A proposed architecture for the central domain of the bacterial enhancer-binding proteins based on secondary structure prediction and fold recognition

The putative Walker A and Walker B motifs of Rrp2 are required for the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi

Rrp2 encodes a putative bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP) in Borrelia burgdorferi. Point mutation (G239C) of Rrp2 abolishes the transcriptional activation of σ⁵⁴ -dependent rpoS. In contrast to canonical bEBPs that are dispensable for bacterial growth, Rrp2 is essential for borrelial growth in BSK medium. It has been believed that Rrp2's ATPase activity is not required for cell growth, but experimental evidence supporting this notion has been lacking. In particular, it has remained unclear whether the residue G239 is involved in Rrp2's presumptive ATPase activity. To address these information gaps, we examined the roles of Rrp2's potential strategic signatures including the G239 residue and the putative Walker A and Walker B motifs. Herein it was showed that Rrp2 has ATP binding and hydrolysis activities engendered by the Walker A and B motifs respectively. However, these activities were not significantly impaired by a G239C mutation. Further mutagenesis analyses indicated that Rrp2's Walker A and B motifs are required for borrelial growth; mutations of key residues in these two motifs were lethal to B. burgdorferi. The combined data suggest that the Walker A and Walker B motifs of Rrp2 are involved in the control of another unknown RpoS-independent gene product(s) associated with borrelial replication.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa MifS-MifR Two-Component System Is Specific for α-Ketoglutarate Utilization

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative, metabolically versatile opportunistic pathogen that elaborates a multitude of virulence factors, and is extraordinarily resistant to a gamut of clinically significant antibiotics. This ability, in part, is mediated by two-component regulatory systems (TCS) that play a crucial role in modulating virulence mechanisms and metabolism. MifS (PA5512) and MifR (PA5511) form one such TCS implicated in biofilm formation. MifS is a sensor kinase whereas MifR belongs to the NtrC superfamily of transcriptional regulators that interact with RpoN (σ⁵⁴). In this study we demonstrate that the mifS and mifR genes form a two-gene operon. The close proximity of mifSR operon to poxB (PA5514) encoding a ß-lactamase hinted at the role of MifSR TCS in regulating antibiotic resistance. To better understand this TCS, clean in-frame deletions were made in P. aeruginosa PAO1 creating PAO∆mifS, PAO∆mifR and PAO∆mifSR. The loss of mifSR had no effect on the antibiotic resistance profile. Phenotypic microarray (BioLOG) analyses of PAO∆mifS and PAO∆mifR revealed that these mutants were unable to utilize C₅-dicarboxylate α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), a key tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediate. This finding was confirmed using growth analyses, and the defect can be rescued by mifR or mifSR expressed in trans. These mifSR mutants were able to utilize all the other TCA cycle intermediates (citrate, succinate, fumarate, oxaloacetate or malate) and sugars (glucose or sucrose) except α-KG as the sole carbon source. We confirmed that the mifSR mutants have functional dehydrogenase complex suggesting a possible defect in α-KG transport. The inability of the mutants to utilize α-KG was rescued by expressing PA5530, encoding C₅-dicarboxylate transporter, under a regulatable promoter. In addition, we demonstrate that besides MifSR and PA5530, α-KG utilization requires functional RpoN. These data clearly suggests that P. aeruginosa MifSR TCS is involved in sensing α-KG and regulating its transport and subsequent metabolism.

The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized activators of σ54-dependent transcription

Bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBPs) are transcriptional activators that assemble as hexameric rings in their active forms and utilize ATP hydrolysis to remodel the conformation of RNA polymerase containing the alternative sigma factor σ(54). We present a comprehensive and detailed summary of recent advances in our understanding of how these specialized molecular machines function. The review is structured by introducing each of the three domains in turn: the central catalytic domain, the N-terminal regulatory domain, and the C-terminal DNA binding domain. The role of the central catalytic domain is presented with particular reference to (i) oligomerization, (ii) ATP hydrolysis, and (iii) the key GAFTGA motif that contacts σ(54) for remodeling. Each of these functions forms a potential target of the signal-sensing N-terminal regulatory domain, which can act either positively or negatively to control the activation of σ(54)-dependent transcription. Finally, we focus on the DNA binding function of the C-terminal domain and the enhancer sites to which it binds. Particular attention is paid to the importance of σ(54) to the bacterial cell and its unique role in regulating transcription.

Lipase expression in Pseudomonas alcaligenes is under the control of a two-component regulatory system

Preliminary observations in a large-scale fermentation process suggested that the lipase expression of Pseudomonas alcaligenes can be switched on by the addition of certain medium components, such as soybean oil. In an attempt to elucidate the mechanism of induction of lipase expression, we have set up a search method for genes controlling lipase expression by use of a cosmid library containing fragments of P. alcaligenes genomic DNA. A screen for lipase hyperproduction resulted in the selection of multiple transformants, of which the best-producing strains comprised cosmids that shared an overlapping genomic fragment. Within this fragment, two previously unidentified genes were found and named lipQ and lipR. Their encoded proteins belong to the NtrBC family of regulators that regulate gene expression via binding to a specific upstream activator sequence (UAS). Such an NtrC-like UAS was identified in a previous study in the P. alcaligenes lipase promoter, strongly suggesting that LipR acts as a positive regulator of lipase expression. The regulating role could be confirmed by down-regulated lipase expression in a strain with an inactivated lipR gene and a threefold increase in lipase yield in a large-scale fermentation when expressing the lipQR operon from the multicopy plasmid pLAFR3. Finally, cell extracts of a LipR-overexpressing strain caused a retardation of the lipase promoter fragment in a band shift assay. Our results indicate that lipase expression in Pseudomonas alcaligenes is under the control of the LipQR two-component system.

Look, no hands! Unconventional transcriptional activators in bacteria

Transcriptional activation in bacteria usually involves an activator protein that binds to sites near the target promoter. Some activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme, however, can stimulate transcription even when their DNA-binding domains are removed. Recent studies have revealed examples of sigma(54)-dependent activators that naturally lack DNA-binding domains and seem to activate transcription from solution rather than from specific DNA sites. In addition, some activators that function with other forms of RNA polymerase holoenzyme, including Bacillus subtilis Spx and the bacteriophage N4 single-stranded DNA-binding protein, also stimulate transcription without binding to DNA. Because binding to regulatory sites enables activators to stimulate transcription from specific promoters, alternative strategies for achieving specificity are required for activators that do not bind to DNA.

The structural basis for regulated assembly and function of the transcriptional activator NtrC

In two-component signal transduction, an input triggers phosphorylation of receiver domains that regulate the status of output modules. One such module is the AAA+ ATPase domain in bacterial enhancer-binding proteins that remodel the sigma(54) form of RNA polymerase. We report X-ray solution scattering and electron microscopy structures of the activated, full-length nitrogen-regulatory protein C (NtrC) showing a novel mechanism for regulation of AAA+ ATPase assembly via the juxtaposition of the receiver domains and ATPase ring. Accompanying the hydrolysis cycle that is required for transcriptional activation, we observed major order-disorder changes in the GAFTGA loops involved in sigma(54) binding, as well as in the DNA-binding domains.

Correlated mutations: advances and limitations. A study on fusion proteins and on the Cohesin-Dockerin families

Correlated mutations have been repeatedly exploited for intramolecular contact map prediction. Over the last decade these efforts yielded several methods for measuring correlated mutations. Nevertheless, the application of correlated mutations for the prediction of intermolecular interactions has not yet been explored. This gap is due to several obstacles, such as 3D complexes availability, paralog discrimination, and the availability of sequence pairs that are required for inter- but not intramolecular analyses. Here we selected for analysis fusion protein families that bypass some of these obstacles. We find that several correlated mutation measurements yield reasonable accuracy for intramolecular contact map prediction on the fusion dataset. However, the accuracy level drops sharply in intermolecular contacts prediction. This drop in accuracy does not occur always. In the Cohesin-Dockerin family, reasonable accuracy is achieved in the prediction of both intra- and intermolecular contacts. The Cohesin-Dockerin family is well suited for correlated mutation analysis. Because, however, this family constitutes a special case (it has radical mutations, has domain repeats, within each species each Dockerin domain interacts with each Cohesin domain, see below), the successful prediction in this family does not point to a general potential in using correlated mutations for predicting intermolecular contacts. Overall, the results of our study indicate that current methodologies of correlated mutations analysis are not suitable for large-scale intermolecular contact prediction, and thus cannot assist in docking. With current measurements, sequence availability, sequence annotations, and underdeveloped sequence pairing methods, correlated mutations can yield reasonable accuracy only for a handful of families.

The transmembrane domain provides nucleotide binding specificity to the bacterial conjugation protein TrwB

In order to understand the functional significance of the transmembrane domain of TrwB, an integral membrane protein involved in bacterial conjugation, the protein was purified in the native, and also as a truncated soluble form (TrwBDeltaN70). The intact protein (TrwB) binds preferentially purine over pyrimidine nucleotides, NTPs over NDPs, and ribo- over deoxyribonucleotides. In contrast, TrwBDeltaN70 binds uniformly all tested nucleotides. The transmembrane domain has the general effect of making the nucleotide binding site(s) less accessible, but more selective. This is in contrast to other membrane proteins in which most of the protein mass, including the catalytic domain, is outside the membrane, but whose activity is not modified by the presence or absence of the transmembrane segment.

Novel substitutions in the sigma54-dependent activator DctD that increase dependence on upstream activation sequences or uncouple ATP hydrolysis from transcriptional activation

Sinorhizobium meliloti DctD is an activator of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme and member of the AAA+ superfamily of ATPases. DctD uses energy released from ATP hydrolysis to stimulate the isomerization of a closed promoter complex to an open complex. DctD binds to upstream activation sequences (UAS) and contacts the closed complex through DNA looping to activate transcription, but the UAS is not essential for activation if DctD is expressed at higher than normal levels. Introduction of specific substitutions within or near the conserved ESELFG motif in the C3 region of a truncated, constitutively active form of DctD produced several mutant forms of the protein that had increased dependence on the UAS for activation. Removing the DNA-binding domain from one UAS-dependent mutant and from one activation-deficient mutant significantly increased transcriptional activation, indicating that the DNA-binding domain interfered with the activities of these mutant proteins. A UAS-dependent mutant with a P315L substitution in the C6 region was identified from a genetic screen. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of conserved amino acid residues around Pro-315 produced two additional UAS-dependent mutants as well as several mutants that failed to activate transcription but retained ATPase activity. In contrast to the two mutant proteins with substitutions in the C3 region, removal of the DNA-binding domain from the mutant proteins with substitutions in the C6 region did not stimulate their activity. The residues in the C6 region that were altered are in a probable hinge region between the alpha/beta and alpha-helical subdomains of the AAA+ domain. The alpha-helical subdomain contains the sensor II helix that has been implicated in other AAA+ proteins as sensing changes in the nucleotide during the hydrolysis cycle. Substitutions in the hinge region may have abolished nucleotide sensing by interfering with subdomain interactions, altering the relative orientation of the sensor II helix or interfering with oligomerization of the protein.

Bacterial transcriptional regulators for degradation pathways of aromatic compounds

Human activities have resulted in the release and introduction into the environment of a plethora of aromatic chemicals. The interest in discovering how bacteria are dealing with hazardous environmental pollutants has driven a large research community and has resulted in important biochemical, genetic, and physiological knowledge about the degradation capacities of microorganisms and their application in bioremediation, green chemistry, or production of pharmacy synthons. In addition, regulation of catabolic pathway expression has attracted the interest of numerous different groups, and several catabolic pathway regulators have been exemplary for understanding transcription control mechanisms. More recently, information about regulatory systems has been used to construct whole-cell living bioreporters that are used to measure the quality of the aqueous, soil, and air environment. The topic of biodegradation is relatively coherent, and this review presents a coherent overview of the regulatory systems involved in the transcriptional control of catabolic pathways. This review summarizes the different regulatory systems involved in biodegradation pathways of aromatic compounds linking them to other known protein families. Specific attention has been paid to describing the genetic organization of the regulatory genes, promoters, and target operon(s) and to discussing present knowledge about signaling molecules, DNA binding properties, and operator characteristics, and evidence from regulatory mutants. For each regulator family, this information is combined with recently obtained protein structural information to arrive at a possible mechanism of transcription activation. This demonstrates the diversity of control mechanisms existing in catabolic pathways.

Helicobacter pylori FlgR is an enhancer-independent activator of sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Helicobacter pylori FlgR activates transcription with sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme (sigma54-holoenzyme) from at least five flagellar operons. Activators of sigma54-holoenzyme generally bind enhancer sequences located >70 bp upstream of the promoter and contact sigma54-holoenzyme bound at the promoter through DNA looping to activate transcription. H. pylori FlgR lacks the carboxy-terminal DNA-binding domain present in most sigma54-dependent activators. As little as 42 bp of DNA upstream of the flaB promoter and 26 bp of DNA sequence downstream of the transcriptional start site were sufficient for efficient FlgR-mediated expression from a flaB'-'xylE reporter gene in H. pylori, indicating that FlgR does not use an enhancer to activate transcription. Other examples of sigma54-dependent activators that lack a DNA-binding domain include Chlamydia trachomatis CtcC and activators from the other Chlamydia spp. whose genomes have been sequenced. FlgR from Helicobacter hepaticus and Campylobacter jejuni, which are closely related to H. pylori, appear to have carboxy-terminal DNA-binding domains, suggesting that the loss of the DNA-binding domain from H. pylori FlgR occurred after the divergence of these bacterial species. Removal of the amino-terminal regulatory domain of FlgR resulted in a constitutively active form of the protein that activated transcription from sigma54-dependent genes in Escherichia coli. The truncated FlgR protein also activated transcription with E. coli sigma54-holoenzyme in an in vitro transcription assay.

Molecular modeling of RecX reveals its mode of interaction with RecA

The protein RecA is involved in homologous recombination, DNA repair and also catalyzes DNA strand exchange. RecX gene is downstream of recA and the gene product RecX is supposed to be important for RecA regulation. Recombinant RecX is purified to homogeneity, and circular dichroism (CD) and FTIR spectroscopy show the protein to exist mostly in helical conformation. The fluorescence emission maxima of the native and the denatured protein and the steady-state fluorescence quenching studies with acrylamide indicate the presence of tryptophan residues partially exposed to the bulk solvent. Denaturation studies with urea and guanidine hydrochloride by use of spectroscopic methods, fluorescence, and CD also confirm the instability of the protein and unfolding occurs following a two-state model. Mass spectrometry and gel permeation chromatography suggest the monomeric form of the protein. Molecular modeling of RecX represents the molecule as extended and helical bundle in conformity with the spectroscopic results. To understand the mechanism of RecX in the regulation of RecA the structural model of RecA-RecX has been discussed. In this proposed model, entry of RecX into hexameric RecA filament prevents binding of ssDNA and also inhibits ATPase activity.

Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in the sigma54-dependent activator DctD

Activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme couple ATP hydrolysis to formation of an open promoter complex. DctD(Delta1-142), a truncated and constitutively active form of the sigma(54)-dependent activator DctD from Sinorhizobium meliloti, displayed an altered DNase I footprint at its binding site located upstream of the dctA promoter in the presence of ATP. The altered footprint was not observed for a mutant protein with a substitution at or near the putative arginine finger, a conserved arginine residue thought to contact the nucleotide. These data suggest that structural changes in DctD(Delta1-142) during ATP hydrolysis can be detected by alterations in the DNase I footprint of the protein and may be communicated by interactions between bound nucleotide and the arginine finger. In addition, kinetic data for changes in fluorescence energy transfer upon binding of 2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)-ATP (Mant-ATP) to DctD(Delta1-142) and DctD suggested that these proteins undergo multiple conformational changes following ATP binding.

The response regulator Rrp2 is essential for the expression of major membrane lipoproteins in Borrelia burgdorferi

Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the agent of Lyme disease, exists in nature through a complex enzootic life cycle that involves both ticks and mammals. As Bb transitions between its two diverse niches, profound adaptive changes occur that are reflected in differential patterns of gene expression, particularly involving lipoprotein genes. Using a mutagenesis approach, we show that Rrp2 (gene BB0763), one of the proteins predicted by the Bb genome (www.tigr.org) to be a response regulator of a two-component sensory transduction system, is a pivotal regulator governing the expression of major membrane lipoproteins such as OspC, DbpA, and Mlp8, as well as many other mammalian infection-associated immunogens of Bb. Sequence analysis additionally suggested that Rrp2 is a bacterial enhancer-binding protein, essential for sigma54-dependent gene activation. Mutagenesis of a key amino acid residue within a putative activation domain revealed that Rrp2 controlled lipoprotein expression by governing the expression of the alternative sigma-factor sigmas in a sigma54-dependent manner. We therefore propose a signal transduction pathway involving Rrp2, sigma54, and sigmas, which in concert control the expression of key lipoproteins and other infection-associated immunogens in Bb.

Mutant forms of the Azotobacter vinelandii transcriptional activator NifA resistant to inhibition by the NifL regulatory protein

The Azotobacter vinelandii sigma(54)-dependent transcriptional activator protein NifA is regulated by the NifL protein in response to redox, carbon, and nitrogen status. Under conditions inappropriate for nitrogen fixation, NifL inhibits transcription activation by NifA through the formation of the NifL-NifA protein complex. NifL inhibits the ATPase activity of the central AAA+ domain of NifA required to drive open complex formation by sigma(54)-RNA polymerase and may also inhibit the activator-polymerase interaction. To analyze the mechanism of inhibition in greater detail, we isolated NifA mutants which are resistant to the inhibitory action of NifL. Mutations in both the amino-terminal GAF domain and the catalytic AAA+ domain of NifA were isolated. Several mutants blocked inhibition by NifL in response to both nitrogen and redox status, whereas some of the mutant NifA proteins were apparently able to discriminate between the forms of NifL present under different environmental conditions. One mutant protein, NifA-Y254N, was resistant to NifL under conditions of anaerobic nitrogen excess but was relatively sensitive to NifL under aerobic growth conditions. The properties of the purified mutant protein in vitro were consistent with the in vivo phenotype and indicate that NifA-Y254N is not responsive to the nitrogen signal conveyed by the interaction of NifL with A. vinelandii GlnK but is responsive to the oxidized form of NifL when ADP is present. Our observations suggest that different conformers of NifL may be generated in response to discrete signal transduction events and that both the GAF and AAA+ domains of NifA are involved in the response to NifL.

Lon protease functions as a negative regulator of type III protein secretion in Pseudomonas syringae

The central conserved region of the Pseudomonas syringae hrp pathogenicity island encodes a type III protein secretion system (TTSS) that is required for pathogenicity in plants. Expression of the hrp TTSS is controlled by the alternative sigma factor, HrpL, whose expression, in turn, is positively controlled by two truncated enhancer binding proteins, HrpR and HrpS. Although a number of environmental conditions are known to modulate hrp TTSS expression, such as stringent conditions and pathogenesis, the mechanism by which the activities of these transcriptional factors are modulated had not been established. In this study, HrpR and HrpS were found to be constitutively expressed under conditions in which the hrpL promoter was inactive. To identify a postulated negative regulator of hrpL expression, transposome (Tz) mutagenesis was used to isolate hrp constitutive mutants. P. syringae Pss61 and DC3000 hrp constitutive mutants were identified that carried lon::Tz insertions and exhibited increased cell length and UV sensitivity typical of Delta lon mutants. The P. syringae Lon protease retained structural features of its homologues found in other bacteria and was capable of complementing an Escherichia coli Delta lon mutant. P. syringae lon::Tz mutants exhibited enhanced expression of the hrpL promoter, suggesting an effect on HrpR and/or HrpS. HrpR was observed to be unstable in wild-type P. syringae strains grown in non-inductive media. However, the apparent half-life increased more than 10-fold in the P. syringae lon::Tz mutants or upon transfer to an inductive medium. The P. syringae lon mutants elicited rapidly developing plant responses and were shown to hypersecrete effector proteins, such as AvrPto. These results indicate that expression of the hrp regulon and type III secretion are negatively regulated by Lon-mediated degradation of HrpR.

The central domain of Escherichia coli TyrR is responsible for hexamerization associated with tyrosine-mediated repression of gene expression

TyrR from Escherichia coli regulates the expression of genes for aromatic amino acid uptake and biosynthesis. Its central ATP-hydrolyzing domain is similar to conserved domains of bacterial regulatory proteins that interact with RNA polymerase holoenzyme associated with the alternative sigma factor, sigma(54). It is also related to the common module of the AAA+ superfamily of proteins that is involved in a wide range of cellular activities. We expressed and purified two TyrR central domain polypeptides. The fragment comprising residues 188-467, called TyrR-(188-467), was soluble and stable, in contrast to that corresponding to the conserved core from residues 193 to 433. TyrR-(188-467) bound ATP and rhodamine-ATP with association constants 2- to 5-fold lower than TyrR and hydrolyzed ATP at five times the rate of TyrR. In contrast to TyrR, which is predominantly dimeric at protein concentrations less than 10 microm in the absence of ligands, or in the presence of ATP or tyrosine alone, TyrR-(188-467) is a monomer, even at high protein concentrations. Tyrosine in the presence of ATP or ATPgammaS promotes the oligomerization of TyrR-(188-467) to a hexamer. Tyrosine-dependent repression of gene transcription by TyrR therefore depends on ligand binding and hexamerization determinants located in the central domain polypeptide TyrR-(188-467).

Biochemical, molecular, and genetic analyses of the acetone carboxylases from Xanthobacter autotrophicus strain Py2 and Rhodobacter capsulatus strain B10

Acetone carboxylase is the key enzyme of bacterial acetone metabolism, catalyzing the condensation of acetone and CO(2) to form acetoacetate. In this study, the acetone carboxylase of the purple nonsulfur photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus was purified to homogeneity and compared to that of Xanthobacter autotrophicus strain Py2, the only other organism from which an acetone carboxylase has been purified. The biochemical properties of the enzymes were virtually indistinguishable, with identical subunit compositions (alpha(2)beta(2)gamma(2) multimers of 85-, 78-, and 20-kDa subunits), reaction stoichiometries (CH(3)COCH(3) + CO(2) + ATP-->CH(3)COCH(2)COO(-) + H(+) + AMP + 2P(i)), and kinetic properties (K(m) for acetone, 8 microM; k(cat) = 45 min(-1)). Both enzymes were expressed to high levels (17 to 25% of soluble protein) in cells grown with acetone as the carbon source but were not present at detectable levels in cells grown with other carbon sources. The genes encoding the acetone carboxylase subunits were identified by transposon mutagenesis of X. autotrophicus and sequence analysis of the R. capsulatus genome and were found to be clustered in similar operons consisting of the genes acxA (beta subunit), acxB (alpha subunit), and acxC (gamma subunit). Transposon mutagenesis of X. autotrophicus revealed a requirement of sigma(54) and a sigma(54)-dependent transcriptional activator (AcxR) for acetone-dependent growth and acetone carboxylase gene expression. A potential sigma(54)-dependent promoter 122 bp upstream of X. autotrophicus acxABC was identified. An AcxR gene homolog was identified 127 bp upstream of acxA in R. capsulatus, but this activator lacked key features of sigma(54)-dependent activators, and the associated acxABC lacked an apparent sigma(54)-dependent promoter, suggesting that sigma(54) is not required for expression of acxABC in R. capsulatus. These studies reveal a conserved strategy of ATP-dependent acetone carboxylation and the involvement of transcriptional enhancers in acetone carboxylase gene expression in gram-negative acetone-utilizing bacteria.

The regulatory N-terminal region of the aromatic-responsive transcriptional activator DmpR constrains nucleotide-triggered multimerisation

The transcriptional promoting activity of DmpR is under the strict control of its aromatic effector ligands that are bound by its regulatory N-terminal domain. The positive control function of DmpR resides within the central C-domain that is highly conserved among activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase. The C-domain mediates ATP hydrolysis and interaction with sigma(54)-RNA polymerase that are essential for open-complex formation and thus initiation of transcription. Wild-type and loss-of-function derivatives of DmpR, which are defective in distinct steps in nucleotide catalysis, were used to address the consequences of nucleotide binding and hydrolysis with respect to the multimeric state of DmpR and its ability to promote in vitro transcription. Here, we show that DmpR derivatives deleted of the regulatory N-terminal domain undergo an aromatic-effector independent ATP-binding triggered multimerisation as detected by cross-linking. In the intact protein, however, aromatic effector activation is required before ATP-binding can trigger an apparent dimer-to-hexamer switch in subunit conformation. The data suggest a model in which the N-terminal domain controls the transcriptional promoting property of DmpR by constraining ATP-mediated changes in its oligomeric state. The results are discussed in the light of recent mechanistic insights from the AAA(+) superfamily of ATPases that utilise nucleotide hydrolysis to restructure their substrates.

Enhancer-binding proteins HrpR and HrpS interact to regulate hrp-encoded type III protein secretion in Pseudomonas syringae strains

In Pseudomonas syringae strains, the hrp-hrc pathogenicity island consists of an HrpL-dependent regulon that encodes a type III protein translocation complex and translocated effector proteins required for pathogenesis. HrpR and HrpS function as positive regulatory factors for the hrpL promoter, but their mechanism of action has not been established. Both HrpR and HrpS are structurally related to enhancer-binding proteins, but they lack receiver domains and do not appear to require a cognate protein kinase for activity. hrpR and hrpS were shown to be expressed as an operon: a promoter was identified 5' to hrpR, and reverse transcriptase PCR detected the presence of an hrpRS transcript. The hrpR promoter and coding sequence were conserved among P. syringae strains. The coding sequences for hrpR and hrpS were cloned into compatible expression vectors, and their activities were monitored in Escherichia coli transformants carrying an hrpL'-lacZ fusion. HrpS could function as a weak activator of the hrpL promoter, but the activity was only 2.5% of the activity detected when both HrpR and HrpS were expressed in the reporter strain. This finding is consistent with a requirement for both HrpR and HrpS in the activation of the hrpL promoter. By using a yeast two-hybrid assay, an interaction between HrpR and HrpS was detected, suggestive of the formation of a heteromeric complex. Physical interaction of HrpR and HrpS was confirmed by column-binding experiments. The results show that HrpR and HrpS physically interact to regulate the sigma(54)-dependent hrpL promoter in P. syringae strains.

Transcriptional regulation at a distance in bacteria

Transcriptional enhancers are cis-acting DNA elements that are binding sites for regulatory proteins and function at large distances from promoter elements to stimulate transcription. Once thought to be unique to eukaryotes, enhancer-like elements have been discovered in a wide variety of bacteria. The regulatory proteins that bind to these bacterial enhancers must contact RNA polymerase to activate transcription. In principle, interactions between bacterial enhancer-binding proteins and RNA polymerase can occur by either DNA looping or tracking of the enhancer-binding protein along the DNA. Paradigms for each of these methods are found in bacterial systems. Activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme contact polymerase by DNA looping, while bacteriophage T4 gp45 functions as a sliding clamp that tracks along DNA until it engages RNA polymerase. Significant advances have been made over the last few years towards understanding the mechanisms by which bacterial enhancer-binding proteins activate transcription, but important aspects of these mechanisms are still poorly defined.

Two-component signal transduction

Most prokaryotic signal-transduction systems and a few eukaryotic pathways use phosphotransfer schemes involving two conserved components, a histidine protein kinase and a response regulator protein. The histidine protein kinase, which is regulated by environmental stimuli, autophosphorylates at a histidine residue, creating a high-energy phosphoryl group that is subsequently transferred to an aspartate residue in the response regulator protein. Phosphorylation induces a conformational change in the regulatory domain that results in activation of an associated domain that effects the response. The basic scheme is highly adaptable, and numerous variations have provided optimization within specific signaling systems. The domains of two-component proteins are modular and can be integrated into proteins and pathways in a variety of ways, but the core structures and activities are maintained. Thus detailed analyses of a relatively small number of representative proteins provide a foundation for understanding this large family of signaling proteins.

Mutational analysis of the structure basis for the multimerization function of NifA central domain

InKlebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) NifA central domain, when the conservative amino acid residue Thr-290 in C3 region was replaced by Val, the function of NifA for activating the transcription ofnif genes was lost. Thus the conservative Thr-290 residue seems critical for the activation function of NifA central domain. This point mutant of NifA central domain is used to examine the putative multimerization function of NifA central domain by merodiploid experiment. The results showed that the NifA central domain bore the multimerization determinants of NifA protein. A series of truncated mutants of NifA were constructed to determine the structural elements at the central domain critical for multimerization. It demonstrates that amino acid residues 252-453 are involved in the multimerization function of NifA central domain.

Phosphorylation-induced signal propagation in the response regulator ntrC

The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC is a well-studied response regulator in a two-component regulatory system. The amino (N)-terminal receiver domain of NtrC modulates the function of its adjacent output domain, which activates transcription by the sigma(54) holoenzyme. When a specific aspartate residue in the receiver domain of NtrC is phosphorylated, the dimeric protein forms an oligomer that is capable of ATP hydrolysis and transcriptional activation. A chemical protein cleavage method was used to investigate signal propagation from the phosphorylated receiver domain of NtrC, which acts positively, to its central output domain. The iron chelate reagent Fe-BABE was conjugated onto unique cysteines introduced into the N-terminal domain of NtrC, and the conjugated proteins were subjected to Fe-dependent cleavage with or without prior phosphorylation. Phosphorylation-dependent cleavage, which requires proximity and an appropriate orientation of the peptide backbone to the tethered Fe-EDTA, was particularly prominent with conjugated NtrC(D86C), in which the unique cysteine lies near the top of alpha-helix 4. Cleavage occurred outside the receiver domain itself and on the partner subunit of the derivatized monomer in an NtrC dimer. The results are commensurate with the hypothesis that alpha-helix 4 of the phosphorylated receiver domain of NtrC interacts with the beginning of the central domain for signal propagation. They imply that the phosphorylation-dependent interdomain and intermolecular interactions between the receiver domain of one subunit and the output domain of its partner subunit in an NtrC dimer precede-and may give rise to-the oligomerization needed for transcriptional activation.

Reciprocal domain evolution within a transactivator in a restricted sequence space

offhough the concept of domain merging and shuffling as a major force in protein evolution is well established, it has been difficult to demonstrate how domains coadapt. Here we show evidence of coevolution of the Sinorhizobium meliloti NifA (SmNifA) domains. We found that, because of the lack of a conserved glycine in its DNA-binding domain, this transactivator protein interacts weakly with the enhancers. This defect, however, was compensated by evolving a highly efficient activation domain that, contrasting to Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA (BjNifA), can activate in trans. To explore paths that lead to this enhanced activity, we mutagenized BjNifA. After three cycles of mutagenesis and selection, a highly active derivative was obtained. Strikingly, all mutations changed to amino acids already present in SmNifA. Our artificial process thus recreated the natural evolution followed by this protein and suggests that NifA is trapped in a restricted sequence space with very limited solutions for higher activity by point mutation.

Reciprocal domain evolution within a transactivator in a restricted sequence space

offhough the concept of domain merging and shuffling as a major force in protein evolution is well established, it has been difficult to demonstrate how domains coadapt. Here we show evidence of coevolution of the Sinorhizobium meliloti NifA (SmNifA) domains. We found that, because of the lack of a conserved glycine in its DNA-binding domain, this transactivator protein interacts weakly with the enhancers. This defect, however, was compensated by evolving a highly efficient activation domain that, contrasting to Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA (BjNifA), can activate in trans. To explore paths that lead to this enhanced activity, we mutagenized BjNifA. After three cycles of mutagenesis and selection, a highly active derivative was obtained. Strikingly, all mutations changed to amino acids already present in SmNifA. Our artificial process thus recreated the natural evolution followed by this protein and suggests that NifA is trapped in a restricted sequence space with very limited solutions for higher activity by point mutation.

Isolation and characterization of mutated FhlA proteins which activate transcription of the hyc operon (formate hydrogenlyase) of Escherichia coli in the absence of molybdate(1)

Escherichia coli growing under anaerobic conditions produces H(2) and CO(2) by the enzymatic cleavage of formate catalyzed by formate hydrogenlyase (FHL) consisting of a molybdoenzyme formate dehydrogenase H (fdhF), hydrogenase 3 (hyc), and intermediate electron carriers (hyc). Transcription of both the fdhF and hyc operons requires the activator, FhlA protein, as well as formate and molybdate. Several fhlA mutants with an altered response to the required effector molybdate were isolated and these FhlA mutated proteins activated hyc transcription in the absence of molybdate, but only in the presence of formate. Mutated protein FhlA126 carries a single mutation (R495C) in the conserved central domain of the modular, sigma(54)-dependent, enhancer-binding protein. FhlA57 contains two mutations; one in the unique N-terminal domain (E205K) and a second in the central domain (P442S). Both mutations in FhlA132 are located in the N-terminal domain (A42T and E363K). Both FhlA126 and FhlA132 proteins activated the hyc operon even in the absence of ModE and MoeA, two components of Mo-metabolism which are required for hyc-lac expression in wild-type E. coli. Based on these results, a model is proposed in which the native FhlA protein interacts with a unique form of Mo (MoeA product?) as a second effector for optimum expression of the hyc operon in E. coli.

Beryllofluoride mimics phosphorylation of NtrC and other bacterial response regulators

Two-component systems, sensor kinase-response regulator pairs, dominate bacterial signal transduction. Regulation is exerted by phosphorylation of an Asp in receiver domains of response regulators. Lability of the acyl phosphate linkage has limited structure determination for the active, phosphorylated forms of receiver domains. As assessed by both functional and structural criteria, beryllofluoride yields an excellent analogue of aspartyl phosphate in response regulator NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein. Beryllofluoride also appears to activate the chemotaxis, sporulation, osmosensing, and nitrate/nitrite response regulators CheY, Spo0F, OmpR, and NarL, respectively. NMR spectroscopic studies indicate that beryllofluoride will facilitate both biochemical and structural characterization of the active forms of receiver domains.

Suppression analysis of positive control mutants of NifA reveals two overlapping promoters for Klebsiella pneumoniae rpoN

Activation of gene expression relies on direct molecular interactions between the RNA polymerase and transcription factors. Eubacterial enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs) activate transcription by binding to distant sites and, simultaneously, contacting the sigma(54)-holoenzyme form of the RNA polymerase (Esigma(54)). The interaction between the EBP and Esigma(54) is transient, such that it has been difficult to be studied biochemically. Therefore, the details of this molecular recognition event are not known. Genetic and physical evidences suggest that the highly conserved C3 region in the activation domain of the EBP has major determinants for positive control and for the interaction with Esigma(54). To further investigate the target of this region we searched for extragenic suppressors of some C3 region mutant derivatives of NifA. As a first step we mutagenized Klebsiella pneumoniae rpoN, the gene that codes for sigma(54). A mutant allele, rpoN1320, that suppressed two different NifA derivatives was obtained. Immunodetection of sigma(54) and transcriptional initiation studies demonstrated that the cause of the suppression was an enhanced expression of rpoN. A single point mutation was responsible for the phenotype. It mapped at the -10 region of an unidentified promoter, here denominated rpoNp1, and increased its similarity to the consensus. A second upstream promoter, denominated rpoNp2, was also identified. Its -10 region partially overlaps with the -35 region of rpoNp1. Interestingly, the promoter-up -10 mutation in rpoNp1 caused a reduction in the expression from rpoNp2, likely reflecting a stronger occupancy of the former promoter by the RNA polymerase at the expense of the latter. The presence of two overlapping promoters competing for the RNA polymerase implies a complex regulatory pattern that needs elucidation. The fact that increasing the concentration of sigma(54) in the cell can suppress positive control mutants of NifA adds further evidence for their direct interaction in the activation process.

"Switch I" mutant forms of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC that perturb the response to DNA

NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C) is a bacterial enhancer-binding protein of 469 residues that activates transcription by sigma(54)-holoenzyme. A region of its transcriptional activation (central) domain that is highly conserved among homologous activators of sigma(54)-holoenzyme-residues 206-220-is essential for interaction with this RNA polymerase: it is required for contact with the polymerase and/or for coupling the energy from ATP hydrolysis to a change in the conformation of the polymerase that allows it to form transcriptionally productive open complexes. Several mutant NtrC proteins with amino acid substitutions in this region, including NtrC(A216V) and NtrC(G219K), have normal ATPase activity but fail in transcriptional activation. We now report that other mutant forms carrying amino acid substitutions at these same positions, NtrC(A216C) and NtrC(G219C), are capable of activating transcription when they are not bound to a DNA template (non-DNA-binding derivatives with an altered helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif at the C terminus of the protein) but are unable to do so when they are bound to a DNA template, whether or not it carries a specific enhancer. Enhancer DNA remains a positive allosteric effector of ATP hydrolysis, as it is for wild-type NtrC but, surprisingly, appears to have become a negative allosteric effector for some aspect of interaction with sigma(54)-holoenzyme. The conserved region in which these amino acid substitutions occur (206-220) is equivalent to the Switch I region of a large group of purine nucleotide-binding proteins. Interesting analogies can be drawn between the Switch I region of NtrC and that of p21(ras).

Novel effector control through modulation of a preexisting binding site of the aromatic-responsive sigma(54)-dependent regulator DmpR

The Pseudomonas derived sigma(54)-dependent DmpR activator regulates transcription of the (methyl)phenol catabolic dmp-operon. DmpR is constitutively expressed, but its transcriptional promoting activity is positively controlled in direct response to the presence of multiple aromatic effectors. Previous work has led to a model in which effector binding by the amino-terminal region of the protein relieves repression of an intrinsic ATPase activity essential for its transcriptional promoting property. Here, we address whether the observed differences in the potencies of the multiple effectors (i) reside at the level of different aromatic binding sites, or (ii) are mediated through differential binding affinities; furthermore, we address whether binding of distinct aromatic effectors has different functional consequences for DmpR activity. These questions were addressed by comparing wild type and an effector specificity mutant of DmpR with respect to effector binding characteristics and the ability of aromatics to elicit ATPase activity and transcription. The results demonstrate that six test aromatics all share a common binding site on DmpR and that binding affinities determine the concentration at which DmpR responds to the presence of the effector, but not the magnitude of the responses. Interestingly, this analysis reveals that the novel abilities of the effector specificity mutant are not primarily due to acquisition of new binding abilities, but rather, they reside in being able to productively couple ATPase activity to transcriptional activation. The mechanistic implications of these findings in terms of aromatic control of DmpR activity are discussed.

Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of NtrC with three alanine substitutions

The structure of the 20 kDa C-terminal DNA-binding domain of NtrC from Salmonella typhimurium (residues Asp380-Glu469) with alanine replacing Arg456, Asn457, and Arg461, was determined by NMR spectroscopy. NtrC is a homodimeric enhancer-binding protein that activates the transcription of genes whose products are required for nitrogen metabolism. The 91-residue C-terminal domain contains the determinants necessary for dimerization and DNA-binding of the full length protein. The mutant protein does not bind to DNA but retains many characteristics of the wild-type protein, and the mutant domain expresses at high yield (20 mg/l) in minimal medium. Three-dimensional (1)H/(13)C/(15)N triple-resonance, (1)H-(13)C-(13)C-(1)H correlation and (15)N-separated nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectroscopy experiments were used to make backbone and side-chain (1)H,(15)N, and (13)C assignments. The structures were calculated using a total of 1580 intra and inter-monomer distance and hydrogen bond restraints (88 hydrogen bonds; 44 hydrogen bond restraints), and 88 phi dihedral restraints for residues Asp400 through Glu469 in both monomers. A total of 54 ambiguous restraints (intra or inter-monomer) involving residues close to the 2-fold symmetry axis were also included. Each monomer consists of four helical segments. Helices A (Trp402-Leu414) and B (Leu421-His440) join with those of another monomer to form an antiparallel four-helix bundle. Helices C (Gln446-Leu451) and D (Ala456-Met468) of each monomer adopt a classic helix-turn-helix DNA-binding fold at either end of the protein. The backbone rms deviation for the 28 best of 40 starting structures is 0.6 (+/-0.2) A. Structural differences between the C-terminal domain of NtrC and the homologous Factor for Inversion Stimulation are discussed.

Mutations affecting motifs of unknown function in the central domain of nitrogen regulatory protein C

The positive control function of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC resides in its central domain, which is highly conserved among activators of sigma54 holoenzyme. Previous studies of a small set of mutant forms specifically defective in transcriptional activation, called NtrC repressor [NtrC(Rep)] proteins, had enabled us to locate various functional determinants in the central domain. In this more comprehensive survey, the DNA encoding a major portion of the central domain was randomly mutagenized and mutated ntrC genes were introduced into the cell via multicopy expression plasmids. DNA sequencing of 95 isolates identified by a preliminary phenotypic screen revealed that the lesions in them caused 55 distinct single amino acid substitutions at 44 different positions. Assays of glnA transcription in vivo and in vitro yielded two conclusions. First, of the 41 mutant proteins that could be purified, 17 (1 known, 16 new) showed no detectable activity in either assay, thus qualifying them as true NtrC(Rep) proteins. These contained residue changes in six of the seven highly conserved regions in the central domain, including two never studied before. Second, some mutant proteins were inactive in vivo but were either marginally or fully active in vitro. Their surprising lack of activity in vivo may be accounted for by high levels of expression, which apparently decreased activation by these mutant proteins but not by wild-type NtrC (NtrCWT). Of particular interest were a subset of these proteins that exhibited greater transcriptional activation than NtrCWT at low concentrations. Their elevated activation capacities remain to be explained.

areABC genes determine the catabolism of aryl esters in Acinetobacter sp. Strain ADP1

Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1 is able to grow on a range of esters of aromatic alcohols, converting them to the corresponding aromatic carboxylic acids by the sequential action of three inducible enzymes: an areA-encoded esterase, an areB-encoded benzyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and an areC-encoded benzaldehyde dehydrogenase. The are genes, adjacent to each other on the chromosome and transcribed in the order areCBA, were located 3.5 kbp upstream of benK. benK, encoding a permease implicated in benzoate uptake, is at one end of the ben-cat supraoperonic cluster for benzoate catabolism by the beta-ketoadipate pathway. Two open reading frames which may encode a transcriptional regulator, areR, and a porin, benP, separate benK from areC. Each are gene was individually expressed to high specific activity in Escherichia coli. The relative activities against different substrates of the cloned enzymes were, within experimental error, identical to that of wild-type Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1 grown on either benzyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, or 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol as the carbon source. The substrate preferences of all three enzymes were broad, encompassing a range of substituted aromatic compounds and in the case of the AreA esterase, different carboxylic acids. The areA, areB, and areC genes were individually disrupted on the chromosome by insertion of a kanamycin resistance cassette, and the rates at which the resultant strains utilized substrates of the aryl ester catabolic pathway were severely reduced as determined by growth competitions between the mutant and wild-type strains.

MgATP binding and hydrolysis determinants of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein

When phosphorylated, the dimeric form of nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC) of Salmonella typhimurium forms a larger oligomer(s) that can hydrolyze ATP and hence activate transcription by the sigma(54)-holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase. Studies of Mg-nucleoside triphosphate binding using a filter-binding assay indicated that phosphorylation is not required for nucleotide binding but probably controls nucleotide hydrolysis per se. Studies of binding by isothermal titration calorimetry indicated that the apparent K(d) of unphosphorylated NtrC for MgATPgammaS is 100 microM at 25 degrees C, and studies by filter binding indicated that the concentration of MgATP required for half-maximal binding is 130 microM at 37 degrees C. Filter-binding studies with mutant forms of NtrC defective in ATP hydrolysis implicated two regions of its central domain directly in nucleotide binding and three additional regions in hydrolysis. All five are highly conserved among activators of sigma(54)-holoenzyme. Regions implicated in binding are the Walker A motif and the region around residues G355 to R358, which may interact with the nucleotide base. Regions implicated in nucleotide hydrolysis are residues S207 and E208, which have been proposed to lie in a region analogous to the switch I effector region of p21(ras) and other purine nucleotide-binding proteins; residue R294, which may be a catalytic residue; and residue D239, which is the conserved aspartate in the putative Walker B motif. D239 appears to play a role in binding the divalent cation essential for nucleotide hydrolysis. Electron paramagnetic resonance analysis of Mn(2+) binding indicated that the central domain of NtrC does not bind divalent cation strongly in the absence of nucleotide.

Physical evidence for a phosphorylation-dependent conformational change in the enhancer-binding protein NtrC

The bacterial enhancer-binding protein nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC) activates transcription by sigma54-containing RNA polymerase in a reaction that depends on ATP hydrolysis. Phosphorylation of an aspartate residue in the N-terminal receiver domain of NtrC induces oligomerization of the protein and activates the ATPase activity, which is a function of its central output domain. To study the role of the receiver domain of NtrC, which is known to act positively, we isolated mutant forms of the protein carrying single cysteine residues and derivatized them with a sulfhydryl-specific nitroxide reagent for electron paramagnetic resonance studies. Single cysteines were placed at four positions at which we had obtained constitutive amino acid substitutions, those that yield activity without phosphorylation. In only one case, derivatized C86 in alpha-helix 4 of the receiver domain, did the motion of the side chain become dramatically slower upon phosphorylation. Importantly, derivatized NtrCD86C (NtrCD86C*) activated transcription normally. Additional experiments indicated that the spectral change observed upon phosphorylation of NtrCD86C* was due to interdomain interactions rather than a conformational change within the N-terminal domain itself. These interactions did not appear to occur within a monomer. Although it is not clear whether the spectral change seen upon phosphorylation of NtrCD86C* is due to an interaction that occurs within a dimer of NtrC or requires the formation of higher-order oligomers, the change indicated that alpha-helix 4 of the receiver domain probably plays an important role in communication with the remainder of the protein.

Properties of a mutant form of the prokaryotic enhancer binding protein, NTRC, which hydrolyses ATP in the absence of effectors

The mutation S170A in the proposed nucleotide binding site of the transcriptional activator protein NTRC abolishes its ability to catalyse open promoter complex formation by the sigma(N)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme. NTRC(S170A) has significant ATPase activity, which, in contrast to the wild-type protein, is unaffected by phosphorylation or binding to enhancer sites on DNA. The mutant protein appears to oligomerise normally on DNA in response to phosphorylation but the ATPase activity is apparently not responsive to changes in oligomerisation state. The defect in transcriptional activation is discussed in relation to mutations in other sigma(N)-dependent activators.

Association states of the transcription activator protein NtrC from E. coli determined by analytical ultracentrifugation

The transcription activator protein NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C) can catalyze the transition of E. coli RNA polymerase complexed with the sigma54 factor (RNAP.sigma54) from the closed complex (RNAP.sigma54 bound at the promoter) to the open complex (melting of the promoter DNA). This process involves phosphorylation of NtrC, assembly of a multimeric NtrC complex at the enhancer DNA sequence, interaction of this complex with promoter bound RNAP. sigma54 via DNA looping, and hydrolysis of ATP. We have used analytical ultracentrifugation to study the different NtrC association states and to derive hydrodynamic models for the conformation of the various NtrC species. The following results were obtained. (i) The unphosphorylated wild-type protein formed a dimer with a measured molecular weight of 102(+/-3) kDa, which compares to a calculated molecular weight of 54 kDa for a monomer (concentration range studied 2 to 8 microM NtrC monomer). (ii) In the unphosphorylated state one NtrC dimer was bound to one binding site as determined with DNA oligonucleotide duplexes containing one or two binding sites (concentration range studied 50 to 1000 nM NtrC dimer). (iii) The data obtained at protein concentrations that were below the concentration of binding sites indicate that binding to the DNA duplex with two binding sites occurred with essentially no cooperativity. The experiments were conducted in the absence of ATP. (iv) The phosphorylated protein formed a specific complex at the DNA duplex with the enhancer sequence (two NtrC binding sites) that consisted of four dimers (concentration range studied 100 to 1000 nM NtrC dimer). (v) The formation of this octameric complex was highly cooperative, and the data suggest that two DNA strands could bind simultaneously to this complex. (vi) From the sedimentation data a model was derived in which the NtrC dimer adopts a V shaped structure with the DNA binding domains being located at the bottom and the two receiver domains at the top of the V. In this conformation higher order NtrC complexes can be stabilized by interaction between the phosphorylated receiver domain and the central activation domain of different NtrC dimers.

In vivo studies on the positive control function of NifA: a conserved hydrophobic amino acid patch at the central domain involved in transcriptional activation

The eubacterial enhancer-binding proteins activate transcription by binding to distant sites and, simultaneously, contacting the RNA polymerase r54 promoter complex (Esigma54). The positive control function is located at the central domain of these proteins, but it is not know which specific region has the determinants for the interaction with Esigma54. Here, we present genetic evidence that a small region of hydrophobic amino acids, previously denominated C3, at the central domain of Bradyrhizobium japonicum NifA is involved in positive control. We obtained 26 missense mutants along this conserved region. Among these, only strains expressing the NifA(F307-->Y) and NifA(A310-->S) mutant proteins retained some of the transcriptional activity (<20%), whereas those carrying NifA(E298-->D) and NifA(T308-->S) had very low but detectable activity (< 1.0%). The rest of the NifA mutants did not induce any measurable transcriptional activity. When expressed in the presence of wild-type NifA, the great majority of the mutants displayed a dominant phenotype, suggesting that their oligomerization determinants were not altered. In vivo dimethyl-sulphate footprinting experiments for a subset of the NifA mutants showed that they were still able to bind specifically to DNA. Analysis of intragenic supressors highlight the functional role of a hydroxyl group at position 308 to activate transcription.

A proposed architecture for lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT): identification of the catalytic triad and molecular modeling

The enzyme cholesterol lecithin acyl transferase (LCAT) shares the Ser/Asp-Glu/His triad with lipases, esterases and proteases, but the low level of sequence homology between LCAT and these enzymes did not allow for the LCAT fold to be identified yet. We, therefore, relied upon structural homology calculations using threading methods based on alignment of the sequence against a library of solved three-dimensional protein structures, for prediction of the LCAT fold. We propose that LCAT, like lipases, belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase fold family, and that the central domain of LCAT consists of seven conserved parallel beta-strands connected by four alpha-helices and separated by loops. We used the conserved features of this protein fold for the prediction of functional domains in LCAT, and carried out site-directed mutagenesis for the localization of the active site residues. The wild-type enzyme and mutants were expressed in Cos-1 cells. LCAT mass was measured by ELISA, and enzymatic activity was measured on recombinant HDL, on LDL and on a monomeric substrate. We identified D345 and H377 as the catalytic residues of LCAT, together with F103 and L182 as the oxyanion hole residues. In analogy with lipases, we further propose that a potential "lid" domain at residues 50-74 of LCAT might be involved in the enzyme-substrate interaction. Molecular modeling of human LCAT was carried out using human pancreatic and Candida antarctica lipases as templates. The three-dimensional model proposed here is compatible with the position of natural mutants for either LCAT deficiency or Fish-eye disease. It enables moreover prediction of the LCAT domains involved in the interaction with the phospholipid and cholesterol substrates.

GLASS: a tool to visualize protein structure prediction data in three dimensions and evaluate their consistency

When a protein sequence does not share any significant sequence similarity with a protein of known structure, homology modeling cannot be applied. However, many novel and interesting methods, such as secondary structure prediction, fold recognition, and prediction of long-range interactions, are being developed and have been shown to be reasonably successful in predicting protein structures from sequence data and evolutionary information. The a priori evaluation of the correctness of a prediction obtained by one of these methods is however often problematic. Consequently, it is important to use all available information provided by as many different methods as possible and all the available experimental data about the protein of interest, since the consistency of the results is indicative of the reliability of the prediction. Hence the need has arisen for suitable tools able to compare results provided by different methods and evaluate their consistency. We have therefore constructed GLASS, a general platform to read, visualize, compare, and evaluate prediction results from many different sources and to project these prediction results into three dimensions. In addition, GLASS allows the comparison of selected parameters calculated for a model with the distribution observed in real protein structures, thus providing an easy way to test new methods for evaluating the likelihood of different structural models. GLASS can be considered as a "workbench" for structural predictions useful to both experimentalists and theoreticians.