Exhaled nitric oxide predicts loss of asthma control in children after inhaled corticosteroids withdrawal

Detailed characterization and impact of small airway dysfunction in school-age asthma

BACKGROUND

Small airway dysfunction (SAD) is increasingly recognized as an important feature of pediatric asthma yet typically relies on spirometry-derived FEF25-75 to detect its presence. Multiple breath washout (MBW) and oscillometry potentially offer improved sensitivity for SAD detection, but their utility in comparison to FEF25-75, and correlations with clinical outcomes remains unclear for school-age asthma. We investigated SAD occurrence using these techniques, between-test correlation and links to clinical outcomes in 57 asthmatic children aged 8-18 years.

METHODS

MBW and spirometry abnormality were defined as z-scores above/below ± 1.96, generating MBW reference equations from contemporaneous controls (n = 69). Abnormal oscillometry was defined as > 97.5th percentile, also from contemporaneous controls (n = 146). Individuals with abnormal FEF25-75, MBW, or oscillometry were considered to have SAD.

RESULTS

Using these limits of normal, SAD was present on oscillometry in 63% (resistance at 5-20 Hz; R5-R20; >97.5th percentile), on MBW in 54% (Scond; z-scores> +1.96) and in spirometry FEF25-75 in 44% of participants (z-scores< -1.96). SAD, defined by oscillometry and/or MBW abnormality, occurred in 77%. Among those with abnormal R5-R20, Scond was abnormal in 71%. Correlations indicated both R5-R20 and Scond were linked to asthma medication burden, baseline FEV1 and reversibility. Additionally, Scond correlated with FENO and magnitude of bronchial hyper-responsiveness. SAD, detected by oscillometry and/or MBW, occurred in almost 80% of school-aged asthmatic children, surpassing FEF25-75 detection rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Discordant oscillometry and MBW abnormality suggests they reflect different aspects of SAD, serving as complementary tools. Key asthma clinical features, like reversibility, had stronger correlation with MBW-derived Scond than oscillometry-derived R5-R20.

Systemic and breath biomarkers for asthma: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Finding suitable biomarkers to phenotype asthma, identify individuals at risk of worsening and guide treatment is highly prioritized in asthma research. We aimed to provide an analysis of currently used and upcoming biomarkers, focusing on developments published in the past 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Type 2 inflammation is the most studied asthma mechanism with the most biomarkers in the pipeline. Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are those most used clinically. Recent developments include their ability to identify individuals at higher risk of exacerbations, faster decline in lung function and more likely to benefit from anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-4/-13 treatment. Certain patterns of urinary eicosanoid excretion also relate to type 2 inflammation. Results of recent trials investigating the use of serum periostin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 to guide anti-IL-13 therapy were somewhat disappointing. Less is known about non-type 2 inflammation but blood neutrophils and YKL-40 may be higher in patients with evidence of non-type 2 asthma. Volatile organic compounds show promise in their ability to distinguish both eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthma.

SUMMARY

The ultimate panel of biomarkers for identification of activated inflammatory pathways and treatment strategies in asthma patients still lies in the future, particularly for non-type 2 asthma, but potential candidates are available.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) in the management of asthma: a position paper of the Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS) and Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Asthma prevalence in Italy is on the rise and is estimated to be over 6% of the general population. The diagnosis of asthma can be challenging and elusive, especially in children and the last two decades has brought evidences that asthma is not a single disease but consists of various phenotypes. Symptoms can be underestimated by the patient or underreported to the clinician and physical signs can be scanty. Usual objective measures, like spirometry, are necessary but sometimes not significant. Despite proper treatment, asthma can be a very severe condition (even leading to death), however new drugs have recently become available which can be very effective in its control. Since asthma is currently thought to be caused by inflammation, a direct measure of the latter can be of paramount importance. For this purpose, the measurement of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FE_NO) has been used since the early years of the current century as a non-invasive, easy-to-assess tool useful for diagnosing and managing asthma. This SIP-IRS/SIAAIC Position Paper is a narrative review which summarizes the evidence behind the usefulness of FE_NO in the diagnosis, management and phenotypization of asthma.

Exhaled nitric oxide in pediatric patients with respiratory disease

Measurement of nitric oxide (NO) levels in exhaled air from the upper and lower airways is currently used as a non-invasive marker of inflammation in respiratory diseases. Assessment of NO exhaled from the lower air respiratory tract is considered to be a quick method for confirmation and control of asthma in patients as well as an estimation of treatment efficiency. The main aim of this study was to determine differences between levels of exhaled nitric oxide (fractional exhaled NO; FeNO) in patients with respiratory disease as measured by an electrochemical analyzer. Measurements were taken in 352 pediatric patients aged 4-17 with cystic fibrosis (CF) (n = 43), asthma (n = 69), allergic rhinitis (AR) (n = 70), asthma and AR (n = 128) and non-diseased children (n = 42) recruited from the Allergology Outpatient Department, Provincial Hospital No 2, Rzeszów. The second objective of this study was to assess any correlations between FeNO and clinical parameters of patients. The level of FeNO in patients with CF was normal when compared with control subjects (10.8 ± 2.9 versus 11.4 ± 6 ppb). We found significantly higher FeNO in patients with asthma (26.6 ± 15.3 ppb, p < 0.001), AR (18.4 ± 9.6 ppb, p < 0.01) as well as in patients with both asthma and AR (43.3 ± 31.1 ppb, p < 0.001) when compared to healthy children. Statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation between FeNO and age, height and weight of control subjects, and height in children with AR. FeNO was independent of sex, BMI, spirometry and blood results as well as the type of residence in control children and subjects with CF, asthma, AR and combined asthma and AR. In conclusion, we found normal levels of FeNO in children with CF and elevated levels in patients with asthma, AR and combined asthma and AR as compared to control subjects. Due to conflicting data, there is still a need for additional research, especially related to regarding factors that affect FeNO levels in respiratory disease.

Asthma control test reflects not only lung function but also airway inflammation in children with stable asthma

Objective: Various numerical asthma control tools have been developed to distinguish different levels of symptom control. We aimed to examine whether the asthma control test (ACT) is reflective of objective findings such as lung function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and laboratory data in patients with stable asthma.Methods: We included patients who were enrolled in the Korean Childhood Asthma Study. ACT, spirometry, blood tests and FeNO were performed in patients after stabilization of their asthma. We examined differences among spirometry parameters, blood tests and FeNO according to control status as determined by ACT and investigated for any significant correlations.Results: The study population consisted of 441 subjects. Spirometry showed that forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity and FEV₁/forced vital capacity were all significantly higher in the controlled asthma group. Likewise, FeNO and percent-change in FEV₁ were both significantly lower in the controlled asthma group. In blood tests, the eosinophil fraction was significantly lower in the controlled asthma group while white blood cell count was significantly higher in the controlled asthma group. Lastly, among the various factors analyzed, only provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV₁ significantly correlated with ACT score.Conclusion: ACT is useful as part of the routine evaluation of asthmatic children and should be used as a complement to existing tools such as spirometry and FeNO measurement.