Outcomes of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) eradication protocol in pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2020: Section 2 pulmonary disease, infections, and inflammation

The outlook for those with cystic fibrosis (CF) has never been brighter with ever increasing life expectancy and the approval of the highly effective CFTR modulators, such as elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. With that being said, the progressive pulmonary decline and importance of lung health, infection, and inflammation in CF remains. This review is the second part in a three-part CF Year in Review 2020. Part one focused on the literature related to CFTR modulators while part three will feature the multisystem effects related to CF. This review focuses on articles from Pediatric Pulmonology, including articles from other journals that are of particular interest to clinicians. Herein, we highlight studies published during 2020 related to CF pulmonary disease, infection, treatment, and diagnostics.

Comparison of intravenous and non-intravenous antibiotic regimens in eradication of P. aeruginosa and MRSA in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pulmonary infection is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The most common pathogens isolated in CF are Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). Chronic infection of PA and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are associated with worse survival and antibiotic eradication treatment is recommended for both. This study compared the outcomes between intravenous (IV) and non-IV antibiotics in eradication of PA and MRSA.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. All respiratory specimen cultures of 309 CF patients and eradication regimens between 2015 and 2019 were reviewed. Patients received eradication treatment in case of first ever isolation or new isolation after being infection-free ≥1 year. The primary analysis was the comparison of the percentage of successful eradication after receiving IV and non-IV eradication regimens. Demographic and clinical risk factors for eradication failure were also analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and two patients with PA isolations and 48 patients with MRSA were analyzed. At 1 year, 21.6% in PA group and 35.4% in MRSA group were successfully eradicated. There was not any statistically significant difference between IV versus non-IV antibiotic regimens on eradication in either group. Additionally, none of the clinical risk factors was significantly associated with eradication failure in PA and MRSA groups.

CONCLUSION

In the eradication of PA and MRSA, IV and non-IV treatment regimens did not show any superiority to one another. Non-parenteral eradication could be a better option considering the cost-effectiveness and the treatment burden of IV treatments due to hospitalization and the need for IV access.

Steam disinfection of toothbrushes from patients with cystic fibrosis: Evidence-based recommendations

BACKGROUND

Patients with cystic fibrosis have increased morbidity/mortality due to chronic respiratory infections, which primarily originate from the environment. Infection prevention and control emphasize the importance of cleaning and disinfection of respiratory devices, however, there is a paucity of guidance on toothbrush hygiene, which have been shown to be a source of cystic fibrosis (CF) pathogens.

METHODS

This study examined steam disinfection of toothbrushes contaminated with clinically significant CF isolates (n = 80; Gram positive = 33; Gram negative = 32, and non-tuberculous mycobacteria = 6) and yeasts (n = 9), as well as oral streptococci (n = 26) and environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 12).

RESULTS

Steam disinfection eradicated all organisms tested, as well as all organisms in CF sputum applied to toothbrushes.

CONCLUSIONS

Steam disinfection offers a relatively simple, cheap and available method of eliminating non-spore-forming CF pathogens on toothbrushes. Toothbrushes should be thoroughly rinsed after each use before steam disinfection, to remove plaque, epithelial cells, and residual toothpaste. Toothbrushes should be steam disinfected after each use employing a baby bottle steam disinfector, adhering to manufacturers' operating instructions and stored in the disinfector until next used within 12 to 24 hours. Toothbrushes should be replaced every 3 to 4 months, or sooner if the bristles look worn out, as well as every time a pulmonary exacerbation occurs or every time the patient is treated for a pulmonary/throat infection. Steam disinfection of toothbrushes is crucial when the patient is undergoing eradication regimes for P. aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, so that the patient does not become reinfected from this source, thereby aiding eradication and enhancing patient safety.