The effect of emicizumab and bypassing agents in patients with hemophilia - An in vitro study

Multicenter evaluation of the hemostatic activity of emicizumab in patients with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab has been approved for the prophylaxis of patients with hemophilia A with or without inhibitors. However, spontaneous and trauma-induced breakthrough bleeds have been reported in patients on emicizumab prophylaxis, and no laboratory assay has been validated to evaluate the hemostatic activity of emicizumab.

OBJECTIVES

The thrombin generation assay (TGA) could be a surrogate marker of the hemostatic efficacy of emicizumab. The correlation between TGA and the methods used to measure emicizumab blood concentration was evaluated in this study.

METHODS

TGA was modified by the use of a trigger reagent combining a very low concentration of tissue factor and activated factor (F)XI. Emicizumab quantification was performed by 3 methods: the modified 1-step FVIII assay and 2 methods based on liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

RESULTS

Using tissue factor/activated FXI-triggered TGA and platelet-poor plasma, a relationship was observed between the area under the thrombin generation curve (endogenous thrombin potential [ETP]) and the clinical response of patients to emicizumab. The ultrastructure of fibrin clots was consistent with ETP results and showed that emicizumab had a hemostatic activity equivalent to 20 to 30 IU/dL of FVIII. Finally, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses showed no correlation between ETP and LC-MS nor with modified 1-stage FVIII assay, but a statistically significant correlation between the LC-MS methods and the time-to-peak results of the TGA.

CONCLUSION

Using a modified TGA, this study showed that patients who experienced breakthrough bleeds while on emicizumab had a lower thrombin-generating capacity compared with others with good clinical response to emicizumab.

Differences in venous clot structures between hemophilic mice treated with emicizumab versus factor VIII or factor VIIIFc

Recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), rFVIIIFc and emicizumab are established treatment options in the management of hemophilia A. Each has its unique mode of action, which can influence thrombin generation kinetics and therefore also the kinetics of thrombin substrates. Such differences may potentially result in clots with different structural and physical properties. A starting observation of incomplete wound closure in a patient on emicizumab prophylaxis led us to employ a relevant mouse model in which we noticed that emicizumab-induced clots appeared less stable compared to FVIII-induced clots. We therefore analyzed fibrin formation in vitro and in vivo. In vitro fibrin formation was faster and more abundant in the presence of emicizumab than in the presence of rFVIII/rFVIIIFc. Furthermore, the time-interval between the initiation of fibrin formation and factor XIII activation was twice as long for emicizumab than as for rFVIII/rFVIIIFc. Scanning electron microscopy and immunofluorescent spinning-disk confocal microscopy of in vivo-generated clots confirmed increased fibrin formation in the presence of emicizumab. Unexpectedly, we also detected a different morphology between rFVIII/rFVIIIFcand emicizumab-induced clots. Contrary to the regular fibrin mesh obtained with rFVIII/rFVIIIFc, fibrin fibers appeared to be fused into large patches upon emicizumab treatment. Moreover, fewer red blood cells were detected in regions in which these fibrin patches were present. The presence of highly dense fibrin structures associated with a diffuse fiber structure in emicizumab-induced clots was also observed when using super-resolution imaging. We hypothesize that the modified kinetics of thrombin, fibrin and factor XIIIa generation contribute to differences in structural and physical properties between clots formed in the presence of FVIII or emicizumab.

Emicizumab promotes factor Xa generation on endothelial cells

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the treatment of hemophilia A relied on factor (F)VIII replacement. However, up to one-third of patients with severe hemophilia A develop neutralizing alloantibodies that render replacement therapies ineffective. The development of emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that partially mimics FVIIIa, has revolutionized the treatment of these patients. However, the use of an activated prothrombin complex concentrate [FEIBA (Takeda)] to treat breakthrough bleeding in patients on emicizumab has been associated with thrombotic complications including a unique microangiopathy.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that the thrombotic complications observed with the combination of emicizumab and FEIBA might be due to excessive expression of procoagulant activity on the surface of endothelial cells.

METHODS

We examined the ability of emicizumab to promote FX activation on endothelial cells using 2 cell culture models.

RESULTS

We found that endothelial cells readily support emicizumab-mediated activation of FX by FIXa. The level of FXa generation depends on the concentration of available FIXa. The addition of FEIBA to emicizumab increased FXa generation in a dose-dependent manner on endothelial cells in both models. The rate of FXa generation was further enhanced by endothelial cell activation. However, unlike emicizumab, we found limited FXa generation in the presence of FVIII(a), which followed a significant lag time and was not dependent on FIXa concentration under these conditions.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab promotes FXa generation on the surface of endothelial cells, which is markedly enhanced in the presence of FEIBA. These findings demonstrate a potential mechanism for the thrombotic complications seen with the combined use of emicizumab and FEIBA.

Thrombin generation on vascular cells in the presence of factor VIII and/or emicizumab

BACKGROUND

The effect of factor VIII (FVIII) or emicizumab on thrombin generation is usually assessed in assays using synthetic phospholipids. Here, we assessed thrombin generation at the surface of human arterial cells (aortic endothelial cells [hAECs] and aortic vascular smooth muscle cells [hVSMCs]).

OBJECTIVES

To explore the capacity of hAECs (resting or stimulated) and hVSMCs to support thrombin generation by FVIII or emicizumab.

METHODS

Primary hVSMCs and hAECs were analyzed for tissue factor (TF)-activity and antigen, phosphatidylserine (PS)-exposure, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)-content and thrombomodulin expression. Cells were incubated with FVIII-deficient plasma spiked with FVIII, emicizumab, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) or combinations thereof.

RESULTS

TF activity and PS-exposure were present on both hVSMCs and hAECs. In contrast, thrombomodulin and TFPI were expressed on hAECs, while virtually lacking on hVSMCs, confirming the procoagulant nature of hVSMCs. Tumor necrosis factor α-mediated stimulation of hAECs increased not only TF antigen, TF activity, and PS-exposure but also TFPI and thrombomodulin expression. As expected, FVIII and emicizumab promoted thrombin generation on nonstimulated hAECs and hVSMCs, with more thrombin being generated on hVSMCs. Unexpectedly, FVIII and emicizumab increased thrombin generation to a lesser extent on stimulated hAECs compared with nonstimulated hAECs. Finally, adding emicizumab to FVIII did not further increase thrombin generation, whereas the addition of emicizumab to APCC resulted in exaggerated thrombin generation.

CONCLUSION

Tumor necrosis factor stimulation of hAECs increases both pro- and anticoagulant activity. Unexpectedly, the increased anticoagulant activity is sufficient to limit both FVIII- and emicizumab-induced thrombin generation. This protective effect disappears when emicizumab is combined with APCC.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

The Use of Bypassing Treatment Strategies in Hemophilia and Their Effect on Laboratory Testing

Factor VIII and IX inhibitors in congenital hemophilia A and B, respectively, neutralize the infused coagulation factor concentrate rendering them ineffective. Bypassing agents (BPAs) that circumvent the block imposed by the inhibitors are used for the prevention and management of bleeding. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate was the original BPA, recombinant activated factor VII was then introduced, and more recently nonfactor agents that target the procoagulant and anticoagulant systems have been developed and are in clinical use (e.g., emicizumab, a bispecific antibody for hemophilia A). Other BPAs are in clinical trials (e.g., fitusiran targets antithrombin, concizumab and marstacimab target tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and SerpinPC targets activated protein C). The BPAs have a varied effect on coagulation assays, and as more patients are exposed to these agents, it is important to be aware of the effects. Herein, we present an overview of the effect of BPAs on routine and specialized coagulation assays including thrombin generation and viscoelastic assays.

In vitro effects of combining Mim8 with factor VIII, FVIIa, and activated prothrombin complex concentrates in thrombin generation assays

BACKGROUND

Mim8 is a novel antifactor IXa/antifactor X bispecific antibody in clinical development for prophylactic treatment of hemophilia A with and without inhibitors. Patients treated with Mim8 may need supplementary bleed treatment under certain conditions such as surgery or major trauma.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to better understand the response of Mim8 in thrombin generation assays (TGAs) alone or in combination with other hemostatic proteins.

METHODS

We used TGAs with different activators (tissue factor (TF) and activated factor XI) to better understand the similarities and differences between the mode of action of Mim8 and factor VIII (FVIII). Following this, we investigated the effects of mixing Mim8 with the main bleed treatment options for persons with hemophilia A with or without inhibitors: FVIII, activated factor VII (FVIIa), and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC).

RESULTS

The results indicated that for patients without inhibitors, Mim8 does not interfere with FVIII's mode of action. For patients with inhibitors, Mim8 mixed with aPCC results in a strong synergistic effect causing thrombin generation far exceeding the normal levels. Contrary to this, mixing Mim8 with FVIIa results in a more controlled additive effect, visible only when using TF as a trigger, which does not exceed the normal level of thrombin generation.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the use of approved clinical doses of FVIIa for bleed treatment of patients with FVIII inhibitors treated with Mim8. Additionally, the findings suggest that concomitant use of FVIII and Mim8 is safe for managing breakthrough bleeds.

Thrombin generation assays to personalize treatment in bleeding and thrombotic diseases

Treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders is highly standardized and based on evidence-based medicine guidelines. These evidence-based treatment schemes are well accepted but may lead to either insufficient treatment or over-dosing, because the individuals' hemostatic properties are not taken into account. This can potentially introduce bleeding or thrombotic complications in individual patients. With the incorporation of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters, based on global assays such as thrombin generation assays (TGAs), a more personalized approach can be applied to treat either bleeding or thrombotic disorders. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature about the technical aspects of TGAs and the relation to diagnosis and management of bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In patients with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia A or factor VII deficiency, TGAs can be used to identify patients with a more severe bleeding phenotype and also in the management with non-replacement therapy and/or bypassing therapy. These assays have also a role in patients with venous thrombo-embolism, but the usage of TGAs in patients with arterial thrombosis is less clear. However, there is a potential role for TGAs in the monitoring of (long-term) antithrombotic therapy, for example with the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Finally this review will discuss controversies, limitations and knowledge gaps in relation to the introduction of TGAs to personalize medicine in daily medical practice.

Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review

Patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have an increased risk of spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding because of a congenital absence of factor VIII (FVIII). Most severe HA patients use prophylactic FVIII concentrate, the effect of which can be monitored with FVIII activity level measurement. However, FVIII activity level is less valuable in predicting the potential clinical bleeding risk. Some patients still experience breakthrough bleeds despite adequate FVIII trough levels, whereas others do not bleed with trough levels below threshold. This difference may be caused by inter-individual differences in pro- and anticoagulant factors, the so-called hemostatic balance. Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) measure the hemostatic balance as a whole. Thereby, the TGAs may be a better tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment in HA patients. In addition, TGAs offer the opportunity to determine the response to bypassing agents and treatment with non-factor replacement therapy, in which FVIII activity assays are not suitable for monitoring. This review summarizes the current knowledge about monitoring different HA treatment modalities by TGA, as a single treatment option and when used in a concomitant fashion.