Duplex Kidney in Adults: a Systematic Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this study, we describe a rare case of a male with a duplex renal collecting system with ectopic ureter insertion into the prostate who presented with sepsis and required urgent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. This study offers urologists and emergency care practitioners a great overview of the variety of manifestations, anatomic differences, and therapeutic approaches for similar patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

modified reconstructive strategy could be a method of choice when addressing particular anatomies, such as incomplete duplex kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in both upper and lower poles when the obstruction is close to the confluence of the two ureters. There is a spectrum of acute presentations and management strategies in adult patients with duplex collecting systems. The majority of patients presenting with obstruction and infection are managed surgically with hemi-nephrectomy; stable patients who present with less extensive anomalies were managed conservatively or with ureteral dilatation or deroofing.

A Case of Left Duplex Kidney with Hydronephrosis Mimicking a Left Renal Cyst in a 29-Year-Old Woman

Patient: Female, 29-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Left duplicated kidney with upper moiety severe hydronephrosis

Symptoms: Left side abdominal pain

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Robot-assisted left heminephrectom

Specialty: Surgery • Urology

Retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy in adult patients with duplex kidneys

Background: To report our experience with retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy in adult patients with duplex kidneys. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7 patients who underwent retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy at our institution between September 2014 and July 2017. Of the robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures, 5 were on the left and 2 on the right side. Results: All patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery successfully in a totally retroperitoneal manner without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 175 mins (range 140-270). The mean estimated blood loss was 84 mL (range 20-200). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range 5-9). No major intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred. All patients had a resolution of their presenting symptoms after surgery at a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 14-38). Conclusion: Our initial clinical experience suggests that robot-assisted laparoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy using a retroperitoneal approach for a duplex kidney appears to be safe with acceptable perioperative outcomes.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Left Renal Vein Transposition for the Treatment of Nutcracker Syndrome: A Preliminary Experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe our robot-assisted laparoscopic left renal vein (LRV) transposition experiences for nutcracker syndrome treatment.

METHODS

From August 2016 through May 2017, three patients with nutcracker syndrome underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic LRV transpositions. The patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative morbidities were reviewed.

RESULTS

Successful surgical procedures were performed in all three patients. The operative times for the three cases were 150, 175, and 162 minutes, respectively, while the LRV anastomosis times were 19, 22, and 13 minutes, respectively. No major perioperative complications were encountered, and the hematuria and flank pain were resolved in all three cases. At the 6-month follow-up, the computed tomography scan showed that the LRV narrowing had disappeared in two of the patients. Although one patient still exhibited LRV flattening, his symptoms were also relieved, and the varicose tributaries spontaneously ceased.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted laparoscopic LRV transposition can be a viable minimally invasive treatment option for patients with nutcracker syndrome.

A contemporary single-institution retrospective cohort study comparing perioperative outcomes between robotic and open partial nephrectomy for poorly functioning renal moieties in children with duplex collecting systems

INTRODUCTION

Studies evaluating robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) are limited to case series, amounting to a lack of studies directly comparing perioperative outcomes for RALPN to open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes between RALPN and OPN.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed to compare perioperative outcomes (operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), complications, readmissions, postoperative interventions, loss in size of the residual moiety, and the presence of postoperative 'contained fluid collections') for RALPN and OPN between February 2007 and July 2014. Descriptive statistics were calculated and unadjusted analyses performed, including Chi-squared/Fisher's exact for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables.

RESULTS

During the study period, 43 partial nephrectomies were performed for benign disease: 27 (63%) RALPN and 16 (37%) OPN. The RALPN cohort was significantly older than the OPN cohort (3.5 vs. 0.8 years; P = 0.003). The cohorts were otherwise similar regarding race, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), affected moiety, laterality, associated anomalies, moiety function, and surgical indication. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with a significantly shorter LOS (1 vs. 3 days; P = 0.002). Operative time and complication rates were comparable. The OPN group had a longer median follow-up (2.7 years vs. 1.1; P = 0.03). No differences were observed between the cohorts for readmissions, postoperative interventions, loss in size of residual moiety, or development of 'contained fluid collections'. These outcomes are reported in the Summary Table. 'Contained fluid collections' occurred more frequently after lower pole resections (73% vs. 30%; P = 0.009).

DISCUSSION

This study is one of the few to directly compare RALPN to OPN, and demonstrated that RALPN has comparable (if not better) outcomes than OPN. In particular, RALPN provides the advantage of a shorter LOS. Avoiding the flank incision used in OPN may also offer reduced pain; however, this was not studied here and the literature provides weak evidence for this effect. This unadjusted analysis may have been confounded by its short median follow-up and significantly younger OPN cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this contemporary comparative analysis, RALPN predicted a similar median OT and safety profile to OPN while offering the advantage of a shorter LOS. Regardless of surgical cohort, there were no adverse effects on the residual renal moieties and postoperative 'contained fluid collections' occurred with notable frequency and were independently associated with lower pole pathology.

Nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma: current perspectives on technical issues

Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma. Although historically the concept of wide excision of the affected kidney dictated surgical thinking for more than half a century, a better understanding of the biology of this tumor, standardized staging, and changing patterns of presentation permit today a refined management approach with nephron-sparing surgery, thus limiting potential long-term morbidity by maximizing the preservation of functional renal parenchyma. This paper aims to review the current status of nephron-sparing surgery for solid renal masses with an emphasis on indications, preoperative assessment, and operative technical issues, summarizing the most recent existing data on the subject.

Laparoscopic upper-pole heminephrectomy for duplicated renal collecting system with superselective artery clamping using virtual partial nephrectomy analysis of Synapse Vincent: A case report

A 22-year-old woman was diagnosed with a duplicated renal collecting system with hydronephrosis and parenchymal loss in the upper pole of the left kidney. She underwent laparoscopic left upper-pole nephrectomy. Although a complex hilar vascular anatomy was identified during the operation, preoperative three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a three-dimensional image analysis device (Synapse Vincent; Fuji Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) greatly helped to accurately identify the anatomical renal hilum. For further detail, virtual partial nephrectomy analysis using a Voronoi decomposition was used to visualize the area supplied by a selected arterial branch including the atrophic cleavage line. We controlled the bleeding with selective clamping and safely carried out upper-pole heminephrectomy according to the preoperative plan.