Hemophilia without prophylaxis: Assessment of joint range of motion and factor activity

Joint health and pain in the changing hemophilia treatment landscape

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia is an inherited bleeding disorder. Bleeding, and in particular joint hemorrhage results in chronic arthropathy and disability. Acute and chronic pain are frequent and limit activity and participation and result in decreased health-related quality of life. Remarkable progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia but bleeding continues to prove recalcitrant to currently available treatments and joint disease remains problematic. Physiotherapy and pain management are mainstays of current multidisciplinary integrated care of people with hemophilia (PWH). The focus of this review is on preservation of joint health in the era of new and innovative therapies.

AREAS COVERED

A search of the PubMed Central was conducted on 1 February 2024 using the MeSH Major Topic terms identified as keywords for the manuscript. This review will highlight what is known and unknown about joint bleeding and arthropathy, including insights on pain as a related complication.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in therapeutic interventions aimed at promoting healthy joints in PWH will be discussed, including both the pharmacological treatment landscape and related strategies to promote joint health.

Concizumab improves clot formation in hemophilia A under flow

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is an emerging therapeutic strategy for treatment of hemophilia. Concizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds TFPI and blocks its inhibition of factor (F)Xa thereby extending the initiation of coagulation and compensating for lack of FVIII or FIX.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate how concizumab affects clot formation in hemophilia A under flow.

METHODS

Blood was collected from normal controls or people with hemophilia A. An anti-FVIII antibody was added to normal controls to simulate hemophilia A with inhibitory antibodies to FVIII. Whole blood and recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa, 25 nM) or concizumab (200, 1000, and 4000 ng/mL) were perfused at 100 s-1 over a surface micropatterned with tissue factor (TF) and collagen-related peptide. Platelet and fibrin(ogen) accumulation were measured by confocal microscopy. Static thrombin generation in plasma was measured in response to rFVIIa and concizumab.

RESULTS

Concizumab (1000 and 4000 ng/mL) and rFVIIa both rescued (93%-101%) total platelet accumulation, but only partially rescued (53%-63%) fibrin(ogen) incorporation to normal control levels in simulated hemophilia A. Results using congenital hemophilia A blood confirmed effects of rFVIIa and concizumab. While these 2 agents had similar effect on clot formation under flow, concizumab enhanced thrombin generation in plasma under static conditions to a greater extent than rFVIIa.

CONCLUSION

TFPI inhibition by concizumab enhanced activation and aggregation of platelets and fibrin clot formation in hemophilia A to levels comparable with that of rFVIIa.

Patient perspective on living with mild hemophilia in Germany: results from a nationwide survey

Introduction

The disease burden and bleeding risk of patients with mild hemophilia may be underestimated. Their health-related quality of life (QoL) may be negatively impacted by insufficient treatment and bleed-related joint damage connected to a potentially delayed diagnosis.

Aim

This study aims to gain information on the care reality and QoL of patients aged ≥12 years with mild hemophilia in Germany.

Methods

An anonymous cross-sectional patient survey using standardized questionnaires was conducted in a validated electronic patient-reported outcome system. Medical specialists, hemophilia centers, patient organizations, and support groups across Germany invited the patients.

Results

A total of 43 patients (35 patients with hemophilia A, 5 patients with hemophilia B, and 3 patients for whom the information was missing) with a median age of 33 years were analyzed. The median age at diagnosis was 6.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-15.0), and the median factor activity was 14.0% (IQR 12.0-25.0). Nearly 85% of the patients received factor concentrates in the past, and the most common reasons for the treatment were surgery or joint bleeding (each 65.6%). Half of the patients who provided feedback experienced complications during bleeding episodes. Prophylactic treatment with factor concentrates was rare (10.3%). The patients had minor problems regarding their health status.

Conclusion

Bleeding complications and joint bleeding, in particular, may be highly underestimated in patients with mild hemophilia, highlighting a medical need in this population. Patients with a potential benefit from prophylaxis need to be identified. Mild hemophilia has a negative impact on patients' QoL. Hemophilia centers satisfied the patients' needs. Further research is needed to address the current lack of awareness and improve adequate treatment in the future.

Intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma in patients with hemophilia and painful knee joint cartilage degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Knee arthropathy causes pain to people with hemophilia (PWH). One of the current controversies is whether injections of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are effective in relieving the knee pain of PWH.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative literature review was conducted on the efficacy of PRP injections in the knees of PWH.

EXPERT OPINION

Intra-articular PRP knee injections are widely used in patients with knee osteoarthritis to relieve pain and delay total knee arthroplasty. Although numerous publications have supported the use of PRP in knee osteoarthritis, there is still major controversy regarding its true usefulness, given that a number of studies with a high degree of evidence have failed to show the efficacy of PRP. With respect to painful hemophilic arthropathy, the use of PRP injections is even more controversial, as there are only four publications on the subject supporting the use of PRP in hemophilia, all of them with a low degree of evidence. A publication with grade 1 evidence recommended against the use of PRP in hemophilic arthropathy because its efficacy has not been demonstrated. My opinion is that intra-articular PRP injections should not be used in hemophilia until there is more evidence of its benefits.