Risk of genital and urinary tract infections associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study in Korea

Genito Urinary Infection and Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving SGLT2 Inhibitors: Evidence from a Systematic Literature Review of Landmark Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

SGLT2 inhibitors are class of drugs that are used in adults with type 2 diabetes through a novel mechanism of action by reducing renal tubular glucose reabsorption, leading to a reduction in blood glucose without stimulating insulin release. In this systematic review, we report the effects of treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors on urinary tract infection (UTI) and genitourinary infection (GUI).

METHOD

The study integrated data from landmark trials of SGLT2 inhibitors (CANVAS, CREDENCE, DECLARE-TIMI 58, and EMPA-REG) to interpret the association of SGLT2 inhibitors with genital infection (GI) and UTI. We reported the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome was a composite of participants reporting UTI and GUI prescribed on SGLT2 inhibitors.

RESULTS

The analysis of four studies involving 38,723 participants revealed incidences of both UTIs and GUI. In the SGLT2 inhibitor group, comprising 21,266 participants, 222 (1.04%) experienced UTIs, and 477 (2.24%) reported GUI. In contrast, among the placebo group consisting of 17,457 participants, 201 (1.15%) reported UTIs, and 70 (0.40%) reported genital infections. These findings underscore the elevated risk associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use, particularly regarding GUI, necessitating careful consideration in clinical practice and patient management strategies.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of UTIs and particularly more pronounced GUI associated with SGLT2 inhibitors highlights the importance of careful risk assessment and monitoring in clinical decision-making, underscoring the need for patient management strategies.

Diabetes, SGLT-2 Inhibitors, and Urinary Tract Infection: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to focus on epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, management, and complications of UTI in people with diabetes as well as reviewing the association of SGLT-2 inhibitors with genitourinary infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Individuals diagnosed with T2DM are more prone to experiencing UTIs and recurrent UTIs compared to individuals without T2DM. T2DM is associated with an increased risk of any genitourinary infections (GUI), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and genital infections (GIs) across all age categories. SGLT2 inhibitors are a relatively new class of anti-hyperglycemic agents, and studies suggest that they are associated with an increased risk of genitourinary infections. The management of diabetes and lifestyle modifications with a patient-centric approach are the most recognized methods for preventing critical long-term complications including genitourinary manifestations of diabetes. The available data regarding the association of SGLT-2 inhibitors with genitourinary infections is more comprehensive compared to that with UTIs. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlining the association between SGLT-2 inhibitors and genital infections and UTIs.

Should Glucokinase be Given a Chance in Diabetes Therapeutics? A Clinical-Pharmacological Review of Dorzagliatin and Lessons Learned So Far

Despite advances in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), one-third of patients with diabetes do not achieve the desired glycemic goal. Considering this inadequacy, many agents that activate glucokinase have been investigated over the last two decades but were withdrawn before submission for marketing permission. Dorzagliatin is the first glucokinase activator that has been granted approval for T2DM, only in China. As overstimulation of glucokinase is linked with pathophysiological disturbances such as fatty liver and cardiovascular issues and a loss of therapeutic efficacy with time. This review aims to highlight the benefits of glucokinase activators vis-à-vis the risks associated with chronic enzymatic activation. We discuss the multisystem disturbances expected with chronic activation of the enzyme, the lessons learned with glucokinase activators of the past, the major efficacy and safety findings with dorzagliatin and its pharmacological properties, and the status of other glucokinase activators in the pipeline. The approval of dorzagliatin in China was based on the SEED and the DAWN trials, the major pivotal phase III trials that enrolled patients with T2DM with a mean glycosylated hemoglobin of 8.3-8.4%, and a mean age of 53-54.5 years from multiple sites in China. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, cardiac diseases, organ dysfunction, and a history of severe hypoglycemia were excluded. Both trials had a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase of 24 weeks followed by an open-label phase of 28 weeks with dorzagliatin. Drug-naïve patients with T2DM with a disease duration of 11.7 months were enrolled in the SEED trial while the DAWN trial involved patients with T2DM with a mean duration of 71.5 months and receiving background metformin therapy. Compared with placebo, the decline in glycosylated hemoglobin at 24 weeks was more with dorzagliatin with an estimated treatment difference of - 0.57% in the SEED trial and - 0.66% in the DAWN trial. The desired glycosylated hemoglobin (< 7%) was also attained at more than two times higher rates with dorzagliatin. The glycemic improvement was sustained in the SEED trial but decreased over 52 weeks in the DAWN trial. Hyperlipidemia was observed in 12-14% of patients taking dorzagliatin versus 9-11% of patients receiving a placebo. Additional adverse effects noticed over 52 weeks with dorzagliatin included an elevation in liver enzymes, hyperuricemia, hyperlacticacidemia, renal dysfunction, and cardiovascular disturbances. Considering the statistically significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin with dorzagliatin in patients with T2DM, the drug may be given a chance in treatment-naïve patients with a shorter disease history. However, with the waning therapeutic efficacy witnessed in patients with long-standing diabetes, which was also one of the potential concerns with previously tested molecules, extended studies involving patients with chronic and uncontrolled diabetes are needed to comment upon the long-term therapeutic performance of dorzagliatin. Likewise, evidence needs to be generated from other countries, patients with organ dysfunction, a history of severe hypoglycemia, cardiac diseases, and elderly patients before extending the use of dorzagliatin. Apart from monitoring lipid profiles, long-term safety studies of dorzagliatin should involve the assessment of serum uric acid, lactate, renal function, liver function, and cardiovascular parameters.

Healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in Japan: A real-world administrative database analysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs are important factors to consider when selecting appropriate treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. We compared the HCRU and healthcare costs of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) vs dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a Japanese retrospective cohort study conducted using the JMDC Claims Database (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2021). Patients newly treated with an SGLT2i (31,872 patients) or a DPP4i (73,279 patients) were matched 1:1, using propensity score, after excluding patients without continuous SGLT2i or DPP4i prescriptions after the index date. HCRU and healthcare costs were compared between the treatment groups in the full cohort and subcohorts/subgroups of different baseline characteristics, including body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

After matching, patient characteristics were well balanced (17,767 patients each). Patients receiving an SGLT2i vs those receiving a DPP4i had significantly lower numbers of hospitalizations per person per month (PPPM) and outpatient visits PPPM, and had shorter lengths of stay per hospitalization. Healthcare costs, including all-cause overall healthcare costs PPPM and all-cause hospitalization costs PPPM, were generally lower in patients receiving an SGLT2i than those receiving a DPP4i. Similar results were observed among patients with a higher BMI but not among patients with a lower BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i were associated with lower HCRU and healthcare costs than DPP4i, suggesting economic benefits with SGLT2i vs DPP4i in type 2 diabetes mellitus management.

Asymptomatic pyuria and bacteriuria are not risk factors for urinary tract infection in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiated SGLT2 inhibitors

PURPOSE

Asymptomatic pyuria and bacteriuria are more prevalent in diabetic patients and may be associated with urinary tract infection (UTI). The aim of this study is to investigate the association between asymptomatic pyuria/bacteriuria at the initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor and UTI risk in female patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The study was designed as a practical, single-center, prospective, cohort study. The female outpatients with type 2 diabetes initiated SGLT2 inhibitor were included. Patients who were symptomatic or treated in the past 3 months for urinary or genital tract infection, had a high risk for UTI were excluded. Hospitalization/antibiotic use for indications other than UTI were exclusion criteria during follow-up. All patients were followed up for 3 months. Pyuria and bacteriuria were exposure and, UTI was the outcome. Cumulative incidence and relative risk of UTI were analyzed for pyuria and bacteriuria.

RESULTS

143 female patients were included among 1132 female type 2 diabetic patients. 13 patients were excluded during follow-up. 41.5% of the patients (n = 54) had pyuria and 28.5% (n = 37) had bacteriuria. The cumulative incidence of UTI was 20% in the whole cohort, 25,9% (n = 14/54) in the pyuria group and 18.9% (n = 7/37) in the bacteriuria group. The relative risk of UTI was 1.64 (95% CI: 0.82-3.26, p = 0.15) for pyuria, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.42-2.01, p = 0.84) for bacteriuria, and 1.2 (95% CI: 0.47-3.08, p = 0.69) for pyuria plus bacteriuria. Adjusted odd ratios revealed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic pyuria/bacteriuria at the initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors are not risk factors for UTI in women with type 2 diabetes.

Risks and Benefits of SGLT-2 Inhibitors for Type 1 Diabetes Patients Using Automated Insulin Delivery Systems-A Literature Review

The primary treatment for autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus-T1DM) is insulin therapy. Unfortunately, a multitude of clinical cases has demonstrated that the use of insulin as a sole therapeutic intervention fails to address all issues comprehensively. Therefore, non-insulin adjunct treatment has been investigated and shown successful results in clinical trials. Various hypoglycemia-inducing drugs such as Metformin, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, amylin analogs, and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporters 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, developed good outcomes in patients with T1DM. Currently, SGLT-2 inhibitors have remarkably improved the treatment of patients with diabetes by preventing cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, and progression of renal disease. However, their pharmacological potential has not been explored enough. Thus, the substantial interest in SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) underlines the present review. It begins with an overview of carrier-mediated cellular glucose uptake, evidencing the insulin-independent transport system contribution to glucose homeostasis and the essential roles of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporters 1 and 2. Then, the pharmacological properties of SGLT-2is are detailed, leading to potential applications in treating T1DM patients with automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. Results from several studies demonstrated improvements in glycemic control, an increase in Time in Range (TIR), a decrease in glycemic variability, reduced daily insulin requirements without increasing hyperglycemic events, and benefits in weight management. However, these advantages are counterbalanced by increased risks, particularly concerning Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA). Several clinical trials reported a higher incidence of DKA when patients with T1DM received SGLT-2 inhibitors such as Sotagliflozin and Empagliflozin. On the other hand, patients with T1DM and a body mass index (BMI) of ≥27 kg/m2 treated with Dapagliflozin showed similar reduction in hyperglycemia and body weight and insignificantly increased DKA incidence compared to the overall trial population. Additional multicenter and randomized studies are required to establish safer and more effective long-term strategies based on patient selection, education, and continuous ketone body monitoring for optimal integration of SGLT-2 inhibitors into T1DM therapeutic protocol.

The Ketogenic Effect of SGLT-2 Inhibitors-Beneficial or Harmful?

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, also called gliflozins or flozins, are a class of drugs that have been increasingly used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to their glucose-lowering, cardiovascular (CV), and renal positive effects. However, recent studies suggest that SGLT-2 inhibitors might also have a ketogenic effect, increasing ketone body production. While this can be beneficial for some patients, it may also result in several potential unfavorable effects, such as decreased bone mineral density, infections, and ketoacidosis, among others. Due to the intricate and multifaceted impact caused by SGLT-2 inhibitors, this initially anti-diabetic class of medications has been effectively used to treat both patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those with heart failure (HF). Additionally, their therapeutic potential appears to extend beyond the currently investigated conditions. The objective of this review article is to present a thorough summary of the latest research on the mechanism of action of SGLT-2 inhibitors, their ketogenesis, and their potential synergy with the ketogenic diet for managing diabetes. The article particularly discusses the benefits and risks of combining SGLT-2 inhibitors with the ketogenic diet and their clinical applications and compares them with other anti-diabetic agents in terms of ketogenic effects. It also explores future directions regarding the ketogenic effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors.

Incident infection risks depending on oral antidiabetic exposure in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have been speculated to have a potential to increase infection risks in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. We performed a cohort study using the Korean health insurance data to investigate infection risks with each drug class relative to metformin in insulin-treated T2DM patients. After propensity score matching, we included 1,498 and 749 patients in DPP4i + insulin vs metformin + insulin and 300 and 549 patients in SGLT2i + insulin vs metformin + insulin, respectively. In stratified analyses per patient factor, none of the odds ratios (ORs) were associated with a statistical significance across respiratory, genital, and urinary tract infections (UTIs), except that of the male stratum for respiratory infections (OR 0.77, p = 0.04). With regard to SGLT2is, a higher risk of genital infections was analyzed with their use than with metformin therapy (OR 1.76, p = 0.03). In stratified analyses, the OR for genital infections remained significant in the baseline cardiovascular disease stratum (OR 2.29, p = 0.01). No increased UTI risk was detected with SGLT2is compared against metformin. In this study on insulin-receiving T2DM patients, DPP4is were not associated with increased infection risks, whereas SGLT2is led to a higher risk for genital infections, but not for UTIs, relative to metformin.

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Empagliflozin Formulations in Healthy Korean Subjects

Purpose

Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor that is commonly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. As cocrystal formulation can improve the chemical properties of drugs, CKD-370 was newly developed as a cocrystal formulation of empagliflozin with solvate L-proline. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of these two empagliflozin formulations in healthy Korean subjects.

Methods

A randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study was conducted on healthy Korean participants. The subjects received a single oral 25 mg dose of either test (CKD-370) or reference treatment (Jardiance^®) tablet at each period. Plasma empagliflozin concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental methods. The primary PK parameters included the maximum concentration (C_max) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to last (AUC_last). The safety of both formulations was monitored and evaluated.

Results

A total of 28 healthy Korean adult subjects were randomized, and 27 subjects were included in the PK analysis. The mean ± standard deviation values of the primary PK parameters, C_max and AUC_last after administration of the test treatment, were 442.02 ± 103.37 μg/L and 3131.08 ± 529.30 μg·h/L, respectively, and those after administration of the reference treatment were 436.29 ± 118.74 μg/L and 3006.88 ± 514.21 μg·h/L, respectively. The geometric mean ratio and its 90% confidence interval of test to reference treatment for C_max and AUC_last were 1.0221 (0.9527-1.0967) and 1.0411 (1.0153-1.0677), respectively, which were within the commonly accepted bioequivalence criteria of 0.80 to 1.25. Both treatments were well-tolerated.

Conclusion

The two formulations of empagliflozin showed similar PK characteristics and were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects.

The Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2-Inhibitors on Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Steatohepatitis and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are part of metabolic syndrome and share multiple causal associations. Both conditions have an alarmingly increasing incidence and lead to multiple complications, which have an impact on a variety of organs and systems, such as the kidneys, eyes, and nervous and cardiovascular systems, or may cause metabolic disruptions. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2-inhibitors (SGLT2-i), as an antidiabetic class with well-established cardiovascular benefits, and its class members have also been studied for their presumed effects on steatosis and fibrosis improvement in patients with NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of SGLT2-i on the treatment of NAFLD/NASH in patients with T2DM. Of the originally identified 179 articles, 21 articles were included for final data analysis. Dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin are some of the most used and studied SGLT2-i agents which have proven efficacy in treating patients with NAFLD/NASH by addressing/targeting different pathophysiological targets/mechanisms: insulin sensitivity improvement, weight loss, especially visceral fat loss, glucotoxicity, and lipotoxicity improvement or even improvement of chronic inflammation. Despite the considerable variability in study duration, sample size, and diagnostic method, the SGLT2-i agents used resulted in improvements in non-invasive markers of steatosis or even fibrosis in patients with T2DM. This systematic review offers encouraging results that place the SGLT2-i class at the top of the therapeutic arsenal for patients diagnosed with T2DM and NAFLD/NASH.

Characteristics of Hospitalized Adults With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Due to Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Escherichia coli in a Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

The increase in extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing microbes in recent years represents a major challenge.

AIM

To study the risk factors for urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in patients requiring hospitalization for treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Electronic health records were used to identify 616 inpatients over the age of 18 who had UTI symptoms and/or signs and an ESBL-producing E. coli strain cultured on urine culture between January 1 and December 31, 2018. The electronic health care records of these patients were searched to identify those patients with previous UTIs due to an ESBL-producing E. coli grown on urine culture. Patients with cancer or those taking prophylactic antibiotics or immunosuppression were excluded.

RESULT

Risk factors for the acquisition of ESBL-producing E. coli included male sex (P = 0.0032), age over 66 years (P < 0.0001), renal stones (P = 0.0021), urology intervention within six months of presentation (P = 0.0360), pressure sores (P = 0.0002), feeding tubes (P = 0.0076), and urinary catheter (P = 0.0023). Comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus and duration of antibiotic therapy were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence of ESBL-producing E. coli UTI (P = 0.4680, P = 0.3826, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial stewardship programs may have reduced the development of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli. However, the recognition of risk factors for UTI caused by ESBL-producing E. coli may facilitate the early detection of high-risk cases and guide treatment decisions. This can improve patient outcomes while decreasing the length of the hospital stay.

Prescribing Cascades: How to Detect Them, Prevent Them, and Use Them Appropriately

BACKGROUND

A prescribing cascade is the treatment of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) with another drug. In this review, we discuss (a) the different types of prescribing cascade and (b) the measures that can be taken so that they will be recognized and dealt with appropriately, both in the hospital and in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search.

RESULTS

The literature distinguishes intentional from unintentional prescribing cascades, and appropriate from inappropriate ones. We further distinguish prophylactic from therapeutic prescribing cascades and draw a line between those that are necessary and those that are merely appropriate. The following main questions are essential for dealing with prescribing cascades appropriately: (1) Did the precipitating drug cause a clinically relevant ADR or risk of an ADR? (2) Is the precipitating drug still indicated? (3) Can an ADR be avoided by altering the treatment with the precipitating drug, or by (4) switching to another drug instead? (5) Can the drug used to treat the ADR actually affect it beneficially? (6) Do the benefits of the prescribing cascade outweigh its risks?

CONCLUSION

Prescribing cascades are not problematic in themselves; on the contrary, they are sometimes a necessary part of good prescribing practice. There is still a lack of practically implementable instruments to help physicians detect prescribing cascades reliably, assess them properly, and put them to appropriate use.