Prehospital management of pediatric asthma patients in a large emergency medical services system

The association of prehospital systemic corticosteroids with emergency department and in-hospital outcomes for patients with asthma exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Timely administration of systemic corticosteroids is a cornerstone of asthma exacerbation treatment, yet little is known regarding potential benefits of prehospital administration by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians. We examined factors associated with prehospital corticosteroid administration with hospitalization and hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of EMS encounters for patients 2-50 years of age with suspected asthma exacerbation from a national data set. We evaluated factors associated with systemic corticosteroid administration using generalized estimating equations. We performed propensity matching based on service level, age, encounter duration, vital signs, and treatments to evaluate the association of prehospital corticosteroid administration with hospitalization and LOS using weighted logistic regression. We evaluated the association of prehospital corticosteroid administration with admission using Bayesian models.

RESULTS

Of 15,834 encounters, 4731 (29.9%) received prehospital systemic corticosteroids. Administration of corticosteroids was associated with older age; sex; urbanicity; advanced life support provider; vital sign instability; increasing doses of albuterol; and provision of ipratropium bromide, magnesium, epinephrine, and supplementary oxygen. Within the matched sample, prehospital corticosteroids were not associated with hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.01) or LOS (multiplier 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.05). Administration of corticosteroids was associated with lower odds of admission and shorter LOS in longer EMS encounters (>34 min), lower admission odds in patients with documented wheezing, and shorter LOS among patients treated with albuterol. In a Bayesian model with noninformative priors, the OR for admission among encounters given corticosteroids was 0.86 (95% credible interval 0.77-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital systemic corticosteroid administration was not associated with hospitalization or LOS in the overall cohort of asthma patients treated by EMS, though they had a lower probability of admission within Bayesian models. Improved outcomes were noted among subgroups of longer EMS encounters, documented wheezing, and receipt of albuterol.

Development of a Computable Phenotype for Prehospital Pediatric Asthma Encounters

INTRODUCTION

Asthma exacerbations are a common cause of pediatric Emergency Medical Services (EMS) encounters. Accordingly, prehospital management of pediatric asthma exacerbations has been designated an EMS research priority. However, accurate identification of pediatric asthma exacerbations from the prehospital record is nuanced and difficult due to the heterogeneity of asthma symptoms, especially in children. Therefore, this study's objective was to develop a prehospital-specific pediatric asthma computable phenotype (CP) that could accurately identify prehospital encounters for pediatric asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study of patient encounters for ages 2-18 years from the ESO Data Collaborative between 2018 and 2021. We modified two existing rule-based pediatric asthma CPs and created three new CPs (one rule-based and two machine learning-based). Two pediatric emergency medicine physicians independently reviewed encounters to assign labels of asthma exacerbation or not. Taking that labeled encounter data, a 50/50 train/test split was used to create training and test sets from the labeled data. A 90/10 split was used to create a small validation set from the training set. We used specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and macro F1 to compare performance across all CP models.

RESULTS

After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24,283 patient encounters remained. The machine-learning models exhibited the best performance for the identification of pediatric asthma exacerbations. A multi-layer perceptron-based model had the best performance in all metrics, with an F1 score of 0.95, specificity of 1.00, sensitivity of 0.91, negative predictive value of 0.98, and positive predictive value of 1.00.

CONCLUSION

We modified existing and developed new pediatric asthma CPs to retrospectively identify prehospital pediatric asthma exacerbation encounters. We found that machine learning-based models greatly outperformed rule-based models. Given the high performance of the machine-learning models, the development and application of machine learning-based CPs for other conditions and diseases could help accelerate EMS research and ultimately enhance clinical care by accurately identifying patients with conditions of interest.

Emergency department course of patients with asthma receiving initial emergency medical services care-Perspectives From the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

Objective

Although 911 calls for acute shortness of breath are common, the role of emergency medical services (EMS) in acute asthma care is unclear. We sought to characterize the demographics, course, and outcomes of adult emergency department (ED) patients with asthma in the United States receiving initial EMS care.

Methods

We analyzed data from the 2016-2019 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). We included patients aged ≥18 years with an ED visit diagnosis of asthma, stratifying the cases according to initial EMS care. Accounting for the survey design of NHAMCS, we generated nationalized estimates of the number of EMS and non-EMS asthma visits. Using logistic regression, we determined the associations between initial EMS care and patient demographics (age, sex, race, and insurance type), ED course (initial vital signs, triage category, testing, medications), and outcomes (hospital admission, ED length of stay).

Results

Of 435 million adult ED visits during 2016-2019, there were ≈5.3 million related to asthma (1.3 million annually, 1.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1%-1.4%). A total of 602,569 (150,642 annually, 11.3%; 95% CI, 8.6%-14.8%) ED patients with asthma received initial EMS care. Compared with non-EMS asthma patients, EMS asthma patients were more likely to present with an "urgent" ED triage category (odds ratio [OR], 22.2; 95% CI, 6.6-74.9) and to undergo laboratory (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.41-5.46) or imaging tests (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.21-4.83). ED patients with asthma receiving initial EMS care were almost 3 times more likely to be admitted to the hospital (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.27-6.25). There were no differences in demographics, ED use of β-agonists or corticosteroids, or ED length of stay between EMS and non-EMS asthma patients.

Conclusions

Approximately 1 in 10 adult ED patients with asthma receive initial care by EMS. EMS asthma patients present to the ED with higher acuity, undergo more diagnostic testing in the ED, and are more likely to be admitted. Although limited in information regarding the prehospital course, these findings highlight the more severe illness of asthma patients transported by EMS and underscore the importance of EMS in emergency asthma care.

EMS Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids to Pediatric Asthma Patients: An Analysis by Severity and Transport Interval

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric asthma exacerbations are a common cause of emergency medical services (EMS) encounters. Bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids are mainstays of asthma exacerbation therapy, yet data on the efficacy of EMS administration of systemic corticosteroids are mixed. This study's objective was to assess the association between EMS administration of systemic corticosteroids to pediatric asthma patients on hospital admission rates based on asthma exacerbation severity and EMS transport intervals.

METHODS

This is a sub-analysis of the Early Administration of Steroids in the Ambulance Setting: An Observational Design Trial (EASI AS ODT). EASI AS ODT is a non-randomized, stepped wedge, observational study examining outcomes one year before and one year after seven EMS agencies incorporated an oral systemic corticosteroid option into their protocols for the treatment of pediatric asthma exacerbations. We included EMS encounters for patients ages 2-18 years confirmed by manual chart review to have asthma exacerbations. We compared hospital admission rates across asthma exacerbation severities and EMS transport intervals using univariate analyses. We geocoded patients and created maps to visualize the general trends of patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 841 pediatric asthma patients met inclusion criteria. While most patients were administered inhaled bronchodilators by EMS (82.3%), only 21% received systemic corticosteroids, and only 19% received both inhaled bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids. Overall, there was no significant difference in hospitalization rates between patients who did and did not receive systemic corticosteroids from EMS (33% vs. 32%, p = 0.78). However, although not statistically significant, for patients who received systemic corticosteroids from EMS, there was an 11% decrease in hospitalizations for mild exacerbation patients and a 16% decrease in hospitalizations for patients with EMS transport intervals greater than 40 min.

CONCLUSION

In this study, systemic corticosteroids were not associated with a decrease in hospitalizations of pediatric patients with asthma overall. However, while limited by small sample size and lack of statistical significance, our results suggest there may be a benefit in certain subgroups, particularly patients with mild exacerbations and those with transport intervals longer than 40 min. Given the heterogeneity of EMS agencies, EMS agencies should consider local operational and pediatric patient characteristics when developing standard operating protocols for pediatric asthma.

Emergency Medical Services Management of Bronchospasm in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis and Nationwide Quality Assessment

Background/Objective: Bronchospasm, caused by asthma and other related conditions, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality commonly managed by emergency medical services (EMS). We aimed to evaluate the quality of prehospital management of bronchospasm by EMS in the US.Methods: The National EMS Information System Public Release Research dataset, a nationwide convenience sample of prehospital patient care report data from 2018 to 2019, was used to capture 9-1-1 activations where patients aged ≥2 years were treated and transported by EMS for suspected bronchospasm. First, we described the extent to which EMS care met eight quality measures identified from available statewide EMS protocols, existing quality measures, and national guidelines. Second, we quantified the extent of risk-standardized agency-level variation in administration of inhaled beta agonists and systemic corticosteroids using logistic regression models, accounting for patient characteristics, severity, and clustering by agencies. Third, we compared rates of completed prehospital interventions between pediatric (age <18 years) versus adult patients using two-sample t-tests.Results: A total of 1,336,988 EMS encounters for suspected bronchospasm met inclusion criteria. Median age of patients was 66 years, with only 4% pediatric; 55% were female. Advanced life support (ALS) units managed 94% of suspected bronchospasm. Respiratory rate (98%) and pulse oximetry (96%) were documented in nearly all cases. Supplemental oxygen was administered to hypoxic patients by 65% of basic life support (BLS) and 73% of ALS units. BLS administered inhaled beta-agonist therapy less than half the time (48%), compared to 77% by ALS. ALS administered inhaled anticholinergic therapy in 38% of cases, and systemic corticosteroids in 19% of cases. Pediatric patients were significantly less likely to receive supplemental oxygen when hypoxic, inhaled beta-agonists, inhaled anticholinergics, or systemic corticosteroids.Conclusions: We found important gaps in recent EMS practice for prehospital care of suspected bronchospasm. We highlight three targets for improvement: inhaled beta-agonist administration by BLS, systemic corticosteroid administration by ALS, and increased interventions for pediatric patients. These findings indicate important areas for research, protocol modification, and quality improvement efforts to improve EMS management of bronchospasm.

Implementing Oral Systemic Corticosteroids for Pediatric Asthma into EMS Treatment Guidelines: A Qualitative Study

Introduction: Respiratory distress accounts for approximately 14% of all pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) encounters, with asthma being the most common diagnosis. In the emergency department (ED), early administration of systemic corticosteroids decreases hospital admission and speeds resolution of symptoms. For children treated by EMS, there is an opportunity for earlier corticosteroid administration. Most EMS agencies carry intravenous (IV) corticosteroids; yet given the challenges and low rates of EMS pediatric IV placement, oral corticosteroids (OCS) are a logical alternative. However, previous single-agency studies showed low adoption of OCS. Therefore, qualitative study of OCS implementation by EMS is warranted.Methods: This study's objective was to explore uptake and implementation of OCS for pediatric asthma treatment through semi-structured interviews and focus groups with EMS clinicians. We thematically coded and analyzed transcripts using the domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify barriers and facilitators that most strongly influenced OCS implementation and adoption by EMS clinicians.Results: We conducted five focus groups with a total of ten EMS clinicians from four EMS systems: one urban region with multiple agencies that hosted two focus groups, one suburban agency, one rural agency, and a mixed rural/suburban agency. Of the 36 CFIR constructs, 31 were addressed in the interviews. Most constructs coded were in the CFIR domains of the inner setting and characteristics of individuals, indicating that EMS agency factors as well as EMS clinician characteristics were impactful for implementation. Barriers to OCS adoption included unfamiliarity and inexperience with pediatric patients and pediatric dosing, and lack of knowledge of the benefits of corticosteroids. Facilitators included friendly competition with colleagues, having a pediatric medical director, and feedback from receiving EDs on patient outcomes.Conclusion: This qualitative focus group study of OCS implementation by EMS clinicians for the treatment of pediatric asthma found many barriers and facilitators that mapped to the structure of EMS agencies and characteristics of individual EMS clinicians. To fully implement this evidence-based intervention for pediatric asthma, more education on the intervention is required, and EMS clinicians will benefit from further pediatric training.

Variation in Prehospital Protocols for Pediatric Respiratory Distress Management in the United States

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare statewide emergency medical services protocols for the management of pediatric respiratory distress.

METHODS

We performed a descriptive study of emergency medical services protocols for the management of pediatric respiratory distress in the United States, excluding those without model or mandatory protocols. We compared medication recommendations for specific disease processes, including asthma, croup, epiglottitis, anaphylaxis, generalized respiratory distress, intubation, and drug assisted intubation.

RESULTS

Thirty-four state protocols were included. All had protocols to address the management of pediatric respiratory distress. There was high agreement in albuterol use for bronchospasm and epinephrine use in anaphylaxis. Epinephrine was recommended in all anaphylaxis protocols, 27 croup protocols (79%), and 3 epiglottitis protocols (9%). Six states (18%) called for albuterol in patients with generalized respiratory distress. Steroid recommendations and indications had variance among states; 26 states (76%) allowed steroid use in patients with asthma, 19 states (56%) recommended steroid use in anaphylaxis, and 11 (32%) recommended steroid use in croup protocols. The route for steroid administration also varied among protocols. Five states (15%) allowed continuous positive airway pressure application in pediatric patients, whereas endotracheal intubation and rapid sequence intubations had varying requirements as well as recommendations for use. Twelve (35%) listed impending or current respiratory failure as an indication, whereas other states had specific markers, such as Glasgow Coma Scale or oxygen saturation, as indications.

CONCLUSIONS

All included states had specific recommendations for the management of pediatric respiratory distress. There was consistency in recommendations for albuterol use for wheezing and epinephrine use for anaphylaxis. However, there was wide variability in other uses for epinephrine, steroid administration, continuous positive airway pressure use, and specific treatments for croup and epiglottitis. The findings of this study provide a base for important future evidence-based protocol developments and changes in prehospital pediatric respiratory distress treatment.

Impact of prehospital pediatric asthma management protocol adherence on clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of EMS protocol non-adherence during pediatric asthma encounters and its association with emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of asthma encounters aged 2-17 years transported by EMS to a pediatric ED from 2012 to 2017. Our primary outcome was hospital admission based on prehospital protocol adherence defined as: (1) bronchodilator administration, (2) treatment of hypoxia with oxygen, or (3) administration of intramuscular (IM) epinephrine in encounters with high severity of distress. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between protocol non-adherence and hospital admission.

RESULTS

During the study period, 290 EMS encounters met inclusion criteria. Median age was 9 years (IQR 5-12), 63% were male, 40% had moderate to severe exacerbations, and 24% were admitted. Protocol non-adherence occurred in 32% of encounters with failure to administer bronchodilators in 27% and failure to administer IM epinephrine when indicated in 83%. Prehospital steroids were administered in 8% of encounters. After adjusting for covariates, protocol non-adherence was not statistically associated with likelihood of inpatient admission (OR 1.3; 95% CI: 0.6-2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Among prehospital pediatric asthma encounters, EMS protocol non-adherence is common but not associated with a higher frequency of hospital admission. Hospital admission was associated with acute exacerbation severity suggesting further research is needed to develop a valid prehospital asthma severity assessment scoring tool.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Modified Delphi Method Derivation of the FAMILY (Family Assessment of Medical Interventions & Liaisons with the Young) EMS Instrument

BACKGROUND

Though family satisfaction with prehospital care is a surrogate for quality and patient outcomes, there are no tools available to measure family satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

To develop the EMS Family Assessment of Medical Interventions & Liaisons with the Young (FAMILY) instrument.

METHODS

Components of family experiences with pediatric prehospital care were identified with a modified Delphi method. The expert panel included Emergency Medical Technicians, paramedics, family representatives, and EMS leaders from Colorado, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. An online survey was used to assess proposed questions from each of five candidate domains from national guidelines, including Safety, Communication, Family Presence, Cultural Awareness, Children with Special Healthcare Needs and Overall Satisfaction. Round-1 items were scored on a five-point Likert scale. Inclusion in the final instrument required 70% agreement ranking items as "include" or "definitely include." In Round-2, participants assessed proposed refinements. This resulted in FAMILY Version-1, with sections for family members and EMS care providers. EMSC Family Action Network (FAN) representatives evaluated the FAMILY, leading to Version-2. Suggestions from the national FAN about content, clarity, and whether the instrument captured their experiences with pediatric EMS care led to the final FAMILY version. Bilingual speakers translated the instrument into Spanish, while assessing the content for semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence between the English and Spanish versions.

RESULTS

There were 22 experts in Round-1, and 20 continued into Round-2 .The Delphi process yielded 12 questions in six domains with 14 recommended modifications. Two questions were excluded. Five domains reached 70% agreement in Round-1. Cultural Awareness reached 75% agreement after Round-2. Six FAN representatives evaluated Version-1, leading to changes for clarity, content and cultural sensitivity. Seventeen FAN representatives evaluated Version-2 leading to additional refinement. The assessment of the equivalence between the English and Spanish survey versions resulted in changes in the Spanish language content for equivalent meaning.

CONCLUSION

A panel of EMS and family stakeholders successfully developed an instrument to assess family satisfaction with pediatric EMS care. Further validation is required in a large respondent population. Assessing family satisfaction with pediatric EMS encounters is an important step toward improving prehospital care.