Role of budesonide as maintenance therapy for children with asthma

No evidence that early use of inhaled corticosteroids reduces current asthma at 10 years of age

BACKGROUND

It is debated whether early treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can change the natural course of childhood asthma.

AIM

To assess if ICS treatment before 2 years of age in children with obstructive airways disease reduces current asthma at 10 years of age.

METHODS

Children with (n=233) and without (n=219) recurrent (r) bronchial obstruction (BO) attending clinical examination at 2 years of age in the birth cohort Environment and Childhood Asthma study in Oslo, were reinvestigated at 10 years of age. Current asthma (CA) at 10 years was defined as asthma with either symptoms and/or asthma treatment during the last year, and/or 10% fall in forced expired volume in 1s after standardized treadmill run. The risk of CA was assessed by logistic regression and propensity modelling (including gender, parental atopy and severity score at 2 years) in children with rBO who received ICS or not by 2 years.

RESULTS

CA was found in 97 children, more often among rBO children with (56.9%) and without ICS treatment (30.8%) compared to no-BO children (5.5%) (p<0.001). In rBO children logistic regression analyses (adjusted odds ratio aOR (95% confidence interval)) identified male gender (aOR 1.82 (1.01-3.27), p=0.046) and severity score at 2 years 1.14 (1.03-1.28), (p=0.01), as significant and ICS treatment as non-significant 2.00 (0.98-4.12) risk factors for CA. With propensity modelling adjusting for disease severity, ICS treatment by 2 years caused a non-significant increased risk aOR of CA of 1.84 (0.89-3.82).

CONCLUSION

No evidence was found that early use of ICS before age two in children with rBO reduces current asthma 8 years later.

Once versus twice daily budesonide metered-dose inhaler in children with mild to moderate asthma: effect on symptoms and bronchial responsiveness

BACKGROUND

Simplifying dosing regimens could improve both adherence and asthma-related morbidity. However, there is little information on the effectiveness of once-daily budesonide, administered through a metered dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer, on asthma symptoms and pulmonary function in asthmatic children.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of once-daily versus twice-daily doses of inhaled budesonide on symptoms, lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in asthmatic children. This study was a randomized, single-blind, parallel clinical trial. Patients received budesonide from an MDI either 800 microg as a daily dose or fractionated in 400 microg twice a day for 12 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using tests for independent and paired samples.

RESULTS

In both groups, asthma symptoms significantly decreased. However, the improvement in asthma symptoms, decrease in BHR and treatment adherence were significantly greater in the once-daily group than in the twice-daily group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in spirometric parameters, morning peak expiratory flow or plasma cortisol values.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily administration of 800 microg of inhaled budesonide administered by MDI plus spacer was more effective in controlling symptoms and improving BHR than fractionating the dose to 400 microg twice daily. The differences observed in this study could have been due to the greater adherence to treatment in patients in the once-daily group.

A multinational, 12-week, randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide and budesonide in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is a new lung-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has shown efficacy in previous placebo-controlled and comparative studies in patients with persistent asthma. It is important to compare new treatments with existing ICSs to obtain relative data concerning their efficacy and tolerability.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide QD with budesonide BID in patients with asthma.

METHODS

This 12-week, randomized study was conducted at 62 study sites across Europe. Male and female patients aged 12 to 75 years with primarily mild to moderate asthma were enrolled. This study was double blind with respect to the ciclesonide dose and open label for budesonide, as placebofor budesonide was not available. Patients were randomly assigned to receive inhaled ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg QD (morning) or budesonide 200 microg BID for 12 weeks. Efficacy and tolerability assessments were performed at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8, and 12. The primary end point was the change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were changes from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study by monitoring of standard laboratory variables (hematology and biochemistry); physical examination, including vital signs; reporting of adverse events (AEs); and 24-hour urinary cortisol as a measure of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-four patients were randomized (301 men, 253 women; mean age, 41.3 years; ciclesonide 80 microg QD, 182 patients; ciclesonide 320 microg QD, 195; budesonide 200 microg BID, 177). Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, including age, sex, weight, and (FEV1) were similar between the 3 groups. Compared with baseline values, week-12 FEV1 (least squares mean [LSM] [SEM] A, +0.267 [0.035], +0.256 [0.033], and +0.355 [0.034] L, respectively; all, P<0.001) and morning PEF (LSM [SEM] Delta, +12 [5], +17 [4], and +21 [4] L/min, respectively; all, P<or=0.008) were significantly improved with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD and budesonide 200 microg BID. At 12 weeks, ciclesonide was found to be noninferior to budesonide with regard to mean changes from baseline in (FEV1) (intent to treat [ITT]: 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.192 to 0.015; 97.5 CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.200 to 0.001) and morning PEF (ITT. 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -22 to 5; 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -17 to 10). Similar findings were seen in the per-protocol population. Week-12 daily, daytime, and nighttime asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use were significantly decreased from baseline in all 3 treatment groups (all, P<0.001). The prevalences of AEs were similar across all 3 treatment groups. Week-12 mean urinary cortisol excretion was statistically similar to baseline with both ciclesonide doses (Delta, -0.54 and +0.16 nmol/mmol creatinine with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD, respectively) but was significantly reduced from baseline with budesonide (Delta, -1.42 nmol/mmol creatinine; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study in patients with primarily mild to moderate asthma suggest that ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD were similar to budesonide 200 microg BID in improving pulmonary function, controlling asthma symptoms, and reducing the need for rescue medication use. Unlike budesonide, ciclesonide was not associated with significant urinary cortisol suppression in these patients.