Imaging the effects of castration on bone turnover and hormone-independent prostate cancer colonization of bone

Niraparib Shows Superior Tissue Distribution and Efficacy in a Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Model Compared to Other PARP Inhibitors

Prostate cancer patients whose tumors bear deleterious mutations in DNA-repair pathways often respond to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Studies were conducted to compare the activity of several PARP inhibitors in vitro, and their tissue exposure and in vivo efficacy in mice bearing PC-3M-luc-C6 prostate tumors grown subcutaneously (SC) or in bone. Niraparib, olaparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib were compared in proliferation assays, using several prostate tumor cell lines, and in a cell-free PARP trapping assay. PC-3M-luc-C6 cells were ~12-20-fold more sensitive to PARP inhibition than other prostate tumor lines, suggesting these cells bear a DNA damage repair defect. The tissue exposure and efficacy of these PARP inhibitors were evaluated in vivo in PC-3M-luc-C6 SC and bone metastasis tumor models. A steady-state pharmacokinetic study in PC-3M-luc-C6 tumor-bearing mice demonstrated that all of the PARP inhibitors had favorable SC tumor exposure, but niraparib was differentiated by superior bone marrow exposure compared with the other drugs. In a PC-3M-luc-C6 SC tumor efficacy study, niraparib, olaparib, and talazoparib inhibited tumor growth and increased survival to a similar degree. In contrast, in the PC-3M-luc-C6 bone metastasis model, niraparib showed the most potent inhibition of bone tumor growth compared to the other therapies (67% vs 40-45% on Day 17), and the best survival improvement over vehicle control (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28 vs HR 0.46-0.59) and over other therapies (HR 1.68-2.16). These results demonstrate that niraparib has superior bone marrow exposure and greater inhibition of tumor growth in bone, compared with olaparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib.

Evaluation of the frequency of putative prostate cancer stem cells in primary and metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumour cells with a stem cell-like phenotype have recently been identified in prostate tumors and it has been suggested that this population may be responsible for the diversity of cell types within tumors and also for the initiation of metastases. These cells carry a number of defined markers: they are cd133 and cd44+ve and express high levels of alpha2beta1 integrin. In this study we have, for the first time, assessed matched primary and bone marrow biopsies from prostate cancer patients for the distribution of cells carrying these and a number of other putative stem cell markers.

METHODS

Eleven matched (primary and bone metastasis) specimens from prostate cancer patients were assessed for the presence of cd133, cd44, alpha2beta1 integrin, CXCR4, c-met, alpha6 integrin, and nestin using immunohistochemistry and stain intensity and distribution scored.

RESULTS

In the bone metastases, tumor cells staining positively for cd133 were detected at low frequency in approximately 50% of samples. Staining for nestin was confined to endothelium. Positive staining of tumor cells for the other antigens was present at variable frequency in >70% of metastases with the exception of CXCR4 which was absent from all but 2 specimens. Where positive staining of tumor cells was present in the metastasis, cells staining for each antigen were present in the matched primary with the exception of cd44 which was absent in all but 2/11 matched primary tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

In established metastases no single or combination of marker expression profiles identify the established metastatic phenotype, although cd44 expression was shown to be more frequent in metastases that in primary cancers.

Pre-clinical whole-body fluorescence imaging: Review of instruments, methods and applications

Fluorescence sampling of cellular function is widely used in all aspects of biology, allowing the visualization of cellular and sub-cellular biological processes with spatial resolutions in the range from nanometers up to centimeters. Imaging of fluorescence in vivo has become the most commonly used radiological tool in all pre-clinical work. In the last decade, full-body pre-clinical imaging systems have emerged with a wide range of utilities and niche application areas. The range of fluorescent probes that can be excited in the visible to near-infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum continues to expand, with the most value for in vivo use being beyond the 630 nm wavelength, because the absorption of light sharply decreases. Whole-body in vivo fluorescence imaging has not yet reached a state of maturity that allows its routine use in the scope of large-scale pre-clinical studies. This is in part due to an incomplete understanding of what the actual fundamental capabilities and limitations of this imaging modality are. However, progress is continuously being made in research laboratories pushing the limits of the approach to consistently improve its performance in terms of spatial resolution, sensitivity and quantification. This paper reviews this imaging technology with a particular emphasis on its potential uses and limitations, the required instrumentation, and the possible imaging geometries and applications. A detailed account of the main commercially available systems is provided as well as some perspective relating to the future of the technology development. Although the vast majority of applications of in vivo small animal imaging are based on epi-illumination planar imaging, the future success of the method relies heavily on the design of novel imaging systems based on state-of-the-art optical technology used in conjunction with high spatial resolution structural modalities such as MRI, CT or ultrasound.

A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays

The study of angiogenesis has grown exponentially over the past 40 years with the recognition that angiogenesis is essential for numerous pathologies and, more recently, with the advent of successful drugs to inhibit angiogenesis in tumours. The main problem with angiogenesis research remains the choice of appropriate assays to evaluate the efficacy of potential new drugs and to identify potential targets within the angiogenic process. This selection is made more complex by the recognition that heterogeneity occurs, not only within the endothelial cells themselves, but also within the specific microenvironment to be studied. Thus, it is essential to choose the assay conditions and cell types that most closely resemble the angiogenic disease being studied. This is especially important when aiming to translate data from in vitro to in vivo and from preclinical to the clinic. Here we critically review and highlight recent advances in the principle assays in common use including those for endothelial cell proliferation, migration, differentiation and co-culture with fibroblasts and mural cells in vitro, vessel outgrowth from organ cultures and in vivo assays such as chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), zebrafish, sponge implantation, corneal, dorsal air sac, chamber and tumour angiogenesis models. Finally, we briefly discuss the direction likely to be taken in future studies, which include the use of increasingly sophisticated imaging analysis systems for data acquisition.