Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of safinamide in subjects with Parkinson's disease

The Effects of Safinamide in Chinese and Non-Chinese Patients with Parkinson's Disease

INTRODUCTION

Ethnicity differences are an important determinant in the clinical manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD), but they are not yet widely recognized, particularly regarding the response to dopaminergic medications. The aim of this paper is to analyze the efficacy and safety of safinamide in Chinese patients with PD in the pivotal studies SETTLE and XINDI compared to the non-Chinese population of the SETTLE trial.

METHODS

SETTLE (NCT00627640) and XINDI (NCT03881371) were phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials. Patients received safinamide or placebo as add-on to levodopa. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the mean total daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total daily ON time, ON time with no/non-troublesome dyskinesia, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 items. Safety was evaluated through the frequency of adverse events. Data from 440 non-Chinese and 109 Chinese patients in the SETTLE study, and 305 Chinese patients in the XINDI trial were considered for this post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Significant positive results were seen in favor of safinamide in all populations for the primary and secondary endpoints, with no differences in terms of magnitude. No "treatment by ethnicity" interaction was detected for any parameters, confirming the homogeneity of treatment effects between different populations. The safety and tolerability of safinamide in Chinese patients were similar to those in the other ethnic groups, without unexpected adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Safinamide was shown to improve PD symptoms and quality of life in different ethnic populations, without any treatment by race interaction. Further studies are warranted to investigate potential differences in a real-life situation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

SETTLE (NCT00627640) and XINDI (NCT03881371).

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Single and Multiple Oral Doses of Safinamide in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

This randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of safinamide in 24 healthy Chinese men and women, randomly assigned to receive 50 or 100 mg of safinamide as a single dose, followed, after a 7-day washout, by multiple doses once daily for 7 days. Plasma safinamide was determined up to 96 h after the first single dose (day 1) and the last multiple dose (day 14), and up to 24 h after the first multiple dose (day 8). Following single- and multiple-dose administration, peak concentrations were achieved at a median time of 1.5-2 h. Plasma exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner. After single dose, mean half-life was 23-24 h. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity was only slightly higher than AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration, corresponding for the 2 parameters, respectively, to 12,380 and 11,560 ng • h/mL for the 50 mg and to 22,030 and 20,790 ng • h/mL for the 100-mg dose. AUC in the dosing interval at steady state was 13,150 and 23,100 ng • h/mL for 50 and 100 mg of safinamide. Steady state was reached in 6 days, accumulation was approximately twofold, and the pharmacokinetics were time independent. The plasma safinamide pharmacokinetic profile observed in this study is in line with the published results in both Chinese and non-Asian populations.

Safinamide in neurological disorders and beyond: Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies

The discovery and development of safinamide, an alpha-aminoamide, has been a valuable addition to the existing clinical management of Parkinson's disease (PD). The journey of safinamide dates back to the year 1983, when an alpha-aminoamide called milacemide showed a weak anticonvulsant activity. Milacemide was then structurally modified to give rise to safinamide, which in turn produced robust anticonvulsant activity. The underlying mechanism behind this action of safinamide is attributed to the inhibition of voltage gated calcium and sodium channels. Moreover, owing to the importance of ion channels in maintaining neuronal circuitry and neurotransmitter release, numerous studies explored the potential of safinamide in neurological diseases including PD, stroke, multiple sclerosis and neuromuscular disorders such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy and non-dystrophic myotonias. Nevertheless, evidence from multiple preclinical studies suggested a potent, selective and reversible inhibitory activity of safinamide against monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B enzyme which is responsible for degrading dopamine, a neurotransmitter primarily implicated in the pathophysiology of PD. Therefore, clinical studies were conducted to assess safety and efficacy of safinamide in PD. Indeed, results from various Phase 3 clinical trials suggested strong evidence of safinamide as an add-on therapy in controlling the exacerbation of PD. This review presents a thorough developmental history of safinamide in PD and provides comprehensive insight into plausible mechanisms via which safinamide can be explored in other neurological and muscular diseases.

Relationship between antofloxacin concentration and QT prolongation and estimation of the possible false-positive rate

PURPOSE

To elucidate the relationship between antofloxacin (AT) plasma concentration and QT interval prolongation, compare the effects of different correction and analytical methods on conclusions, and estimate the possible false-positive rate in thorough QT (TQT) studies.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy Chinese volunteers from a four-period crossover TQT study orally received 200 mg/d AT, 400 mg/d AT, 400 mg/d moxifloxacin, and a placebo in a random order for 5 d for each. QT interval samples were collected on d 1 and d 5. Population models were established describing the relationship between QT and AT concentration. The yardstick from ICH E14 guidelines was used to measure the effect of drugs on QT prolongation both in biostatistical and modeling analyses. A possible false-positive rate was estimated by constructing a 1000-time bootstrap to obtain the rate-of-difference values between d 1 and d 5 over 5 ms in the placebo period.

RESULTS

In the modeling analysis, the QT prolongation estimate at the mean maximal concentration of AT (4.51 μg/mL) was 3.84 ms, and its upper bound of the one-sided 95 % CI was 7.04 ms, which showed a negative effect on QT interval prolongation. The estimation for the false-positive rate was 31 % in this study.

CONCLUSION

The effect of AT on QT interval prolongation may not have been significant at the dosage of 400 mg. Baseline and placebo adjustments were necessary in TQT studies. Population modeling has demonstrated clear superiority in making full use of data to accurately analyze the relationship between drugs and QT intervals.

Safinamide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

The deficiency pattern of neurotransmitters is heterogeneous in patients with Parkinson's disease. Consequence is an individual variable expression of motor and nonmotor features. They respond to agents with a broader spectrum of mode of actions, whereas dopamine substitution only targets impaired motor behavior. The pharmacological profile of safinamide includes reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibition and modulation of voltage-dependent sodium- and calcium channels with consecutive decline of glutamate release. Safinamide improves motor and nonmotor symptoms. Combination of safinamide with the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor opicapone in one capsule is a promising future treatment alternative, which simplifies drug therapy in Parkinson's disease. Both agents complement each other in terms of application mode and efficacy on motor complications as adjuncts to levodopa therapy.

Perioperative implications of common and newer psychotropic medications used in clinical practice

Psychotropic medications are widely prescribed by clinicians as both primary therapy for a variety of psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases and as adjunctive analgesics for use in the perioperative period. It is critical to understand various modes of action, drug-drug interactions, side effects, and clinical implications. Health care providers must understand how these medications interact with anesthetics, as well as other drugs used in perioperative care. We review relevant psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases, psychotropic medications used to treat them, and how these medications interact with anesthetics and drugs used in perioperative care. We will also discuss emerging psychotropic drugs and the challenges they may create during the perioperative period. Future direction of investigation into the role of these drugs during the perioperative period and implications is also discussed.

Safinamide: an add-on treatment for managing Parkinson's disease

Heterogeneous expression of neurotransmitter deficits results from onset and progression of Parkinson's disease. Intervals, characterized by reappearance of motor and associated certain nonmotor symptoms, determine the end of good tolerability and efficacy of oral levodopa therapy. These "OFF" states result from levodopa pharmacokinetics and disease progression-related deterioration of the central buffering capacity for fluctuations of dopamine levels. This review discusses safinamide as an add-on therapeutic agent in orally levodopa-treated patients with "OFF" phenomena. Safinamide provided beneficial effects on "OFF" symptoms in pivotal trials with doses of 50 or 100 mg once daily. Safinamide reversibly inhibits mono-amine oxidase B and declines abnormal glutamate release by modulation of potassium- and sodium ion channels. An ideal candidate for combination with safinamide is opicapone. This inhibitor of peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase supports continuous brain delivery of levodopa and, thus, the continuous dopaminergic stimulation concept. Both compounds with their once-daily application and good tolerability may complement each other by reduction of necessary oral levodopa intakes and "OFF" times. Thus, a promising, future option will be combination of safinamide and opicapone in one formulation. It will reduce adherence issues and may complement levodopa treatment. It will probably cause less nausea and edema than a dopamine agonist/levodopa regimen.

Safinamide: a new hope for Parkinson's disease?

The loss of dopaminergic neurons (DAn) and reduced dopamine (DA) production underlies the reasoning behind the gold standard treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) using levodopa (L-DOPA). Recently licensed by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), safinamide [a monoamine oxidase B (MOA-B) inhibitor] is an alternative to L-DOPA; as we discuss here, it enhances dopaminergic transmission with decreased secondary effects compared with L-DOPA. In addition, nondopaminergic actions (neuroprotective effects) have been reported, with safinamide inhibiting glutamate release and sodium/calcium channels, reducing the excitotoxic input to dopaminergic neuronal death. Effects of safinamide have been correlated with the amelioration of non-motor symptoms (NMS), although these remain under discussion. Overall, safinamide can be considered to have potential antidyskinetic and neuroprotective effects and future trials and/or studies should be performed to provide further evidence for its potential as an anti-PD drug.

Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of safinamide in subjects with Parkinson's disease

Safinamide is an orally administered α‐aminoamide derivative with both dopaminergic and non‐dopaminergic properties. Nonlinear mixed effects models for population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD) analyses were developed using records from, respectively, 623 and 668 patients belonging to two Phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind efficacy studies. The aim was to estimate safinamide population PK parameters in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) on stable levodopa therapy, and to develop a model of safinamide effect on the PD phase of normal functioning (ON‐time). The final models were internally evaluated using visual predictive checks (VPCs), prediction corrected‐VPC, and nonparametric bootstrap analysis. Safinamide profiles were adequately described by a linear one‐compartmental model with first‐order absorption and elimination. CL/F, Vd/F, and KA (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 4.96 (4.73–5.21) L/h, 166 (158–174) L, and 0.582 (0.335–0.829) h⁻¹, respectively. CL/F and Vd/F increased with body weight, while age, gender, renal function, and exposure to levodopa did not influence safinamide PK. The observed ON‐time values were adequately described by a linear model, with time in the study period as dependent variable, and rate of ON‐time change and baseline plus offset effect as slope and intercept parameters. Safinamide treatment resulted in an increase in ON‐time of 0.73 h (week 4), with further ON‐time increase with the same slope as placebo. The increase was not influenced by age, levodopa, or safinamide exposure. The population models adequately describe the population PK of safinamide and safinamide effect on ON‐time. No dose adjustments in elderly and mild to moderate renally impaired patients are requested.