1
|
Flynn L, Fallows S. Bowel cancer knowledge gaps evident among Irish residents: results of a national questionnaire survey. Ir J Med Sci 2023; 192:2085-2093. [PMID: 36656421 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03273-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent of knowledge of bowel cancer, its symptoms and risk factors are unknown in Irish residents. An understanding of bowel cancer awareness may be useful in aiding healthcare professionals, and policy makers develop improved bowel cancer awareness programmes and public health initiatives in Ireland. AIMS AND METHODS A 22-question online questionnaire survey was designed to gather data to assess residents' awareness of bowel cancer, its symptoms, and risk factors and to determine reasons for not participating in BowelScreen Ireland. RESULTS There were 449 participants (329 women, 119 men and 1 'prefer not to say'). The majority of participants were aged 35-49 years (42.8%), and 82.6% had completed a third level qualification. Irish residents (non-healthcare professionals/scientists (NHCP/S)) recalled on average less than three warning signs/symptoms. Among NHCP/S the most well-recalled protective diet and lifestyle choices were active lifestyle/exercise (62.1%), a fibre rich diet (45.4%) and no/low alcohol consumption (32.1%). Many were unable to recall red and processed meat as risk factors with only 10.7% and 4.9%, respectively, citing these foods. However, prompted awareness was superior with 71.1% agreeing or strongly agreeing that consumption of red and processed meat is a risk factor. 43.4% said they would be 'fairly confident' in recognising a sign/symptom, but more than a third (38.7%) reported they were 'not very confident'. CONCLUSION This survey emphasises the need to improve the awareness of bowel cancer as gaps in this specific cancer knowledge were evident among Irish residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Flynn
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
| | - Stephen Fallows
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Le Bonniec A, Meade O, Fredrix M, Morrissey E, O'Carroll RE, Murphy PJ, Murphy AW, Mc Sharry J. Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Soc Sci Med 2023; 329:116022. [PMID: 37348182 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Worldwide, colorectal cancer is a major public health issue. Despite the existence of screening programmes in many countries, global uptake remains low. This meta-ethnography aimed to analyse qualitative literature to explore attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening and reasons for non-participation in eligible people that do not participate when invited. METHODS Systematic searches were conducted in five databases in May 2021. Critical appraisal of included studies was performed using the CASP checklist for qualitative studies. FINDINGS Thirteen studies were included. Three main themes and eight sub-themes were developed across studies: (1) Differences in motivation, with non-participants expressing a lack of knowledge and varying levels of intention to participate but not feeling screening was personally necessary; (2) Active aversion to screening expressed by fear, discomfort, disgust or not wanting to know; and (3) Contextual barriers of the healthcare system such as practical constraints or poor relationships with healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION Findings suggest multiple pathways to non-participation including ambivalence, aversion to the process and consequences of screening or lack of support. Persuasive messages and prompts to action to target ambivalence, reassurance regarding the screening procedures to target negative reactions, and increased support from healthcare professionals may be beneficial in increasing screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Le Bonniec
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Oonagh Meade
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Eimear Morrissey
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ronan E O'Carroll
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Patrick J Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Discipline of General Practice, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew W Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Discipline of General Practice, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jenny Mc Sharry
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Snudden CM, Calanzani N, Archer S, Honey S, Pannebakker MM, Faher A, Chang A, Hamilton W, Walter FM. Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072359. [PMID: 37316310 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is increasingly used in UK primary care to triage patients presenting with symptoms and at different levels of colorectal cancer risk. Evidence is scarce on patients' views of using FIT in this context. We aimed to explore patients' care experience and acceptability of using FIT in primary care. DESIGN A qualitative semi-structured interview study. Interviews were conducted via Zoom between April and October 2020. Transcribed recordings were analysed using framework analysis. SETTING East of England general practices. PARTICIPANTS Consenting patients (aged ≥40 years) who presented in primary care with possible symptoms of colorectal cancer, and for whom a FIT was requested, were recruited to the FIT-East study. Participants were purposively sampled for this qualitative substudy based on age, gender and FIT result. RESULTS 44 participants were interviewed with a mean age 61 years, and 25 (57%) being men: 8 (18%) received a positive FIT result. Three themes and seven subthemes were identified. Participants' familiarity with similar tests and perceived risk of cancer influenced test experience and acceptability. All participants were happy to do the FIT themselves and to recommend it to others. Most participants reported that the test was straightforward, although some considered it may be a challenge to others. However, test explanation by healthcare professionals was often limited. Furthermore, while some participants received their results quickly, many did not receive them at all with the common assumption that 'no news is good news'. For those with a negative result and persisting symptoms, there was uncertainty about any next steps. CONCLUSIONS While FIT is acceptable to patients, elements of communication with patients by the healthcare system show potential for improvement. We suggest possible ways to improve the FIT experience, particularly regarding communication about the test and its results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia M Snudden
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Natalia Calanzani
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephanie Honey
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Merel M Pannebakker
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anissa Faher
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Aina Chang
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Willie Hamilton
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clarke N, Hayes L, McQueen A, Gallagher P, Kearney PM, McNamara D, O'Morain CA, von Wagner C, Mooney T, Sharp L. The role of defensive information processing in population-based colorectal cancer screening uptake. Cancer 2023; 129:1253-1260. [PMID: 36740959 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, colorectal cancer screening participation remains low despite the availability of home-based testing and numerous interventions to increase uptake. To be effective, interventions should be based on an understanding of what influences individuals' decisions about screening participation. This study investigates the association of defensive information processing (DIP) with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening uptake. METHODS Regression modeling of data from a cross-sectional survey within a population-based FIT screening program was conducted. The survey included the seven subdomains of the McQueen DIP measure. The primary outcome variable was the uptake status (screening user or nonuser). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for screening nonuse by DIP (sub)domain score, with adjustments made for sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with uptake. RESULTS Higher scores (equating to greater defensiveness) on all DIP domains were significantly associated with lower uptake in the model adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In the model with additional adjustments for behavioral factors, the suppression subdomains of "deny immediacy to be tested" (OR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.65; p < .001) and "self-exemption" (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p < .001) independently predicted nonuse of FIT-based screening. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study outside the United States that has identified DIP as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening uptake, and it is the first focused specifically on FIT-based screening. The findings suggest that two suppression barriers, namely denying the immediacy to be tested and self-exempting oneself from screening, may be promising targets for future interventions to improve uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Clarke
- School of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Louise Hayes
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amy McQueen
- Health Communication Research Laboratory, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Division of General Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scaglioni G, Guidetti M, Cavazza N. The role of disgust as an emotional barrier to colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health 2023; 38:389-408. [PMID: 34433347 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1967351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Worldwide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are suboptimal. This systematic review and meta-analysis examine the role of disgust in CRC screening avoidance. DESIGN A systematic literature search was conducted. In all, 46 studies were included in the review. Among these, 16 studies were compared with a meta-analytical approach in order to 1) estimate the effect size of state disgust on screening intention and attendance; 2) examine whether methodological characteristics moderate the effect of state disgust on screening behaviour; 3) estimate the effect sizes of trait disgust and type of exam kit on state disgust. RESULTS In the reviewed studies, state disgust was often associated with CRC screening and especially with CRC screening avoidance. The meta-analysis confirmed low-to-moderate negative effects of state disgust on screening intention and attendance. Population sampling strategy was the only significant moderator of the effect of state disgust on screening attendance, i.e. studies that used convenience (versus random/representative) samples found a significantly lower effect size. Trait disgust and type of exam kit exerted a large and a moderate-to-large positive effect, respectively, on state disgust. CONCLUSIONS Disgust can boost CRC screening avoidance. Further studies and interventions must be designed to help patients in overcoming this emotional barrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Scaglioni
- Department of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Margherita Guidetti
- Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Cavazza
- Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davis M, Oaten M, Tapp C, Occhipinti S. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Aversion to Bowel Cancer Screening Scale. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13661. [PMID: 35851704 PMCID: PMC9788280 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Avoidance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is well documented with emotional barriers deterring screening intention and uptake. However, the assessment of such aversion is limited by the available instruments focusing on siloed emotions or screening procedures, limiting relevance to the complete process of decision-making in the CRC context. METHODS To address this gap, psychometric properties of the newly developed Aversion to Bowel Cancer Screening Scale (ABCSS) were assessed using data from 640 CRC screening eligible asymptomatic community members. Item review and piloting reduced 179 items to the initial 29-item scale. Using a holdout sample technique, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity checks were conducted. RESULTS A three-factor model (Fecal Occult Blood Test [FOBT] Aversion, Colonoscopy Aversion and Health Conscientiousness) with 21 items was identified. Analyses of the 21-item ABCSS indicated excellent reliabilities for the scale and subscales (α = .91 to .95). Correlations with relevant existing measures, intention and behaviour indicated good construct validity. CONCLUSION The ABCSS is a valid measure of aversion to CRC screening for asymptomatic community members facing the decision to undertake CRC screening. This instrument may provide a more comprehensive understanding of the decision-making process for CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Davis
- School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | - Megan Oaten
- School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | - Caley Tapp
- School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia,School of Public HealthUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Stefano Occhipinti
- School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia,Department of English and CommunicationThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takahashi K, Nakamura S, Watanabe K, Sakaguchi M, Narimatsu H. Availability of Financial and Medical Resources for Screening Providers and Its Impact on Cancer Screening Uptake and Intervention Programs. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11477. [PMID: 36141750 PMCID: PMC9517448 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Interventions for residents and medical/financial resources available to screening providers can improve cancer screening rates. Yet the mechanisms by which the interactions of these factors affect the screening rates remain unknown. This study employed structural equation modeling to analyze the mechanisms underlying these factors. Data for Japanese municipalities' medical/financial status, their implementation of screening interventions, and the number of municipality-based cancer screening appointments from April 2016 to March 2017 were obtained from an open database. Five cancer screenings were included: gastric, lung, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening; all are nationally recommended for population screening in Japan. We defined two latent variables, namely, intervention for residents and medical/financial resources, and then analyzed the relationships between these variables and screening rates using structural equation modeling. Models were constructed for gastric, lung, and breast cancer screening, and similar relationships were observed. With these cancer types, medical/financial resources affected the intervention for residents, directly affecting screening rates. One limitation of this study is that it only included screening by municipalities, which may cause selection bias. In conclusion, financial pressures and lack of medical resources may cause a reduction in screening intervention programs, leading to stagnant screening rates. Ensuring consistent implementation of interventions for residents may improve local and regional cancer screening rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koshi Takahashi
- Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
- Kaneyama Town Clinic, 324-1 Kaneyama, Kaneyama Town, Mogami-gun 999-5402, Japan
| | - Sho Nakamura
- Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
- Graduate School of Health Innovation, Kanagawa University of Human Services, 3-25-10 Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 210-0821, Japan
| | - Kaname Watanabe
- Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
| | - Masahiko Sakaguchi
- Department of Engineering Informatics, Faculty of Information and Communication Engineering, Osaka Electro-Communication University, 18-8 Hatsucho, Neyagawa-shi 572-8530, Japan
| | - Hiroto Narimatsu
- Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
- Graduate School of Health Innovation, Kanagawa University of Human Services, 3-25-10 Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 210-0821, Japan
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Donovan B, Mooney T, Rimmer B, Fitzpatrick P, Flannelly G, Doherty L, Russell N, Martin CM, O'Leary JJ, Sharp L, O'Connor M. Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening. Prev Med Rep 2022; 25:101684. [PMID: 35127361 PMCID: PMC8800010 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland’s national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed cancer had not been told of earlier misdiagnosed smear tests. During this high profile controversy we conducted qualitative interviews exploring factors that influence cervical screening participation. Women who had been invited for routine screening tests were recruited from the national screening register. Telephone interviews were conducted with 48 women aged 25–65 years; with a range of screening histories – 34 were adequately screened (attended all routine screening tests) and 14 were inadequately screened (attended some/no screening tests). Thematic analysis was conducted and all interviewees spontaneously raised the screening controversy revealing that the crisis had resulted in serious loss of trust, faith and confidence in the screening programme. Publicity surrounding the controversy had some beneficial effects, including increased awareness of the value of screening and beliefs that intense focus on the programme will improve the service long-term. Strategies which incorporate these findings could help rebuild trust in screening.
Collapse
|
9
|
Implementing strategies at the workplace level to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake in Argentina: a controlled interrupted time-series study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:335-345. [DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-21-0465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
10
|
Morales S, Salehabadi SM, Srivastava D, Gibson TM, Leisenring WM, Alderfer MA, Lown EA, Zeltzer LK, Armstrong GT, Krull KR, Buchbinder D. Health-related and cancer risk concerns among siblings of childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS). J Cancer Surviv 2021; 16:624-637. [PMID: 34075534 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01056-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the prevalence and predictors of concerns regarding future health and cancer risk among siblings of childhood cancer survivors. METHODS This study reports longitudinal data (baseline and follow-up) from 3969 adult siblings (median age = 29 [range 18-56] years) of long-term survivors of childhood cancer (median time since diagnosis 19.6 [9.6-33.8] years). Self-reported future health and cancer risk concerns (concerned vs not concerned) were assessed. Demographics and health data reported by both the siblings and their matched cancer survivors were examined as risk factors for health concerns using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Percentage of siblings reporting future health and cancer risk concerns, respectively, decreased across decade of survivors' diagnosis: 1970s (73.3%; 63.9%), 1980s (67.2%; 62.6%), and 1990s (45.7%; 52.3%). Risk factors associated with future health concerns included sibling chronic health conditions (grade 2 Odds Ratio [OR]=1.57, 95% CI: 1.12-2.20; grades 3-4 OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.18-2.94; compared to less than grade 2). Risk factors associated with future cancer concerns included sibling chronic health conditions (grade 2 OR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.05-1.94; grades 3-4 OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.09-2.47; compared to less than grade 2). CONCLUSIONS Sibling concerns regarding future health and cancer have diminished in recent decades. There are subgroups of siblings that are at-risk for future health and cancer risk concerns. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Routine screening of concerns in at-risk siblings of survivors of childhood cancer may benefit the siblings of cancer survivors. These individuals may benefit from early interventions during diagnosis and treatment of their siblings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Morales
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology at Children's Hospital of Orange County, 1201 W. La Veta Avenue, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | | | - Deokumar Srivastava
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Todd M Gibson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Wendy M Leisenring
- Cancer Prevention Program at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Melissa A Alderfer
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, DE, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - E Anne Lown
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences and Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lonnie K Zeltzer
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Kevin R Krull
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.,Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - David Buchbinder
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. .,Division of Hematology/Oncology at Children's Hospital of Orange County, 1201 W. La Veta Avenue, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clarke N, Kearney PM, Gallagher P, McNamara D, O'Morain CA, Sharp L. Negative emotions and cancer fatalism are independently associated with uptake of Faecal Immunochemical Test-based colorectal cancer screening: Results from a population-based study. Prev Med 2021; 145:106430. [PMID: 33482227 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Although systematic colorectal cancer screening is efficacious, many programmes suffer from low uptake. Few behavioural or attitudinal factors have been identified as being associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening. We explored knowledge, beliefs about cancer, subjective health literacy, emotional attitudes to screening, and social influences among individuals invited to a population-based screening programme. Regression modelling of a cross-sectional survey of 2299 individuals (users and non-users) of a population-based Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) screening programme in Dublin was conducted. Questions were derived from previous theoretically-informed qualitative work and assessed using previously used and validated measures. The primary outcome variable was uptake status (User/Participation or Non-User/Non-participation); multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) for screening participation. Stronger fatalistic beliefs independently predicted lower uptake (OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P = 0.003). Those aged <65 who disagreed that "cancer can often be cured" also had lower uptake (OR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.22-0.82: P = 0.017). Agreement that the test was disgusting and tempting fate predicted lower uptake (OR = 0.16: 95% CI 0.10-0.27: p < 0.001), while the influence of a partner on decision to be screened was associated with higher uptake (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.15-1.50: P < 0.001). Negative cancer-related and screening-related beliefs and emotions are associated with non-participation in FIT (-based screening). Research is warranted to explore if these negative beliefs and emotions are modifiable and, if so, whether this would improve screening uptake. The association between the influence of a partner and screening participation present a challenge around improving uptake among those not in co-habiting relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Linda Sharp
- Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McBrien B. Assessment and management of metastatic bone cancer in emergency departments. Emerg Nurse 2021; 29:20-25. [PMID: 33231019 DOI: 10.7748/en.2020.e2059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
A cancer diagnosis in emergency departments (EDs) is often associated with advanced or metastatic cancer. Patients with bone metastases have a complex range of physical and psychological needs. Meeting the needs of patients with cancer is an important part of the role of emergency nurses, but evidence suggests that they often do not feel adequately prepared to provide effective care for this patient group. This article uses a case study of a patient who presented to an ED with metastatic cancer in his right lower limb, to provide an overview of bone metastases, including the relevant anatomy, pain management and psychological support. The article also outlines the signs and symptoms of bone metastases and discusses patient assessment, symptom management and available treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry McBrien
- Emergency Department, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saab MM, FitzGerald S, Noonan B, Kilty C, Collins A, Lyng Á, Kennedy U, O'Brien M, Hegarty J. Promoting lung cancer awareness, help-seeking and early detection: a systematic review of interventions. Health Promot Int 2021; 36:1656-1671. [PMID: 33647930 PMCID: PMC8699397 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daab016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death. Barriers to the early presentation for LC include lack of symptom awareness, symptom misappraisal, poor relationship with doctors and lack of access to healthcare services. Addressing such barriers can help detect LC early. This systematic review describes the effect of recent interventions to improve LC awareness, help-seeking and early detection. This review was guided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, APA PsycARTICLES, APA PsycInfo and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection were searched. Sixteen studies were included. Knowledge of LC was successfully promoted in most studies using educational sessions and campaigns. LC screening uptake varied with most studies successfully reducing decision conflicts using decision aids. Large campaigns, including UK-based campaign 'Be Clear on Cancer', were instrumental in enhancing LC awareness, promoting help-seeking and yielding an increase in chest X-rays and a decrease in the number of individuals diagnosed with advanced LC. Multimodal public health interventions, such as educational campaigns are best suited to raise awareness, reduce barriers to help-seeking and help detect LC early. Future interventions ought to incorporate targeted information using educational resources, face-to-face counselling and video- and web-based decision aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad M Saab
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland T12 AK54
| | - Serena FitzGerald
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland T12 AK54
| | - Brendan Noonan
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland T12 AK54
| | - Caroline Kilty
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland T12 AK54
| | - Abigail Collins
- National Cancer Control Programme, Health Service Executive, Ireland DO1 A3Y8
| | - Áine Lyng
- National Cancer Control Programme, Health Service Executive, Ireland DO1 A3Y8
| | - Una Kennedy
- National Cancer Control Programme, Health Service Executive, Ireland DO1 A3Y8
| | - Maidy O'Brien
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland T12 AK54
| | - Josephine Hegarty
- Catherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Ireland T12 AK54
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dressler J, Johnsen AT, Madsen LJ, Rasmussen M, Jorgensen LN. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review. Public Health 2020; 190:67-74. [PMID: 33360029 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer. Many countries in Europe have already implemented systematic screening programmes as per the recommendations by the European Union. The impact of screening is highly dependent on participation rates. The aim of the study was to identify barriers, facilitators and modifiers to participation in systematised, stool sample-based, publicly financed CRC screening programmes. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and PsycINFO was undertaken. We included both qualitative and quantitative studies reporting on barriers and facilitators (excluding sociodemographic variables) to participation in stool sample-based CRC screening. Barriers and facilitators to participation were summarised and analysed. RESULTS The inclusion criteria were met in 21 studies. Reported barriers and facilitators were categorised into the following seven themes (examples): psychology (fear of cancer), religion (believing cancer is the will of God), logistics (not knowing how to conduct the test), health-related factors (mental health), knowledge and awareness (lack of knowledge about the test), role of the general practitioner (being supported in taking the test by the general practitioner), and environmental factors (knowing someone who has participated in a screening programme). Six studies reported that non-participation was not due to a negative attitude towards screening for CRC. CONCLUSION Many barriers to screening were found. It is important to work with peoples' fear of screening. Moreover, this review suggests that it might be possible to increase participation rates, if the population-wide awareness and knowledge of potential health benefits of CRC screening are increased and proper logistical support is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Dressler
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - A T Johnsen
- Institute of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - L J Madsen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - M Rasmussen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - L N Jorgensen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fahy L, Fitzpatrick P, Meade C, Farrell HC, O'Donoghue D, Mooney T. Impact of the introduction of a new policy of direct faecal immunochemical home screening test provision in a national bowel screening programme, both during and outside of advertising campaigns. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 69:101844. [PMID: 33099212 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BowelScreen, The National Bowel Screening Programme in Ireland, offers free colorectal screening to persons aged 60-69 through a home Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit. 40.2% uptake in the first screening round was below the programme standard (≥50.0%). To improve uptake, an intervention saw FIT kits sent directly to previously screened clients rather than by the usual invitation process comprising a letter of invitation followed by a FIT kit if requested. The intervention proved successful and was fully implemented into the programme for subsequent clients. Despite the improved uptake it was noted over time that the unsatisfactory FIT rate was approaching the programme standard (≤3%). The aim of this study is to compare uptake by two invite methods occurring contemporaneously alongside advertising and to compare unsatisfactory rates before and after full FIT-Direct implementation. METHODS Percentage uptake and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each invite method before and after advertising and compared using two-proportion z-tests. Rate ratios and 95% CI compared the unsatisfactory FIT rate before and after full-FIT Direct implementation. RESULTS Uptake was significantly higher amongst FIT-Direct compared with Usual-Invite clients during (91.0% vs 84.9%, p < 0.0001) and outside advertising (93.8% vs 85.3%, p < 0.0001). The unsatisfactory FIT rate was 2.3 times higher (95% CI: 1.84-2.92, p < 0.0001) after full FIT-Direct implementation compared with before. CONCLUSIONS The FIT-Direct intervention had an overall positive effect on uptake. After adjusting for advertising, uptake of FIT was higher outside advertising periods. Monitoring of the unsatisfactory rate is ongoing; a communication enhancement strategy may be required should this persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Fahy
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin, D01 A3Y8, Ireland.
| | - Patricia Fitzpatrick
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin, D01 A3Y8, Ireland; UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Caroline Meade
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin, D01 A3Y8, Ireland.
| | - Hilary Coffey Farrell
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin, D01 A3Y8, Ireland.
| | - Diarmuid O'Donoghue
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin, D01 A3Y8, Ireland.
| | - Therese Mooney
- National Screening Service, King's Inns House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin, D01 A3Y8, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chin YH, Ng CH, Seah SHY, Jain SR, Law JH, Devi MK, Chong CS. Evolving perspectives on stool testing for colorectal cancer: a qualitative systematic review. Eur J Cancer Prev 2020; 29:416-423. [PMID: 32740167 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths globally. A multitude of screening methods has been devised for early diagnosis, including the faecal immunochemical test (FIT). This qualitative review aims to discover the barriers and facilitators to the utility of the FIT from the general population's perspective. METHODS Authors searched five electronic bases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science) till December 2019. The search was conducted using key search terms and qualitative and mixed-method studies were included. Two independent reviewers screened articles and conducted quality appraisal. Data were synthesised thematically. RESULTS A total of 11 articles that reported users' views on FIT kits were included. Three themes were generated from the included articles: FIT kit factors, patients' perception of colorectal cancer screening, and social health support system. The nature of the test and the supplementary information was found to affect the utilisation of the test. User's awareness and perspectives towards cancer and screening were found to have impacted the adoption of the FIT kit. Social support and local healthcare systems were also found to have influenced the use of FIT. CONCLUSION This systematic review focuses on addressing and understanding the perception of FIT from first-hand accounts. Since its inception, FIT screening has increased colorectal cancer screening uptake due to its increased reliability and the simplicity of the test. However, there is a need to increase the uptake of FIT kits through increasing accessibility of the screening process and considering the holistic patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yip Han Chin
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
| | - Sherlyn Hui Yu Seah
- Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, National University Singapore
| | | | - Jia Hao Law
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital
| | - M Kamala Devi
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Choon Seng Chong
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
White A, Ironmonger L, Steele RJC, Ormiston-Smith N, Crawford C, Seims A. A review of sex-related differences in colorectal cancer incidence, screening uptake, routes to diagnosis, cancer stage and survival in the UK. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:906. [PMID: 30236083 PMCID: PMC6149054 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4786-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an illness strongly influenced by sex and gender, with mortality rates in males significantly higher than females. There is still a dearth of understanding on where sex differences exist along the pathway from presentation to survival. The aim of this review is to identify where actions are needed to improve outcomes for both sexes, and to narrow the gap for CRC. Methods A cross-sectional review of national data was undertaken to identify sex differences in incidence, screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer stage at diagnosis and survival, and their influence in the sex differences in mortality. Results Overall incidence is higher in men, with an earlier age distribution, however, important sex differences exist in anatomical site. There were relatively small differences in screening uptake, route to diagnosis, cancer staging at diagnosis and survival. Screening uptake is higher in women under 69 years. Women are more likely to present as emergency cases, with more men diagnosed through screening and two-week-wait. No sex differences are seen in diagnosis for more advanced disease. Overall, age-standardised 5-year survival is similar between the sexes. Conclusions As there are minimal sex differences in the data from routes to diagnosis to survival, the higher mortality of colorectal cancer in men appears to be a result of exogenous and/or endogenous factors pre-diagnosis that lead to higher incidence rates. There are however, sex and gender differences that suggest more targeted interventions may facilitate prevention and earlier diagnosis in both men and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan White
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Leeds Beckett University, Civic Quarter, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
| | - Lucy Ironmonger
- Cancer Research UK, Angel Building, 407 St John Street, London, EC1V 4A, UK
| | - Robert J C Steele
- Division of Cancer Research, Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening (CRiPS), University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Nick Ormiston-Smith
- Department of Health, 15 Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, 4006, QLD, Australia
| | - Carina Crawford
- Cancer Research UK, Angel Building, 407 St John Street, London, EC1V 4A, UK
| | - Amanda Seims
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Leeds Beckett University, Civic Quarter, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Saab MM, Reidy M, Hegarty J, O'Mahony M, Murphy M, Von Wagner C, Drummond FJ. Men's information-seeking behavior regarding cancer risk and screening: A meta-narrative systematic review. Psychooncology 2017; 27:410-419. [PMID: 28728212 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Preventive strategies are known to reduce cancer risk and incidence and improve prognosis. Men seldom seek medical information about cancer prevention and risk reduction. The aim of this meta-narrative systematic review was to critically appraise evidence from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that explored men's information-seeking behaviors in relation to cancer prevention and risk reduction. METHODS MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Education Full Text, and ERIC were systematically searched for studies published in English between January 1, 2006 and May 30, 2016. A total of 4117 titles were identified; of which, 31 studies were included (21 qualitative studies, 9 quantitative studies, and 1 mixed-methods study). The methodological quality of the studies was appraised by using different tools. RESULTS Most studies focused on screening for prostate (n = 18) and colorectal cancer (n = 7). Most men were passive information-gatherers rather than active information-seekers. Key sources of information included the Internet for active information-seekers and health care professionals for passive information-gatherers. Barriers to information-seeking included information overload, embarrassment, and fear. Low literacy and health literacy levels were addressed in 3 studies and were identified as impediments to active information-seeking. Facilitators to information-seeking included family support, media, celebrity endorsements, and targeted information. CONCLUSIONS Men's information-seeking behavior regarding cancer risk reduction, prevention, and screening is influenced by several factors. This necessitates targeted interventions aimed at raising awareness of cancer prevention and screening, while accounting for men's informational needs, preferred learning strategies, and literacy levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad M Saab
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Mary Reidy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Josephine Hegarty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Mairin O'Mahony
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Mike Murphy
- School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Christian Von Wagner
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Frances J Drummond
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Clarke N, McNamara D, Kearney PM, O'Morain CA, Shearer N, Sharp L. The role of area-level deprivation and gender in participation in population-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2016; 93:198-203. [PMID: 27765660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of sex and deprivation on participation in a population-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening programme. The study population included 9785 individuals invited to participate in two rounds of a population-based biennial FIT-based screening programme, in a relatively deprived area of Dublin, Ireland. Explanatory variables included in the analysis were sex, deprivation category of area of residence and age (at end of screening). The primary outcome variable modelled was participation status in both rounds combined (with "participation" defined as having taken part in either or both rounds of screening). Poisson regression with a log link and robust error variance was used to estimate relative risks (RR) for participation. As a sensitivity analysis, data were stratified by screening round. In both the univariable and multivariable models deprivation was strongly associated with participation. Increasing affluence was associated with higher participation; participation was 26% higher in people resident in the most affluent compared to the most deprived areas (multivariable RR=1.26: 95% CI 1.21-1.30). Participation was significantly lower in males (multivariable RR=0.96: 95%CI 0.95-0.97) and generally increased with increasing age (trend per age group, multivariable RR=1.02: 95%CI, 1.01-1.02). No significant interactions between the explanatory variables were found. The effects of deprivation and sex were similar by screening round. Deprivation and male gender are independently associated with lower uptake of population-based FIT colorectal cancer screening, even in a relatively deprived setting. Development of evidence-based interventions to increase uptake in these disadvantaged groups is urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Clarke
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Patricia M Kearney
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Nikki Shearer
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, England.
| |
Collapse
|