention. This rarely occurs in routine clinical practice due to barriers such as lack of time and experience. This study investigated the feasibility of community-based telephone helpline operators screening callers affected by cancer for their level of distress using a brief screening tool (Distress Thermometer), and triaging to the appropriate level of care using a tiered model.

Methods

Consecutive cancer patients and carers who contacted the helpline from September-December 2006 (n = 341) were invited to participate. Routine screening and triage was conducted by helpline operators at this time. Additional socio-demographic and psychosocial adjustment data were collected by telephone interview by research staff following the initial call.

Results

The Distress Thermometer had good overall accuracy in detecting general psychosocial morbidity (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale cut-off score ≥ 15) for cancer patients (AUC = 0.73) and carers (AUC = 0.70). We found 73% of participants met the Distress Thermometer cut-off for distress caseness according to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (a score ≥ 4), and optimal sensitivity (83%, 77%) and specificity (51%, 48%) were obtained with cut-offs of ≥ 4 and ≥ 6 in the patient and carer groups respectively. Distress was significantly associated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores (total, as well as anxiety and depression subscales) and level of care in cancer patients, as well as with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety subscale for carers. There was a trend for more highly distressed callers to be triaged to more intensive care, with patients with distress scores ≥ 4 more likely to receive extended or specialist care.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that it was feasible for community-based cancer helpline operators to screen callers for distress using a brief screening tool, the Distress Thermometer, and to triage callers to an appropriate level of care using a tiered model. The Distress Thermometer is a rapid and non-invasive alternative to longer psychometric instruments, and may provide part of the solution in ensuring distressed patients and carers affected by cancer are identified and supported appropriately.