Perioperative radiotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer

Preoperative radiation response evaluated by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts survival in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study focuses on the prognostic survival value of postirradiation metabolic activity in primary rectal cancer as measured with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

METHODS

From July 1995 to March 2002, all 59 patients underwent two series of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: one before preoperative radiation (standardized uptake values-1), and the other two to three weeks after radiation (standardized uptake values-2). Standardized uptake values-1 and standardized uptake values-2 correspond to before and after radiation, respectively.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, the following emerged as significant prognostic variables: with or without residual tumor, pathologic differentiation, with or without recurrence, standardized uptake values-2, and with or without lymph node metastases. In multivariate analysis, residual tumor and standardized uptake values-2 were significant prognostic factors for survival. The median survival and the five-year overall survival rate comparing standardized uptake values-2 values <5 vs. >5 were 95 vs. 42 months and 70 vs. 44 percent, respectively (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

A significant survival benefit was observed in patients with low fluorodeoxyglucose uptake after preoperative radiotherapy in primary tumors of rectal cancer.

Sphincter-preserving R0 total mesorectal excision with resection of internal genitalia combined with pre- or postoperative chemoradiation for T4 rectal cancer in females

AIM: To evaluate the impact of chemoradiation admi-nistered pre- or postoperatively on prognosis in females following R0 extended resection with sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision (TME) for locally advanced rectal cancer and to assess the association between chemoradiation and intra- and postoperative variables.

METHODS: Twenty-one females were treated for locally advanced but preoperatively assessed as primarily resectable rectal cancer involving reproductive organs. Anterior resection with TME and excision of internal genitalia was combined with neo- or adjuvant chemoradiation. Two-year disease-free survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The association between chemoradiation and other variables was evaluated with the Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS: Survival rate decreased in anaemic females (51.5% vs 57.4%), in patients older than 60 years (41.8% vs 66.7%) with poorly differentiated cancers (50.0% vs 55.6%) and tumors located ≤ 7 cm from the anal verge (42.9% vs 68.1%) but with the lack of importance. Patients with negative lymph nodes and women chemoradiated preoperatively had significantly favourable prognosis (85.7% vs 35.7%; P = 0.03 and 80.0% vs 27.3%; P = 0.01, respectively). Preoperative chemoradiation compared to adjuvant radiochemotherapy was not significantly associated with the duration of surgery, incidence of intraoperative bowel perforation and blood loss ≥ 1 L, rate of postoperative bladder and anorectal dysfunction, and minimal distal resection margin. It significantly influenced minimal radial margin (mean 4.2 mm vs 1.1 mm; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: Despite involving internal genitalia, long-term disease-free survival and sphincter preservation may be achieved with combined-modality therapy for females with T4 locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not compromise functional results and may significantly improve oncological outcomes probably due to enhanced radial clearance.

Laparoscopic assisted distal rectal cancer resection with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Anatomy of deep pelvis, narrow distal margin and tumor invasion into neighbor organ are obstacles for curative radical resection for advanced cancer of distal rectum. Technically, laparoscopic application after downstaging the tumor with preoperative concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) may give a solution to overcome the anatomical difficulties. We compared the results of laparoscopic surgery in the patients who received CCRT with those of patients who had conventional surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A continuous infusion of 5FU plus leucovorin and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) in 28 fractions was given each patient as CCRT. They underwent D2 radical resection with TME and ANP for the rectal cancer in 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty three patients had laparoscopic resection such as LAR, colo-anal anastomosis and APR. The results were compared with 12 cases of the conventional resections. As a result of preoperative CCRT, the cancer was down-staged in 71%. Two year disease free survival was 75% and 74% in the group of conventional and laparoscopic resection, respectively (p=0.427). Ileus, voiding difficulty and leakage after surgery were not different between two groups. Weakness of ejaculation was noted in 9 approximately 11% of both groups. The DFS of the preoperative CCRT followed by radical resection in the groups with a response was more favorable than that in the group with progressive or stable disease.

CONCLUSION

Radical resection of advanced distal rectal cancer could be done with performing a laparoscopic assisted operation after CCRT induced down-staging. We may suggest that laparoscopic assisted resection is a good treatment option as it doesn't increase the complications and it has a compatible survival rate to conventional surgery.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer

Combined radiochemotherapy is the recommended standard postoperative therapy for patients with stage II and III rectal cancer in the USA and in Germany. During thelast decade, substantial progress has been made in treatment modalities: surgical management currently includes a broad spectrum of operative procedures ranging from radical operations such as abdominoperineal resections to innovative sphincter-preserving techniques. Specialized groups have reported excellent local control rates with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone without the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. New and improved radiation techniques using conformal radiotherapy as well as innovative chemotherapy schedules and combinations (capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) of chemotherapy may have the potential to further increase the therapeutic benefit of (neo-)adjuvant treatment. Moreover, the basic issue of timing of radiotherapy-preoperative versus postoperative-within a multimodality regimen is currently being addressed in prospective trials. Evidently, the current monolithic approach established by studies conducted more than a decade ago, to either apply the same schedule of postoperative radiochemotherapy to all patients with UICC stage II and III rectal cancer or to give preoperative short-course radiation according to the Swedish concept for all patients with resectable rectal cancer irrespective of tumor stage and treatment goal (e.g., sphincter preservation), need to be questioned.

Quality of treatment in routine care in a population sample of rectal cancer patients

Variations in compliance with rectal cancer treatment guidelines and the effect of quality indicators on long-term outcomes were investigated with data from the Munich Cancer Registry. Patients diagnosed between 1996 and 1998 with an invasive primary rectal tumor which was resected were included in these analyses (n=884). Median follow up was 5.7 years. Relative and overall survival was examined. Adjusted survival was predicted by UICC stage, grade, age, local recurrence, and residual tumor status. UICC III patients receiving the recommended adjuvant therapy had a significant survival advantage in the multivariate model; UICC II patients did not. Even if there were no significant survival differences there were significant treatment and outcome (regarding local recurrence) variations between hospitals. The variations between hospitals refer to different quality indicators in the individual hospitals. The outcome (regarding survival) appears good in Munich and is comparable with other population studies. Fewer local recurrences, better reporting of the TME technique, greater use of combined therapy and fewer stomas, however, may improve the quality of care in Munich. Variations in care between hospitals should therefore be monitored and controlled. Detailed and frequent feedback to the clinicians is vital to improve quality of care and is possible with cancer registries.

Survival for rectal cancer patients and international comparisons

BACKGROUND

Population-based cancer registry data are important because they reflect routine care, present long-term follow-up, can show differences in treatment, outcomes and health care over time, and can be used for comparisons between regions and countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Details of all cancer patients in the Munich region are recorded by the Munich Cancer Registry. Rectal cancer patients with an invasive primary tumor diagnosed between 1996 and 1998 were included in this analysis (n=936). Observed and relative survival are presented. Observed survival was also investigated with a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time of survivors was 5.7 years. Five-year relative survival for the whole sample was 62.2%. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage was the most important prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Compared with the 1992-1999 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data (62.4%), relative survival for each disease stage and the whole sample were very similar. In comparison with other European registries, Munich patients had slightly higher survival rates per stage (for example, 5-year relative survival in UICC III was 58.3% in Munich, 54.6% in South East Netherlands, 33.3% in Modena and 47.4% in Cote d'Or); however, more patients in Munich were in higher disease stages with worse prognoses, indicating poorer early detection.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that treatment of rectal cancer in Munich is good, but early detection could be improved. Cancer registries should publish their population-based stage data to ensure quality of care and provide regular feedback to health-care workers and decision makers. Comparisons between countries without stage data should be conducted cautiously.

18F-FDG positron emission tomography staging and restaging in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation

PURPOSE

To assess the information supplied by FDG-PET in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer both in the initial staging and in the evaluation of tumor changes induced by preoperative chemoradiation (restaging).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five consecutive patients with rectal cancer were included, with tumor stages (c)T(2-4)N(x)M(0), during the period 1997-1999. We prospectively performed two FDG-PET scans in all patients to assess disease stage (1) at initial diagnosis and (2) presurgically, 4 to 5 weeks after protracted chemoradiation. Protracted chemoradiation was carried out during 5-6 weeks with 45-50 Gy, plus concurrent oral tegafur 1200 mg/day or 5-fluorouracil 500-1000 mg/m(2) administered as a 24-h continuous i.v. infusion on Days 1-4 and 21-25 of the radiotherapy treatment. Tumors were staged with CT in 95% of patients, whereas endorectal ultrasound was used in 90% of patients. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was used as the quantitative parameter to estimate the tumor:tissue metabolic ratio.

RESULTS

Preoperative chemoradiation significantly decreased the SUVMAX: 5.9 (mean SUVmax at initial staging) vs. 2.4 (mean SUVmax after chemoradiation) with p < 0.001. Unknown liver metastases were detected by FDG-PET in 2 patients, in 1 of them with the initial staging FDG-PET scan, and with the restaging FDG-PET scan in the other. After an average follow-up of 39 months, the value of SUVmax > or =6 allowed us to discriminate for survival at 3 years: 92% vs. 60% (p = 0.04). T downstaging (total 62%) was significantly correlated with SUVmax changes: 1.9 vs. 3.3 (p = 0.03). The degree of rectal cancer response to chemoradiation, established as mic vs. mac categories, was not associated with SUVmax differences (mean values of 2.0 vs. 2.7).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results observed suggest the potential utility of FDG-PET as a complementary diagnostic procedure in the initial clinical evaluation (8% of unsuspected liver metastases) as well as in the assessment of chemoradiation response (any T downstaged event) of locally advanced rectal cancer. Initial SUVmax might be of prognostic value related to long-term patient outcome.

Preoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) and concomitant CPT-11 in locally advanced rectal carcinoma: a phase I study

PURPOSE

Patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma are at risk for both local recurrence and distant metastases. We demonstrated the efficacy of preoperative hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART). In this Phase I trial, we aimed at introducing chemotherapy early in the treatment course with both intrinsic antitumor activity and a radiosensitizer effect.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-eight patients (19 males; median age 63, range 28-75) with advanced rectal carcinoma (cT3: 24; cT4: 4; cN+: 12; M1: 5) were enrolled, including 8 patients treated at the maximally tolerated dose. Escalating doses of CPT-11 (30-105 mg/m(2)/week) were given on Days 1, 8, and 15, and concomitant HART (41.6 Gy, 1.6 Gy bid x 13 days) started on Day 8. Surgery was to be performed within 1 week after the end of radiochemotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients completed all preoperative radiochemotherapy as scheduled; all patients underwent surgery. Dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea Grade 3 occurring at dose level 6 (105 mg/m(2)). Hematotoxicity was mild, with only 1 patient experiencing Grade 3 neutropenia. Postoperative complications (30 days) occurred in 7 patients, with an anastomotic leak rate of 22%.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended Phase II dose of CPT-11 in this setting is 90 mg/m(2)/week. Further Phase II exploration at this dose is warranted.