Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary studies

Association of day of surgery and distance traveled with length of stay in patients undergoing robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at a tertiary medical center

The objective of this study is to analyze the association between surgical day of the week and distance traveled with prolonged length of stay (LOS) following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). 563 consecutive RAPN performed by a single surgeon were evaluated. Early week RAPN was considered Monday through Wednesday, while late-week RAPN was defined as surgery performed Thursday through Friday. Distance traveled for RAPN was evaluated as greater than or less than 60 miles. The respective groups were compared to see if the surgical day of the week or distance traveled influenced the hospital stay or prolonged hospital stay (defined as hospital length of stay equal or greater than 3 days). Overall, 213 patients (38.0%) undergoing RAPN experienced a prolonged LOS. A total of 380 patients underwent early week RAPN compared to 183 late-week RAPN. Patients undergoing late-week RAPN were more likely to have a prolonged LOS compared to early week RAPN (n = 81, 44% vs. n = 133, 35%, respectively; p = 0.004). 229 patients traveled less than 60 miles, while 332 patients traveled more than 60 miles to receive RAPN. 135 patients (40.7%) traveling more than 60 miles experienced a prolonged stay compared to 78 patients (34.1%) traveling less than 60 miles, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.128). Patients who underwent RAPN at the end of the week were more likely to have a prolonged LOS, while distance traveled for RAPN did not appear to affect likelihood of prolonged LOS.

Perioperative and functional outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Descriptive analysis of Indian study group on partial nephrectomy database

Introduction

There is an unmet need for high-quality data for Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the Indian population. Indian study group on partial nephrectomy (ISGPN) is a consortium of Indian centers contributing to the partial nephrectomy (PN) database. The current study is a descriptive analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes following RAPN.

Methods

For this study, the retrospective ISGPN database was reviewed, which included patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses at 14 centers across India from September 2010 to September 2022. Demographic, clinical, radiological, perioperative, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Ethics approval was obtained from each of the participating centers.

Results

In this study, 782 patients were included, and 69.7% were male. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR 44-62]), median operative time was 180 min (IQR 133-240), median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-200), mean warm ischemia time was 22.7 min and positive surgical margin rates were 2.5%. The complication rate was 16.2%, and most of them were of minor grade. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes were attained in 61.4% and 60% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

This is the largest Indian multi-centric study using the Indian Robotic PN Collaborative database to evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted PN, and has proven its safety and efficacy in the management of renal masses.

Robot-assisted pelvic and renal surgery compared with laparoscopic or open surgery: Literature review of cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical experiences and cost-effectiveness by comparing robot-assisted surgery with laparoscopic- or open surgery for pelvic and renal operations.

METHODS

A narrative review was carried out.

RESULTS

When using robotic-assisted surgery, oncological and functional results are similar to after laparoscopic or open surgery. One exception may be a shorter survival in cancer of the cervix uteri. In addition, postoperative complications after robotic-assisted surgery are similar, bleeding and transfusion needs are less, and the hospital stay is shorter but the preparation of the operating theater before and after surgery and the operation times are longer. Finally, robot-assisted surgery has, in several studies, been reported to be not cost-effective primarily due to high investment costs. However, more recent studies provide improved cost-effectiveness estimates due to more effective preparation of the operating theater before surgery, improved surgeon experience, and decreased investment costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications and functional and oncological outcomes after robot-assisted surgery are similar to open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. The cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted surgery is likely to equal or surpass the alternatives.

Perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic versus open versus robotic partial nephrectomy: Current Review

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of small renal tumours remain gold-standard for individuals who are suitable candidates. Over the last decade, minimally invasive surgery has provided significant advancements within the field of urological surgery. However, there is still a debate on which surgical modality is superior. This study aims to review the current literature on perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic (LPN), open (OPN) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) using the standardised system, Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC).

METHODS

A literature search was performed on Cochrane, Embase and PubMed databases. Articles between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Perioperative outcomes investigated include estimated blood loss (EBL), operating time (OT), conversion rate (CR), warm ischaemia time (WIT), positive surgical margin (PSM) and postoperative complications using CDC. Relevant pieces of literatures were analysed and data were extracted.

RESULTS

This study included 12 studies, with a total of 3908 patients. (LPN = 1120, OPN = 1206 and RPN = 1580). LPN demonstrated a lower overall EBL (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between OT (p = 0.291), CR (p = 0.200), WIT (p = 0.760), PSM (p = 0.549), CDC I (p = 0.556), CDC II (p = 0.779) and CDC⩾III (p = 0.663) of the three surgical approaches.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OPN and RPN, LPN demonstrated a lower EBL. All other perioperative outcomes demonstrated similar results between the three treatment modalities. Future large-scale, prospective, randomised studies is necessary to draw a definitive conclusion from this analysis.

Partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: recommendations of the Italian Society of Urology RCC working group

INTRODUCTION

Partial nephrectomy (PN) aims to remove renal tumors while preserving renal function without affecting oncological and perioperative surgical outcomes. Aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence on PN and to provide evidence-based recommendations on indications, surgical technique, perioperative management and postoperative surveillance of PN for renal tumors in the Italian clinical and health care system context.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This review is the result of an interactive peer-reviewing process of the recent literature on PN for renal tumors carried out by an expert panel composed of members of the Italian Society of Urology (SIU) Renal Cell Carcinoma Working Group.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

PN for localized renal tumors is not inferior to radical nephrectomy in terms of survival outcomes while significantly better preserving renal function. Loss of renal function after PN is influenced by medical comorbidities/preoperative renal function and surgical variables such volume of parenchyma preserved and ischemia time. Urologists should select the clamping strategy during PN based on their experience and patient-specific factors. PN can be performed with any surgical approach based on surgeon's expertise and skills. Robotic PN has the potential to expand the minimally invasive indications without interfering with oncological outcomes. The use of 3D virtual models, real time ultrasound and fluorescence tools to assess the anatomy and vascularization of renal tumors during PN may allow a more accurate preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. Proper postoperative surveillance protocols are essential to detect tumor recurrences and assess functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

PN is the standard of care for treatment of localized T1 renal tumors. Recent data supports PN also for selected T2-T3a tumors in experienced institutions. Careful preoperative planning, adequate surgical skills and volumes and appropriate postoperative management and surveillance are paramount to optimize PN oncological and functional outcomes.

Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy: The ROBOCOP II Study

BACKGROUND

There is no evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of trial recruitment and to compare surgical outcomes between RAPN and OPN.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

ROBOCOP II was designed as single-center, open-label, feasibility RCT. Patients with suspected localized renal cell carcinoma referred for PN were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either RAPN or OPN.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was the feasibility of recruitment, assessed as the accrual rate. Secondary outcomes included perioperative and postoperative data. Data were analyzed descriptively in a modified intention-to-treat population consisting of randomized patients who underwent surgery.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 50 patients underwent RAPN or OPN (accrual rate 65%). In comparison to OPN, RAPN had lower blood loss (OPN 361 ml, standard deviation [SD] 238; RAPN 149 ml, SD 122; difference 212 ml, 95% confidence interval [CI] 105-320; p < 0.001), less need for opioids (OPN 46%; RAPN 16%; difference 30%, 95% CI 5-54; p = 0.024), and fewer complications according to the mean Comprehensive Complication Index (OPN 14, SD 16; RAPN 5, SD 15; difference 9, 95% CI 0-18; p = 0.008). OPN has a shorter operative time (OPN 112 min, SD 29; RAPN 130 min, SD 32; difference -18 min, 95% CI -35 to -1; p = 0.046) and warm ischemia time (OPN 8.7 min, SD 7.1; RAPN 15.4 min, SD 7.0; difference 6.7 min, 95% CI -10.7 to -2.7; p = 0.001). There were no differences between RAPN and OPN regarding postoperative kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

This first RCT comparing OPN and RAPN met the primary outcome of the feasibility of recruitment; however, the window for future RCTs is closing. Each approach has advantages over the other, and both remain safe and effective options.

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with a kidney tumor, open surgery and robot-assisted keyhole surgery are both feasible and safe approaches for partial removal of the affected kidney. Each approach has known advantages. Long-term follow-up will explore differences in quality of life and cancer control outcomes.

A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of full economic analyses of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in adults' thoracic and abdominopelvic indications. Authors used Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed to conduct a systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fully published economic articles in English were included. Methodology and reporting quality were assessed using standardized tools. Majority of studies (28/33) were on oncology procedures. Radical prostatectomy was the most reported procedure (16/33). Twenty-eight studies used quality-adjusted life years, and five used complication rates as outcomes. Nine used primary and 24 studies used secondary data. All studies used modeling. In 81% of studies (27/33), RAS was cost-effective or potentially cost-effective compared to comparator procedures, including radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy. Societal perspective, longer-term time-horizon, and larger volumes favored RAS. Cost-drivers were length of stay and equipment cost. From societal and payer perspectives, robotic-assisted surgery is a cost-effective strategy for thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.Clinical trial registration This study is a systematic review with no intervention, not a clinical trial.

Surgical Management of Localized Disease and Small Renal Masses

The incidence of renal cancer has increased over the past several decades, but mortality has declined. This is thought to be related in part to earlier detection of renal masses which portend excellent 5-year survival rates. Management of small renal masses and localized disease include both nonsurgical and surgical options. The choice of intervention is ultimately based on comprehensive evaluation and shared decision-making. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current surgical management options for localized renal cancer.

Operative and oncological outcomes of salvage robotic radical and partial nephrectomy: a multicenter experience

We aim to describe the perioperative and oncological outcomes for salvage robotic partial nephrectomy (sRPN) and salvage robotic radical nephrectomy (sRRN). Using a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database, we compared baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes, including pathological stage, tumor histology, operative time, ischemia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and mortality. We identified a total of 58 patients who had undergone robotic salvage surgery for a recurrent renal mass, of which 22 (38%) had sRRN and 36 (62%) had sRPN. Ischemia time for sRPN was 14 min. The median EBL was 100 mL in both groups (p = 0.581). One intraoperative complication occurred during sRRN, while three occurred during sRPN cases (p = 1.000). The median LOS was 2 days for sRRN and 1 day for sRPN (p = 0.039). Postoperatively, one major complication occurred after sRRN and two after sRPN (p = 1.000). The recurrence reported after sRRN was 5% and 3% after sRPN. Among the patients who underwent sRRN, the two most prevalent stages were pT1a (27%) and pT3a (27%). Similarly, the two most prevalent stages in sRPN patients were pT1a (69%) and pT3a (6%). sRRN and sRPN have similar operative and perioperative outcomes. sRPN is a safe and feasible procedure when performed by experienced surgeons. Future studies on large cohorts are essential to better characterize the importance and benefit of salvage partial nephrectomies.

Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 7): an evidence-based analysis

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) compared with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in the management of complex renal tumors (defined as RENAL score ≥ 7). We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant comparative studies up to January 2023. This study was conducted with the Review Manager 5.4 software, and included RAPN and OPN-controlled trials for complex renal tumors. The prime outcomes were to assess the perioperative results, complications, renal function, and oncologic outcomes. A total of 1493 patients were included in seven studies. Compared to OPN, RAPN was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] - 1.53 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.44, - 0.62; p = 0.001), less blood loss (WMD - 95.88 mL, 95% CI - 144.19, - 47.56; p = 0.0001), lower transfusion rates (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15, 0.71; p = 0.005), fewer major complications (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39, 1.01; p = 0.05), and fewer overall complications (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36, 0.65; p < 0.00001). Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated glomerular decline, intraoperative complications, positive surgical margins, local recurrence, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. The study demonstrated that RAPN had superior perioperative parameters and fewer complications when compared to OPN for complex renal tumors. However, no significant differences were found in terms of renal function and oncologic outcomes.

Comparison between robot-assisted versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: outcomes from a pooled analysis

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to locate pertinent studies published in English up to January 2023. The primary outcomes evaluated included perioperative results, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Statistical analyses and calculations were performed using Review Manager 5.4. The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022383035). In total, eight comparative trials, including 37,984 patients were enrolled. Compared to ONU, RANU was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] - 1.63 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.90, - 0.35; p = 0.01), less blood loss (WMD - 107.04 mL, 95% CI - 204.97, - 9.11; p = 0.03), less major complication(OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.88; p < 0.0001), and lower positive surgical margin (PSM) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12, 0.92; p = 0.03). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in operative time, transfusion rates, rate of lymph node dissection, lymph node yield, overall complications, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival. RANU has superior advantages compared to ONU in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative complications, and PSM, while providing comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with UTUC.

The current evidence on surgical management for synchronous bilateral renal tumors: results from a scoping review

PURPOSE

Synchronous bilateral renal masses (SBRM) account for a low percentage of kidney tumors, and there is no current recommendation for their management. The objective was to review evidence regarding the best surgical approach for SBRM in terms of type and timing of surgery.

METHODS

A broad literature search was performed on 28th January 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE. Only English papers dealing with adults were included. Meeting abstracts were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four papers were accepted and included. SBRM behave less aggressively than metachronous tumors, and partial nephrectomy (PN) is the preferred therapeutic option to preserve renal function. Open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches were found to be similar in oncological outcomes, though robot-assisted surgery resulted in lower comorbidities. Same-sitting PN was demonstrated to be a safe approach, particularly in the robotic-assisted one. Finally, the same-siting and staged NSS were similar in preserving renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

PN should be the desirable treatment for SBRM whenever feasible and if patients are fit, but surgeon expertise should also be taken into the account.

The State of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes From A Robust Multi-Institution Collaborative

OBJECTIVE

To describe the most recent surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of RPN utilizing one of the largest, prospectively maintained, multi-institution consortium of patients undergoing robotic renal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was obtained from a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database of patients who underwent RPN for clinically localized kidney cancer between 2018 and 2022 by 9 high-volume surgeons. Demographic and tumor characteristics as well as operative, functional, and oncological outcomes were queried.

RESULTS

A total of 2836 patients underwent RPN. Intraoperative, postoperative, and 30-day major complication rates were 2.68%, 11.39%, and 3.24%, respectively. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm. Tumors with low complexity had a shorter median operative time, lower median EBL, shorter median ischemia time, lower postoperative complication rate, and lower decline in renal function There was no significant difference between tumor complexities with respect to the rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy, conversion to open, major complications, and positive margins. Lower BMI, smaller clinical tumor size, lower tumor complexity, and higher baseline eGFR were significantly associated with trifecta achievement.

CONCLUSION

Patient BMI, baseline eGFR, and tumor characteristics such as size and complexity are the most important predictors of trifecta achievement. Patients with complex tumors should be counseled that they are at increased risk of complications and worsening renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy.

Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review

To establish the feasibility of robotic surgical procedures in urology in terms of the applications, merits, and demerits as well as the postoperative and oncological outcomes while comparing it with the conventional approaches. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort studies on Robot-Assisted urological surgical procedures in comparison with the conventional methods. The quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the revised Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool. A qualitative narrative synthesis of the data extracted from the studies was performed and presented in tabulated form. After screening, 39 studies were included in our review (7 Randomized Controlled Trials and 32 Cohort studies). Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy appears to be associated with lower estimated blood loss and shorter length of hospital stay. For Robot-Assisted Cystectomy, the results suggest longer operative time and fewer complications. Robot-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy was found to be associated with fewer perioperative complications and longer mean operative time while Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy was associated with less positive surgical margins and reduced need for postoperative analgesia. The mean operative time was longer while the length of stay was shorter for the robotic approach in inguinal lymphadenectomy and ureteral reimplantation. The feasibility of Robot-Assisted surgery varied for different outcome measures as well as for different procedures. Some common advantages were a shorter length of stay, lesser blood loss, and fewer complications while the drawbacks included longer operative time.Study protocol PROSPERO database (Registration Number: CRD42021256623).

A survey of augmented reality methods to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) has become the standard of care for localized kidney tumors over the past decade. The characteristics of each tumor, in particular its size and relationship with the excretory tract and vessels, allow one to judge its complexity and to attempt predicting the risk of complications. The recent development of virtual 3D model reconstruction and computer vision has opened the way to image-guided surgery and augmented reality (AR).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to perform a systematic review to list and describe the different AR techniques proposed to support PN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review of the literature was performed on 12/04/22, using the keywords "nephrectomy" and "augmented reality" on Embase and Medline. Articles were considered if they reported surgical outcomes when using AR with virtual image overlay on real vision, during ex vivo or in vivo MIPN. We classified them according to the registration technique they use.

RESULTS

We found 16 articles describing an AR technique during MIPN procedures that met the eligibility criteria. A moderate to high risk of bias was recorded for all the studies. We classified registration methods into three main families, of which the most promising one seems to be surface-based registration.

CONCLUSION

Despite promising results, there do not exist studies showing an improvement in clinical outcomes using AR. The ideal AR technique is probably yet to be established, as several designs are still being actively explored. More clinical data will be required to establish the potential contribution of this technology to MIPN.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Cryoablation in Elderly Patients with Renal Cancer

Advances in imaging technologies have increased the opportunities for treating small-diameter renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in the elderly. This retrospective study based on real-world clinical practice compared perioperative complications, preoperative and postoperative renal function, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival in elderly patients with RCC who had undergone robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) or percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). A total of 99 patients (aged ≥70 years), including 50 and 49 patients in the RAPN and PCA groups, respectively, were analyzed. In the entire cohort, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications occurred in only one patient who had undergone RAPN. Renal function was significantly lower in the postoperative period than in the preoperative period in both the RAPN and PCA groups. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were worse in the PCA group than in the RAPN group, albeit not significantly. RAPN was considered a safe and effective method for treating RCCs in elderly patients. Moreover, although the recurrence rate was slightly higher in the PCA group than in the RAPN group, PCA was deemed to be a safe alternative, especially for treating patients in whom general anesthesia poses a high risk.

Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study)

We compared the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using contemporary data to respond to unmet clinical needs. Data from patients included in the registry who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2017 within 20 centres of the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer UroCCR were collected (NCT03293563). Statistical methods included adjusted multivariable analyses. Rates of peri- and post-operative transfusion, and of surgical revision, were lower in the RPN (n = 1434) than the OPN (n = 571) group (2.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0012; 3.8% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001; 2.4% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariable analyses, RPN was independently associated with fewer early post-operative complications than OPN (overall: odds-ratio [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.48 [0.35-0.66]; severe: 0.29 [0.16-0.54], p < 0.0001 for both) and shorter hospital stays (34% [30%; 37%], p < 0.0001). RPN was also a significantly associated with a decresedrisk of post-operative acute renal failure, and new-onset chronic kidney disease at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. There were no between-group differences in oncological outcomes. In comparison with OPN, RPN was associated with improved peri- and post-operative morbidity, better functional outcomes, and shorter hospital stays. Our results support the use of RPN, even for large and complex tumours.

Impact of robot-assisted surgery appearance on reduction of annual blood transfusion cases in Japan: application of meta-analysis and NDB open data

In Japan, the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) started to be covered by health insurance since 2016, and it is replacing conventional open partial nephrectomy (OPN). RAPN is a minimally invasive surgery, and the spreading of RAPN in partial nephrectomy (PN) performed annually is expected to reduce the number of blood transfusions in Japan. The number of PN surgery in Japan was calculated using the Japanese NDB open data in 2018. We extracted articles comparing the transfusion rates of RAPN and OPN from 2017 to 2021 using PubMed, Web of Science, and Ichu-shi, and integrated the ratios of transfusion rates by meta-analysis. We estimated the reduction in the annual transfusion cases in PN due to the widespread use of RAPN. The total number of renal cancer surgeries in 2018 was 21,298, of which 3,876 (18.2%) were RAPN and 4,384 (20.6%) were OPN. For the comparison of transfusion implementation rate between RAPN and OPN, 871 articles were screened and 27 articles were included. The pooled ratio in transfusion rate of RAPN compared with OPN was 0.49 [0.46, 0.52]; the introduction of RAPN was estimated to have reduced the annual number of transfusions in PN by 9.1% compared with that of unintroduced RAPN. This study showed quantitatively evaluated the impact of the introduction of RAPN on the decrease in the annual number of transfusions in Japan. This method has the potential to evaluate the impact of robot-assisted surgery on the use of blood products for transfusion.

Anaesthesia for Major Urological Surgery

This article focuses on the anesthetic considerations for major cancer urology surgeries such as cystectomies, nephrectomies, and radical prostatectomies. It aims to explore the anesthetic considerations for both open and minimally invasive techniques.

How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery : The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation

Molecular imaging is one of the pillars of precision surgery. Its applications range from early diagnostics to therapy planning, execution, and the accurate assessment of outcomes. In particular, molecular imaging solutions are in high demand in minimally invasive surgical strategies, such as the substantially increasing field of robotic surgery. This review aims at connecting the molecular imaging and nuclear medicine community to the rapidly expanding armory of surgical medical devices. Such devices entail technologies ranging from artificial intelligence and computer-aided visualization technologies (software) to innovative molecular imaging modalities and surgical navigation (hardware). We discuss technologies based on their role at different steps of the surgical workflow, i.e., from surgical decision and planning, over to target localization and excision guidance, all the way to (back table) surgical verification. This provides a glimpse of how innovations from the technology fields can realize an exciting future for the molecular imaging and surgery communities.

ROBOCOP II (ROBOtic assisted versus conventional open partial nephrectomy) randomised, controlled feasibility trial: clinical trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Randomised controlled trials comparing robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and open PN (OPN) are lacking. Therefore, we aim to report the study protocol and a trial update for a randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing RAPN versus OPN for renal neoplasms.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ROBOtic assisted versus conventional Open Partial nephrectomy II trial is designed as a single-centre, randomised, open-label, feasibility trial. Participation will be offered to patients with renal neoplasms and deemed feasible for both, OPN and RAPN. We aim to enrol 50 patients within 15 months using a 1:1 allocation ratio. The primary endpoint of the trial is feasibility of recruitment and will be successful if one third of eligible patients agree to participate. Secondary endpoints include perioperative results, health-related quality of life, inflammatory response as well as surgical ergonomics of the operating team. If the primary outcome, feasibility of recruitment, is successful, the secondary results of the trial will be used for planning a confirmative phase III trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the local institutional review board (Ethik-Kommission II at Heidelberg University: 2020-542N). Results will be made publicly available in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at appropriate congresses and social media.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04534998.

Integration of Robotics in Urology Residency Programs: an Unchecked Technological Revolution

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the integration of robotics in urology residency programs and evaluate how it has impacted a graduates' level of surgical competence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical technique training has shown a dramatic shift towards robotics with the most profound occurring in oncology. However, integration of robotics is not uniform across programs nor even among residents themselves. Robotics require graduates to garner a broader skill set within the same prescribed training time. Unfortunately, in this modern era, graduates are feeling more ill-equipped to start independent practice and show an increased need to pursue fellowship training to achieve technical proficiency. The dissemination of robotics in residency programs has gone unchecked. Modulating existing training structures through (1) development of procedure- and surgical technique-specific target metrics for graduation and (2) integration of a formalized robotic curriculum may improve the overall quality and outcome of the educational experience.

[Robot-assisted surgery for renal cell carcinoma - today a standard?]

Twenty years have passed since the first reports on robot-assisted kidney tumor surgery in 2001. However, robotic surgery has not spread to all German urologic departments yet. Hence, one has to question whether robot-assisted kidney tumor surgery can be considered a standard today. Until now, no prospective randomized controlled trials have compared robot-assisted radical nephrectomy with the open or laparoscopic approach. Regardless, laparoscopy and robotics both have proven better perioperative and comparable oncological outcomes than with open nephrectomy. In direct comparison, robot-assisted nephrectomy has no additional benefits over the laparoscopic approach and is less cost-effective. However, reports on robot-assisted level III or IV vena cava tumor thrombectomies illustrate that robotic surgery can be superior to the laparoscopic approach in highly complex interventions. Likewise, no prospective randomized controlled trials have analyzed robot-assisted partial nephrectomy yet. When conducted by experienced surgeons, robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies can also have lower morbidity compared to the open approach. No consensus has been reached when directly comparing robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. However, evidence is increasing that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can offer additional benefits, especially for the treatment of highly complex endophytic renal tumors. Thereof, head-to-head comparisons are often impacted by patient- and tumor-related factors, as well as the learning curve of the surgeon, bed-side assistant and the annual caseload of the department. Hence, one has to conclude that robot-assisted kidney tumor surgery has evolved into a standard procedure with good results. The perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted surgery are superior to the open technique at a comparable oncological follow-up. Even if robot-assisted interventions are often more expensive than laparoscopic surgery due to higher costs of acquisition, robotics have the potential to gain superior results especially in very complex tumor surgery. Due to expiring patent protections, new manufacturers and the development of new technologies, the market of robotic surgery will most likely undergo significant changes and its costs will probably decrease within the next years.

Health-related quality of life in patients with small renal mass who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A prospective evaluation

INTRODUCTION

There have been insufficient data regarding the impact of partial nephrectomy (PN) with minimal invasive approaches, including robot-assisted PN (RAPN), on postoperative quality of life (QOL) in patients with small renal mass (SRM). The objective of this study was to investigate the changes in health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) outcomes in patients with SRM who underwent RAPN.

METHODS

　We performed a prospective observational study including 100 consecutive patients with SRM who underwent RAPN at our institution between April 2016 and August 2018. A single surgeon performed RAPN for all 100 cases using the da Vinci Xi. HRQOL in these patients was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8) before, 3, 6 and 12 months after RAPN.

RESULTS

Mean age in the 100 patients was 63 years, and diabetes mellitus, hypertension and chronic kidney disease were preoperatively detected in 22, 44 and 30 patients, respectively. Mean values of tumor diameter and RENAL nephrometry score were 25 mm and 7, respectively. Console and warm ischemia times during RAPN were 115 and 15 minutes, respectively. Of 8 sub-scale scores of the SF-8 survey, 3 sub-scales prior to RAPN, including bodily pain, role emotional and mental health, were significantly improved after RAPN. Furthermore, of 2 summary scores, metal health component summary (MCS), but not physical health component summary (PCS), showed a significant improvement postoperatively. Multivariate analyses of several factors revealed that despite the lack of factors associated with improved PCS, younger age (<65 years) had an independent impact on improved MCS.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that patients undergoing RAPN could result in the achievement of favorable HRQOL, particularly that reflecting mental health status in younger patients.

Transitioning to robotic partial nephrectomy with a team-based proctorship achieves the desired improved outcomes over open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Proctoring may facilitate a safe transition to robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for centres performing open (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies (LPN). This study compared the 5-year outcomes of RAPN, initiated with a team-based proctorship, with OPN and LPN. Following an observation course at the proctor's institution and a 3-surgeon performance of proctored RAPN in August 2014, a review of 90 RAPN, 29 LPN and 43 OPN consecutively performed by the same team from 2013 to 2019 at National University Hospital, Singapore was conducted. Peri-operative data, functional and oncological outcomes were compared amongst the three groups. Most cases were performed robotically after 2015 with comparable baseline characteristics in all groups. Median RENAL Nephrometry Score was not significantly different between RAPN (8 [IQR 6, 9]) and OPN (9 [IQR 7, 10]) (P = 0.12) but was significantly lower for LPN (7 [IQR 5, 8]) compared to RAPN (P = 0.002). RAPN achieved the lowest blood loss (226 ml vs.348 ml and 263 ml for OPN and LPN respectively, P = 0.02), transfusion rate (3% vs.21% and 17% respectively, P = 0.003) and median length of stay after surgery (4 vs.6 and 5 days respectively, P = 0.001). Complication rates, warm ischemic times were similar between the three approaches with no differences in 1-year and long-term renal function. The rate of positive surgical margin was 8%, 8% and 3% for RAPN, LPN and OPN, respectively (P = 0.76), with a single recurrence in each arm. Despite modest hospital volume, a team-based proctorship facilitated the transition to the Da Vinci robotic platform to perform partial nephrectomies of equivalent complexities as open surgery, achieving improved perioperative outcomes, while maintaining oncological and kidney functional results.

Single-port robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy is associated with decreased post-operative narcotic use in a propensity score matched analysis

Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has proven to be an effective minimally invasive option for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) in recent years. Single-site surgery is theorized to reduce post-operative pain beyond traditional minimally invasive approaches. We sought to assess whether use of a single-port robotic platform decreases post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing RASP our institution from November 2017 to July 2019. Demographic, intraoperative, and post-operative data, including morphine equivalent (ME) use, were collected. Patients were stratified by robotic platform utilized. Propensity score matching using nearest neighbor method was performed using prostate volume, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and post-op ketorolac use in 4:1 fashion. Chi-squared analysis and Kruskal-Wallis analyses were utilized. Two-hundred-and-seven men underwent RASP. After matching, 80 patients (64 multi-port, 16 single-port) were included in the analysis. Groups were comparable for age, body mass index, CCI, prostate volume, prior opioid use, and use of scheduled ketorolac post op. The single-port approach was associated with a reduction in MEs once admitted to the floor (5 vs. 11 mg, p = 0.025) and an increase in the proportion of patients who did not require any narcotics post-operatively (44 vs. 19%, p = 0.036). In a propensity matched cohort of patients undergoing RASP at a single institution, use of the single-port robotic system conferred a significant decrease in post-operative narcotic use by approximately 50%.

Pilot experience of simultaneous robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for bilateral renal tumors-single center analysis

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral renal tumors accounts for approximately 3% of renal tumors. However, surgical treatment methods for bilateral renal tumors have not yet been established. It is imperative to balance the need for curative surgery with the goal of maximal functional preservation in patients with bilateral synchronous renal tumors. Therefore, partial nephrectomy may be the optimal surgical treatment for bilateral synchronous renal tumors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study to analyze the clinical outcome of simultaneous robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for bilateral renal tumors at our institution between 2016 and 2019. A total of eight patients were enrolled and the number of renal masses in the 16 kidneys was 18.

RESULTS

There was no positive surgical margin after RAPN in our case series and no local recurrence or metastasis during the follow-up period. The only complication of simultaneous RAPN in the present case series was that one patient experienced acute kidney injury after operation without need for dialysis therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that simultaneous RAPN for bilateral renal tumors might be feasible both for the preservation of renal function and for oncological outcome such as negative surgical margin.

Open partial nephrectomy: current review

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is increasingly considered the gold standard treatment for localized renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) where technically feasible. The advantage of nephron-sparing surgery lies in preservation of parenchyma and hence renal function. However, this advantage is counterbalanced with increased surgical risk. In recent years with the popularization of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (laparoscopic and robotic), the contemporary role of open PN (OPN) has changed. OPN has several advantages, particularly in complex patients such as those with a solitary kidney, multi-focal tumors, and significant surgical history, as well as providing improved application of renoprotective measures. As such, it is a technique that remains relevant in current urology practice. In this article we discuss the evidence, indications, operative considerations and surgical technique, along with the role of OPN in contemporary nephron-sparing surgery.

Infectious complications associated with perioperative blood transfusion in partial or radical nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (PBT) is associated with increased infectious risk for many surgical procedures, although this has not been thoroughly explored for extirpative renal surgery. Underlying mechanisms may be related to an alteration of the patient immune response. We aimed to assess the infectious complications associated with PBT after radical or partial nephrectomy.

METHODS/MATERIALS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1996-2015) was queried for patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy. We assessed rates of infectious complications in patients who did and did not receive PBT. Infections were index complications and included sepsis, abscess, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and wound infection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the risk of infectious complications accounting for age, gender, race, insurance, income, surgery type and approach, length of stay, comorbidity, and PBT.

RESULTS

We identified 140,183 patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy during the study period with 17,874 (12.7%) receiving PBT. The rate of PBT was stable throughout the study period (Cochran-Armitage, P= 0.97). Patients receiving PBT compared to those without were relatively older (proportion of age >70, 42.6% vs. 30.5%), non-white (25.4% vs. 21.1%), who underwent radical nephrectomy (84.3% vs. 77.4%), and with longer hospital stay (9.1 vs. 5.1 days; all P< 0.001). On multivariable analysis, PBT was associated with higher odds of any infectious complication (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.5-1.68, P< 0.001). During the study period, the risk of infectious complications was persistently increased in those receiving PBT.

CONCLUSION

PBT is independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative infections for patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy. This may be due to underlying transfusion-related immunomodulatory mechanisms. While PBT is necessary in many instances to promote patient survival, providers should remain cautious when providing PBT after extirpative renal surgery.

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Renal Tumors Arising from Horseshoe Kidneys: Results from an International Multicenter Collaboration

BACKGROUND

Despite being the most frequent renal fusion anomaly, tumors arising from horseshoe kidneys (HSKs) are extremely rare and management guidance is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of surgically treated HSK tumors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 43 HSK tumors in 40 patients was conducted, and technical description of the surgical approach has been provided.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Surgical resection of renal tumors arising from HSKs was performed either via open surgery or via minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

MEASUREMENTS

We analyzed patient and tumor characteristics as well as surgical technique, and functional and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Eight patients were treated by MIS and 32 by open surgery. One patient (2.5%) experienced an intraoperative complication and 13 patients (32.5%) experienced postoperative complications, of which three (7.5%) were Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications. Surgical margins were positive in two tumors (4.7%). The most frequent histology was clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (46.5%). The median follow-up was 51 (interquartile range [IQR] 17-73) mo. The 5-yr overall, cancer-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 81.2%, 86.8%, and 83.1%, respectively. The percent decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge and the last follow-up were 15% (IQR 4-26%) and 17% (IQR 1-31%), respectively. Limitations include the cohort's retrospective nature, heterogeneity, and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of tumors in HSKs can be approached via both open surgery and MIS, with maximal preservation of functional renal parenchyma. In this cohort, rates of complications, positive surgical margins, and renal functional decrease were acceptable, considering the anatomical complexity of these kidneys and tumors. These tumors display great variation in histological subtypes. Meticulous presurgical planning, taking advantage of advanced imaging techniques, can aid in achieving good outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We evaluated the surgical management of renal tumors in horseshoe kidneys, which are very rare. Although these procedures are highly complex, outcomes are acceptable. Modern imaging techniques are often required in presurgical planning.

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review

Background

Adoption of the robotic surgical platform for small renal cancers has rapidly expanded, but its utility compared to other approaches has not been established. The objective of this review is to assess perioperative and long-term oncologic and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) compared to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN).

Methods

A search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane (2010-2019) was conducted. Of 3877 articles screened, 7 observational studies were included.

Results

RAPN was associated with 24-50 mL less intraoperative blood loss compared to LPN and 39-84 mL less than OPN. RAPN also demonstrated trends of other postoperative benefits, such as shorter length of stay and fewer major complications. Several studies reported better long-term functional kidney outcomes, but these findings were inconsistent. Recurrence and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were similar across groups. While RAPN had a 5-year CSS of 90.1%-97.9%, LPN and OPN had survival rates of 85.9%-86.9% and 88.5-96.3% respectively.

Conclusions

RAPN may be associated with a lower estimated blood loss and comparable long-term outcomes when compared to other surgical approaches. However, additional randomized or propensity matched studies are warranted to fully assess long-term functional kidney and oncologic outcomes.

Shared decision-making for the management of small renal masses: Development and acceptability testing of a novel patient decision aid

INTRODUCTION

Shared decision-making incorporates patients' values and preferences to achieve high-quality decisions. The objective of this study was to develop an acceptable patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for the management of small renal masses (SRMs).

METHODS

The International Patient Decision Aids Standards were used to guide an evidence-based development process. Management options included active surveillance, thermal ablation, partial nephrectomy, and radical nephrectomy. A literature review was performed to provide incidence rates for outcomes of each option. Once a prototype was complete, alpha-testing was performed using a 10-question survey to assess acceptability with patients, patient advocates, urologists, and methodological experts. The primary outcome was acceptability of the decision aid.

RESULTS

A novel patient decision aid was created to facilitate shared decision-making for the management of SRMs. Acceptability testing was performed with 20 patients, 10 urologists, two patient advocates, and one methodological expert. Responders indicated the decision aid was appropriate in length (82%, 27/33), well-balanced (82%, 27/33), and had language that was easy to follow (94%, 31/33). All patient responders felt the decision aid would have been helpful during their consultation and would recommend the decision aid for future patients (100%, 20/20). Most urologists reported they intend to use the decision aid (90%, 9/10).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel patient decision aid was created to facilitate shared decision-making for management of SRMs. This clinical tool was acceptable with patients, patient advocates, and urologists and is freely available at: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/decaids.html.

[New aspects in the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Localized renal cell carcinoma is increasingly relevant in daily urological practice due to earlier diagnosis and higher life expectancy.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze and compare current treatment evidence for localized renal cell carcinoma regarding new aspects of nephron-sparing surgery, the different surgical approaches and focal therapy.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify relevant publications from 2018 and 2019.

RESULTS

Prospective randomized trials comparing nephrectomy with partial nephrectomy, the three different surgical approaches with each other, and focal therapy with surgery are still lacking. Positive effects on survival by partial nephrectomy could be demonstrated, even though partial nephrectomy has a higher morbidity than radical nephrectomy. Older patients (>75 years) with advanced localized renal cell carcinoma did not appear to benefit from partial nephrectomy so far, but minimally invasive surgical approaches are underrepresented in such studies. Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy is superior to the open approach, and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has better results than laparoscopy. Focal therapy of kidney tumors is technically safe and feasible, but relevant comparisons with partial nephrectomy are still lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy is still the gold standard treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma, it should be preferably performed by a robot-assisted approach. Focal therapy can serve as an alternative in highly selected cases.