Androgenic and antiandrogenic control on epidermal growth factor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and androgen receptor expression in human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP

DUSP22 suppresses prostate cancer proliferation by targeting the EGFR-AR axis

Dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSPs) regulate the activity of various downstream kinases through serine or threonine or tyrosine dephosphorylation. Loss of function and aberrant expression of DUSPs has been implicated in cancer progression and poor survival, yet the function of DUSP22 in prostate cancer (PCa) cells is not clear. Gene Expression Omnibus and cBioPortal microarray database analyses showed that DUSP22 expression was lower in PCa tissues than normal prostate tissues, and altered DUSP22 expression was associated with shorter progression-free and disease-free survival of patients with PCa. Exogenous DUSP22 expression in LNCaP, PC3, and C4-2B PCa cells inhibited cellular proliferation and colony formation, supporting a growth inhibitory role for DUSP22 in PCa cells. DUSP22 expression significantly attenuated epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) and its downstream ERK1/2 signaling by dephosphorylation. However, DUSP22 failed to suppress the growth of CWR22Rv1 and DU145 cells with elevated phosphorylated (p-)ERK1/2 levels. A serine-to-alanine mutation at position 58, a potential ERK1/2-targeted phosphorylation site in DUSP22, was sufficient to suppress growth of CWR22Rv1 cells with elevated p-ERK1/2 levels, suggesting a mutually antagonistic relationship between DUSP22 and ERK1/2 dependent on phosphorylation status. We showed that DUSP22 can suppress prostate-specific antigen gene expression through phosphatase-dependent pathways, suggesting that DUSP22 is an important regulator of the androgen receptor (AR) in PCa cells. Mechanistically, DUSP22 can interact with AR as a regulatory partner and interfere with EGF-induced AR phosphorylation at Tyr534, suggesting that DUSP22 serves as a crucial suppressor of both EGFR and AR-dependent signaling in PCa cells via dephosphorylation. Our findings indicate that loss of function of DUSP22 in PCa cells leads to aberrant activation of both EGFR-ERKs and AR signaling and ultimately progression of PCa, supporting the potential for novel therapeutic design of harnessing DUSP22 in the treatment of PCa.-Lin, H.-P., Ho, H.-M., Chang, C.-W., Yeh, S.-D., Su, Y.-W., Tan, T.-H., Lin, W.-J. DUSP22 suppresses prostate cancer proliferation by targeting the EGFR-AR axis.

Inhibition of RSK/YB-1 signaling enhances the anti-cancer effect of enzalutamide in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Previously, we have shown that Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) regulates androgen receptor (AR) expression and contributes to castration resistance. However, the mechanism of YB-1 activation remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism and role of YB-1 activation in relation to castration resistance as well as enzalutamide resistance, with a view to developing a novel therapeutic concept for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treatment.

METHODS

The expression and phosphorylation levels of ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (RSK1), YB-1 and AR were examined by quantitative PCR and Western blotting using prostate cancer cells. In addition, the effects of YB-1 inhibition using specific siRNA and small molecule inhibitor SL0101 on AR expression as well as combination treatment with enzalutamide and SL0101 were examined.

RESULTS

We found that androgen deprivation, as well as treatment with the next-generation anti-androgen enzalutamide, induced RSK1 and YB-1 activation followed by AR induction, which could be reversed by YB-1 shutdown and RSK inhibitor SL0101. SL0101 and enzalutamide exerted a synergistic tumor-suppressive effect on cell proliferation in androgen-dependent prostate cancer LNCaP cells, as well as castration-resistant C4-2 cells. Furthermore, the phosphorylation levels of RSK1 and YB-1 were elevated in castration- and enzalutamide-resistant cells, compared with their parental cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these findings indicate that RSK1/YB-1 signaling contributes to castration as well as enzalutamide resistance, and that the therapeutic targeting of RSK1/YB-1 signaling would be a promising novel therapy against prostate cancer, especially CRPC when combined with enzalutamide.

Obesity and metabolic comorbidities: environmental diseases?

Obesity and metabolic comorbidities represent increasing health problems. Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are exogenous agents that change endocrine function and cause adverse health effects. Most EDCs are synthetic chemicals; some are natural food components as phytoestrogens. People are exposed to complex mixtures of chemicals throughout their lives. EDCs impact hormone-dependent metabolic systems and brain function. Laboratory and human studies provide compelling evidence that human chemical contamination can play a role in obesity epidemic. Chemical exposures may increase the risk of obesity by altering the differentiation of adipocytes. EDCs can alter methylation patterns and normal epigenetic programming in cells. Oxidative stress may be induced by many of these chemicals, and accumulating evidence indicates that it plays important roles in the etiology of chronic diseases. The individual sensitivity to chemicals is variable, depending on environment and ability to metabolize hazardous chemicals. A number of genes, especially those representing antioxidant and detoxification pathways, have potential application as biomarkers of risk assessment. The potential health effects of combined exposures make the risk assessment process more complex compared to the assessment of single chemicals. Techniques and methods need to be further developed to fill data gaps and increase the knowledge on harmful exposure combinations.

Benign prostate hyperplasia and stem cells: a new therapeutic opportunity

Most men over 50 experience some lower urinary tract symptoms of nocturia, poor stream, urgency and frequency for urination, due to hyperplastic enlargement of the prostate (benign prostate hyperplasia, BPH). BPH is thought to be a disease with multiple aetiologies including hormone signalling, disruption of proliferation and apoptosis dynamics and chronic inflammation with changes in the morphology and phenotype of the prostate stroma. It has been proposed, recently, that stromal stem cells in prostate may be caused by the development of BPH. This review focuses on this putative role of stromal stem or stem-like cells in the development of BPH and assesses the potential of targeting the stem cells for the treatment of BPH.

Increased androgen receptor transcription: a cause of castration-resistant prostate cancer and a possible therapeutic target

Few effective therapies exist for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Recent evidence suggests that CRPC may be caused by augmented androgen/androgen receptor (AR) signaling, generally involving AR overexpression. Aberrant androgen/AR signaling associated with AR overexpression also plays a key role in prostate carcinogenesis. Although AR overexpression could be attributed to gene amplification, only 10-20% of CRPCs exhibit AR gene amplification, and aberrant AR expression in the remaining instances of CRPC is thought to be attributed to transcriptional, translational, and post-translational mechanisms. Overexpression of AR at the protein level, as well as the mRNA level, has been found in CRPC, suggesting a key role for transcriptional regulation of AR expression. Since the analysis of the AR promoter region in the 1990s, several transcription factors have been reported to regulate AR transcription. In this review, we discuss the molecules involved in the control of AR gene expression, with emphasis on its transcriptional control by transcription factors in prostate cancer. We also consider the therapeutic potential of targeting AR expression.

Epidermal growth factor receptor expression escapes androgen regulation in prostate cancer: a potential molecular switch for tumour growth

Androgen deprivation therapy reduces prostate cancer (PCa) tumour growth; however, disease relapse often ensues independently of androgen stimulation, producing androgen-refractory tumours with increased invasion, proliferation, and malignancy. Androgens downregulate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in normal prostate but not in PCa. Thus, loss of EGFR regulation and altered signalling may, in part, explain the transition of prostate tumours from androgen dependent to androgen independent. Studies in animal models, PCa cell lines, and tumour specimens suggest that androgens modulate prostate growth and function through mechanisms that involve ‘cross-talk’ between androgen receptor (AR) and growth factor receptor signalling pathways. The objective of this review is to discuss the paradoxical relationship between androgen regulation of EGFR in normal prostate and PCa. We reviewed the literature from mid-1980s through 2009 to assess the relationship between androgens and EGFR function in modulating the growth of normal prostate and PCa. Loss of androgen regulation of EGFR in PCa may be responsible for increased tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis, with important implications on the clinical management of PCa. We advance the hypothesis that a molecular switch, responsible for downregulating EGFR expression by androgens in the normal prostate, is either lost or modified in PCa.

Action, localization and structure-function relationship of growth factors and their receptors in the prostate

Whereas the direct action of sex steroids, namely of androgens, on prostate cell division was questioned as early as in the 1970s, and remains so, the interest in prostatic growth factors (GFs) is rather recent but has expanded tremendously in the last five years. This lag period can be partly explained by the fact that, at the time, androgen receptors had just been discovered, and newly developed hormonal regimens or strategies to treat patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) or epithelioma had generated great enthusiasm and hopes in the medical and scientific community. Another point to consider was the difficulty in maintaining prostate tissues in organ cultures and the relative novelty of culturing prostate epithelial cells in monolayers. Failures of sex steroids to elicit a direct positive response on prostate cell divisionin vitro, as seenin vivo, were interpreted as resulting from inappropriate models or culture conditions. However, the increasing number of reports confirming the lack of mitogenic activity of sex steroidsin vitro, coupled with the powerful mitogenic activity of GFs displayed in other systems, the discovery of GF receptors (GF-Rs), and the elucidation of their signalling pathways showing sex steroid receptors as potential substrates of GF-activated protein kinases gradually led to an increased interest in the putative role of GFs in prostate physiopathology. Of utmost importance was the recognition that hormone refractiveness was responsible for PCa progression, and for the poor outcome of patients with advanced disease under endocrine therapies. This problem remains a major issue and it raises several key questions that need to be solved at the fundamental and clinical levels.

Androgen receptor controls EGFR and ERBB2 gene expression at different levels in prostate cancer cell lines

EGFR or ERBB2 contributes to prostate cancer (PCa) progression by activating the androgen receptor (AR) in hormone-poor conditions. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which androgens regulate EGFR and ERBB2 expression in PCa cells. In steroid-depleted medium (SDM), EGFR protein was less abundant in androgen-sensitive LNCaP than in androgen ablation-resistant 22Rv1 cells, whereas transcript levels were similar. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) treatment increased both EGFR mRNA and protein levels and stimulated RNA polymerase II recruitment to the EGFR gene promoter, whereas it decreased ERBB2 transcript and protein levels in LNCaP cells. DHT altered neither EGFR or ERBB2 levels nor the abundance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), TMEPA1, or TMPRSS2 mRNAs in 22Rv1 cells, which express the full-length and a shorter AR isoform deleted from the COOH-terminal domain (ARDeltaCTD). The contribution of both AR isoforms to the expression of these genes was assessed by small interfering RNAs targeting only the full-length or both AR isoforms. Silencing of both isoforms strongly reduced PSA, TMEPA1, and TMPRSS2 transcript levels. Inhibition of both AR isoforms did not affect EGFR and ERBB2 transcript levels but decreased EGFR and increased ERBB2 protein levels. Proliferation of 22Rv1 cells in SDM was inhibited in the absence of AR and ARDeltaCTD. A further decrease was obtained with PKI166, an EGFR/ERBB2 kinase inhibitor. Overall, we showed that ARDeltaCTD is responsible for constitutive EGFR expression and ERBB2 repression in 22Rv1 cells and that ARDeltaCTD and tyrosine kinase receptors are necessary for sustained 22Rv1 cell growth.

Prostate cancer cells generated during intermittent androgen ablation acquire a growth advantage and exhibit changes in epidermal growth factor receptor expression

BACKGROUND

Intermittent androgen ablation is a palliative treatment option for advanced prostate cancer which is associated with less side effects, improved quality of life of patients, and reduced costs. Regulation of growth and survival of prostate cancer cells during intermittent androgen withdrawal has not been studied in appropriate models yet.

METHODS

Two cycles of androgen withdrawal and supplementation were performed in human prostate cancer cells LNCaP in vitro. Proliferation of prostate cancer cell sublines established after intermittent androgen withdrawal was assessed in the absence or presence of epidermal growth factor (EGF) by protein determination. Cell cycle was analyzed with a flow cytometer. EGF was measured in the supernatants of LNCaP sublines with a commercial ELISA. EGF receptor mRNA and protein were determined by real-time PCR and Western blot, respectively.

RESULTS

Basal proliferation rate of all newly generated LNCaP sublines increased over that of the parental LNCaP cell line. The highest stimulation of proliferation by exogenous EGF was observed in parental LNCaP cells. In each LNCaP derivative established during intermittent androgen withdrawal, the percentage of cells in the S phase of cell cycle was higher than that in parental LNCaP cells. EGF levels did not increase during intermittent androgen ablation. The expression of EGF receptor protein decreased following each cycle of androgen ablation and increased subsequently after androgen supplementation. EGF receptor (EGFR) mRNA was regulated in a similar manner in LNCaP derivatives established during the second cycle of intermittent withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in the expression of the EGF receptor occur during intermittent androgen ablation but they cannot be solely responsible for increased basal proliferation. Alternatively, other ligands and receptors of the EGF system may become overexpressed during prolonged withdrawal and supplementation of androgenic hormones in prostate cancer therapy.

Identification of genetic pathways activated by the androgen receptor during the induction of proliferation in the ventral prostate gland

The androgen receptor (AR), when complexed with 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), supports the survival and proliferation of prostate cells, a process critical for normal development, benign prostatic hypertrophy, and tumorigenesis. However, the androgen-responsive genetic pathways that control prostate cell division and differentiation are largely unknown. To identify such pathways, we examined gene expression in the ventral prostate 6 and 24 h after DHT administration to androgen-depleted rats. 234 transcripts were expressed significantly differently from controls (p < 0.05) at both time points and were subjected to extensive data mining. Functional clustering of the data reveals that the majority of these genes can be classified as participating in induction of secretory activity, metabolic activation, and intracellular signaling/signal transduction, indicating that AR rapidly modulates the expression of genes involved in proliferation and differentiation in the prostate. Notably AR represses the expression of several key cell cycle inhibitors, while modulating members of the wnt and notch signaling pathways, multiple growth factors, and peptide hormone signaling systems, and genes involved in MAP kinase and calcium signaling. Analysis of these data also suggested that p53 activity is negatively regulated by AR activation even though p53 RNA was unchanged. Experiments in LNCaP prostate cancer cells reveal that AR inhibits p53 protein accumulation in the nucleus, providing a post-transcriptional mechanism by which androgens control prostate cell growth and survival. In summary these data provide a comprehensive view of the earliest events in AR-mediated prostate cell proliferation in vivo, and suggest that nuclear exclusion of p53 is a critical step in prostate growth.

Androgen-independent prostate cancer: potential role of androgen and ErbB receptor signal transduction crosstalk

In prostate cancer (PC), increasing evidence suggests that androgen receptor (AR) signalling is functional under conditions of maximal androgen blockade. PC cells survive and proliferate in the altered hormonal environment possibly by interactions between growth factor-activated pathways and AR signalling. The present review article summarizes the current evidence of this crosstalk and focuses on the interactions among the ErbB receptor network, its downstream pathways, and the AR. The potential role of this crosstalk in the development of androgen independence and in relation to antiandrogen therapy is discussed. Such interactions provide insight into possible complementary or additional strategies in the management of PC.

Characterisation of gene expression patterns in 22RV1 cells for determination of environmental androgenic/antiandrogenic compounds

Alteration of androgen receptor function due to hormonally active compounds in the environment, may be responsible for impaired reproductive function in aquatic wildlife. Based on human prostate carcinoma 22RV1 cells, a cell culture expression system was established to test effects of putative androgenic/antiandrogenic compounds on endogenous gene expression. 22RV1 cells were shown to express human androgen receptor, but not human progestin (hPR) or human oestrogen receptor (hER) alpha and beta. Six androgen-regulated genes (ARGs) were chosen to determine androgenic/antiandrogenic action using highly sensitive real-time RT-PCR. Results showed that gene expression is altered in a time-dependent manner. After stimulation of cells by DHT (10nM), synthetic androgen R1881 (1 nM), or organic pesticides (difenoconazole, fentinacetate, tetramethrin) TMPRSS2 mRNA expression was down-regulated by the factor 0.6 after 24h of DHT treatment. Similar results were obtained when cells were assayed for mRNA expression of PSA after fentinacetate and R1881 stimulation. In contrast, TMPRSS2 expression was up-regulated by the factor 0.9 when cells were stimulated by tetramethrin. Final goal of the work is a sensitive determination of differential gene expression by different compounds under study, achievement of substance-specific expression patterns and function related analysis of potential androgens/antiandrogens.

The response of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) to androgen-induced proliferation in the androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP

The mechanisms by which androgens stimulate proliferation of prostate cancer cells are poorly understood. It has been proposed that androgen stimulation may induce the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase system in prostate cancer cells and lead to cellular proliferation. We attempted to evaluate the role of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway in the stimulation by androgens of prostate cancer cell proliferation. Androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP) cells plated on sterile glass coverslips were treated with 10(-8) M dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or epidermal growth factor (EGF) (10 ng/ml) for periods ranging from 1 min to 96 h. The proliferative index of the cells, evaluated by immunoperoxidase staining of cells with an antibody to Ki-67, was increased at least two-fold at all time points from 5 min to 48 h following exposure to either DHT or EGF. Immunohistochemical evaluation of ERK1/2 and pERK (activated ERK) demonstrated high levels of ERK1/2 in untreated LNCaP cells, while pERK was expressed at much lower levels. Following treatment with DHT, no change in staining intensity for either ERK1/2 or pERK was observed, while treatment with EGF resulted in no change in ERK1/2, but significantly increased cytoplasmic staining for pERK at all time points beyond 2 min. These results were confirmed by Western blot analysis of ERK1/2 and pERK expression in these cell lines following treatment with DHT or EGF. Our findings suggest that the proliferative response of prostate cancer cells to androgens, unlike the proliferative response to EGF, is not mediated by the activation of ERK1/2, and that currently undefined pathways other than those involving ERK1/2 are involved.

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer? Anti-androgen withdrawal and intermittent hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE

To separate hormone-dependent from hormonally relapsed prostate cancers, a D3 category has been proposed. The term has become synonymous with a hormone-refractory state with the implication that any further hormonal treatment would not be beneficial. In this review we examine some data on androgen receptor expression, anti-androgen withdrawal syndrome and intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

MATERIALS

The literature on the mechanism of the withdrawal phenomenon in patients with prostate cancer submitted to hormone therapy was reviewed. Experimental and clinical data are reported.

RESULTS

The progression of prostate cancer in patients treated with combined androgen blockade (CAB) is associated with the activation of previously androgen-repressed genes, some of which may code for autocrine and paracrine growth factors that substitute for androgens in maintaining the viability of the tumorigenic stem cells. If androgens are replaced before progression begins, the surviving stem cells should give rise to an androgen-dependent tumor, which would be amenable to retreatment by CAB. This theory provides the rationale for intermittent androgen deprivation. We suggest that IAD could be more effective in patients with initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression after radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to withdrawal therapies or second-line treatments is an example of a "hormonal" therapy that may benefit a proportion of patients with hormone-refractory disease, suggesting that the tumor is still androgen-dependent. Whether IAD enhances progression-free survival or overall survival must be verified in randomized clinical trials. Until further studies have been completed, the therapeutic concept of IAD should be treated as experimental.

Multiple G1 regulatory elements control the androgen-dependent proliferation of prostatic carcinoma cells

Prostatic epithelial cells and most primary prostate tumors are dependent on androgen for growth, but how androgen regulates cellular proliferation remains unsolved. Using poorly understood mechanisms, recurrent tumor cells evade the androgen requirement. We utilized androgen-dependent prostatic tumor cells to demonstrate that androgen exerts its effect on the cell cycle by influencing specific aspects of G1-S progression. Androgen depletion of these cells results in early G1 arrest, characterized by reduced cyclin-dependent kinase activity, and underphosphorylated retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB). The reduction in kinase activity was partially attributed to reduction of specific G1 cyclins and alternate regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Using this information, we developed a reliable assay to assess the ability of specific G1 regulatory proteins to circumvent these controls and promote androgen-independent growth. As expected, inactivation of RB was required for progression through the cell cycle. Surprisingly, overexpression of G1 cyclins, which drives RB phosphorylation, was insufficient to promote androgen-independent cell cycle progression. Introduction of viral oncoproteins did promote G1-S progression in the absence of androgen, dependent on their ability to sequester RB and related proteins. These results provide the first evidence that multiple elements governing the G1-S transition dictate androgen-dependent growth, and the formation of androgen-independent prostatic tumors may be because of misregulation of these processes.

Epidermal growth factor in the rat prostate: production, tissue content and molecular forms in the different prostatic lobes

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) induces proliferation in prostate epithelial and stromal cells in primary culture. This investigation was set up to characterize the time and spatial expression of EGF in the rat prostate.

METHODS

The expression of EGF was characterized in the distinct lobes of the rat prostate by means of ELISA, gel filtration, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Local synthesis of EGF by the luminal epithelium was demonstrated by in situ hybridization in the dorsal lobe only. This lobe contained the major part of the prostatic EGF with a sixfold higher concentration than measured in the lateral lobe, and 300-fold higher than in the ventral lobe. Rat prostatic EGF was found to consist of at least two high-molecular-weight forms, as well as a 6-kDa form. The high-molecular-weight forms made up approximately 40% of the EGF measured in the dorsal rat prostate. At 8-12 weeks of age, the concentration of EGF in the dorsal lobe was doubled, with no further increase up to 16 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a 300-fold difference in the lobar content of EGF in the rat prostate, and a doubling of the concentration at 8-12 weeks of age.

LNCaP prostatic adenocarcinoma cells derived from low and high passage numbers display divergent responses not only to androgens but also to retinoids

In the present paper, two strains of LNCaP cells derived from the same source (American Type Culture Collection), but studied either at a low passage number (LP) or at a high passage number (HP), were compared in their response to R1881 (a synthetic androgen), all-trans-retinoic acid (atRA), and 1alpha,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (VD3). [3H]Thymidine incorporation and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) binding were measured as parameters related to the proliferative response of the cells. The secretion of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the mRNA expression of PSA, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), and diazepam-binding inhibitor (DBI) were used as parameters reflecting differentiated function. Marked differences were noted in the response of LP and HP cells to androgens. [3H]Thymidine incorporation displayed a bell-shaped dose-response curve in both strains. The amplitude of the response, however, was much higher in HP cells and growth inhibition at high levels of R1881 was only observed in LP cells. On the contrary, androgen induction of PSA secretion and PSA mRNA expression, as well as the expression of PAP was much more pronounced in LP cells, whereas DBI expression was not altered according to passage number. LP cells and HP cells also displayed striking differences in their response to atRA. An up to 6-fold stimulation of [3H]thymidine incorporation was observed in LP cells, whereas in HP cells the only significant effect was growth inhibition. VD3, on the contrary, inhibited [3H]thymidine incorporation to a comparable degree in LP and HP cells. Only marginal effects of atRA and VD3 were observed on PSA secretion. In both LP and HP cells EGF-R levels were increased by androgens and to a slight extent also by atRA and VD3. It is concluded that LP and HP LNCaP cells display markedly divergent responses not only to androgens but also to atRA. The proliferative rather than antiproliferative effects of atRA in some strains of LNCaP should caution against the uncontrolled use of these agents, or of drugs affecting their metabolism, in patients with prostate cancer.

The effects of dihydrotestosterone on the expression of p185(erbB-2) and c-erbB-2 mRNA in the prostatic cell line LNCaP

The c-erbB-2 proto-oncogene encodes a 185000 molecular weight protein (p185(erbB-2)) which shares structural homology with the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor. We examined the effects of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on the expression of p185(erbB2) and c-erbB-2 mRNA in the human malignant prostatic cell line LNCaP. LNCaP cells grown in steroid-depleted media were treated with DHT (10(-11)-10(-6) M) for 48 h and p185(erbB-2) expression was determined by Western blotting and immunoprecipitation of 35S-methionine labelled p185(erbB-2). c-erbB-2 mRNA levels were determined using a competitive quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based technique. DHT at concentrations of 10(-9) M or greater resulted in decreased expression of p185(erbB-2). In contrast, DHT at these levels stimulated EGF receptor protein expression and cellular proliferation. c-erbB-2 mRNA levels declined to 30-50% of control levels following treatment with DHT of 10(-10) M or greater. Furthermore, the inhibitory effects on c-erbB-2 mRNA were rapid, occurring within 6-12 h of treatment. In summary, these results demonstrate that DHT, at concentrations that stimulate cell growth, inhibits the expression of p185(erbB-2) and c-erbB-2 mRNA.

Effects of the lipidosterolic extract of Serenoa repens (Permixon) on human prostatic cell lines

BACKGROUND

Permixon is a drug used in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. We studied its androgenic and antiandrogenic effects in the prostatic cell lines LNCaP and PC3, respectively responsive and unresponsive to androgen stimulation.

METHODS

We performed FACScan analysis to investigate toxicity, 3H thymidine and 35S methionine incorporation to determine antiproliferative and metabolic effects, electron microscopy to study ultrastructural changes and cotransfection experiments to elucidate the role of wild type androgen receptor.

RESULTS

In LNCaP cell line, Permixon induced a double proliferative/differentiative effect, not observed in PC3 cells. In PC3 cells cotransfected with wild-type androgen receptors and CAT reporter genes under the control of a androgen responsive element, the drug inhibited androgen-induced CAT transcription.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate a role of the androgen receptor in mediating the effects of Permixon in LNCaP cells. Cotransfection experiments in PC3 cells support a clear antiandrogenic action of the drug.

Growth factors in steroid-responsive prostatic tumor cells

Androgens stimulate the growth of prostatic carcinoma, possibly by modulating the activity of locally expressed growth factors. Recently, we have shown that an LHRH (or LHRH-like) system exerting an inhibitory action on cell proliferation is present in the human androgen-dependent prostatic tumor cell lines LNCaP. The following experiments have been performed in LNCaP cells to clarify whether LHRH might inhibit cell proliferation by interfering with the two major mitogenic factors for these cells: (a) testosterone (T), the major exogenous stimulating factor, and (b) epidermal growth factor (EGF), one of the locally produced growth factors. (a) It has been shown that an LHRH agonist (LHRH-A, Zoladex) counteracts the proliferative action of T in a dose-dependent way. To clarify whether LHRH might interfere with the activity of T in prostate tumors, LNCaP cells were treated with LHRH agonist over different time intervals, and the effects of treatment evaluated in terms of expression of androgen receptor mRNA. The data obtained indicate that LHRH-A does not affect androgen receptor expression at any time interval examined. (b) LHRH-A inhibits the mitogenic action of EGF on LNCaP cells and significantly reduces the concentration of EGF receptors in these cells. Experiments have been performed to explore whether LHRH-A might alter intracellular signaling mechanisms mediating the activity of EGF. In LNCaP cells LHRH-A blocks EGF-induced expression of the c-fos proto-oncogene but does not modify EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGF receptor. These data suggest that, in androgen-dependent prostate tumors, LHRH might inhibit cell proliferation by interfering with some but not all of the mechanisms mediating the mitogenic action of EGF. Possible interactions between LHRH and T-activated events still remain to be elucidated.