Quality of life measurement in rosacea. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces (TFs) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (ARHS) do not recommend the use of any generic instrument as a single method of Health Related (HR) QoL assessment in rosacea, except when comparing quimp (quality of life impairment) in rosacea patients with that in other non-dermatologic skin diseases and/or healthy controls. The EADV TFs on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and ARHS recommend the use of the dermatology-specific HRQoL instrument the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the rosacea-specific HRQoL instrument RosaQoL in rosacea patients. The DLQI minimal clinically important difference may be used as a marker of clinical efficacy of the treatment and DLQI score banding of 0 or 1 corresponding to no effect on patients' HRQoL could be an important treatment goal. This information may be added to consensuses and guidelines for rosacea.

TRASS: a global approach to assess the severity of truncal acne

INTRODUCTION

Only a small amount of published data regarding truncal acne is available and no proper tool to assess its severity exists.

AIM

to provide dermatologists with an easy-to-use tool to assess truncal acne (TRASS, truncal acne severity scale) using a global approach.

METHODS

A scoring tool that assesses the severity of acne (based on GEA and ECLA scales) on the trunk using a global approach was built, including three subscores: family history, clinical signs and quality of life (QoL). In order to test TRASS, the experts used photos of 47 patients attending their clinics with truncal acne. The ROP (Regression OPtimized) model was applied to assess the diagnosis performance of TRASS and to identify items contributing to the classification of the patients. Internal testing was made to demonstrate the robustness of the model. Correlation analyses between the different items were performed to evaluate the interaction between the different items and their impact on the severity grading of truncal acne.

RESULTS

Patients with the most severe acne were identified by TRASS. The error level was 6.6% after internal validation and 10.4% when using the median value or the centile 75^th (6.6% and 10.4%). Correlation was significant between systemic treatment and scars (p=0.0025) and nodules (p=0.01988) and between location and QoL (p=0.0095).

CONCLUSION

TRASS is the first global, patient-centred approach to evaluate truncal acne by scoring the importance of each factor independently from its clinical severity. TRASS may allow the practitioner to choose and validate the most suitable therapy together with the patient in order to treat his or her truncal acne successfully and to limit treatment failure.

Photoprotection according to skin phototype and dermatoses: practical recommendations from an expert panel

Increasing evidence on the impact of the different wavelengths of sunlight on the skin demonstrates the need for tailored recommendations of sunscreen according to skin phototype and dermatoses, which is now possible due to advances in the filters and formulations of sunscreens. A selective literature search was performed by an international expert panel, focusing on the type of sunscreen to recommend for photoaging, skin cancers, photodermatoses, pigmentary disorders and skin inflammatory disorders. Protection against ultraviolet (UV)B is especially important for light skin as there is a high risk of sunburn, DNA damage and skin cancers. Darker skin may be naturally better protected against UVB but is more prone to hyperpigmentation induced by visible light (VL) and UVA. Protection against UVA, VL and infrared A can be helpful for all skin phototypes as they penetrate deeply and cause photoaging. Long‐wave UVA1 plays a critical role in pigmentation, photoaging, skin cancer, DNA damage and photodermatoses. Adapting the formulation and texture of the sunscreen to the type of skin and dermatoses is also essential. Practical recommendations on the type of sunscreen to prescribe are provided to support the clinician in daily practice.

Which adjuvant treatment for patients with BRAFV600-mutant cutaneous melanoma?

Treatment of patients with melanoma has considerably improved over the past decade and more recently with adjuvant therapies for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III (loco-regional metastases) or IV (distant metastases) totally resected melanoma, in order to prevent recurrence. In the adjuvant setting, two options are available to patients with BRAF^V600-mutant AJCC stage III totally resected melanoma: anti-PD-1 blockers (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or BRAF plus MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib plus trametinib). In the absence of comparative studies, it is difficult to determine which of these options is best. Our aim was to review published studies focusing on the management of patients with BRAF^V600-mutant melanoma in the adjuvant setting. We also reviewed the main clinical trials of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy in advanced (i.e. unresectable metastatic) BRAF-mutant melanoma in an attempt to identify results potentially affecting the management of patients on adjuvants. More adverse events are observed with targeted therapy, but all resolve rapidly upon drug discontinuation, whereas with immune checkpoint blockers some adverse events may persist. New therapeutic strategies are emerging, notably neoadjuvant therapies for stage III patients and adjuvant therapies for stage II patients; the place of the adjuvant strategy amidst all these options will soon be re-evaluated. The choice of adjuvant treatment could influence the choice of subsequent treatments in neo-adjuvant or metastatic settings. This review will lead clinicians to a better understanding of the different adjuvant treatments available for patients with totally resected AJCC stage III and IV BRAF^V600-mutant melanoma before considering subsequent treatment strategies.

Impact of acne on the daily life of adult patients: building a self-administered patient questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Acne is a long-lasting disease in adolescents and adults impacting the patient's daily life. Currently, there is no specific questionnaire that assesses its impact in adult patients.

AIM

To build a self-administered questionnaire assessing the impact of acne on the daily life in adult patients.

METHOD

A multidisciplinary working group was created, including 3 experts in healthcare questionnaires and dermatologists specialized in acne. A questionnaire using a standardized methodology for designing self-administered patient questionnaires according to conceptual, development and validation phases was developed. A cultural and linguistic validation into US English was conducted, based on the original French version.

RESULTS

A 14-item questionnaire demonstrating consistency, reproducibility and high reliability was build. The questionnaire significantly correlated with the SF-12 mental and SF-12 physical scores and CADI, indicating good external validity.

CONCLUSION

The present acne burden questionnaire AI-ADL allows the practioner to assess quickly and easily the burden of acne in patients during his daily clinical practice. Moreover, its short format allows patients to express easily and quickly their feelings and to initiate a conversation between the practioner and his patient. Thus, AI-ADL may help to better understand the multidimensional nature of acne, as well as the individual impact on the acne patient's daily life and moreover, it may play a key role in the decision-making process of treatment initiation and involvement of the patient in the management of his acne.

Benefits of simulation using standardized patients for training dermatology residents in breaking bad news

INTRODUCTION

Simulation in healthcare is a rapidly developing teaching method in the training of technical procedures. It is also used to enable caregivers to learn how to inform patients of serious illness and complex health status. However, its use is not widespread in the field of dermatology. This study investigated the utility of simulation as regards disclosing melanoma diagnosis, taking resident physician satisfaction as a primary endpoint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen dermatology residents were recruited as trainees. Four scenarios were allocated based on length of residency. An introductory briefing was held prior to the training sessions. Debriefing took place on completion of the diagnosis disclosure consultation. The participants completed questionnaires after the simulation session, after debriefing, and 3 months after the simulation session. The primary endpoint was usefulness of the session felt by trainees several months after the simulation.

RESULTS

The majority of participants (93.3%) thought the session helped with stress management, improved their attitude and control over their reaction (86.6%), and improved their communication skills (100%). They rated the usefulness of the simulation at 7.79/10 on average (range: 5-10).

DISCUSSION

According to our findings the resident physicians involved, particularly those with the least experience, were satisfied with this type of learning technique. Any difficulties encountered by these residents were brought to light and addressed during debriefing.

CONCLUSION

There would appear to be real benefits to be reaped from simulation, whatever the stage of medical training at which it takes place. Simulation should become an increasingly important part of contemporary pregraduate specialty programs.

Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAFV600 wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase III IMspire170 study

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest that the combination of MEK inhibitors and immunotherapeutic agents may result in improved efficacy in melanoma. We evaluated whether combining MEK inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition was more efficacious than immune checkpoint inhibition alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF^V600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

IMspire170 was an international, randomized, open-label, phase III study. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive cobimetinib (60 mg, days 1-21) plus anti-programmed death-ligand 1 atezolizumab (840 mg every 2 weeks) in 28-day cycles or anti-programmed death-1 pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) alone until loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Between 11 December 2017, and 29 January 2019, 446 patients were randomized to receive cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (n = 222) or pembrolizumab (n = 224). Median follow-up was 7.1 months [interquartile range (IQR) 4.8-9.9] for cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 7.2 months (IQR 4.9-10.1) for pembrolizumab. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-7.2] with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 5.7 months (95% CI 3.7-9.6) with pembrolizumab [stratified hazard ratio 1.15 (95% CI 0.88-1.50); P = 0.30]. Hazard ratios for PFS were consistent across prespecified subgroups. In exploratory biomarker analyses, higher tumor mutational burden was associated with improved clinical outcomes in both treatment arms. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were increased blood creatine phosphokinase (10.0% with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab versus 0.9% with pembrolizumab), diarrhea (7.7% versus 1.9%), rash (6.8% versus 0.9%), hypertension (6.4% versus 3.7%), and dermatitis acneiform (5.0% versus 0). Serious AEs occurred in 44.1% of patients with cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and 20.8% with pembrolizumab.

CONCLUSION

Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab did not improve PFS compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with BRAF^V600 wild-type advanced melanoma.

The evolving field of Dermato-oncology and the role of dermatologists: Position Paper of the EADO, EADV and Task Forces, EDF, IDS, EBDV-UEMS and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force

BACKGROUND

The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing steadily over the last decades. Although there have been significant breakthroughs in the management of skin cancers with the introduction of novel diagnostic tools and innovative therapies, skin cancer mortality, morbidity and costs heavily burden the society.

OBJECTIVE

Members of the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, International Dermoscopy Society, European Dermatology Forum, European Board of Dermatovenereology of the European Union of Medical Specialists and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force have joined this effort to emphasize the fundamental role that the specialist in Dermatology-Venereology has in the diagnosis and management of different types of skin cancer. We review the role of dermatologists in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and cutaneous lymphomas, and discuss approaches to optimize their involvement in effectively addressing the current needs and priorities of dermato-oncology.

DISCUSSION

Dermatologists play a crucial role in virtually all aspects of skin cancer management including the implementation of primary and secondary prevention, the formation of standardized pathways of care for patients, the establishment of specialized skin cancer treatment centres, the coordination of an efficient multidisciplinary team and the setting up of specific follow-up plans for patients.

CONCLUSION

Skin cancers represent an important health issue for modern societies. The role of dermatologists is central to improving patient care and outcomes. In view of the emerging diagnostic methods and treatments for early and advanced skin cancer, and considering the increasingly diverse skills, knowledge and expertise needed for managing this heterogeneous group of diseases, dermato-oncology should be considered as a specific subspecialty of Dermatology-Venereology.

Predictive value of FDG-PET imaging for relapse in metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD1 immunotherapy has shown a sustainable clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, strong predictive factors of the long-term response or risk of relapse remain to be identified.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether FDG-PET imaging could be superior to CT scan in distinguishing residual tumours versus the absence of tumour in patients with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) and whether a complete metabolic response (CMR) was associated with better outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective study conducted in all patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy between October 2014 and October 2017 considered to be in complete remission. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a relapse during the follow-up. CT scan and FDG-PET scan had to be performed within a maximum of 2 months of treatment discontinuation. For CT imaging, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 were used and included progressive disease (PD), SD, PR and complete response (CR). For FDG-PET imaging, the metabolic responses were classified as progressive metabolic disease, stable metabolic disease, residual FDG avidity (RFA) and CMR.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were in complete remission after collegial decision. Two patients had a SD on CT scan and a CMR on FDG-PET scan, and none of them relapsed. Ten patients had a PR on CT scan and a CMR on FDG-PET scan, and none of them relapsed. The mean treatment duration to achieve a complete remission was 7 months (3-23). A univariate analysis showed that a RFA assessed on the FDG-PET scan was significantly associated with a relapse (P = 0.00231).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with a PR on the CT scan and a CMR on the FDG-PET scan should be considered with a CR. Our study showed that FDG-PET imaging could play a crucial role in predicting the long-term outcome and help to decide whether treatment should be discontinued.

Truncal acne, what do we know?

Truncal acne is frequently overlooked in dermatological practice, even though it may result in scars and impact on self-esteem and body image. Therefore, it is important to identify the disease early in order to initiate treatment in time and, thus, to prevent it from worsening and resulting in physical and psychological sequelae. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of what is currently known about truncal acne, its prevalence, aetiology and physiopathology, how its severity is currently evaluated, how to differentiate it from other skin afflictions and current treatment options. A review of literature considering the issue of truncal acne published up to 2019 and available from PubMed was conducted, and in total, 76 articles were selected from PubMed. Currently, only little information about truncal acne is available. Considered as having the same pathophysiology as facial acne, the clinical picture and treatment response seem to differ. Specific acne severity grading systems and quality of life questionnaires as well as a specific treatment algorithm are still lacking. Filling this gap should allow clinicians to assess truncal acne in the best possible way, choosing suitable treatment options, helping patients to improve treatment adherence and quality of life and finally allowing a better management of truncal acne. In conclusion, more knowledge is required to treat more efficiently truncal acne.

Safety review of phenoxyethanol when used as a preservative in cosmetics

Phenoxyethanol, or 2-phenoxyethanol, has a large spectrum of antimicrobial activity and has been widely used as a preservative in cosmetic products for decades. It is effective against various Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, as well as against yeasts, and has only a weak inhibitory effect on resident skin flora. According to the European Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety, phenoxyethanol is safe for all consumers - including children of all ages - when used as a preservative in cosmetic products at a maximum concentration of 1%. Adverse systemic effects have been observed in toxicological studies on animals but only when the levels of exposure were many magnitudes higher (around 200-fold higher) than those to which consumers are exposed when using phenoxyethanol-containing cosmetic products. Despite its widespread use in cosmetic products, phenoxyethanol is a rare sensitizer. It can be considered as one of the most well-tolerated preservatives used in cosmetic products.

Acne from the young patient's perspective

Acne may significantly impact quality of life, self-esteem and self-worth. The aim of this paper was to provide an overview of the knowledge and perception of acne and its risk factors in adolescents and young adults. The most critical issues reported for an optimal management of this specific population were identified. A PubMed literature review of results from patient-oriented surveys published between 2007 and 2018 was conducted. Two different types of survey were used: those using either validated questionnaires or specifically developed questionnaires. No consistency or directly comparable data with regards to age, onset, duration, severity and treatment of acne and by whom and where data were collected were observed. Acne affected female patients psychologically more than male patients. The majority referred to their treating physician in order to obtain information, and all surveys pointed out that specific treatment programs would allow to increase awareness about acne. Beliefs, traditions and economic factors continue to impact the perception of and treatment choices for acne in almost all countries and cultures, maintaining the improvement of awareness about acne a major global health challenge. In conclusion, identifying, considering and managing the patient's concerns about acne may improve the young patient's well-being and thus decrease additional healthcare expenses for emerging psychological comorbidities. This can be achieved by creating substantial and structured awareness through local and global information campaigns via the treating physicians, Internet, social networks and education.

Cutibacterium acnes phylotypes diversity loss: a trigger for skin inflammatory process

BACKGROUND

Acne has long been understood as a multifactorial chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous follicle, where Cutibacterium acnes (subdivided into six main phylotypes) is a crucial factor. In parallel, the loss of microbial diversity among the skin commensal communities has recently been shown as often accompanied by inflammatory skin disorders.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the association of C. acnes phylotype diversity loss and the impact on Innate Immune System (IIS) activation.

METHODS

The IIS response of skin after incubation with phylotypes IA1, II or III individually and with the combination of IA1 + II + III phylotypes, was studied in an in vitro skin explant system. The inflammatory response was monitored by immunohistochemistry and ELISA assays, targeting a selection of Innate Immune Markers (IIMs) (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, TGF-β).

RESULTS

IIMs were significantly upregulated in skin when being incubated with phylotype IA1 alone compared with the combination IA1 + II + III. In parallel, ELISA assays confirmed these results in supernatants for IL-17, IL-8 and IL-10.

CONCLUSION

We identify the loss of C. acnes phylotype diversity as a trigger for IIS activation, leading to cutaneous inflammation. These innovative data underline the possibility to set up new approaches to treat acne. Indeed, maintaining the balance between the different phylotypes of C. acnes may be an interesting target for the development of drugs.

Actualités sur la prise en charge des kératoses actiniques chez les patients transplantés d’organes

Transplant recipients are at high risk of developing actinic keratosis (AK) and skin cancer. For this reason, initiating treatment at an early stage is crucial. Topical and systemic therapeutic options for AK have widely been described in studies of immunocompetent patients. However, little is known about AK management in organ transplant recipients (OTR). Photodynamic therapy (PDT), along with imiquimod, topical NSAIDs and topical 5-fluorouracil have been used on ORT patients in small non randomized studies. Although these studies seem to suggest that PDT offers best results, solid evidence is lacking. Nicotinamide and oral retinoids have also been described as reasonably effective preventive treatments in ORT patients. Management of immunosuppressive drugs is also considered as a key point for reducing the number of AK in ORT patients; an early switch for m-tor inhibitors has been shown to be protective while azathioprine, ciclosporin and tacrolimus have been shown to heighten the risk of developing AKs and skin cancer in this population. © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Kératoses actiniques : comprendre et traiter réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Galderma International.

Evolution and duration of nodules in severe nodular acne on the back: results from a four-week non-interventional, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Severe nodular acne is characterized by inflammatory nodules and scarring. Their natural evolution and duration are insufficiently investigated.

AIM

To investigate the evolution and duration of untreated acne nodules.

METHODOLOGY

Four-week, single-centre, non-interventional, prospective study in subjects with severe nodular acne on the back. Nodule evolution and duration was assessed using standardized photographs taken twice weekly.

RESULTS

Data from 23 subjects were evaluable. Mean age was 25.1 ± 4.9 years, 87% were males, and mean acne duration was 9.7 ± 6.7 years. At baseline, the overall total nodule count was 132 (mean number: 5.7 ± 3.0 nodules/subject). Among others, the following two main pathways were observed: nodules evolving directly into atrophic scars (31.8%) and nodules evolving towards papules into atrophic scars (37.9%). After 4 weeks, 77.3% of baseline nodules had evolved into atrophic scars. After baseline visit, a total of 247 new nodules (3.1 ± 2.2 nodules/week/subject) with a mean duration of 4.9 ± 2.6 days were observed. The mean duration of new nodules was significantly longer in subjects (n = 16) with ≥6 new nodules compared to subjects (n = 7) with <6 new nodules (5.2 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8 days; P = 0.008)). There was no correlation between the number of new nodules and acne duration or with the number of baseline nodules.

CONCLUSION

This study documents the natural nodule evolution and duration over 4 weeks and showed in 23 patients the scarring potential of untreated severe nodular acne of the back.

Taxonomy and phylogeny of Cutibacterium (formerly Propionibacterium) acnes in inflammatory skin diseases

Since its discovery, Propionibacterium acnes has undergone various name changes, and has been known since 2016, as Cutibacterium acnes. Herein we set out the history and rational of these taxonomic changes together with a description of a new genus, Cutibacterium, which includes five species within the cutaneous ecosystem. Modern microbiological techniques allow finer distinction between species and subspecies while also enabling the identification of separate subtypes within the population of Cutibacterium acnes. Phylogeny and molecular typing techniques thus provide a better understanding of the subtypes involved in certain inflammatory skin diseases, including acne, folliculitis and progressive macular hypomelanosis.