Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment to study depressive symptoms among cancer caregivers

The use of ecological momentary assessment for family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review

Background

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) as a real-time data collection method can provide insight into the daily experiences of family caregivers.

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to synthesize studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted within six databases for articles published from the inception of the database through September 2023. We extracted the characteristics of the included studies and data on EMA-specific methods to determine the quality of the included studies.

Results

A total of 12 studies involving EMA completed by family caregivers of adults with chronic conditions were identified, with almost all studies focused on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's or dementia-related conditions. The average compliance rate across the included studies was 75%, below the recommended rate. In addition, most of the included studies did not collect the family caregivers' daily activities and care contexts in their responses (i.e., affect, stress, well-being, care demand, and fatigue) to the EMA prompts.

Discussion

This review showed that using EMA to collect information on family caregivers of adults with chronic health conditions appeared feasible and acceptable. However, the methodology or design of using EMA to collect caregiver information in this population is still preliminary. The limited number of existing studies that have used EMA to capture the daily experiences of family caregivers does not provide key information that could improve understanding of caregivers' emotional experiences and well-being in real-life situations. We identified gaps in the literature that warrant additional EMA studies for this population.

Hospice Family Caregivers' Uncertainty, Burden, and Unmet Needs in Prospective Audio Diaries

Hospice cancer caregivers' (HCCs') burden and unmet needs are well documented in the literature through retrospective, standardized self-report surveys. Hospice cancer caregiver daily experiences of burden and unmet needs are rarely captured within a real-time context. The purpose of this secondary data analysis was to characterize HCCs' day-to-day burden and unmet needs with prospective HCC (N = 50) audio diary data between hospice enrollment and patient death. Uncertainty theory provided a framework for analysis. Diaries were transcribed, analyzed deductively and inductively, and organized thematically. Uncertainty in day-to-day experiences was an important driver of HCC burden and unmet needs. Unmet needs included unclear/unmet expectations regarding hospice care team support; not understanding the extent of HCC role and involvement; and communication challenges with hospice team members. Sources of HCCs' burden were dissonance between how they "should" feel and how they actually felt; feeling alone/having no outlet to express feelings; concerns about their own health and subsequent patient impact; and feeling helpless/occupying a liminal space. Uncertainty surrounding HCCs' experiences encompassed interactions with hospice care teams and the nature of end-of-life caregiving with symptom management, the dying process, and the HCC role. Hospice care teams can respond to uncertainty through assessment, understanding, and recognition of the daily context of HCCs.

Clinic-based Assessment and Support for Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: Results of a Feasibility Study

Background

Cancer caregiving is burdensome with unique needs, highlighting the importance of assessing caregivers' distress. Caregivers often accompany patients to healthcare visits, presenting an opportunity to complete distress screening at patients' point-of-care.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of caregiver distress screening at patients' point-of-care and implementing a caregiver psychoeducational session.

Methods

We approached caregivers in outpatient cancer clinic waiting rooms. Participants completed depression, burden, anxiety, quality of life, and stress measures. A psychoeducational session with a psychologist was offered to those meeting clinical cutoffs for depression and/or burden. Fifty caregivers completed 1+ measure; however, due to incomplete consent documentation, findings from 23 caregivers are reported.

Results

22% of caregivers screened positive for depression, 30% burden, and 70% anxiety. More than half rated stress as moderate or higher. Mental wellbeing was slightly below that of the general population. More than 75% screened positive on 1+ distress measure. Of the 9 caregivers who met cutoffs for depression and/or burden, two (22%) accepted the psychoeducational session.

Conclusion

Caregivers were moderately receptive to distress screening during patients' visits, but were less receptive to engaging in the psychoeducational session due to time constraints and privacy concerns.

Implications for Practice

Assessing caregivers' distress can facilitate referrals for supportive services. Offering caregivers psychoeducational intervention outside of patient care may not be acceptable. Future research may evaluate the integration of routine caregiver screening within patient care to promote engagement with mental health services.

Foundational

This research offers a unique method of assessing cancer caregivers' distress.

Associations between context and affect within the daily lives of cancer caregivers

PURPOSE

This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to test the association between activity, location, and social company contexts with cancer caregivers' in-the-moment affect to identify precisely when and where to deliver psychological interventions for caregivers.

METHODS

Current cancer caregivers (N = 25) received 8 EMA prompts per day for 7 consecutive days. At each prompt, caregivers reported their current positive affect and negative affect, as well as what they were doing, where they were located, and who they were with. Multilevel logistic regressions tested the associations between caregivers' contexts with their own person-mean-centered state (concurrent momentary level) and trait (overall weekly average) positive or negative affect.

RESULTS

Caregivers reported lower state negative affect, as well as higher state positive affect, when socializing (ps < .001), when at a public location (ps < .03), and when around their friends, family, spouse/partner, or care recipient (i.e., person with cancer, ps < .02), relative to when not endorsing the context. Caregivers also reported lower state negative affect when eating/drinking or engaging in leisure (ps < .01; but no parallel effects for state positive affect). Caregivers reported higher state negative affect while working, when at their workplace, or when around work colleagues (ps < .001) and lower state positive affect when at home or alone (ps < .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest the pertinence of a behavioral activation framework to mitigate the emotional strain of caregiving. Interventions that facilitate caregivers' ability to socialize with a range of friends and family, including their loved one with cancer, outside of the home may have the strongest positive emotional impact.

Smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment to study "scanxiety" among Adolescent and Young Adult survivors of childhood cancer: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Scan-related anxiety ("scanxiety") refers to the fear, stress, and anxiety in anticipation of tests and scans in follow-up cancer care. This study assessed the feasibility of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) for real-world, real-time capture of scanxiety using patients' personal smartphone.

METHODS

Adolescent and Young Adult survivors of childhood cancer were prompted to complete EMA surveys on a smartphone app three times per day for 11 days (33 surveys total) around their routine surveillance scans. Participants provided structured feedback on the EMA protocol.

RESULTS

Thirty out of 46 contacted survivors (65%) enrolled, exceeding the preregistered feasibility cutoff of 55%. The survey completion rate (83%) greatly exceeded the preregistered feasibility cutoff of 65%. Participants generally found the smartphone app easy and enjoyable to use and reported low levels of distress from answering surveys. Participants reported significantly more daily fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and negative affect in the days before compared to the days after surveillance scans, aligning with the expected trajectory of scanxiety. Participants who reported greater FCR and scanxiety using comprehensive measures at baseline also reported significantly more daily FCR around their surveillance scans, indicating validity of EMA items. Bodily threat monitoring was prospectively and concurrently associated with daily FCR, thus warranting further investigation as a risk factor for scanxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of EMA as a research tool to capture the dynamics and potential risk factors for scanxiety.