Postoperative chemoimmunotherapy for the treatment of liver cancer

Cryotherapy for liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is affected by two of the most common groups of malignant tumours: primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer and long-term survival rates reported for patients after radical surgical treatment is approximately 50%. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in the majority of patients. Cryotherapy is performed with the use of an image-guided cryoprobe which delivers liquid nitrogen or argon gas to the tumour tissue. The subsequent process of freezing is associated with formation of ice crystals, which directly damage exposed tissue, including cancer cells.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatments in people with liver metastases.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, and six other databases up to June 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy and its comparators for liver metastases, irrespective of the location of the primary tumour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We extracted information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes important for our review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the trials. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in each study. One review author performed data extraction and a second review author checked entries.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised clinical trials comparing cryotherapy versus no intervention or versus systemic treatments; however, we identified one randomised clinical trial comparing cryotherapy with conventional surgery. The trial was conducted in Ukraine. The trial included 123 participants with solitary, or multiple unilobar or bilobar liver metastases; 63 participants received cryotherapy and 60 received conventional surgery. There were 36 women and 87 men. The primary sites for the metastases were colon and rectum (66.6%), stomach (7.3%), breast (6.5%), skin (4.9%), ovaries (4.1%), uterus (3.3%), kidney (3.3%), intestines (1.6%), pancreas (1.6%), and unknown (0.8%). The trial was not reported sufficiently enough to assess the risk of bias of the randomisation process, allocation concealment, or presence of blinding. It was also not possible to assess incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting bias. The certainty of evidence was low because of risk of bias and imprecision.The participants were followed for up to 10 years (minimum five months). The trial reported that the mortality at 10 years was 81% (51/63) in the cryotherapy group and 92% (55/60) in the conventional surgery group. The calculated by us relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.02. We judged the evidence as low-certainty evidence. Regarding adverse events and complications, separately and in total, our calculation showed no evidence of a difference in recurrence of the malignancy in the liver: 86% (54/63) of the participants in the cryotherapy group and 95% (57/60) of the participants in the conventional surgery group developed a new malignancy (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; low-certainty evidence). The frequency of reported complications was similar between the cryotherapy group and the conventional surgery group, except for postoperative pain. Both insignificant and pronounced pain were reported to be more common in the cryotherapy group while intense pain was reported to be more common in the conventional surgery group. However, the authors did not report whether there was any evidence of a difference. There were no intervention-related mortality or bile leakages.We identified no evidence for health-related quality of life, cancer mortality, or time to progression of liver metastases. The study reported tumour response in terms of the carcinoembryonic antigen level in 69% of participants, and reported results in the form of a graph for 30% of participants. The carcinoembryonic antigen level was lower in the cryotherapy group, and decreased to normal values faster in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05).

FUNDING

the trial did not provide information on funding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the effectiveness of cryotherapy versus conventional surgery in people with liver metastases is of low certainty. We are uncertain about our estimate and cannot determine whether cryotherapy compared with conventional surgery is beneficial or harmful. We found no evidence for the benefits or harms of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, or versus systemic treatments.

Harms and benefits of adoptive immunotherapy for postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated review

The harms and benefits of adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) for patients with postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are controversial among studies. This study aims to update the current evidence on efficacy and safety of AIT for patients with HCC who have received curative therapy. Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating adjuvant AIT for patients with HCC after curative therapies. Recurrence and mortality were compared between patients with or without adjuvant AIT. Eight RCTs and two cohort studies involving 2,120 patients met the eligibility criteria and were meta-analyzed. Adjuvant AIT was associated with significantly lower recurrence rate than curative therapies alone at 1 year [risk ratio (RR) 0.64, 95%CI 0.49-0.82], 3 years (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.79-0.91) and 5 years (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.85-0.95). Similarly, adjuvant AIT was associated with significantly lower mortality at 1 year (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.52-0.79), 3 years (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.65-0.81) and 5 years (RR 0.86, 95%CI 0.79-0.94). Short-term outcomes were confirmed in sensitivity analyses based on RCTs or choice of a fixed- or random-effect meta-analysis model. None of the included patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Therefore, this update reinforces the evidence that adjuvant AIT after curative treatment for HCC lowers risk of recurrence and mortality.

Timely meta-analysis on the efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative therapy

Aims

The role of adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have received curative therapy is still not well illustrated. This timely meta-analysis aims to update the current evidence on efficacy and safety of AIT for patients with HCC who have received curative therapy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Through January 2017 for relevant studies. Mortality and tumor recurrence were compared between patients with or without adjuvant AIT. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Eight studies involving 1861 patients met the eligibility criteria and were meta-analyzed. Adjuvant AIT was associated with significantly lower mortality at 1 year (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.52–0.79), 3 years (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.65–0.81) and 5 years (RR 0.86, 95%CI 0.79–0.94). Similarly, adjuvant AIT was associated with significantly lower recurrence rate than curative therapies alone at 1 year (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.49–0.82), 3 years (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.79–0.91) and 5 years (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.85–0.95). Short-term outcomes were confirmed in sensitivity analyses based on randomized trials or choice of random- or fixed-effect meta-analysis model. None of the included patients experienced grade 4 adverse events.

Conclusions

This timely meta-analysis confirms the evidence that adjuvant AIT for patients with HCC after curative treatment lowers risk of mortality and tumor recurrence.

Specific immunotherapy in hepatocellular cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In recent years, several novel immunotherapeutic approaches were developed and investigated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We designed this systematic review, to evaluate clinical efficacy of specific immunotherapy in patients with HCC, according to the guidelines of Border of Immune Tolerance Education and Research Network (BITERN) and Cochrane collaboration.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, TRIP, DART, OpenGrey, and ProQuest through the 9th of December 2015. One author reviewed and retrieved citations from these seven databases for irrelevant and duplicate studies, and two other authors independently extracted data from the studies and rated their quality. We collated study findings and calculated a weighted treatment effect across studies using Review Manager.

RESULTS

We found 12144 references in seven databases of which 21 controlled studies with 1885 HCC patients in different stages were included in this systematic review after the primary and secondary screenings. Overall, patients undergoing specific immunotherapy had significantly higher overall survival than those in control group (HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.47-0.76, P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference in recurrence-free survival between patients undergoing specific immunotherapy and patients in control groups and patients in immunotherapy groups overall had less recurrence than control group (HR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.46-0.63, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this systematic review based on the available literature suggest that overall specific immunotherapeutic approaches could be beneficiary for the treatment of patients with HCC. This further supports the current and ongoing evaluations of specific immunotherapies in the field.

Synergism of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and recombinant mutant human tumour necrosis factor-alpha in chemotherapy of multidrug-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Locoregional chemotherapy continues to be the mainstay for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). One of the principal obstacles implicated in its unsuccessful therapy is multidrug resistance (MDR). Former studies have identified the multidrug-resistant nature and possible mechanisms of hepatoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. This work aimed to develop an effective strategy for the treatment of HCC with MDR.

METHODS

The treatment was exploited to inhibit the MDR cells by co-administration of the recombinant mutant human tumour necrosis factor-alpha (rmhTNF-alpha), a sublethal dose of chemicals [adriamycin (ADM), mitomycin and 5-FU] and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHAPs). Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and electrochemiluminescence Western blot were used to detect the expression of several related genes.

RESULTS

The chemicals acted synergistically with rmhTNF-alpha and nHAP in suppressing the growth of hepatoma cells and inducing apoptosis of the cells, with the MDR phenotype reversed, as measured by intracellular ADM retention. Analysis of mRNA and protein revealed that rmhTNF-alpha inhibited the gene expression of XIAP, survivin, Ki67, PCNA, MDR1 and BCRP to some extent. Moreover, the inhibitory effects mentioned above could be as good or better than when nHAP is incorporated into the regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

rmhTNF-alpha was not only able to restore the chemotherapeutic sensitivity to HepG2/ADM, its xenograft model and clinical samples but also further inhibited the growth of these tumours by a combination of nHAP. These results strongly suggested that chemicals in combination with rmhTNF-alpha and nHAP may be beneficial for the local treatment of advanced HCC.

Effects of thymosin α1 on immune function in perioperative patients with primary liver cancer

AIM: To investigate the immune state of patients with primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) liver cancer after treatment with thymosin α1 during perioperative period.

METHODS: One hundred and three patients with PHC were divided into two groups. The patients in group A (n = 35) received hepatectomy plus thymosin α1 treatment and the patients in group B (n = 68) underwent hepatectomy only. Twenty normal blood donors were used as controls. Before and 7, 14, and 21 d after treatment, the changes of serum CD3⁺, CD4⁺CD8⁺, CD8⁺CD28⁺, and CD16⁺CD56⁺ were measured by flow cytometry. MTT colometric assay was performed to detect the activity of interleukin-2 (IL-2).

RESULTS: Before hepatectomy and thymosin α1 treatment, serum CD8⁺, CD4⁺/CD8⁺, CD8⁺CD28⁺, CD16⁺/CD56⁺ and IL-2 were markedly lower in group A than that in the controls (F = 8.2, P = 0.005), while after treatment, serum CD4⁺/CD8⁺, CD16⁺CD56⁺ were significantly increased (F = 8.4, P = 0.004). Seven days after hepatectomy, serum CD4⁺/CD8⁺, CD8⁺CD28⁺, CD16⁺/CD56⁺ were elevated (F = 4.7, P = 0.005 or F= 3.5, P = 0.04), and 14 d after hepatectomy, the level of serum IL-2 was inceased (F = 3.6, P = 0.03). For group B, serum CD4⁺, CD8⁺, CD4⁺/CD8⁺, CD8⁺/CD28⁺, CD16⁺/CD56⁺ were notably reduced 7 d after hepatectomy (F = 5.4, P = 0.006 or F = 3.6, P = 0.02). The levels of serum CD8⁺ and CD8⁺/CD28⁺ were still lower (F = 5.0, P = 0.007) at 14 d than those before operation, but the levels of CD4⁺, CD4⁺/CD8⁺, and CD16⁺/CD56⁺ restored to some extent. At 21 d, serum CD8⁺ level still didn't restore (F = 6.3, P = 0.000). The levels of serum CD3⁺, CD8⁺, CD4⁺/CD8⁺, CD8⁺/CD28⁺, CD16⁺/CD56⁺ were all lower in group B than those in group A (F = 7.2, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION: The immunosuppression exists in patients with PHC, and it can be aggravated in early stage after hepatectomy. However, the immunosuppression can be alleviated by thymosin α1 treatment during perioperative period.

Meta-analysis: evaluation of adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

In a first step, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials were performed. Four therapeutic modalities were evaluated: pre-operative transarterial chemotherapy, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and a combination of systemic and transarterial chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Only post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival significantly at 2 years [difference, 22.8%; confidence interval (CI), 8.6-36.9%; P = 0.002] and 3 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 28.8%; CI, 16.7-40.8%; P < 0.001), 2 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005) and 3 years (difference, 28%; CI, 8.2-47.9%; P = 0.006). In a sensitivity analysis after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy still improved survival at 1 year (difference, 9.6%; CI, 0.8-18.3%; P = 0.03), 2 years (difference, 13.5%; CI, 0.9-26%, P = 0.04) and 3 years (difference, 18%; CI, 7-28.9%; P < 0.001), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 20.3%; CI, 7.7-33%; P = 0.002), 2 years (difference, 35%; CI, 21.4-46.3%; P < 0.001) and 3 years (difference, 34.5%; CI, 18.7-50.3%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival and decreased the cumulative probability of no recurrence. New randomized controlled trials evaluating this modality are required.

Randomized controlled trial to compare the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Adjuvant locoregional chemotherapy has been shown to be useful to prevent recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in some retrospective studies. Our aim was to compare the dose effect in the prevention of tumor recurrence.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with curative resection of HCC; they were given either one intra-arterial dose of cisplatin/lipiodol, or received four doses, once every 3 months. The rates of recurrence, disease-free and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

During a median follow up of 818 days, 21 patients received one dose and 19 received four doses, with 10 (47.6%) and eight (42.1%) recurrences, respectively. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 71%, 54% and 44% for the one-dose group and 74%, 60% and 40% for the four-dose group (P = 0.78). The respective overall survival rates were 85%, 74%, 55% and 84%, 71%, 40% (P = 0.64). The only prognostic factor was presence of vascular permeation. The side-effects were mild and tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in the survival rates between the two groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy may not be useful.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: review of the randomised clinical trials

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is common worldwide, and its incidence is increasing. Liver resection or transplantation is potentially curative, although subsequent recurrence and death are common. We reviewed randomised trials on the role of adjuvant therapy in resectable HCC. We identified 13 randomised trials with recurrence or survival endpoints reported at 3 years or longer. Three studies involved predominantly systemic adjuvant chemotherapy; four involved predominantly hepatic-artery-based chemotherapy or embolisation; and six used other therapeutic modalities including immunological, radiation, and differentiation agents. A therapeutic benefit in terms of disease-free or overall survival was noted in six trials, five of which involved modalities other than systemic or hepatic-artery chemotherapy or embolisation. We conclude that systemic and hepatic-artery chemotherapy or chemoembolisation have not been shown to improve overall or disease-free survival after resection of HCC, although there has been no definitive trial comparing adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with no treatment. Other adjuvant modalities (mostly tested in small, preliminary settings) may confer benefit after potentially curative resection of HCC.

Randomized clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary cancer

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains among the most common malignancies in the world. Many of the advances in the treatment of this disease have come from combinations of early detection in endemic areas, improved radiologic evaluation in defining extent of disease, an increased use of nonsurgical treatment and improvements in surgical technique.

Chemo-immunotherapy and chemo-adoptive immunotherapy of cancer

The chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) and chemo-adoptive immunotherapy (CAIT) regimens tested in the past decade are summarized. From them we have learned a great deal about the interactions between various chemotherapeutic agents, immune modulating agents and effector cells. The most commonly reported result in multi-modality experiments with CAIT has been a synergistic enhancement in antitumor activity. Clinical trials usually demonstrated improvement in patient quality of life, an extension of survival time, and occasional complete regression of tumor. In many animal models, this enhancement often meant the complete regression and apparent cure of tumor in the animal. One mechanism by which this synergistic enhancement takes place appears to be a suppression of tumor-associated suppressor T cell activity by the chemotherapeutic agents, thereby inducing enhanced cytolytic activity against tumor by the adoptively transferred, activated effector cells. In CAIT the most commonly used drug has been cyclophosphamide. In CIT a wide variety of chemotherapy agents have been used but none of the clinical trials made use of cyclophosphamide. Thus, direct comparisons are not possible. Suggestive of the intricate regulatory processes involved, many CIT studies indicate a synergy only when specific doses of chemotherapy and immunotherapy agents are given, and in a specific sequence. CIT has become less toxic, is being handled on a cost-effective outpatient basis, while maintaining similar objective response rates to earlier inpatient treatments. In the future, CAIT and CIT will probably have an increasing role in the management of patients with specific cancers.

Non-immunogenic murine hepatocellular carcinoma Hepa1-6 cells expressing the membrane form of macrophage colony stimulating factor are rejected in vivo and lead to CD8+ T-cell immunity against the parental tumor

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a lethal disease and methods that develop effective cellular-based immunotherapy are needed. We retrovirally transduced non-immunogenic mouse Hepa1-6 hepatoma cells with the gene encoding the membrane form of macrophage colony stimulating factor (mM-CSF). Excess recombinant M-CSF and phagocytosis-inhibiting chemicals blocked macrophage-mediated killing of cloned mM-CSF transfected Hepa1-6 hepatoma cells. Macrophages derived from Hck(-/-)Fgr(-/-) and Lyn(-/-) triple knockout mice, which are incapable of performing phagocytosis, failed to kill the mM-CSF transduced cells. The mM-CSF transfected tumor clones failed to grow when injected into C57BL/6 or C57L/J mice. Splenocytes from these vaccinated mice displayed cytotoxicity against parental Hepa1-6 cells, but not against B16 and CT-26 tumor cells in vitro. Mice that rejected the mM-CSF transfected Hepa1-6 tumor subsequently rejected parental Hepa1-6 cells but not the B16 melanoma cells when rechallenged. Elimination of the CD8+ effector cells by an anti-CD8 antibody and complement treatment prevented the adoptive transfer of anti-Hepa1-6-specific immunity into naive animals. Thus, mM-CSF provides a method of generating effective anti-tumor immune responses by macrophages and cytotoxic T cells against the parental Hepa1-6 cells. Our work suggests that mM-CSF transduced hepatoma cells could be used as a tumor vaccine to stimulate immune responses against hepatocellular carcinoma.

B7-1 (CD80)-gene transfer combined with interleukin-12 administration elicits protective and therapeutic immunity against mouse hepatocellular carcinoma

Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) frequently recurs after primary therapy, resulting in poor prognosis. To try to find a way to prevent this, we examined the combined effectiveness of B7-1 (CD80)-gene transfer and interleukin-12 (IL-12) on the induction of protective antitumor immunity against poorly immunogenic BNL1ME A.7R. 1 (BNL) mouse HCC cells. We introduced mouse B7-1 gene into BNL1ME A. 7R.1 cells. Overexpression of B7-1 on BNL1ME A.7R.1 cells resulted in significant inhibititon of subcutaneous tumor development in syngeneic BALB/c mice, but not in complete rejection, suggesting that strong expression of B7-1 molecules may enhance the immunogenicity of BNL1ME A.7R.1 cells in immunocompetent mice. Lymphocyte study revealed that the cytolytic activity generated by immunization with B7-1 transfectants against BNL1ME A.7R.1 cells was mediated mainly by CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). We examined the synergistic effect of IL-12 and immunization with B7-1 transfectants. The combination led to rejection of BNL1ME A.7R.1 cells in 6 of 10 tested mice and delayed tumor development in the remaining mice. Furthermore, the combined treatment against pre-established BNL1ME A.7R.1 tumors resulted in rejection in 3 of 8 tested mice or in significant inhibition of tumor growth in the remaining mice. In vivo lymphocyte subset depletion study indicated that the combined antitumor effect was dependent on the presence of both CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells. In conclusion, the combination of immunization of B7-1-transfected HCC cells and IL-12 could induce protective and therapeutic immunity against parental HCC cells, and this combination may be therapeutically useful for suppressing recurrence of HCC.