Ventilatory response to combined high frequency jet ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation for the rescue treatment of severe neonatal lung disease

Single center experience with first-intention high-frequency jet vs. volume-targeted ventilation in extremely preterm neonates

Objectives

To examine whether first-intention high-frequency jet ventilation (HFVJ), compared to volume-targeted ventilation (VTV), in extremely preterm infants is associated with lower incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and other adverse clinical outcomes.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating neonates with gestational age (GA) ≤28 weeks, who received first-intention HFJV (main exposure) or VTV (comparator), between 11/2020 and 3/2023, with a subgroup analysis including neonates with GA ≤26 weeks and oxygenation index (OI) >5.

Results

We identified 117 extremely preterm neonates, 24 (GA 25.2 ± 1.6 weeks) on HFJV, and 93 (GA 26.4 ± 1.5 weeks, p = 0.001) on VTV. The neonates in the HFJV group had higher oxygenation indices on admission, higher inotrope use, and remained intubated for a longer period. Despite these differences, there were no statistically significant differences in rates of BPD, survival, or other adverse outcomes between the two groups. In subgroup analysis of 18 neonates on HFJV and 39 neonates on VTV, no differences were recorded in the GA, and duration of mechanical ventilation, while neonates in the HFJV group had significantly lower rates of BPD (50% compared to 83%, p = 0.034), and no significant differences in other adverse outcomes compared to neonates in the VTV group. In neonates ≤26 weeks of GA with OI >5, HFJV was significantly associated with lower rates of BPD (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.92), and combined BPD or death (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03-0.85), after adjusting for birth weight, and Arterial-alveolar gradient on admission.

Conclusions

In extremely preterm neonates ≤26 weeks of GA with OI >5, first-intention HFJV, in comparison to VTV, is associated with lower rates of BPD.

Ventilator Management in Extremely Preterm Infants

Advances in ventilation strategies for infants in the NICU have led to increased survival of extremely preterm infants. More than 75% of infants born at less than or equal to 27 weeks' gestation require initial mechanical ventilation for survival due to developmental immaturity of their lungs and respiratory drive. Various ventilators using different technologies and involving multiple management strategies are available for use in this population. Centers across the world have successfully used conventional, high-frequency oscillatory and high-frequency jet ventilation to manage respiratory failure in extremely preterm infants. This review explores the existing evidence for each mode of ventilation and the importance of individualizing ventilator management strategies when caring for extremely preterm infants.

First intention high-frequency jet ventilation for periviable infants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ventilation of periviable infants born at 22-23 weeks gestation remains a challenge in neonatology. This review highlights the evidence surrounding the use of first intention high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) in infants born near the limits of viability with a review of pulmonary fetal development and a focused overview of HFJV strategies including an in-depth analysis of the management strategies used in the initial randomized trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

A paucity of recent trials exists, with no randomized control trials assessing the use of first intention HFJV performed in the last 25 years. A retrospective observational cohort trial of the use of HFJV for infants born at less than 750 g has been recently published demonstrating the efficacy of HFJV for this population even with 2.0-mm endotracheal tubes.

SUMMARY

The lack of recent randomized trials contributes to the controversy surrounding the use of first intention HFJV. Although new research is needed in the area, this review includes the ventilation strategy of an experienced center with a focus on the use of first intention HFJV for the care of premature infants born less than 24 weeks gestation.

Respiratory management for extremely premature infants born at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation in proactive centers in Sweden, Japan, and USA

Survival of preterm newborn infants have increased steadily since the introduction of surfactant treatment and antenatal steroids. In the absence of randomized controlled trials on ventilatory strategies in extremely preterm infants, we present ventilatory strategies applied during the initial phase and the continued ventilatory care as applied in three centers with proactive prenatal and postnatal management and well documented good outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity in this cohort of infants.

Volume Targeted Ventilation and High Frequency Ventilation as the Primary Modes of Respiratory Support for ELBW Babies: What Does the Evidence Say?

Respiratory management of the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) newborn has evolved over time. Although non-invasive ventilation is being increasingly used for respiratory support in these ELBW infants, invasive ventilation still remains the primary mode in this population. Current ventilators are microprocessor driven and have revolutionized the respiratory support for these neonates synchronizing the baby's breath to ventilator breaths. High frequency ventilators with the delivery of tidal volumes less than the dead space have been introduced to minimize barotrauma and chronic lung disease. Despite these advances, the incidence of chronic lung disease has not decreased. There is still controversy regarding which mode is ideal as the primary mode of ventilation in ELBW infants. The most common modes seem to be pressure targeted conventional ventilation, volume targeted conventional ventilation and high frequency ventilation which includes high frequency oscillatory ventilation, high frequency jet ventilation and high frequency flow interrupter. In recent years, several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have compared volume vs. pressure targeted ventilation and high frequency ventilation. While volume targeted ventilation and high frequency ventilation does show promise, substantial practice variability among different centers persists. In this review, we weighed the evidence for each mode and evaluated which modes show promise as the primary support of ventilation in ELBW babies.

High frequency jet ventilation versus high frequency oscillatory ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is considered one of the major contributors to severe pulmonary dysfunction and consequent death in preterm infants. Despite widespread improvements in care, including increased utilization of antenatal steroids, use of surfactant replacement therapy, and advances in conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV), chronic lung disease (CLD) occurs in 42% of surviving preterm infants born at less than 28 weeks gestational age (GA). High frequency ventilation (HFV) aims to optimize lung expansion while minimizing tidal volume (Vt) to decrease lung injury. Two methods of HFV - high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) - are widely used, but neither has demonstrated clear superiority in elective or rescue mode.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and side effects of HFJV versus HFOV for mortality and morbidity in preterm infants born at less than 37 weeks GA with pulmonary dysfunction in both elective and rescue modes.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 11), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to November 30, 2015), EMBASE (1980 to November 30, 2015), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to November 30, 2015). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials. We imposed no date, language, or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomized, cluster-randomized, and quasi-randomized controlled trials if study authors stated explicitly that groups compared in the trial were established by a random or systematic method of allocation. We planned to exclude cross-over studies, as they would not allow assessment of the outcomes of interest.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group, including independent trial assessment and data extraction. We intended to analyze the data by using risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) and 1/RD. We planned to calculate the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) or the number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH).

MAIN RESULTS

We found no studies that met our inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence to support the superiority of HFJV or HFOV as elective or rescue therapy. Until such evidence is available, comparison of potential side effects or presumed benefits of either mode is not feasible.

Clinical Use of Nonconventional Modes of Ventilator Support

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is now a mainstay of respiratory care for the neonatal patient. In this chapter, we will define HFOV as those ventilators with a “true” active expiratory phase created by a piston or diaphragm. Jet ventilation and flow interrupters are discussed elsewhere in this book.

Neonatal ventilatory techniques - which are best for infants born at term?

Few studies have examined ventilatory modes exclusively in infants born at term. Synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) compared to intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) is associated with a shorter duration of ventilation. The limited data on pressure support, volume targeted ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist demonstrate only short term benefits in term born infants. Favourable results of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in infants with severe respiratory failure were not confirmed in the two randomised trials. Nitric oxide (NO) in term born infants, except in those with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), reduces the combined outcome of death and requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In infants with severe refractory hypoxaemic respiratory failure, ECMO, except in infants with CDH, reduced mortality and the combined outcome of death and severe disability at long-term follow-up. Randomised studies with long term outcomes are required to determine the optimum modes of ventilation in term born infants.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 2001. The odyssey continues

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was established as a standard of care by demonstrating its ability to save lives in moribund infants. The designs of early studies provided no living cohorts of similarly ill patients by which to measure accurately other (and perhaps to many more important) outcomes of interest: long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes or cost. Prospective cohort studies of neurodevelopmental outcomes post-ECMO demonstrate: (1) because ECMO, as used, saves lives, there will be an increase in the absolute number of handicapped children surviving; (2) there is little evidence that ECMO creates a relative increase in the percent of handicapped children surviving severe respiratory failure. The high direct costs of an ECMO program are measured and well publicized. When such costs are compared with similar therapies in other fields (in such terms as cost per survivor), the cost of ECMO does not seem to be an outlier. Trials of newer therapies, such as iNO, show the capacity to decrease the use of ECMO but have failed to demonstrate either cost-effectiveness or better long-term outcomes. It has not been shown that either society or individual patients have benefited from the decreased need for ECMO.

Prolonged partial liquid ventilation using conventional and high-frequency ventilatory techniques: gas exchange and lung pathology in an animal model of respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of prolonged partial liquid ventilation with perflubron (partial liquid ventilation), using conventional and high-frequency ventilatory techniques, on gas exchange, hemodynamics, and lung pathology in an animal model of lung injury.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

Animal laboratory of the Infant Pulmonary Research Center, Children's Health Care-St. Paul.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-six newborn piglets.

INTERVENTIONS

We studied newborn piglets with lung injury induced by saline lavage. Animals were randomized into one of five treatment groups: a) conventional gas ventilation (n = 8); b) partial liquid ventilation with conventional ventilation (n = 7); c) partial liquid ventilation with high-frequency jet ventilation (n = 7); d) partial liquid ventilation with high-frequency oscillation (n = 7); and e) partial liquid ventilation with high-frequency flow interruption (n = 7). After induction of lung injury, all partial liquid ventilation animals received intratracheal perflubron to approximate functional residual capacity. After 30 mins of stabilization, animals randomized to high-frequency ventilation were changed to their respective high-frequency modes. Hemodynamics and blood gases were measured before and after lung injury, after perflubron administration, and then every 4 hrs for 20 hrs. Histopathologic evaluation was carried out using semiquantitative scoring and computer-assisted morphometric analysis on pulmonary tissue from animals surviving at least 16 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All animals developed acidosis and hypoxemia after lung injury. Oxygenation significantly (p < .001) improved after perflubron administration in all partial liquid ventilation groups. After 4 hrs, oxygenation was similar in all ventilator groups. The partial liquid ventilation-jet ventilation group had the highest pH; intergroup differences were seen at 16 and 20 hrs (p < .05). The partial liquid ventilation-oscillation group required higher mean airway pressure; intergroup differences were significant at 4 and 8 hrs (p < .05). Aortic pressures, central venous pressures, and heart rates were not different at any time point. Survival rate was significantly lower in the partial liquid ventilation-flow interruption group (p < .05). All partial liquid ventilation-treated animals had less lung injury compared with gas-ventilated animals by both histologic and morphometric analysis (p < .05). The lower lobes of all partial liquid ventilation-treated animals demonstrated less damage than the upper lobes, although scores reached significance (p < .05) only in the partial liquid ventilation-conventional ventilation animals.

CONCLUSIONS

In this animal model, partial liquid ventilation using conventional or high-frequency ventilation provided rapid and sustained improvements in oxygenation without adverse hemodynamic consequences. Animals treated with partial liquid ventilation-flow interruption had a significantly decreased survival rate vs. animals treated with the other studied techniques. Histopathologic and morphometric analysis showed significantly less injury in the lower lobes of lungs from animals treated with partial liquid ventilation. High-frequency ventilation techniques did not further improve pathologic outcome.

Multicenter controlled clinical trial of high-frequency jet ventilation in preterm infants with uncomplicated respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) will reduce the incidence and/or severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and acute airleak in premature infants who, despite surfactant administration, require mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of HFJV and conventional ventilation (CV). Patients were to remain on assigned therapy for 14 days or until extubation, whichever came first. Crossover from CV to HFJV was allowed if bilateral pulmonary interstitial emphysema or bronchopleural fistula developed. Patients could cross over to the other ventilatory mode if failure criteria were met. The optimal lung volume strategy was mandated for HFJV by protocol to provide alveolar recruitment and optimize lung volume and ventilation/perfusion matching, while minimizing pressure amplitude and O2 requirements. CV management was not controlled by protocol.

SETTING

Eight tertiary neonatal intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Preterm infants with birth weights between 700 and 1500 g and gestational age <36 weeks who required mechanical ventilation with FIO2 >0.30 at 2 to 12 hours after surfactant administration, received surfactant by 8 hours of age, were <20 hours old, and had been ventilated for <12 hours. Outcome Measures. Primary outcome variables were BPD at 28 days and 36 weeks of postconceptional age. Secondary outcome variables were survival, gas exchange, airway pressures, airleak, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), and other nonpulmonary complications.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were included in the final analysis; 65 were randomized to HFJV and 65 to CV. The groups were of comparable birth weight, gestational age, severity of illness, postnatal age, and other demographics. The incidence of BPD at 36 weeks of postconceptional age was significantly lower in babies randomized to HFJV compared with CV (20.0% vs 40.4%). The need for home oxygen was also significantly lower in infants receiving HFJV compared with CV (5.5% vs 23.1%). Survival, incidence of BPD at 28 days, retinopathy of prematurity, airleak, pulmonary hemorrhage, grade I-II IVH, and other complications were similar. In retrospect, it was noted that the traditional HFJV strategy emphasizing low airway pressures (HF-LO) rather than the prescribed optimal volume strategy (HF-OPT) was used in 29/65 HFJV infants. This presented a unique opportunity to examine the effects of different HFJV strategies on gas exchange, airway pressures, and outcomes. HF-OPT was defined as increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) by >/=1 cm H2O from pre-HFJV baseline and/or use of PEEP of >/=7 cm H2O. Severe neuroimaging abnormalities (PVL and/or grade III-IV IVH) were not different between the CV and HFJV infants. However, there was a significantly lower incidence of severe IVH/PVL in HFJV infants treated with HF-OPT compared with CV and HF-LO. Oxygenation was similar between CV and HFJV groups as a whole, but HF-OPT infants had better oxygenation compared with the other two groups. There were no differences in PaCO2 between CV and HFJV, but the PaCO2 was lower for HF-LO compared with the other two groups. The peak inspiratory pressure and DeltaP (peak inspiratory pressure-PEEP) were lower for HFJV infants compared with CV infants.

CONCLUSIONS

HFJV reduces the incidence of BPD at 36 weeks and the need for home oxygen in premature infants with uncomplicated RDS, but does not reduce the risk of acute airleak. There is no increase in adverse outcomes compared with CV. HF-OPT improves oxygenation, decreases exposure to hypocarbia, and reduces the risk of grade III-IV IVH and/or PVL.

Partial liquid ventilation: a comparison using conventional and high-frequency techniques in an animal model of acute respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that high-frequency ventilation (HFV), when compared with conventional techniques, enhances respiratory gas exchange during partial liquid ventilation (PLV).

DESIGN

A four-period crossover design.

SETTING

Animal research laboratory of Children's Health Care-St. Paul.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-two newborn piglets, weighing 1.40 +/- 0.39 kg.

INTERVENTIONS

Animals were divided into four groups of eight animals: a) PLV with high-frequency jet ventilation; b) PLV with jet ventilation using a background intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) rate; c) PLV with high-frequency oscillation; or d) PLV with high-frequency flow interruption using a background IMV rate. After anesthesia, paralysis, and tracheotomy, a normal saline wash procedure produced lung injury. Perfluorocarbon was then instilled via the endotracheal tube in an amount estimated to represent functional residual capacity. Animals received randomly either PLV using conventional techniques or PLV using the selected HFV technique as initial treatment. Then, animals were crossed over to the alternative treatment at equal mean airway pressure, as measured at the endotracheal tube tip. This sequence was repeated for a total of four crossover periods, such that all animals were treated twice with PLV using conventional techniques and twice with PLV using HFV.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We measured airway pressures at the endotracheal tube tip, aortic and central venous blood pressures, arterial blood gases, and respiratory system mechanics at baseline, after induction of lung injury, and at specified intervals throughout the experiment. Measurements were made before and 15 mins after crossovers, then ventilators were adjusted to normalize gas exchange. Measurements were again made 30 mins later, at the end of the treatment period. All types of PLV provided adequate gas exchange. Only PLV using jet ventilation with IMV produced gas exchange equal to that seen during PLV using conventional techniques at equivalent mean airway pressure. By the end of the treatment periods, only PLV using high-frequency oscillation continued to require higher airway pressure than PLV using conventional techniques for equivalent gas exchange.

CONCLUSIONS

Gas exchange was not enhanced during PLV-HFV. Application of HFV with PLV provides no clear acute physiologic advantages to PLV using more conventional techniques.

Predicting outcome in children with severe acute respiratory failure treated with high-frequency ventilation

OBJECTIVES

a) To demonstrate the effect of high-frequency ventilation on gas exchange in children with severe acute respiratory failure unresponsive to conventional ventilation; b) to identify patients at high risk of death early after institution of high-frequency ventilation.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit in a university hospital.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, observational study with factorial design.

PATIENTS

Thirty-one patients with severe acute respiratory failure defined as a Pao2/F1o2 of < 150 torr (< 20 kPa) with a positive end-expiratory pressure of > or = 8 cm H2O and/or Paco2 of > 60 torr (> 8 kPa) with an arterial pH < 7.25.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either high-frequency oscillation or jet ventilation if respiratory failure was unresponsive to conventional ventilation and if the underlying disease process was deemed reversible.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-one children were managed with high-frequency ventilation, 11 children with jet and 20 children with oscillator. Arterial blood gases and level of ventilatory support were recorded before and at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hrs after institution of high-frequency ventilation. There was an improvement in an arterial pH, Paco2, Pao2, and Pao2/FID2 6 hrs after institution of high-frequency ventilation (p < .01). This improvement, along with decreased need for oxygen, was sustained through the subsequent course. Twenty-three (74%) of 31 children treated with high-frequency ventilation survived. Survivors showed an increase in an arterial pH, Pao2, Pao2/FIO2, and a decrease in Paco2 within 6 hrs, whereas nonsurvivors did not. Oxygenation index was the best predictor of outcome. A combination of an initial oxygenation index of > 20 and failure to decrease the oxygenation index by > 20% by 6 hrs after initiation of high-frequency ventilation predicted death with 88% (7/8) sensitivity and 83% (19/23) specificity, with an odds ratio of 33 (p = .0036, 95% confidence interval 3-365).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with potentially reversible underlying diseases resulting in severe acute respiratory failure that is unresponsive to conventional ventilation, high-frequency ventilation improves gas exchange in a rapid and sustained fashion. The magnitude of impaired oxygenation and its improvement after high-frequency ventilation can predict outcome within 6 hrs.

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary circulation in severe respiratory failure of the neonate: an aid for extracorporeal lung support indications

Extracorporeal lung support (ECLS) for newborns with acute respiratory failure has achieved increased popularity over the last decade. However, precise criteria for its implementation remain controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the value of Doppler echocardiography (DE) in 31 neonates with PaO2 of < or = 50 mmHg, FIO2 of 1, and optimal ventilation. Treatment included mechanical ventilation, paralysis, volume loading, vasopressors, and tolazoline. Markers indicative of ECLS (failure of maximal medical therapy, assessed by AaDO2 of more than 610 mm Hg beyond 8 hours and/or an oxygenation index (OI = mean airway pressure x FIO2%/postductal PaO2) of more than 40 beyond 4 to 6 hours) were present in 23 (group 1) and absent in eight (group 2). Shunt direction and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) calculated from tricuspid insufficiency velocity were assessed using DE. At the time of admission, sPAP was significantly higher in group 1 (62.1 v 43.7 mm Hg). On day 1, group 1 differed from group 2 in maximum sPAP value (73.2 v 44.4 mm Hg), PaCO2 (56.1 v 40 mm Hg), right-to-left shunting (85% v 25% of the patients), and pulmonary-to-systemic-pressure systolic ratio (sPAP:sSAP) (1.29 v 0.75). Patients with an sPAP:sSAP ratio of more than 1 and patients with high sPAP associated with high PaCO2 on day 1, all later (average, 10 hours later) fulfilled ECLS criteria; this suggests that DE assessment of pulmonary circulation may yield early and predictive markers of impending ECLS indication. Further confirmation of these results would help avoid unnecessary delays in ECLS implementation in newborns with severe respiratory failure.

Treatment of hydrocarbon pneumonitis. High frequency jet ventilation as an alternative to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

A child presented with hydrocarbon ingestion leading to pneumonitis and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Treatment with conventional ventilation in this child led to very high pressures and pulmonary air leaks. Treatment with high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) resulted in less barotrauma, resolution of air leak, and clinical improvement. Thus, HFJV is an acceptable alternative to both conventional ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of hydrocarbon pneumonitis leading to ARDS.

High frequency ventilator therapy for newborns

High-frequency ventilation is a general term that refers to a family of ventilator techniques that utilize respirator rates greater than 60 breaths/minute and tidal volumes that are usually less than or equal to the anatomical dead space of the airways. These techniques include high frequency positive-pressure ventilation, high frequency jet ventilation, high frequency flow interruption, high frequency oscillatory ventilation, and high frequency chest wall oscillation. I review the proposed mechanisms of gas transport during high-frequency ventilation and the different ventilators capable of delivering this mode of ventilation. In addition, clinical studies involving infants treated with this new technology are reviewed, along with long-term patient follow-up and reported complications.

High frequency jet ventilation: intraoperative application in infants

The potential advantages of the intraoperative use of high frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) when compared with conventional ventilation (CV) include the maintenance of adequate gas exchange and lung function with a relatively motionless surgical field. To determine the pulmonary response to HFJV ventilation in infants during cardiac surgery, we evaluated lung function in nine infants supported with CV and HFJV during a Blalock-Taussig shunt procedure. Infants were randomized to each mode of ventilation with inspiratory and expiratory pressures and FiO2 held constant. Heart rate, blood pressure, arterial blood gases, pulmonary mechanics (lung compliance and resistance), and functional residual capacity (FRC) were compared after 10 minutes of stabilization of each ventilation mode, with the infants in the thoracotomy position and the surgical field adequately exposed. Pulmonary mechanics were measured using esophageal manometry and pneumotachography, and FRC by helium dilution. There was no difference in vital signs, pulmonary mechanics, FRC, or PaO2 on HFJV ventilation when compared with CV. Arterial PaCO2 was lower with a lower mean airway pressure on HFJV when compared with CV. The surgical team subjectively observed a diminished need for lung manipulation and improved ease of access to the surgical field with HFJV. These results indicate that the use of HFJV during closed-heart cardiac surgical procedures in infants provides similar cardiopulmonary stability and some potentially important clinical benefits when compared with CV.

High-frequency jet ventilation in children with the adult respiratory distress syndrome complicated by pulmonary barotrauma

High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) was used in 29 children with severe ARDS complicated by pulmonary barotrauma (PBT). Treatment with HFJV was begun when PBT was progressing over a 24-h period while receiving conventional ventilation (CV). The mean (+/- SD) age was 0.95 +/- 1.21 years (range, 0.03-4 years). The most common diagnosis was viral pneumonia (n = 17); other diagnoses included aspiration pneumonitis (n = 4), bacterial pneumonia (n = 3), multiple trauma (n = 2), and near-drowning (n = 3). The Bunnell Life-Pulse ventilator was used at a rate of 240/min or 300/min, with inspiratory time of 0.02 sec. Twenty children survived (69%). Survivors and nonsurvivors had equal disease severity prior to HFJV as assessed by ventilator settings, alveolar-to-arterial oxygen tension gradient, oxygenation index, and blood gas values. Survivors had spent significantly less time on conventional ventilation prior to HFJV than nonsurvivors, with a mean (+/- SD) of 3.7 +/- 2.1 days vs 9.6 +/- 4.5 days, respectively (P < 0.05). Survivors underwent an average of 4.4 +/- 3.9 days of HFJV, which supported adequate gas exchange with lower airway pressures, and produced resolution or significant improvement in airleak on chest radiograph. In conclusion, we speculate that the application of HFJV early in the course of severe hypoxemic respiratory failure complicated by airleak, allows the reduction of airway pressures, thereby minimizing pulmonary barotrauma and allowing the lung to recover from the underlying insult. Further controlled evaluation of HFJV in this high risk group of patients is warranted.

Randomized study of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. HiFO Study Group

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, noncrossover, randomized study to determine whether high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) would decrease the development or progression of air leak syndrome in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. Air leak syndrome was defined as pulmonary interstitial emphysema or gross air leak such as pneumothorax. Infants were eligible for study entry if they were less than 48 hours of age and had severe respiratory distress syndrome, defined by peak inspiratory pressure or the presence of air leak syndrome. Infants who weighed > or = 0.5 kg at birth were randomly assigned to receive either conventional ventilation (CV) or HFOV. HFOV was provided by a ventilator that operated at 15 Hz, with a 1:2 inspiratory/expiratory ratio and no background tidal breaths. Severity of pulmonary interstitial emphysema was scored independently by two neonatologists unaware of the infants' ventilatory group. Gross air leak severity was scored according to the number of chest tubes required and duration of air leak. Eighty-six infants received HFOV; 90 received CV. During the first 24 hours of the study, patients in the HFOV group received significantly higher mean airway pressure and lower inspired oxygen concentration, had significantly lower arterial carbon dioxide tension, and had a higher ratio of arterial to alveolar oxygen tension. When the HFOV and CV groups were compared with control for birth weight strata, study site, and inborn versus outborn status, HFOV significantly reduced the development of air leak syndrome in those patients who entered the study without the syndrome. We conclude that HFOV, when the strategy employed in this study is used, provides effective ventilation, improves oxygenation, and significantly reduces the development of air leak syndrome in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome.

High-frequency jet ventilation and surfactant treatment of newborns with severe respiratory failure

Twenty-eight newborn infants (birthweight, 2.4 +/- 1.1 kg; gestational age, 34.6 +/- 6.1 weeks) with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), meconium aspiration syndrome, or pneumonia who deteriorated in spite of optimal conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and exogenous surfactant therapy were treated with high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) and continued surfactant therapy. For enrollment, infants had to have a limited response to surfactant therapy and conventional ventilation, and meet clinical criteria that confirmed clinical deterioration and severity of illness. Study infants had received exogenous calf lung surfactant extract (CLSE) and conventional ventilation prior to the start of HFJV at 46.3 +/- 8.2 hours of age. Patients initially responded to HFJV alone with significant improvement in several respiratory variables, but deteriorated subsequently and receive additional doses of exogenous surfactant on HFJV. Exogenous surfactant and HFJV resulted in significant and sustained improvement in several respiratory variables. Only ten patients deteriorated to meet criteria for a second surfactant dose on HFJV, and two patients received a third dose. Twenty-five of the 28 patients studied survived (89%). No patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or were discharged home on oxygen. The results of this pilot study suggest that the combination of HFJV and exogenous surfactant replacement may be effective in treating infants with more severe respiratory failure, and indicate the need for more extensive controlled investigations.

Multicenter controlled trial comparing high-frequency jet ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in newborn infants with pulmonary interstitial emphysema

One hundred forty-four newborn infants with pulmonary interstitial emphysema were stratified by weight and severity of illness, and randomly assigned to receive treatment with high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) or rapid-rate conventional mechanical ventilation (CV) with short inspiratory time. If criteria for treatment failure were met, crossover to the alternate ventilatory mode was permitted. Overall, 45 (61%) of 74 infants met treatment success criteria with HFJV compared with 26 (37%) of 70 treated with CV (p less than 0.01). Eighty-four percent of patients who crossed over from CV to HFJV initially responded to the new treatment, and 45% ultimately met success criteria on HFJV. In contrast, only 9% of those who crossed over from HFJV to CV responded well to CV (p less than 0.01), and the same 9% ultimately met success criteria (p less than 0.05). Therapy with HFJV resulted in improved ventilation at lower peak and mean airway pressures, as well as more rapid radiographic improvement of pulmonary interstitial emphysema, in comparison with rapid-rate CV. Survival by original assignment was identical. When survival resulting from rescue by the alternate therapy in crossover patients was excluded, the survival rate was 64.9% for HFJV, compared with 47.1% for CV (p less than 0.05). The incidence of chronic lung disease, intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus, airway obstruction, and new air leak was similar in both groups. We conclude that HFJV, as used in this study, is safe and is more effective than rapid-rate CV in the treatment of newborn infants with pulmonary interstitial emphysema.

Early randomized intervention with high-frequency jet ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome

To determine whether early use of high-frequency jet ventilation reduces neonatal mortality or pulmonary morbidity rates, we randomly selected 42 infants with clinical and radiographic evidence of severe respiratory distress syndrome to receive either high-frequency jet ventilation or conventional ventilation. Separate sequential analyses (two-sided, alpha = 0.05, power = 0.95 to detect 85:15 advantage) were performed for mortality rates, air leaks, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and assignment crossover, and a combined analysis was performed, with death overriding other outcome variables. Enrollment was completed when the combined analysis reached the sequential design boundary indicating no treatment difference. Mortality rates (19% among infants receiving high-frequency jet ventilation vs 24% among infants receiving conventional ventilation), the incidence of air leaks (48% vs 52%), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (39% vs 41%), and intraventricular hemorrhage (33% vs 43%), and assignment crossovers (14% vs 24%) did not differs significantly between the treatment groups. We conclude that early use of high-frequency jet ventilation does not prevent or substantially reduce mortality or morbidity rates associated with assisted ventilation.