Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Imipenem-Relebactam in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Bacterial Infections

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) drug combinations: insights from a pharmacometric simulation study

BACKGROUND

The emergence of β-lactamase-producing bacteria has led to the use of β-lactam (BL) antibiotic and β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) drug combinations. Despite therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) being endorsed for BLs, the impact of TDM on BLIs remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate whether BLIs are available in effective exposures at the site of infection and assess if TDM of BLIs could be of interest.

METHODS

Population pharmacokinetic models for 9 BL and BLI compounds were used to simulate drug concentrations at infection sites following EMA-approved dose regimens, considering plasma protein binding and tissue penetration. Predicted target site concentrations were used for probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis.

RESULTS

Using EUCAST targets, satisfactory (≥90%) PTA was observed for BLs in patients with typical renal clearance (CrCL of 80 mL/min) across various sites of infection. However, results varied for BLIs. Avibactam achieved satisfactory PTA only in plasma, with reduced PTAs in abdomen (78%), lung (73%) and prostate (23%). Similarly, tazobactam resulted in unsatisfactory PTAs in intra-abdominal infections (79%), urinary tract infections (64%) and prostatitis (34%). Imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam achieved overall satisfactory PTAs, except in prostatitis and high-MIC infections for the latter combination.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the risk of solely relying on TDM of BLs, as this can indicate acceptable exposures of the BL while the BLI concentration, and consequently the combination, can result in suboptimal performance in terms of bacterial killing. Thus, dose adjustments also based on plasma concentration measurements of BLIs, in particular for avibactam and tazobactam, can be valuable in clinical practice to obtain effective exposures at the target site.

Mutant prevention concentrations, in vitro resistance evolution dynamics, and mechanisms of resistance to imipenem and imipenem/relebactam in carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates showing ceftazidime/avibactam resistance

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants selected during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment usually develop susceptibility to carbapenems and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitors, such as imipenem and imipenem/relebactam. We analyzed imipenem and imipenem/relebactam single-step mutant frequencies, resistance development trajectories and differentially selected resistance mechanisms using two representative K. pneumoniae isolates that had developed ceftazidime/avibactam resistance during therapy (ST512/KPC-31 and ST258/KPC-35). Mutant frequencies and mutant prevention concentrations were measured in Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing incremental concentrations of imipenem or imipenem/relebactam. Resistance dynamics were determined after incubation for 7 days in 10 mL MH tubes containing incremental concentrations of each antibiotic or combination, up to 64 times their baseline MIC. Two colonies per strain from each experiment were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing. The impact of KPC variants identified in resistant mutants on β-lactam resistance was investigated by cloning experiments. Imipenem/relebactam suppressed the emergence of resistant mutants at lower concentrations than imipenem, slowed down resistance development for both strains, and the resulting mutants yielded lower MICs of carbapenems and carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitors than those selected with imipenem alone. Characterization of resistant mutants revealed that imipenem resistance was mainly caused by inactivation of OmpK36 and mutations in the KPC β-lactamase. Imipenem/relebactam-resistant mutants also maintained OmpK36 alterations, but mutations in KPC were much less frequent compared with those selected with imipenem alone. Genetic and biochemical characterization of the KPC derivatives identified in the resistant mutants confirmed their role in carbapenem resistance. Our data positions imipenem/relebactam as an attractive therapeutic option for combating ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections.

Durlobactam to boost the clinical utility of standard of care β-lactams against Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease

β-Lactams present several desirable pharmacodynamic features leading to the rapid eradication of many bacterial pathogens. Imipenem (IPM) and cefoxitin (FOX) are injectable β-lactams recommended during the intensive treatment phase of pulmonary infections caused by Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab). However, their potency against Mab is many-fold lower than against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens for which they were optimized, putting into question their clinical utility. Here, we show that adding the recently approved durlobactam-sulbactam (DUR-SUL) pair to either IPM or FOX achieves growth inhibition, bactericidal, and cytolytic activity at concentrations that are within those achieved in patients and below the clinical breakpoints established for each agent. Synergies between DUR-SUL and IPM or FOX were confirmed across a large panel of clinical isolates. Through in vitro resistant mutant selection, we also show that adding DUR-SUL abrogates acquired resistance to IPM and FOX. Since the use of β-lactam injectables is firmly grounded in clinical practice during the intensive treatment phase of Mab pulmonary disease, their potentiation by FDA-approved DUR-SUL to bring minimum inhibitory concentration distributions within achievable concentration ranges could offer significant short-term benefits to patients, while novel β-lactam combinations are optimized specifically against Mab pulmonary infections, for which no reliable cure exists.

Evolving resistance landscape in gram-negative pathogens: An update on β-lactam and β-lactam-inhibitor treatment combinations for carbapenem-resistant organisms

Antibiotic resistance has become a global threat as it is continuously growing due to the evolution of β-lactamases diminishing the activity of classic β-lactam (BL) antibiotics. Recent antibiotic discovery and development efforts have led to the availability of β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) with activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamases as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO). Nevertheless, there is still a lack of drugs that target metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), which hydrolyze carbapenems efficiently, and oxacillinases (OXA) often present in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. This review aims to provide a snapshot of microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical data for currently available BL/BLI treatment options as well as agents in late stage development for CRO harboring various β-lactamases including MBL and OXA-enzymes.

What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for β-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices are widely used for the selection of optimum antibiotic doses. For β-lactam antibiotics, fT>MIC, best relates antibiotic exposure to efficacy and is widely used to guide the dosing of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, often without considering any PK/PD exposure requirements for BLIs.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to describe the PK/PD exposure requirements of BLIs for optimal microbiological efficacy when used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

Literature was searched online through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to 5 June 2023. Studies that report the PK/PD index and threshold concentration of BLIs approved for clinical use were included. Narrative data synthesis was carried out to assimilate the available evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. The PK/PD index that described the efficacy of BLIs was fT>CT for tazobactam, avibactam and clavulanic acid and fAUC0-24/MIC for relebactam and vaborbactam. The optimal magnitude of the PK/PD index is variable for each BLI based on the companion β-lactam antibiotics, type of bacteria and β-lactamase enzyme gene transcription levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK/PD index that describes the efficacy of BLIs and the exposure measure required for their efficacy is variable among inhibitors; as a result, it is difficult to make clear inference on what the optimum index is. Further PK/PD profiling of BLI, using preclinical infection models that simulate the anticipated mode(s) of clinical use, is warranted to streamline the exposure targets for use in the optimization of dosing regimens.

Imipenem/relebactam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving modality but has the potential to alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antimicrobials. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an antibiotic with utility in treating certain multi-drug resistant Gram-negative infections. Herein, we describe the population pharmacokinetics of imipenem and relebactam in critically ill patients supported on ECMO.

METHODS

Patients with infection supported on ECMO received 4-6 doses of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam per current prescribing information based on estimated creatinine clearance. Blood samples were collected following the final dose of the antibiotic. Concentrations were determined via LC-MS/MS. Population PK models were fit with and without covariates using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulations of 1000 patients assessed joint PTA of fAUC0-24/MIC ≥ 8 for relebactam, and ≥40% fT > MIC for imipenem for each approved dosing regimen.

RESULTS

Seven patients supported on ECMO were included in PK analyses. A two-compartment model with creatinine clearance as a covariate on clearance for both imipenem and relebactam fitted the data best. The mean ± standard deviation parameters were: CL0, 15.21 ± 6.52 L/h; Vc, 10.13 ± 2.26 L; K12, 2.45 ± 1.16 h-1 and K21, 1.76 ± 0.49 h-1 for imipenem, and 6.95 ± 1.34 L/h, 9.81 ± 2.69 L, 2.43 ± 1.13 h-1 and 1.52 ± 0.67 h-1 for relebactam. Simulating each approved dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam according to creatinine clearance yielded PTAs of ≥90% up to an MIC of 2 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dosed according to package insert in patients supported on ECMO is predicted to achieve exposures sufficient to treat susceptible Gram-negative isolates, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Endophytes: a uniquely tailored source of potential antibiotic adjuvants

Multidrug microbial resistance is risking an annual loss of more than 10 million people' lives by 2050. Solutions include the rational use of antibiotics and the use of drugs that reduce resistance or completely obliterate them. Here endophytes come to play due to their high-yield production and inherent nature to produce antimicrobial molecules. Around 40%, 45% and 17% of antibacterial agents were obtained from fungi, actinomycetes, and bacteria, respectively, whose secondary metabolites revealed effectiveness against resistant microbes such as MRSA, MRSE, and Shigella flexneri. Endophyte's role was not confined to bactericidal effect but extended to other mechanisms against MDR microbes, among which was the adjuvant role or the "magic bullets". Scarce focus was given to antibiotic adjuvants, and many laboratories today just screen for the antimicrobial activity without considering combinations with traditional antibiotics, which means real loss of promising resistance combating molecules. While some examples of synthetic adjuvants were introduced in the last decade, the number is still far from covering the disused antibiotics and restoring them back to clinical use. The data compiled in this article demonstrated the significance of quorum sensing as a foreseen mechanism for adjuvants from endophytes secondary metabolites, which call for urgent in-depth studies of their molecular mechanisms. This review, comprehensively and for the first time, sheds light on the significance of endophytes secondary metabolites in solving AMR problem as AB adjuvants.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in Children with Confirmed or Suspected Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A Phase 1b, Open-Label, Single-Dose Clinical Trial

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved for the treatment of serious gram-negative bacterial infections in adults. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (with a fixed 2:1 ratio of imipenem/cilastatin to relebactam, and with a maximum dose of 15 mg/kg imipenem and 15 mg/kg cilastatin [≤500 mg imipenem and ≤500 mg cilastatin] and 7.5 mg/kg relebactam [≤250 mg relebactam]) in children with confirmed/suspected gram-negative bacterial infections receiving standard-of-care antibacterial therapy. In this phase 1, noncomparative study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03230916), PK parameters from 46 children were analyzed using both population modeling and noncompartmental analysis. The PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target for imipenem was percent time of the dosing interval that unbound plasma concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT>MIC) of ≥30% (MIC = 2 mcg/mL). For relebactam, the PK/PD target was a free drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) normalized to MIC (at 2 mcg/mL) of ≥8.0 (equivalent to an AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity of ≥20.52 mcg·h/mL). Safety was assessed up to 14 days after drug infusion. For imipenem, the ranges for the geometric mean %fT>MIC and maximum concentration (Cmax ) across age cohorts were 56.5%-93.7% and 32.2-38.2 mcg/mL, respectively. For relebactam, the ranges of the geometric mean Cmax and AUC from 0 to 6 hours across age cohorts were 16.9-21.3 mcg/mL and 26.1-55.3 mcg·h/mL, respectively. In total, 8/46 (17%) children experienced ≥1 adverse events (AEs) and 2/46 (4%) children experienced nonserious AEs that were deemed drug related by the investigator. Imipenem and relebactam exceeded plasma PK/PD targets; single doses of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam were well tolerated with no significant safety concerns identified. These results informed imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dose selection for further pediatric clinical evaluation.

In vitro development of imipenem/relebactam resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae involves multiple mutations including OmpK36 disruption and KPC modification

OBJECTIVES

In order to inform and anticipate potential strategies aimed at combating KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections, we analysed imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam single-step mutant frequencies, resistance development trajectories, differentially selected resistance mechanisms and their associated fitness cost using four representative high-risk K. pneumoniae clones.

METHODS

Mutant frequencies and mutant preventive concentrations were determined using agar plates containing incremental concentrations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor. Resistance dynamics were determined through incubation for 7 days in 10 mL MH tubes containing incremental concentrations of each antibiotic combination up to their 64 × baseline MIC. Two colonies per strain from each experiment were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole genome sequencing and competitive growth assays (to determine in vitro fitness). KPC variants associated with imipenem/relebactam resistance were characterized by cloning and biochemical experiments, atomic models and molecular dynamics simulation studies.

RESULTS

Imipenem/relebactam prevented the emergence of single-step resistance mutants at lower concentrations than ceftazidime/avibactam. In three of the four strains evaluated, imipenem/relebactam resistance development emerged more rapidly, and in the ST512/KPC-3 clone reached higher levels compared to baseline MICs than for ceftazidime/avibactam. Lineages evolved in the presence of ceftazidime/avibactam showed KPC substitutions associated with high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, increased imipenem/relebactam susceptibility and low fitness costs. Lineages that evolved in the presence of imipenem/relebactam showed OmpK36 disruption, KPC modifications (S106L, N132S, L167R) and strain-specific substitutions associated with imipenem/relebactam resistance and high fitness costs. Imipenem/relebactam-selected KPC derivatives demonstrated enhanced relebactam resistance through important changes affecting relebactam recognition and positioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings anticipate potential resistance mechanisms affecting imipenem/relebactam during treatment of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections.

Individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with augmented renal clearance

Objectives: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a state of enhanced renal function commonly observed in 30%-65% of critically ill patients despite normal serum creatinine levels. Using unadjusted standard dosing regimens of renally eliminated drugs in ARC patients often leads to subtherapeutic concentrations, poor clinical outcomes, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. We summarized pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic research on the definition, underlying mechanisms, and risk factors of ARC to guide individualized dosing of antibiotics and various strategies for optimizing outcomes. Methods: We searched for articles between 2010 and 2022 in the MEDLINE database about ARC patients and antibiotics and further provided individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC. Results: 25 antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC and various strategies for optimization of outcomes, such as extended infusion time, continuous infusion, increased dosage, and combination regimens, were summarized according to previous research. Conclusion: ARC patients, especially critically ill patients, need to make individualized adjustments to antibiotics, including dose, frequency, and method of administration. Further comprehensive research is required to determine ARC staging, expand the range of recommended antibiotics, and establish individualized dosing guidelines for ARC patients.

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

Relebactam restores susceptibility of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhances imipenem activity against chromosomal AmpC-producing species: analysis of global SMART 2018-2020

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant bacteria are an increasing problem in clinical practice; thus, it is important to identify β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., relebactam) that can restore carbapenem susceptibility. We report analyses of relebactam enhancement of imipenem activity against both imipenem-nonsusceptible (NS) and imipenem-susceptible (S) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Gram-negative bacterial isolates were collected for the ongoing Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends global surveillance program. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were used to determine the imipenem and imipenem/relebactam antibacterial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2020, 36.2% of P. aeruginosa (N = 23,073) and 8.2% of Enterobacterales (N = 91,769) isolates were imipenem-NS. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility in 64.1% and 49.4% of imipenem-NS P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates, respectively. Restoration of susceptibility was largely observed among K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-negative P. aeruginosa. Relebactam also caused a lowering of imipenem MIC among imipenem-S P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from chromosomal Ambler class C β-lactamase (AmpC)-producing species. For both imipenem-NS and imipenem-S P. aeruginosa isolates, relebactam reduced the imipenem MIC mode from 16 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL and from 2 μg/mL to 0.5 μg/mL, respectively, compared with imipenem alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility among nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhanced imipenem susceptibility among susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and isolates from Enterobacterales species that can produce chromosomal AmpC. The reduced imipenem modal MIC values with relebactam may result in a higher probability of target attainment in patients.

Participant- and Disease-Related Factors as Independent Predictors of Treatment Outcomes in the RESTORE-IMI 2 Clinical Trial: A Multivariable Regression Analysis

Background

In the RESTORE-IMI 2 trial, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in treating hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. This post hoc analysis was conducted to determine independent predictors of efficacy outcomes in the RESTORE-IMI 2 trial, to assist in treatment decision making.

Methods

A stepwise multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify variables that were independently associated with day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM), favorable clinical response at early follow-up (EFU), and favorable microbiologic response at end of treatment (EOT). The analysis accounted for the number of baseline infecting pathogens and in vitro susceptibility to randomized treatment.

Results

Vasopressor use, renal impairment, bacteremia at baseline, and Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores ≥15 were associated with a greater risk of day 28 ACM. A favorable clinical response at EFU was associated with normal renal function, an APACHE II score <15, no vasopressor use, and no bacteremia at baseline. At EOT, a favorable microbiologic response was associated with IMI/REL treatment, normal renal function, no vasopressor use, nonventilated pneumonia at baseline, intensive care unit admission at randomization, monomicrobial infections at baseline, and absence of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex at baseline. These factors remained significant after accounting for polymicrobial infection and in vitro susceptibility to assigned treatment.

Conclusions

This analysis, which accounted for baseline pathogen susceptibility, validated well-recognized patient- and disease-related factors as independent predictors of clinical outcomes. These results lend further support to the noninferiority of IMI/REL to piperacillin/tazobactam and suggests that pathogen eradication may be more likely with IMI/REL.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02493764.

Antibiotic Adjuvants: A Versatile Approach to Combat Antibiotic Resistance

The problem of antibiotic resistance is on the rise, with multidrug-resistant strains emerging even to the last resort antibiotics. The drug discovery process is often stalled by stringent cut-offs required for effective drug design. In such a scenario, it is prudent to delve into the varying mechanisms of resistance to existing antibiotics and target them to improve antibiotic efficacy. Nonantibiotic compounds called antibiotic adjuvants which target bacterial resistance can be used in combination with obsolete drugs for an improved therapeutic regime. The field of "antibiotic adjuvants" has gained significant traction in recent years where mechanisms other than β-lactamase inhibition have been explored. This review discusses the multitude of acquired and inherent resistance mechanisms employed by bacteria to resist antibiotic action. The major focus of this review is how to target these resistance mechanisms by the use of antibiotic adjuvants. Different types of direct acting and indirect resistance breakers are discussed including enzyme inhibitors, efflux pump inhibitors, inhibitors of teichoic acid synthesis, and other cellular processes. The multifaceted class of membrane-targeting compounds with poly pharmacological effects and the potential of host immune-modulating compounds have also been reviewed. We conclude with providing insights about the existing challenges preventing clinical translation of different classes of adjuvants, especially membrane-perturbing compounds, and a framework about the possible directions which can be pursued to fill this gap. Antibiotic-adjuvant combinatorial therapy indeed has immense potential to be used as an upcoming orthogonal strategy to conventional antibiotic discovery.

Biochemical exploration of β-lactamase inhibitors

The alarming rise of microbial resistance to antibiotics has severely limited the efficacy of current treatment options. The prevalence of β-lactamase enzymes is a significant contributor to the emergence of antibiotic resistance. There are four classes of β-lactamases: A, B, C, and D. Class B is the metallo-β-lactamase, while the rest are serine β-lactamases. The clinical use of β-lactamase inhibitors began as an attempt to combat β-lactamase-mediated resistance. Although β-lactamase inhibitors alone are ineffective against bacteria, research has shown that combining inhibitors with antibiotics is a safe and effective treatment that not only prevents β-lactamase formation but also broadens the range of activity. These inhibitors may cause either temporary or permanent inhibition. The development of new β-lactamase inhibitors will be a primary focus of future research. This study discusses recent advances in our knowledge of the biochemistry behind β-lactam breakdown, with special emphasis on the mechanism of inhibitors for β-lactam complexes with β-lactamase. The study also focuses on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of all inhibitors and then applies them in clinical settings. Our analysis and discussion of the challenges that exist in designing inhibitors might help pharmaceutical researchers address root issues and develop more effective inhibitors.

In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam, Meropenem-Vaborbactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparators on Carbapenem-Resistant Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales

Background: Avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam are β-lactamase inhibitors that proved their efficiency against KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Regarding their inhibitor activity towards Ambler’s class A extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and Ambler’s class C cephalosporinase (AmpC), they should be active on most of the carbapenem-resistant non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CR non-CPE). Objectives: Determine the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam and comparators against CR non-CPE. Methods: MICs to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, but also temocillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ertapenem, colistin, eravacycline and tigecycline were determined by broth microdilution (ThermoFisher) on a collection of 284 CR non-CPE (inhibition zone diameter < 22 mm to meropenem). Whole genome sequencing was performed on 90 isolates to assess the genetic diversity as well as resistome. Results: According to EUCAST breakpoints, susceptibility rates of ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem used at standard dose were 0.7%, 45.1%, 14.8% and 2.5%, respectively. Increased exposure of ceftazidime, imipenem and meropenem led to reach 3.5%, 68.3% and 67.7% susceptibility, respectively. Using the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, susceptibility rates of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam were 88.4%, 81.0% and 80.6%, respectively. Susceptibility rates of temocillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, tigecycline, eravacycline, and colistin were 0%, 4.6%, 27.8%, 54.9% and 90.1%. MICs distributions with and without the presence of the inhibitor demonstrated a better ability of avibactam and relebactam compared to vaborbactam to restore susceptibility to the associated β-lactam. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and to a lesser extent meropenem/vaborbactam against CR non-CPE. Moreover, to test all β-lactams/β-lactamases inhibitors combinations without a priori for CRE, non-CPE is crucial since resistance to one of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations does not predict resistance to another molecule, depending on the resistance mechanisms involved.

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance

BACKGROUND

Imipenem and relebactam are predominantly excreted via glomerular filtration. Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a common syndrome in critically-ill patients with sepsis, and sub-therapeutic antibiotic concentrations are of concern. Herein, we describe the pharmacokinetics of imipenem/relebactam in critically-ill patients with ARC.

METHODS

Infected patients in the ICU with ARC (CLCR ≥ 130 mL/min) received a single dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 1.25 g as a 30 min infusion. Blood samples were collected over 6 h for concentration determination. Protein binding was assessed by ultrafiltration. An 8 h urine creatinine collection confirmed ARC. Population pharmacokinetic models with and without covariates were fit using the non-parametric adaptive grid algorithm in Pmetrics. A 5000 patient Monte Carlo simulation assessed joint PTA using relebactam fAUC/MIC ≥8 and imipenem ≥40% fT>MIC.

RESULTS

Eight patients with ARC completed the study. A base population pharmacokinetic model with two-compartments fitted the data best. The mean ± SD parameters were: CL, 17.31 ± 5.76 L/h; Vc, 16.15 ± 7.75 L; k12, 1.62 ± 0.99 h-1; and k21, 3.53 ± 3.31 h-1 for imipenem, and 11.51 ± 4.79 L/h, 16.54 ± 7.43 L, 1.59 ± 1.12 h-1, and 2.83 ± 2.91 h-1 for relebactam. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 1.25 g as a 30 min infusion every 6 h achieved 100% and 93% PTA at MICs of 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enhanced clearance of both imipenem and relebactam, the currently approved dosing regimen for normal renal function was predicted to achieve optimal exposure in critically-ill patients with ARC sufficient to treat most susceptible pathogens.

Drug Regimens of Novel Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients with Varying Renal Functions: A Rapid Review

There is currently an increase in the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR) worldwide, requiring the development of novel antibiotics. However, it is not only the choice of antibiotic that is important in treating an infection; the drug regimen also deserves special attention to avoid underdosing and excessive concentrations. Critically ill patients often have marked variation in renal function, ranging from augmented renal clearance (ARC), defined as a measured creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≥ 130 mL/min*1.73 m², to acute kidney injury (AKI), eventually requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), which can affect antibiotic exposure. All novel beta-lactam (BLs) and/or beta-lactam/beta-lactamases inhibitors (BL/BLIs) antibiotics have specific pharmacokinetic properties, such as hydrophilicity, low plasma–protein binding, small volume of distribution, low molecular weight, and predominant renal clearance, which require adaptation of dosage regimens in the presence of abnormal renal function or RRT. However, there are limited data on the topic. The aim of this review was therefore to summarize available PK studies on these novel antibiotics performed in patients with ARC or AKI, or requiring RRT, in order to provide a practical approach to guide clinicians in the choice of the best dosage regimens in critically ill patients.

Microbiological, Clinical, and PK/PD Features of the New Anti-Gram-Negative Antibiotics: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Combination and Cefiderocol—An All-Inclusive Guide for Clinicians

Bacterial resistance mechanisms are continuously and rapidly evolving. This is particularly true for Gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, the strategy to develop new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLs/BLIs) combinations has paid off and results from phase 3 and real-world studies are becoming available for several compounds. Cefiderocol warrants a separate discussion for its peculiar mechanism of action. Considering the complexity of summarizing and integrating the emerging literature data of clinical outcomes, microbiological mechanisms, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of the new BL/BLI and cefiderocol, we aimed to provide an overview of data on the following compounds: aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, ceftaroline/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Each compound is described in a dedicated section by experts in infectious diseases, microbiology, and pharmacology, with tables providing at-a-glance information.

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review

Urinary tract infections, including cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, are among the most common diagnoses prompting antibiotic prescribing. The rise in antimicrobial resistance over the past decades has led to the increasing challenge of urinary tract infections because of multidrug-resistant and "difficult-to-treat resistance" among Gram-negative bacteria. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy and medical microbiology are modernizing how these urinary tract infections are treated. Advances in pharmacotherapy have included not only the development and approval of novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and glycylcyclines, but also the re-examination of the potential role of legacy antibiotics, including older aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. Recent advances in medical microbiology allow phenotypic and molecular mechanism of resistance testing, and thus antibiotic prescribing can be tailored to the mechanism of resistance in the infecting pathogen. Here, we provide a narrative review on the clinical and pre-clinical studies of drugs that can be used for difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria, with a particular focus on data relevant to the urinary tract. We also offer a pragmatic framework for antibiotic selection when encountering urinary tract infections due to difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria based on the organism and its mechanism of resistance.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study)

BACKGROUND

Imipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP).

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population.

RESULTS

Of 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P < .001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, -5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02493764.

Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) develops and publishes standards and guidelines for AST methods and results interpretation in an annual update to the Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (M100). This minireview will discuss changes to M100 for the 31st edition, including new and revised breakpoints and testing recommendations. New MIC and disk diffusion breakpoints are described for azithromycin (Shigella spp.), imipenem-relebactam (Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and anaerobes), and lefamulin (Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae), and disk breakpoints are described for azithromycin and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The rationale behind revised oxacillin MIC breakpoints for select staphylococci is discussed. Updates to test methods include a method for disk diffusion using positive blood culture broth and use of linezolid to predict tedizolid susceptibility. There is clarification on which drugs to suppress on bacteria isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid and clarification on the use of a caret symbol attached to the intermediate category ("I^") to indicate those antimicrobials that concentrate in the urine.

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in patients with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia

In the phase III RESTORE-IMI 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02493764), the combination antibacterial agent imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) demonstrated noninferiority to piperacillin/tazobactam for the end points of all-cause mortality at day 28 and favorable clinical response at the early follow-up visit in adult participants with gram-negative hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Existing population pharmacokinetic models for imipenem (IPM) and REL were updated using data from patients with HABP/VABP from RESTORE-IMI 2. Creatinine clearance (CrCl), body weight, infection type, and ventilation status were significant covariates in the updated model. The following simulations were performed to calculate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint probability of target attainment among patients with HABP/VABP and varying degrees of renal function: augmented renal clearance (CrCl ≥150 ml/min), normal renal function (CrCl ≥90 to <150 ml/min), renal impairment (mild, CrCl ≥60 to <90 ml/min; moderate, CrCl ≥30 to <60 ml/min; or severe, CrCl ≥15 to <30 ml/min), and end-stage renal disease (CrCl <15 ml/min). At the recommended IMI/REL dosing regimens across renal categories, greater than 90% of patients in all renal function groups were predicted to achieve joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets at a minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of ≤2 μg/ml, regardless of ventilation status. This modeling and simulation analysis supports use of the recommended IMI/REL dosing regimens, adjusted based on renal function, in patients with HABP/VABP.

Penetration of Antibacterial Agents into Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid: An Update

A comprehensive review of drug penetration into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was previously published in 2011. Since then, an extensive number of studies comparing plasma and ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents have been published and are summarized in this review. The majority of the studies included in this review determined ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents using bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage, and this review focuses on intrapulmonary penetration ratios determined with area under the concentration-time curve from healthy human adult studies or pharmacokinetic modeling of various antibacterial agents. If available, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters determined from preclinical murine infection models that evaluated ELF concentrations are also provided. There are also a limited number of recently published investigations of intrapulmonary penetration in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections, where greater variability in ELF concentrations may exist. The significance of these changes may impact the intrapulmonary penetration in the setting of infection, and further studies relating ELF concentrations to clinical response are needed. Phase I drug development programs now include assessment of initial pharmacodynamic target values for pertinent organisms in animal models, followed by evaluation of antibacterial penetration into the human lung to assist in dosage selection for clinical trials in infected patients. The recent focus has been on β-lactam agents, including those in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors, particularly due to the rise of multidrug-resistant infections. This manifests as a large portion of the review focusing on cephalosporins and carbapenems, with or without β-lactamase inhibitors, in both healthy adult subjects and critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Further studies are warranted in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the relationship between intrapulmonary penetration and clinical and microbiological outcomes. Our clinical research experience with these studies, along with this literature review, has allowed us to outline key steps in developing and evaluating dosage regimens to treat extracellular bacteria in lower respiratory tract infections.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Imipenem-Cilastatin/Relebactam Combination Therapy

On 16 July, 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration approved imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. This decision was based on substantial clinical and pre-clinical data, including rigorous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic work, and is an important step forward in the management of these debilitating conditions. This article provides an overview of the body of research associated with imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, beginning with an examination of the fundamental underpinnings of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index. This is followed by the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic work that led to the approval of this novel drug combination, including data derived from checkerboard and hollow fiber infection studies, as well as large, multi-center, phase III clinical trials known as RESTORE-IMI 1 and RESTORE-IMI 2. The article also explores how this important new antibiotic may be used to treat other infections in the years to come, including hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia attributed to imipenem-non-susceptible pathogens and certain atypical mycobacterial infections.

Variations in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target values across MICs and their potential impact on determination of susceptibility test interpretive criteria

BACKGROUND

An antibacterial drug's susceptibility test interpretive criteria (STIC) are determined by integrating clinical, microbiological and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) data. PTA analysis plays a pivotal or supportive role in STIC determination and is heavily dependent on the PK-PD target values determined from animal PK-PD studies. Therefore, variations in PK-PD target values may impact STIC determination. Factors contributing to variation in the PK-PD target values include the number of and MICs for bacterial isolates used in animal PK-PD studies.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the relationship between PK-PD target values and MICs, describe the variations in PK-PD target values of isolates and evaluate whether the proposed/target STICs were within the ranges of the MICs for isolates used in animal PK-PD studies.

METHODS

A database was compiled for this research by screening animal PK-PD study reports submitted to the FDA from 10 new drug applications (NDAs).

RESULTS

A relationship evaluation between PK-PD target values and MICs for tested isolates for seven drugs (that used AUC/MIC ratio as the PK-PD index) showed that, generally, the AUC/MIC values decreased with an increase in MIC. These target values were highly variable, with the percentage coefficient of variation ranging between 1% and 132% for isolates having the same MIC. For 16/27 (59%) drug/bacteria combinations from all 10 drugs, the proposed/target STICs were higher than the highest MIC for bacteria isolates evaluated, while 6/27 (22.5%) were lower.

CONCLUSIONS

This research suggests that careful considerations related to selection of bacterial isolates for animal PK-PD studies could strengthen the STIC determination process.

An overview of cilastatin + imipenem + relebactam as a therapeutic option for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia: evidence to date

Introduction: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are prevalent nosocomial infections with a worrisomely increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant causative organisms, including those with resistance to carbapenems. The addition of relebactam, a β-lactamase inhibitor, to imipenem treatment restores the antimicrobial activity against the most of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including some carrying β-lactamase enzyme-type carbapenemases.Areas covered: The aim of this article is to summarize the current evidence regarding imipenem/relebactam for the treatment of HAP/VAP. The authors discuss its chemistry, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, microbiology, tolerance and clinical efficacy. The results of clinical trials have demonstrated an efficacy of imipenem/relebactam similar to that of its comparator for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Different studies have also shown its good safety profile, which is better than that of the combination of other β-lactams with other antibiotics.Expert opinion: This drug should be incorporated as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP, especially as an alternative treatment in patients with confirmed infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negatives.

In vivo activity of human-simulated regimens of imipenem alone and in combination with relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the murine thigh infection model

BACKGROUND

Imipenem/relebactam is a carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales, including KPC producers.

OBJECTIVES

To provide translational data to support the clinical utility of the imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h regimen using a human-simulated regimen (HSR) of imipenem/relebactam, compared with imipenem alone, against a phenotypically and genotypically diverse population of P. aeruginosa.

METHODS

Twenty-nine P. aeruginosa isolates, including KPC (n = 6), PDC (n = 9), PAO (n = 4), GES (n = 5) and VIM (n = 1) producers, were used for the in vivo efficacy studies. Neutropenic mice were thigh-inoculated and randomized to receive HSRs of either imipenem 500 mg q6h, imipenem 1 g q8h, imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h or saline.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of the 29 isolates examined were imipenem resistant, with 24/29 isolates showing imipenem MICs of ≥32 mg/L. The addition of relebactam decreased the MICs up to 64-fold; imipenem/relebactam MICs ranged from 0.25 to >32 mg/L. Efficacies of the imipenem monotherapies and the imipenem/relebactam therapy were comparable for the two imipenem-susceptible organisms. Among the imipenem-resistant isolates, an increased mean growth was observed in the imipenem 500 mg q6h HSR and 1 g q8h HSR treatment groups of 1.31 ± 1.01 and 0.18 ± 1.67 log10 cfu/thigh, respectively. In contrast, a ≥2 log reduction in bacterial density was observed in 27/29 (93%) of the imipenem-resistant isolates subjected to imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h HSR.

CONCLUSIONS

The imipenem/relebactam 500/250 mg q6h HSR demonstrated superior in vivo activity compared with the conventionally employed imipenem regimens against MDR P. aeruginosa over a wide range of imipenem/relebactam MICs.

Pharmacokinetics of Non-β-Lactam β-Lactamase Inhibitors

The growing emergence of drug-resistant bacterial strains is an issue to treat severe infections, and many efforts have identified new pharmacological agents. The inhibitors of β-lactamases (BLI) have gained a prominent role in the safeguard of beta-lactams. In the last years, new β-lactam-BLI combinations have been registered or are still under clinical evaluation, demonstrating their effectiveness to treat complicated infections. It is also noteworthy that the pharmacokinetics of BLIs partly matches that of β-lactams companions, meaning that some clinical situations, as well as renal impairment and renal replacement therapies, may alter the disposition of both drugs. Common pharmacokinetic characteristics, linear pharmacokinetics across a wide range of doses, and known pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters may guide modifications of dosing regimens for both β-lactams and BLIs. However, comorbidities (i.e., burns, diabetes, cancer) and severe changes in individual pathological conditions (i.e., acute renal impairment, sepsis) could make dose adaptation difficult, because the impact of those factors on BLI pharmacokinetics is partly known. Therapeutic drug monitoring protocols may overcome those issues and offer strategies to personalize drug doses in the intensive care setting. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to improve the use of BLIs and their β-lactam companions in severe and complicated infections.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations of Imipenem in Burn Patients With and Without Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in the Military Health System

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is a life‐sustaining procedure in patients with severe burns and acute kidney injury. Physiologic changes from burn injury and use of CVVH may alter imipenem pharmacokinetics (PK). We aimed to compare imipenem clearance (CL) in burn patients with and without CVVH, determine the effect of burn on imipenem volume of distribution (CVVH, n = 12; no CVVH, n = 11), in combination with previously published models. Model qualification was performed with standard diagnostics and comparing predicted PK parameters/time‐concentration profiles with those in the existing literature. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate the probability of target attainment. A 2‐compartment model best described the data. Utilizing albumin as a covariate on volume parameters and leveraging the clearance model from prior literature, our model predicted imipenem central volume and CL within a 10% margin of error across healthy, renally impaired, and burn populations. We provide direct comparison of imipenem CL in burn patients with and without CVVH. Notably, there was no significant difference. Large imipenem V_d in patients with severe burns is likely explained by increased capillary permeability, for which serum albumin may be a reasonable surrogate. Dosing 500 mg every 6 hours is adequate for burn patients on renally dosed CVVH; however, suspicion of augmented renal clearance or patients placed on CVVH without renal impairment may necessitate dosing of 1000 mg every 6 hours.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill renal patients on antimicrobial usage: focus on novel beta-lactams and beta lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Several novel beta-lactams (BLs) and/or beta lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) have been recently developed for the management of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. Data concerning dose optimization in critically ill patients with altered renal function are scanty.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a critical reappraisal of pharmacokinetic and clinical issues emerged with novel BLs and/or BL/BLIs in renal critically ill patients. Clinical and pharmacokinetic studies published in English until December 2020 were searched on the PubMed-MEDLINE database.

EXPERT OPINION

Several issues emerged with the use of novel BLs and/or BL/BLIs in critically ill renal patients. Suboptimal clinical response rate with ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam was reported in phase II-III trials in patients with moderate kidney injury; data on patients undergoing renal replacement therapy are limited to some case reports; dose adjustment in augmented renal clearance is provided only for cefiderocol. Implementation of altered dosing strategies (prolonged infusion and/or higher dosage) coupled with adaptive real-time therapeutic drug monitoring could represent the most effective approach in warranting optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets with novel BLs and/or BL/BLIs in challenging scenarios, thus minimizing the risk of clinical failure and/or of resistance selection.

Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) is an intravenously administered combination of the carbapenem imipenem, the renal dehydropeptidase-I inhibitor cilastatin, and the novel β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam. Relebactam is a potent inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases, conferring imipenem activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible strains. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in adults and other gram-negative infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) [including pyelonephritis] and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options. In pivotal phase II and III trials, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with HABP/VABP and to imipenem/cilastatin in patients with cUTIs and cIAIs. It was also effective in imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that of imipenem/cilastatin. Available evidence indicates that imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an effective and generally well tolerated option for gram-negative infections in adults, including critically ill and/or high-risk patients, and a potential therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

A Clinical Review and Critical Evaluation of Imipenem-Relebactam: Evidence to Date

Imipenem-relebactam (I-R) is a novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination given with cilastatin. It is indicated for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. A literature search was completed to evaluate the evidence to date of I-R. I-R has in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant organisms including carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. It was granted FDA approval following the promising results of two phase II clinical trials in patients with complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. The most common adverse drug events associated with I-R were nausea (6%), diarrhea (6%), and headache (4%). I-R is a new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that will be most likely used for patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in which there are limited or no available alternative treatment options.

The safety and efficacy of relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection or complicated urinary tract infection: A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative phase 3 study

INTRODUCTION

Relebactam, a novel class A/C β-lactamase inhibitor developed as a fixed-dose combination with imipenem/cilastatin, restores imipenem activity against imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative pathogens.

METHODS

This phase 3, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study (NCT03293485) evaluated relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin (250 mg/500 mg/500 mg) dosed every 6 h for 5-14 days in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) or complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including those with secondary sepsis. Sepsis was defined as an infection-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome, with a documented positive blood culture; patients meeting these protocol-defined criteria were evaluated for efficacy against sepsis.

RESULTS

Of 83 patients enrolled, 81 patients (cIAI, n = 37; cUTI, n = 44) received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Escherichia coli was the most common baseline pathogen isolated in both patients with cIAI and cUTI. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74.1% (n = 60/81) of patients, and drug-related AEs occurred in 18.5% (n = 15/81). The most common AEs were diarrhea and nausea (8.6%). Serious AEs occurred in nine patients, including one death, but none were considered treatment related. The primary efficacy endpoint for patients with cIAI was clinical response at end of treatment (EOT) in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population, and for patients with cUTI was microbiological response at EOT in the ME population. The proportion of cIAI and cUTI patients achieving favorable responses were 85.7% (n = 24/28) and 100.0% (n = 39/39), respectively. All patients with sepsis (cIAI, n = 1; cUTI, n = 5) achieved a favorable composite clinical and microbiological response at EOT.

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable safety and efficacy profile for relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin was observed in Japanese patients with cIAI and cUTI.

The Strategies of Pathogen-Oriented Therapy on Circumventing Antimicrobial Resistance

The emerging antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses serious threats to the global public health. Conventional antibiotics have been eclipsed in combating with drug-resistant bacteria. Moreover, the developing and deploying of novel antimicrobial drugs have trudged, as few new antibiotics are being developed over time and even fewer of them can hit the market. Alternative therapeutic strategies to resolve the AMR crisis are urgently required. Pathogen-oriented therapy (POT) springs up as a promising approach in circumventing antibiotic resistance. The tactic underling POT is applying antibacterial compounds or materials directly to infected regions to treat specific bacteria species or strains with goals of improving the drug efficacy and reducing nontargeting and the development of drug resistance. This review exemplifies recent trends in the development of POTs for circumventing AMR, including the adoption of antibiotic-antibiotic conjugates, antimicrobial peptides, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, nanotechnologies, CRISPR-Cas systems, and microbiota modulations. Employing these alternative approaches alone or in combination shows promising advantages for addressing the growing clinical embarrassment of antibiotics in fighting drug-resistant bacteria.

Augmented Renal Clearance and How to Augment Antibiotic Dosing

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) refers to the state of heightened renal filtration commonly observed in the critically ill. Its prevalence in this patient population is a consequence of the body’s natural response to serious disease, as well as the administration of fluids and pharmacologic therapies necessary to maintain sufficient blood pressure. ARC is objectively defined as a creatinine clearance of more than 130 mL/min/1.73 m² and is thus a crucial condition to consider when administering antibiotics, many of which are cleared renally. Using conventional dosing regimens risks the possibility of subtherapeutic concentrations or clinical failure. Over the past decade, research has been conducted in patients with ARC who received a number of antibacterials frequently used in the critically ill, such as piperacillin-tazobactam or vancomycin. Strategies to contend with this condition have also been explored, though further investigations remain necessary.

Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam: A Novel β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI-REL) is a novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs). Relebactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor with the ability to inhibit a broad spectrum of β-lactamases such as class A and class C β-lactamases, including carbapenemases. The addition of relebactam to imipenem restores imipenem activity against several imipenem-resistant bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical data demonstrate that IMI-REL is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of cUTIs and cIAIs due to imipenem-resistant bacteria. In a phase III trial comparing IMI-REL with imipenem plus colistin, favorable clinical response was achieved in 71% and 70% of patients, respectively. Available clinical and pharmacokinetic data support the approved dosage of a 30-minute infusion of imipenem 500 mg-cilastatin 500 mg-relebactam 250 mg every 6 hours, along with dosage adjustments based on renal function. In this review, we describe the chemistry, mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy, and safety and tolerability of this new agent. The approval of IMI-REL represents another important step in the ongoing fight against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.

Y-site Administration of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam With Common Intravenous Medications

PURPOSE

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam has shown efficacy in complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in the RESTORE IMI-1 study, and it was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. A press release announced that another Phase III study (RESTORE IMI-2) in patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia has met the primary end point. Critically ill patients with multidrug-resistant infections are expected to receive several pharmaceutical intravenous drugs while admitted in hospitals, warranting the need for Y-site compatibility studies. This study was conducted to evaluate the physical compatibility of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for injection during Y-site administration with common injectable intravenous medications.

METHODS

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was prepared to the concentration of 5 mg/mL, and other intravenous tested drugs were reconstituted as per the package inserts. Y-site was simulated as a 2-drug combination by mixing 5 mL of each in a glass tube, with reversing of the order of mixing; physical characteristics were recorded, and pH changes and turbidity were measured at time intervals.

FINDINGS

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was found to be compatible with a wide range of intravenous medications, facilitating co-administration with various IV medications.

IMPLICATIONS

The compatibility reported is limited to a 2-h observation period in this study to adequately cover imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam infusion time. In addition, it is based on the measured turbidity with no chemical assay of the components of the admixture.

A translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to characterize bacterial kill in the presence of imipenem-relebactam

OBJECTIVES

Relebactam is a small molecule β-lactamase inhibitor under clinical investigation for use as a fixed-dose combination with imipenem/cilastatin. Here we present a translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mathematical model to support optimal dose selection of relebactam.

METHODS

Data derived from in vitro checkerboard and hollow fiber infection studies of imipenem-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were incorporated into the model. The model integrates the effect of relebactam concentration on imipenem susceptibility in a semi-mechanistic manner using the checkerboard data and characterizes the bacterial time-kill profiles from the hollow fiber infection model data.

RESULTS

Simulations demonstrated that the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve for free drug to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC) was the pharmacokinetic driver for relebactam, with a target fAUC/MIC=7.5 associated with 2-log kill. At a clinical dose of 250mg relebactam, greater than 2-log reductions in bacterial load are projected for imipenem-resistant strains with an imipenem/relebactam MIC≤4μg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic driver for relebactam is fAUC/MIC, that an fAUC/MIC ratio of 7.5 is associated with 2-log kill in vitro, and that a 250mg clinical dose of relebactam achieves this target value when delivered in combination with imipenem/cilastatin.