Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management intervention in Mexican colorectal cancer patients: Pilot study

Cognitive behavioral stress management is an effective intervention to relieve anxiety and depression, improve the quality of life in patients with cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) modifies individuals' maladaptive cognition and improves their ability in managing stress. The present study was to inquire about the utility of CBSM in mental health and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

Totally, 172 postoperative cervical cancer patients were randomly classified into CBSM (N=86) and normal care group (N=86) to receive 8-week CBSM and normal care, correspondingly. Self-rating anxiety/depression scale (SAS/SDS), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and quality of life questionnaire-core 30 (QLQ-C30) scores were evaluated at discharge (M0), 1st month (M1), M3, and M6 after discharge.

RESULTS

SAS scores at M6 (P=0.003), M1 (P=0.042), and M3 (P=0.010), and the proportion of patients with SAS-defined anxiety at M3 (P=0.040) and M6 (P=0.019) were reduced in CBSM group versus normal care group. SDS scores at M3 (P=0.020) and M6 (P=0.016), and the proportion of patients with SDS-defined depression at M6 (P=0.036) was descended in CBSM group versus normal care group. EQ-VAS score at M1 (P=0.044), M3 (P=0.014), and M6 (P=0.002) were increased, while EQ-5D score at M3 (P=0.030) was descended in CBSM group versus normal care group. Meanwhile, QLQ-C30 global health status score at M1 (P=0.046), M3 (P=0.037), and M6 (P=0.007), QLQ-C30 function score at M3 (P=0.033) and M6 (P=0.016) were ascended, but QLQ-C30 symptom score at M3 (P=0.042) was declined in CBSM group versus normal care group.

CONCLUSION

CBSM is an effective intervention for decreasing anxiety and depression, and improving quality of life in patients with cervical cancer.

Comparison of psychological interventions for anxiety, depression, fatigue and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found that psychological interventions have a positive effect on improving physical and psychological problems in colorectal cancer survivors. However, there is still a lack of high-quality evidence reviews that summarize and compare the impact of different psychological interventions. The aim of this study was to synthesize existing psychological interventions and use network meta-analysis to explore whether psychological interventions improve anxiety, depression, fatigue and quality of life in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors.

METHODS

We will extract relevant randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for CRC survivors from eight electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInFO, CNKI, and Wanfang database. Two reviewers will independently screen the literature and extract data. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed using the RoB2: Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We will then conduct paired meta-analyses and network meta-analyses of the extracted data, using a frequency-based framework and random effects models.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first proposed qualitative and quantitative integration of existing evidence using systematic evaluation and network meta-analysis. This study will inform health policy makers, healthcare providers' clinical intervention choices and guideline revisions, and will help to reduce depression and anxiety in CRC survivors, reduce fatigue, improve quality of life.

Cognitive-behavioral stress management program reduces postoperative psychological pressure and improves life quality in prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) improves mental status and quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients, while its impact on prostate cancer (PC) patients remains unknown. Thus, the study aimed at investigating the potency of CBSM program in ameliorating postoperative anxiety, depression, and QoL in PC patients.

METHODS

Totally, 160 postoperative PC patients were consecutively recruited followed by random assignments to either CBSM (N = 81) or usual care (UC) (N = 79) group as a 1:1 ratio. The patients received the corresponding interventions for 10 weeks then were followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

CBSM group presented lower Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety score and anxiety rate at month (M) 4 and M6 versus UC group (all P < 0.05), but not at M0, M1, and M2. Meanwhile, CBSM group exhibited a lower HADS-depression score versus UC group at M6 (P = 0.036) but no other timepoints; however, CBSM group showed no difference in depression rate versus UC group at any timepoints. Regarding the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core30 (QLQ-C30) evaluation, CBSM group exhibited higher global health status scores at M1 (P = 0.010), M2 (P = 0.001), M4 (P = 0.029), and M6 (P = 0.015), higher functions score at M4 (P = 0.040) and M6 (P = 0.044), but a lower symptom score at M4 (P = 0.034) versus UC group; meanwhile, the above QoL indexes were not different at other timepoints between CBSM and UC groups.

CONCLUSION

CBSM serves as an effective caring program in relieving anxiety and depression as well as improving the QoL in postoperative PC patients.

Psychometric Properties of a New Mexican Optimism Scale: Ethnopsychological Approach

BACKGROUND

In this paper, a Mexican Optimism Scale was constructed to investigate and estimate psychometric properties (reliability and validity based on the measurement model). The convergent validity and validity criterion were evaluated for a sample of young Mexicans.

METHODS

The scale was presented to 848 Mexican young people aged between 17 and 30 years from three different regions of Mexico. The scale was reduced to 20 items on the basis of CFA and analyses of internal consistency.

RESULTS

The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) suggested a three-factor structure of optimism: affective resources, positive vision and hope. The data provided evidence for convergent validity with positive affect, negative affect and coping. Additionally, males scored higher on affective resources and positive vision than females. Finally, the results support the reliability of the instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of the Mexican Optimism Scale proved to be highly acceptable and allow for a novel assessment of optimism from an ethnopsychological perspective. Validity, reliability and invariance were determined, as well as percentiles for the practical use of the scale. This scale may be of crucial importance for future research on optimism and health.

Non-pharmacological interventions to manage psychological distress in patients living with cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Psychological distress is common in patients with cancer; interfering with physical and psychological wellbeing, and hindering management of physical symptoms. Our aim was to systematically review published evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for cancer-related psychological distress, at all stages of the disease.

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022311729). Searches were made using eight online databases to identify studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Data were collected on outcome measures, modes of delivery, resources and evidence of efficacy. A meta-analysis was planned if data allowed. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies with 17,628 participants were included. One third of studies included mindfulness, talking or group therapies. Half of all studies reported statistically significant improvements in distress. Statistically significant intervention effects on distress were most prevalent for mindfulness techniques. Four of these mindfulness studies had moderate effect sizes (d = -0.71[95% CI: -1.04, -0.37] p < 0.001) (d = -0.60 [95% CI: -3.44, -0.89] p < 0.001) (d = -0.77 [CI: -0.146, -1.954] p < 0.01) (d = -0.69 [CI: -0.18, -1.19] p = 0.008) and one had a large effect size (d = -1.03 [95% CI: -1.51, -0.54] p < 0.001). Heterogeneity of studies precluded meta-analysis. Study quality was variable and some had a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of studies using a mindfulness intervention in this review are efficacious at alleviating distress. Mindfulness-including brief, self-administered interventions-merits further investigation, using adequately powered, high-quality studies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42022311729.

Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients under the intervention of cognitive-behavioral stress management

Objective

Cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) is a psychotherapy that helps patients cognize and manage stress to improve mental health and quality of life. This study aimed to explore the influence of CBSM on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

In total, 172 NSCLC patients who received tumor resection were randomized 1:1 into the usual care (UC) group (N = 86) and CBSM group (N = 86) to receive 10-week UC and CBSM interventions. Moreover, all participants attended a 6-month follow-up.

Results

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS)-anxiety score at 3^rd month (M3) (P = 0.015) and 6^th month (M6) (P = 0.018), HADS-depression score at M3 (P = 0.040) and M6 (P = 0.028), and depression rate at M6 (P = 0.035) were descended in CBSM group compared to UC group. Besides, depression severity was reduced at M6 (P = 0.041) in CBSM group compared to UC group, but anxiety severity only showed a decreased trend (P = 0.051). Additionally, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status score and QLQ-C30 function score at 1^st month (M1), M3, and M6 were elevated (all P < 0.05), while QLQ-C30 symptoms score was declined at M1 (P = 0.031) and M3 (P = 0.014) in CBSM group compared to UC group. Notably, the efficacy of CBSM was impressive in patients with baseline depression or undergoing adjuvant therapy.

Conclusion

CBSM is a feasible intervention that effectively improves mental health and quality of life in postoperative NSCLC patients.

Effect of cognitive behavioral stress management on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in colorectal cancer patients post tumor resection: a randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) is a psychotherapy helping individuals develop adaptive behaviors, whose application in colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare. This randomized, controlled study intended to explore the effect of CBSM on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in CRC patients post tumor resection.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty CRC patients who received tumor resection were randomized (1:1) to receive weekly CBSM or usual care (UC) for 10 weeks after discharge (120 min for each session). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) of each patient were assessed after randomization (M0), one month (M1), three months (M3), and six months (M6).

RESULTS

CBSM realized decreased HADS-anxiety scores at M1 (P = 0.044), M3 (P = 0.020), M6 (P = 0.003) compared to UC, so did anxiety rates at M3 (28.0% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.045), M6 (25.7% vs. 42.5%, P = 0.035), HADS-depression scores at M3 (P = 0.017), M6 (P = 0.005), and depression rates at M3 (25.3% vs. 41.0%, P = 0.040), M6 (22.9% vs. 41.1%, P = 0.020). Concerning the quality of life, CBSM achieved elevated QLQ-C30 global health status scores at M6 (P = 0.008), QLQ-C30 functions scores at M3 (P = 0.047), M6 (P = 0.031), and decreased QLQ-C30 symptoms scores at M3 (P = 0.048) and M6 (P = 0.039) compared with UC. By subgroup analyses, CBSM had a better utility on relieving anxiety, depression and improving quality of life in patients with higher education level and patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

CBSM program alleviates anxiety, depression, and elevates quality of life in CRC patients post tumor resection.

Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer survivors.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert panel convened to update the guideline. A systematic review of evidence published from 2013-2021 was conducted.

RESULTS

The evidence base consisted of 17 systematic reviews ± meta analyses (nine for psychosocial interventions, four for physical exercise, three for mindfulness-based stress reduction [MBSR], and one for pharmacologic interventions), and an additional 44 randomized controlled trials. Psychological, educational, and psychosocial interventions led to improvements in depression and anxiety. Evidence for pharmacologic management of depression and anxiety in cancer survivors was inconsistent. The lack of inclusion of survivors from minoritized groups was noted and identified as an important consideration to provide high-quality care for ethnic minority populations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended to use a stepped-care model, that is, provide the most effective and least resource-intensive intervention based on symptom severity. All oncology patients should be offered education regarding depression and anxiety. For patients with moderate symptoms of depression, clinicians should offer cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), behavioral activation (BA), MBSR, structured physical activity, or empirically supported psychosocial interventions. For patients with moderate symptoms of anxiety, clinicians should offer CBT, BA, structured physical activity, acceptance and commitment therapy, or psychosocial interventions. For patients with severe symptoms of depression or anxiety, clinicians should offer cognitive therapy, BA, CBT, MBSR, or interpersonal therapy. Treating clinicians may offer a pharmacologic regimen for depression or anxiety for patients who do not have access to first-line treatment, prefer pharmacotherapy, have previously responded well to pharmacotherapy, or have not improved following first-line psychological or behavioral management.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

[Effect of psychological interventions on psychosocial variables in patients with colorectal cancer: a narrative review of the literature]

Objective

To describe the effects of psychological interventions on anxiety, depression, emotional distress and/or quality of life (QoL) of patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

Narrative literature review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, 2011-2021.

Results

A total of 553 articles were obtained, of which twelve were included. Most were brief, individual, face-to-face interventions. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy was the most reported intervention, showing positive effects on QoL, specifically in stoma patients; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and solution-focused therapy also identified improvements in QoL. Reminiscence therapy and a self-efficacy intervention reported significant improvements in anxiety and depression. Relaxation and writing training were not proven effective; psychoeducation showed inconsistent effects.

Conclusion

There is a paucity of studies conducted during the last years, which do not evidence a consensus of the therapeutic model that produces consistent improvements in psychological well-being.

A literature review of post-treatment survivorship interventions for colorectal cancer survivors and/or their caregivers

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors have reported a number of concerns and unmet needs after treatment completion. This paper aims to explore existing survivorship interventions after CRC treatment according to the American Cancer Society CRC Survivorship Care Guidelines, to identify study gaps, and provide valuable evidence directing future research.

METHODS

Five electronic databases, including CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from 2005 to October 2020, were systematically searched to identify English or Chinese literature on CRC post-treatment survivorship interventions. Manual searching through the articles' references lists was also conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty studies met the criteria, and focused on addressing issues in four CRC Survivorship Care Guidelines domains. Several issues for CRC surveillance programmes remain to be explored. Regarding the long-term physical and psychosocial effects of CRC treatment, we found mounting evidence for various interventions to solve ostomy issues and improve distress/depression/anxiety, strong evidence for exercise to improve fatigue, and limited evidence in addressing CRC patient sexual concerns. For health promotion, high-quality evidence was found for exercises to improve cardiopulmonary fitness, metabolism, tumour-related biomarkers, and short-term improvement in physical fitness and QOL. Emerging evidence was found for a survivorship care plan to improve patient perceptions of care coordination.

CONCLUSIONS

Further refinements based on the existing evidence, and the development of comprehensive CRC survivorship care comprising multiple essential survivorship components, are required. Furthermore, considering both survivor and caregiver cancer survivorship needs, future research may optimise the care delivered, and help survivors and their families live better with cancer.