Semi-Mechanism-Based Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of the Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor Vismodegib

Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound valemetostat and platelet dynamics in healthy volunteers and patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Valemetostat is an EZH2/1 inhibitor that has been approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, based mainly on results from a single-arm phase II trial. It is currently under investigation worldwide for the treatment of other non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), including peripheral T-cell lymphoma, and for solid tumors. Semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic modeling of total and unbound valemetostat and an analysis of the platelet time course during treatment with valemetostat were conducted using data from five clinical trials (two in patients with NHL and three in healthy volunteers). Pharmacokinetic data, including 3162 total/1871 unbound valemetostat observations from 102 patients and 72 healthy volunteers, were described by a three-compartment model with sequential zero-/first-order absorption and saturable binding in the central compartment. Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) was the most influential covariate for total valemetostat exposure, yet had little impact on unbound exposure, meaning no dose adjustment was warranted based on AAG levels. The longitudinal platelet data from 101 patients (2313 observations) were adequately described by a modified Friberg model with two proliferation compartments, which characterized unique spontaneous recovery of platelet counts without dose modifications. A model-based simulation quantitatively assessed the proposed dose-adjustment guidance in case of platelet count decreased by comparing the probability of treatment discontinuation due to platelet count decreased with or without the dose adjustment. In summary, the models described observed total and unbound valemetostat concentrations and a unique time course of platelets during treatment, which can justify the clinical dose and provide dose-adjustment guidance.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Hedgehog pathway inhibitors used in the treatment of advanced or treatment-refractory basal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Sonidegib and vismodegib are currently the only US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency-approved small-molecule Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs)for treating adults with advanced or refractory basal cell carcinoma (BCC) that is not amenable to conventional surgery or radiotherapy. At this time, there are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing these two HHIs for efficacy and safety to assist clinicians with determining which HHI may be best suited for their patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review briefly describes the pathogenesis of BCC, provides a detailed overview of the key pharmacokinetic profile differences between sonidegib and vismodegib, explains their pharmacodynamics, and highlights the therapeutic considerations when either HHI is used to treat special patient populations.

EXPERT OPINION

Although both HHIs act at the same molecular target in the Hedgehog pathway, there are significant differences in their pharmacokinetic profiles that may play a potential role in their efficacy and safety. Evidence-based recommendations serve to inform clinicians until direct comparative clinical trials of sonidegib versus vismodegib are conducted to determine the clinical relevance of the reported differences in their pharmacokinetic properties.

The current clinical approach to difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor in adult white populations. If BCCs are not treated for years, if they cause massive destruction of the surrounding tissues, if they are considered unresectable or not eligible for radiotherapy they become progressively 'locally advanced' (laBCC) or metastatic (mBCC). These tumors are defined as 'difficult-to-treat BCC.'

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive search on PubMed was conducted to identify relevant literature about the several approved and recommended treatment options for the management of difficult-to-treat BCC published from January 2012 to July 2022. Surgical options, radiotherapy, hedgehog inhibitors, immunotherapy, and combined treatments are discussed. The keywords used were basal cell carcinoma; difficult-to-treat BCC; management of difficult-to-treat BCC; surgical therapy; radiotherapy; hedgehog inhibitors; immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Identifying the best approach to DTT BCCs is one of the main challenges for the dermato-oncologist. The introduction of HHI for the treatment of advanced BCCs has revolutionized the clinical management of DTT BCCs. The immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab has been approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic BCC refractory to HHI therapy or in patients intolerant to HHI therapy. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a key role in managing these complex patients.

Sonidegib for the Treatment of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) accounts for almost 80% of skin cancers, and its healthcare workload burden is substantial within dermatology departments. Although most BCCs are small, well-defined tumors amenable of surgery or conservative procedures, in a small proportion of patients, BCCs can progress to an advanced stage including locally advanced BCC. The goal of the clinician in the treatment of BCC should be the right therapeutic approach at diagnosis, and different guidelines propose treatment strategies in order to prevent relapses or disease progression. In case of unresectable and untreatable BCC with radiotherapy, the first-choice medical therapy is Hedgehog-GLI (HH) pathway inhibitors. Sonidegib was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) as a first-line treatment for adult patients with locally advanced BCC, becoming the second HH pathway inhibitor receiving approval after vismodegib. In this review, data on pharmacology, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sonidegib are summarized and compared to those of vismodegib. Lastly, indications on the management of advanced basal cell carcinoma based on author’s clinical experience are provided.

Expression of Glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 as biomarker with sonidegib in advanced basal cell carcinoma

The pivotal BOLT (Basal cell carcinoma Outcomes with LDE225 [sonidegib] Treatment) study established the durable efficacy and manageable toxicity of sonidegib 200 mg once daily (QD) through 42 months in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC). This secondary analysis used expression of Glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (GLI1) as a biomarker to assess the extent of Hedgehog pathway inhibition by sonidegib in patients with locally advanced BCC (laBCC) and metastatic BCC (mBCC). The study enrolled 230 patients, 79 and 151 receiving sonidegib 200 and 800 mg QD, respectively. At week 17, GLI1 expression was reduced from baseline by a median percentage (95% confidence interval) of 88.7% (54.6%-93.0%) and 97.0% (77.5%-98.9%) for aggressive laBCC, 97.5% (80.3%-98.8%) and 95.0% (80.7%-97.5%) for nonaggressive laBCC, and 99.1% (96.4%-99.6%) and 99.3% (95.9%-99.9%) for mBCC in the 200 and 800 mg groups, respectively. Substantial repression of GLI1 was observed in patient subgroups stratified by age, sex, BCC cytological subtype, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lesion site, baseline number of BCCs, and prior radiotherapy. Results support further studies on the inhibition of Hedgehog pathway genes by sonidegib in patients with laBCC and mBCC.

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Vismodegib: Deconvoluting the Impact of Saturable Plasma Protein Binding, pH-Dependent Solubility and Nonsink Permeation

Vismodegib displays unique pharmacokinetic characteristics including saturable plasma protein binding to alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG) and apparent time-dependent bioavailability leading to non-linear PK with dose and time, significantly faster time to steady-state and lower than predicted accumulation. Given these unique characteristics, a PBPK model was developed to explore mechanistic insights into saturable protein binding and complex oral absorption processes and de-convolute the impact of these independent non-linear processes on vismodegib exposure. Simcyp V18 was used for model development; oral absorption was characterized using the multi-layer gut wall (M-ADAM) model and mechanistic permeability model, incorporating transport across an unstirred boundary layer (UBL) between the luminal fluid and enterocyte in each segment of the gastrointestinal tract. PBPK simulations were compared with observed PK data from clinical trials in oncology patients and healthy subjects. Saturation of vismodegib protein binding to AAG led to substantially lower total drug accumulation, time to steady-state, and Css_total. For free exposure, Css_free and accumulation were unchanged, but time to steady-state was substantially reduced. Vismodegib oral absorption declined with both dose and dosing frequency; the concentration gradient driving vismodegib oral absorption declined with multiple doses, leading to a 32% decrease in vismodegib f_a from first dose to steady-state. Fed simulations suggested that increased solubility and dissolution are partially offset by reduced permeability across the UBL due to slower diffusion of micelle-bound drug. This work demonstrates the value of PBPK modeling to simultaneously capture and de-convolute multi-faceted absorption and disposition processes and provide mechanistic insights for compounds with complex pharmacokinetics.

Analysis of Longitudinal-Ordered Categorical Data for Muscle Spasm Adverse Event of Vismodegib: Comparison Between Different Pharmacometric Models

Longitudinal‐ordered categorical data, common in clinical trials, can be effectively analyzed with nonlinear mixed effect models. In this article, we systematically evaluated the performance of three different models in longitudinal muscle spasm adverse event (AE) data obtained from a clinical trial for vismodegib: a proportional odds (PO) model, a discrete‐time Markov model, and a continuous‐time Markov model. All models developed based on weekly spaced data can reasonably capture the proportion of AE grade over time; however, the PO model overpredicted the transition frequency between grades and the cumulative probability of AEs. The influence of data frequency (daily, weekly, or unevenly spaced) was also investigated. The PO model performance reduced with increased data frequency, and the discrete‐time Markov model failed to describe unevenly spaced data, but the continuous‐time Markov model performed consistently well. Clinical trial simulations were conducted to illustrate the muscle spasm resolution time profile during the 8‐week dose interruption period after 12 weeks of continuous treatment.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Glasdegib in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies and Solid Tumors

Glasdegib is an inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway recently approved in the United States for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted to characterize the kinetic behavior of glasdegib and its sources of variability (covariates) by utilizing data from 269 patients with cancer treated with oral glasdegib doses ranging from 5 to 640 mg/d. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was conducted using NONMEM (v.7.3) and Perl-speaks NONMEM (v.4.2.0). The estimated apparent total clearance, apparent central volume of distribution, and apparent peripheral volume of distribution were 6.27 L/h, 3.32 L, and 279.2 L, respectively. Age, sex, race, and hepatic function were not significant covariates on glasdegib pharmacokinetic parameters. Baseline body weight, percentage bone marrow blasts, creatinine clearance, and use of moderate or strong cytochrome P450 3A inhibitors were statistically significant covariates on apparent total clearance; however, the magnitude of the effects was not considered clinically meaningful.

Vismodegib: A Review in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

Vismodegib (Erivedge^®) is the first-in-class, oral small molecule inhibitor of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway, abnormal activation of which is associated with basal cell carcinoma (BCC). In the USA, vismodegib is indicated for the treatment of adults with metastatic BCC (mBCC) or with locally-advanced BCC (LaBCC) that has recurred following surgery or who are not candidates for surgery, and who are not candidates for radiation. Similarly, in the EU, vismodegib is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic mBCC, or with laBCC inappropriate for surgery or radiotherapy. The full European approval of vismodegib was based on the results of two phase II, open-label, noncomparative, international trials (ERIVANCE BCC and STEVIE), both of which showed high rates of tumour control in the indicated patient populations, including individuals with or without Gorlin syndrome. These studies also showed that vismodegib has an acceptable and manageable tolerability profile characterized by a number of class-related treatment-emergent adverse events, including muscle spasms, taste disturbances, alopecia, weight loss and asthenia (fatigue). Primary and secondary resistance to vismodegib has been documented, albeit at a low rate compared with some other targeted therapies. Vismodegib is therefore an effective and generally well tolerated systemic therapy for patients with mBCC and laBCC that can no longer be suitably controlled with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Historically, it is the first member of a class of drugs (Hh pathway inhibitors) that are now considered to be first-line treatment options for such individuals.

Survival Prolongation Index as a Novel Metric to Assess Anti-Tumor Activity in Xenograft Models

A single efficacy metric quantifying anti-tumor activity in xenograft models is useful in evaluating different tumors' drug sensitivity and dose-response of an anti-tumor agent. Commonly used metrics include the ratio of tumor volume in treated vs. control mice (T/C), tumor growth inhibition (TGI), ratio of area under the curve (AUC), and growth rate inhibition (GRI). However, these metrics have some limitations. In particular, for biologics with long half-lives, tumor volume (TV) of treated xenografts displays a delay in volume reduction (and in some cases, complete regression) followed by a growth rebound. These observed data cannot be described by exponential functions, which is the underlying assumption of TGI and GRI, and the fit depends on how long the tumor volumes are monitored. On the other hand, T/C and TGI only utilizes information from one chosen time point. Here, we propose a new metric called Survival Prolongation Index (SPI), calculated as the time for drug-treated TV to reach a certain size (e.g., 600 mm³) divided by the time for control TV to reach 600mm³ and therefore not dependent on the chosen final time point t_f. Simulations were conducted under different scenarios (i.e., exponential vs. saturable growth, linear vs. nonlinear kill function). For all cases, SPI is the most linear and growth-rate independent metric. Subsequently, a literature analysis was conducted using 11 drugs to evaluate the correlation between pre-clinically obtained SPI and clinical overall response. This retrospective analysis of approved drugs suggests that a predicted SPI of 2 is necessary for clinical response.

A survey of renal impairment pharmacokinetic studies for new oncology drug approvals in the USA from 2010 to early 2015: a focus on development strategies and future directions

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a guidance document in 2010 on pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in renal impairment (RI) on the basis of observations that substances such as uremic toxins might result in altered drug metabolism and excretion. No specific recommendations for oncology drugs were included. We surveyed the publicly available FDA review documents of 29 small molecule oncology drugs approved between 2010 and the first quarter of 2015. The objectives were as follows: (i) summarize the impact of RI on PK at the time of the initial new drug application; (ii) identify limitations of the guidance; and (iii) outline an integrated approach to study the impact of RI on these drugs. Our survey indicates that the current FDA guidance does not appear to provide clear strategic or decision pathways for RI studies in terms of small molecule oncology drugs. The FDA review documents indicate an individualized approach to the review because of the complex pharmacologic nature of these drugs and patient populations. Overall, the strategy for carrying out a RI study during clinical development or as a postmarketing study requires integration with the totality of data, including mass balance, absolute bioavailability, drug–drug interaction, hepatic dysfunction, population PK, exposure–response analysis, the therapeutic window for best guidance, and determination of the optimal doses for special oncology populations.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Topiramate in Japanese Pediatric and Adult Patients With Epilepsy Using Routinely Monitored Data

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is a second-generation antiepileptic drug used as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in adults and children with partial seizures. A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed to improve the topiramate dosage adjustment for individualized treatment.

METHODS

Patients whose steady-state serum concentration of topiramate was routinely monitored at Kyoto University Hospital from April 2012 to March 2013 were included in the model-building data. A nonlinear mixed effects modeling program was used to evaluate the influence of covariates on topiramate pharmacokinetics. The obtained PPK model was evaluated by internal model validations, including goodness-of-fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks, and was externally confirmed using the validation data from January 2015 to December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 177 steady-state serum concentrations from 93 patients were used for the model-building analysis. The patients' age ranged from 2 to 68 years, and body weight ranged from 8.6 to 105 kg. The median serum concentration of topiramate was 1.7 mcg/mL, and half of the patients received carbamazepine coadministration. Based on a one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination, the apparent volume of distribution was 105 L/70 kg, and the apparent clearance was allometrically related to the body weight as 2.25 L·h·70 kg without carbamazepine or phenytoin. Combination treatment with carbamazepine or phenytoin increased the apparent clearance to 3.51 L·h·70 kg. Goodness-of-fit plots, prediction-corrected visual predictive check, and external validation using the validation data from 43 patients confirmed an appropriateness of the final model. Simulations based on the final model showed that dosage adjustments allometrically scaling to body weight can equalize the serum concentrations in children of various ages and adults.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPK model, using the power scaling of body weight, effectively elucidated the topiramate serum concentration profile ranging from pediatric to adult patients. Dosage adjustments based on body weight and concomitant antiepileptic drug help obtain the dosage of topiramate necessary to reach an effective concentration in each individual.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of vismodegib in patients with advanced solid malignancies and hepatic impairment

PURPOSE

Vismodegib is a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma. Currently, the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of vismodegib in patients with hepatic dysfunction are unknown and are the objective of this study.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid malignancies and hepatic impairment were enrolled into one of four cohorts: normal [bilirubin (bili) < upper limit of normal (ULN)], mild (ULN < bili ≤ 1.5 × ULN), moderate (1.5 × ULN < bili ≤ 3×ULN), and severe (3 × ULN < bili < 10 × ULN) dysfunction. Patients received oral vismodegib 150 mg daily. Plasma PK samples on days 1, 3, 5, and 8 were collected. Vismodegib therapy was continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were accrued: nine normal, eight mild, eight moderate, and six severe. Four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity of hyperbilirubinemia on study: one in the moderate cohort and three in the severe cohort. Six patients died within 30 days after the last dose of vismodegib. All deaths were attributed to disease progression. Observed maximal and average steady-state concentrations and AUC of vismodegib at steady state (day 8) were similar across cohorts. Average AAG concentrations in patients with hepatic impairment were comparable to those of patients with normal hepatic function.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic impairment does not appear to impact vismodegib PK, and therefore, dose adjustment is not necessary in this special population. The study was influenced by the high number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with advanced cirrhosis; rendering it difficult to draw any causal relationships between vismodegib exposure and the serious adverse events.