A multicenter clinical trial on the use of alpha1-antichymotrypsin-prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers

Background: Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed.

Methods: Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites—testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian—were critically reviewed.

Results: For testicular cancer, α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring. α-Fetoprotein is also recommended for differential diagnosis of nonseminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not recommended for prostate cancer screening, but may be used for detecting disease recurrence and monitoring therapy. Free PSA measurement data are useful for distinguishing malignant from benign prostatic disease when total PSA is <10 μg/L. In colorectal cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen is recommended (with some caveats) for prognosis determination, postoperative surveillance, and therapy monitoring in advanced disease. Fecal occult blood testing may be used for screening asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. For breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors are mandatory for predicting response to hormone therapy, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 measurement is mandatory for predicting response to trastuzumab, and urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 may be used for determining prognosis in lymph node–negative patients. CA15-3/BR27–29 or carcinoembryonic antigen may be used for therapy monitoring in advanced disease. CA125 is recommended (with transvaginal ultrasound) for early detection of ovarian cancer in women at high risk for this disease. CA125 is also recommended for differential diagnosis of suspicious pelvic masses in postmenopausal women, as well as for detection of recurrence, monitoring of therapy, and determination of prognosis in women with ovarian cancer.

Conclusions: Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers.

PSA and other tissue kallikreins for prostate cancer detection

Prostate cancer is the most common neoplasia of middle-aged men. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the first FDA-approved tumour marker for early detection of cancer and it is now in widespread clinical use. The discovery of different PSA molecular forms in serum (free PSA, PSA complexed with various protease inhibitors) in the early 1990s renewed clinical research to enhance the specificity of PSA. Also, the use of a homologous prostate-localised antigen, human glandular kallikrein 2 (KLK2) may further reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies. More recently, promising data is emerging regarding molecular forms of free PSA (proPSA, BPSA, 'intact' PSA) and other members of the expanded human kallikrein family. These new findings may add substantial clinical information for early detection of prostate cancer.

Age-associated increase of prostate-specific antigen in a high level of men visiting urological clinics

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the distribution of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as a function of age in men with no evidence of prostate cancer who visited urological clinics.

METHODS

Simultaneous measurements of total PSA and PSA-alpha-1-antichymotrypsin (PSA-ACT) were performed on patients who presented at urological clinics in Japan. After excluding 490 patients because of follow-up biopsy findings indicating prostate cancer, patients' history of prostatic surgery and medication affecting the serum PSA level, 1520 patients with PSA levels of less than 20.0 ng/mL were available for the study.

RESULTS

Medians (95th percentile) of the total PSA levels were 0.9 (4.7), 1.2 (5.6), 1.7 (11.0), 2.1 (9.8) and 2.8 (11.0) ng/mL in men in their 40s (n = 37), 50s (n = 211), 60s (n = 488), 70s (n = 609) and 80s (n = 175), respectively, whereas those of PSA-ACT were 0.5 (2.9), 0.7 (3.7), 1.1 (7.4), 1.2 (5.9) and 1.6 (6.4) ng/mL, respectively. Both total PSA and PSA-ACT increase with aging, although comparison between the 10-year age groups showed a significant difference in the two molecular forms only between men in their 50s and 60s.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSA ranges of men who visited urological clinics were higher than those of men participating in prostate cancer screening programs reported in other published studies. An age-associated increase in PSA similar to screening populations was also observed in urological outpatients. The results of the present study indicate that age-adjusted PSA cut-off levels can be used in outpatient settings, although the PSA reference value derived from the screening population should be carefully applied to symptomatic men of clinical practices.

Are multiple markers the future of prostate cancer diagnostics?

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the most successful and widely employed cancer serum marker in use today. There is growing evidence that the introduction of wide PSA screening and earlier detection can result in decreased cancer mortality associated with a decline in metastatic disease. PSA circulates in a number of distinct forms. Measurement of these in addition to total PSA significantly increases diagnostic utility. Diagnostic utility is likely to be further increased by adding kallikreins, cytokines, growth factors, receptors and cellular adhesion factors to the biomarker panel. The need for multiple markers reflects the multidimensional nature of prostate disease which ranges from metastatic cancer to indolent cancer to benign hyperplasia and inflammation, all of which require distinct treatments and medical interventions.

Comparative evaluation of various prostate specific antigen ratios for the early detection of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of various ratios using total prostate specific antigen (PSA), complexed PSA (cPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) in the early detection of prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 535 consecutive patients evaluated at a prostate cancer detection clinic between January 1998 and October 1999. Patients had blood samples drawn before transrectal ultrasonography and prostate biopsy to measure PSA, cPSA and fPSA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (sensitivity vs 1 - specificity) were used to evaluate the performance of PSA, cPSA, f/tPSA, cPSA/tPSA, fPSA/cPSA, tPSA/prostate volume (PV), fPSA/PV, and cPSA/PV. The areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for each ratio. The performance of each ratio over all patients or in those with a tPSA of 4-6 or 4-10 ng/mL were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 535 patients, 204 (38%) had biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. The AUC obtained with tPSA alone was 0.64; when measured for all patients the cPSA/PV (0.78), PSA/PV (0.77), f/tPSA (0.76) and fPSA/cPSA (0.75) performed better than tPSA alone. Furthermore, in patients with a tPSA of 4-10 ng/mL, tPSA/PV (0.72), cPSA/PV (0.71), f/tPSA (0.69), fPSA/cPSA (0.69) and cPSA/tPSA (0.62) performed better than tPSA alone (0.52). Finally, in patients with a tPSA of 4-6 ng/mL, PSA/PV and cPSA/PV performed better than the other ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PSA ratios gives a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting prostate cancer than the use of tPSA alone.

The role of molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA or hK3) and of human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) in the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer and in extra-prostatic disease

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA or hK3) is a glandular kallikrein with abundant expression in the prostate that is widely used to detect and monitor prostate cancer (PCa), although the serum level is frequently elevated also in benign and inflammatory prostatic diseases. PSA testing is useful for early detection of localized PCa and for the detection of disease recurrence after treatment. However, PSA has failed to accurately estimate cancer volume and preoperative staging. There is no PSA level in serum that definitively distinguishes men with benign conditions from those with prostate cancer, although PCa is rare in men with PSA levels in serum < 2.0 ng/ml. This prompted searches for enhancing parameters to combine with PSA testing, such as PSA density, PSA velocity, and age-specific reference ranges. Due to the protease structure, PSA occurs in different molecular forms in serum and their concentrations vary according to the type of prostatic disease. Human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) is very similar to PSA, but expressed at higher levels in prostate adenocarcinoma than in normal prostate epithelium. Blood testing for hK2 combined with different PSA forms improves discrimination of men with benign prostatic disease from those with prostate cancer. Many data have also been reported on the extra-prostatic expression of both PSA and hK2, and it is now believed that they may both have functions in tissues outside the prostate.