Estimating cumulative incidence functions in competing risks data with dependent left-truncation

Landmarking for Left-Truncated Competing Risk Data

Landmarking is an alternative to complex multistate models when the aim is to calculate dynamic predictions. We develop the concept of landmarking for the case of left truncation and competing risks from the application background of drug safety assessment in pregnancy. The method is illustrated with a cohort study of the German Embryotox Pharmacovigilance Institute in Berlin to assess if the risk or the cumulative incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, like spontaneous abortions (SABs), is increased in fluoroquinolone-exposed women. Furthermore, we conduct an extensive simulation study to compare the dynamic predictions and coefficient estimates obtained by landmarking to those from nonparametric multistate models and classical time-dependent covariate Cox regression. The results from the simulation study indicate that attenuation of the effects is present in the landmark estimates, also in the complex setting considered here, but the estimates are still close to those from the multistate models. Regarding the Berlin fluoroquinolone data, the fluoroquinolone exposure of a pregnant woman in the first trimester seems to increase her cumulative incidence of elective termination of pregnancy over women never exposed before, but there is no evidence of a significantly increased risk or cumulative incidence in exposed women for SABs. This supports previous results on the same data, which were driven from an analysis without landmarking methods.

Selection processes, transportability, and failure time analysis in life history studies

In life history analysis of data from cohort studies, it is important to address the process by which participants are identified and selected. Many health studies select or enrol individuals based on whether they have experienced certain health related events, for example, disease diagnosis or some complication from disease. Standard methods of analysis rely on assumptions concerning the independence of selection and a person's prospective life history process, given their prior history. Violations of such assumptions are common, however, and can bias estimation of process features. This has implications for the internal and external validity of cohort studies, and for the transportabilty of results to a population. In this paper, we study failure time analysis by proposing a joint model for the cohort selection process and the failure process of interest. This allows us to address both independence assumptions and the transportability of study results. It is shown that transportability cannot be guaranteed in the absence of auxiliary information on the population. Conditions that produce dependent selection and types of auxiliary data are discussed and illustrated in numerical studies. The proposed framework is applied to a study of the risk of psoriatic arthritis in persons with psoriasis.

How to account for early overly small risk sets in the analysis of pregnancy outcome data?-Comparison of different methods for stabilizing the Aalen-Johansen estimator

PURPOSE

In analyzing pregnancy data concerning drug exposure in the first trimester, the risk of spontaneous abortions is of primary interest. For estimating the cumulative incidence function, the Aalen-Johansen estimator is typically used, and competing risks such as induced abortion and livebirth are considered. However, the delayed study entry can lead to overly small risk sets for the first events. This results in large jumps in the estimated cumulative incidence function of spontaneous abortions or induced abortions using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, and consequently in an overestimation of the probability.

METHODS

Several approaches account for early overly small risk sets. The first approach is conditioning on the event time being greater than the event time causing the large jump. Second, the events can be ignored by censoring them. Third, the events can be postponed until a large enough number is at risk. These three approaches are compared.

RESULTS

All approaches are applied using data of 54 lacosamide-exposed pregnancies. The Aalen-Johansen estimate of the probability of spontaneous abortion is 22.64%, which is relatively large for only three spontaneous abortions in the dataset. The conditional approach and the ignore approach have an estimated probability of 7.17%. In contrast, the estimate of the postpone approach is 16.45%. In this small sample, bootstrapped confidence intervals seem more accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

In the analyses of pregnancy data with rare events, the postpone approach is favorable as no events are excluded. However, the approach that ignores early events has the narrowest confidence interval.

A comparison of statistical methods to predict the residual lifetime risk

Lifetime risk measures the cumulative risk for developing a disease over one's lifespan. Modeling the lifetime risk must account for left truncation, the competing risk of death, and inference at a fixed age. In addition, statistical methods to predict the lifetime risk should account for covariate-outcome associations that change with age. In this paper, we review and compare statistical methods to predict the lifetime risk. We first consider a generalized linear model for the lifetime risk using pseudo-observations of the Aalen-Johansen estimator at a fixed age, allowing for left truncation. We also consider modeling the subdistribution hazard with Fine-Gray and Royston-Parmar flexible parametric models in left truncated data with time-covariate interactions, and using these models to predict lifetime risk. In simulation studies, we found the pseudo-observation approach had the least bias, particularly in settings with crossing or converging cumulative incidence curves. We illustrate our method by modeling the lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation in the Framingham Heart Study. We provide technical guidance to replicate all analyses in R.

Conditional Independence Test of Failure and Truncation Times: Essential Tool for Method Selection

Conditional independence assumption of truncation and failure times conditioning on covariates is a fundamental and common assumption in the regression analysis of left-truncated and right-censored data. Testing for this assumption is essential to ensure the correct inference on the failure time, but this has often been overlooked in the literature. With consideration of challenges caused by left truncation and right censoring, tests for this conditional independence assumption are developed in which the generalized odds ratio derived from a Cox proportional hazards model on the failure time and the concept of Kendall's tau are combined. Except for the Cox proportional hazards model, no additional model assumptions are imposed, and the distributions of the truncation time and conditioning variables are unspecified. The asymptotic properties of the test statistic are established and an easy implementation for obtaining its distribution is developed. The performance of the proposed test has been evaluated through simulation studies and two real studies.