Reptin Regulates Pluripotency of Embryonic Stem Cells and Somatic Cell Reprogramming Through Oct4-Dependent Mechanism

microRNAs (miR 9, 124, 155 and 224) transdifferentiate mouse macrophages to neurons

Development is an irreversible process of differentiating the undifferentiated cells to functional cells. Brain development involves generation of cells with varied phenotype and functions, which is limited during adulthood, stress, damage/degeneration. Cellular reprogramming makes differentiation reversible process with reprogramming somatic/stem cells to alternative fate with/without stem cells. Exogenously expressed transcription factors or small molecule inhibitors have driven reprogramming of stem/somatic cells to neurons providing alternative approach for pre-clinical/clinical testing and therapeutics. Here in, we report a novel approach of microRNA (miR)- induced trans-differentiation of macrophages (CD11b high) to induced neuronal cells (iNCs) (neuronal markershigh- Nestin, Nurr1, Map2, NSE, Tubb3 and Mash1) without exogenous use of transcription factors. miR 9, 124, 155 and 224 successfully transdifferentiated macrophages to neurons with transient stem cell-like phenotype. We report trans differentiation efficacy 18% and 21% with miR 124 and miR 155. in silico(String 10.0, miR gator, mESAdb, TargetScan 7.0) and experimental analysis indicate that the reprogramming involves alteration of pluripotencygenes like Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, Nanog and pluripotency miR, miR 302. iNCs also shifted to G0 phase indicating manipulation of cell cycle by these miRs. Further, CD133+ intermediate cells obtained during current protocol could be differentiated to iNCs using miRs. The syanpsin⁺ neurons were functionally active and displayed intracellular Ca⁺² evoke on activation. miRs could also transdifferentiate bone marrow-derived macrophages and peripheral blood mononuclear cells to neuronal cells. The current protocol could be employed for direct in vivo reprogramming of macrophages to neurons without teratoma formation for transplantation and clinical studies.

Regulation of the protein stability and transcriptional activity of OCT4 in stem cells

OCT4 (also known as Oct3 and Oct3/4), which is encoded by Pou5f1, is expressed in early embryonic cells and plays an important role in early development, pluripotency maintenance, and self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. It also regulates the reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Several OCT4-binding proteins, including SOX2 and NANOG, reportedly regulate gene transcription in stem cells. An increasing number of evidence suggests that not only gene transcription but also post-translational modifications of OCT4 play a pivotal role in regulating the expression and activity of OCT4. For instance, ubiquitination and sumoylation have been reported to regulate OCT4 protein stability. In addition, the phosphorylation of Ser347 in OCT4 also stabilizes the OCT4 protein level. Recently, we identified KAP1 as an OCT4-binding protein and reported the KAP1-mediated regulation of OCT4 protein stability. KAP1 overexpression led to an increased proliferation of mouse embryonic stem cells and promoted the reprogramming of somatic cells resulting in induced pluripotent stem cells. In this review, we discuss how the protein stability and function of OCT4 are regulated by protein-protein interaction in stem cells.

Kap1 regulates the self-renewal of embryonic stem cells and cellular reprogramming by modulating Oct4 protein stability

Oct4 plays a crucial role in the regulation of self-renewal of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying posttranslational regulation and protein stability of Oct4 remain unclear. Using affinity purification and mass spectrometry analysis, we identified Kap1 as an Oct4-binding protein. Silencing of Kap1 reduced the protein levels of Oct4 in ESCs, whereas the overexpression of Kap1 stimulated the levels of Oct4. In addition, Kap1 overexpression stimulated the self-renewal of ESCs and attenuated the spontaneous differentiation of ESCs in response to LIF withdrawal. Kap1 overexpression increased the stability of Oct4 by inhibiting the Itch-mediated ubiquitination of Oct4. Silencing of Kap1 augmented Itch-mediated ubiquitination and inhibited the stability of Oct4. We identified the lysine 133 (K133) residue in Oct4 as a ubiquitination site responsible for the Kap1-Itch-dependent regulation of Oct4 stability. Preventing ubiquitination at the lysine residue by mutation to arginine augmented the reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. These results suggest that Kap1 plays a crucial role in the regulation of the pluripotency of ESCs and somatic cell reprogramming by preventing Itch-mediated ubiquitination and the subsequent degradation of Oct4.

Trib2 regulates the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells and enhances reprogramming efficiency

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent cells characterized by self-renewability and differentiation potential. Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are ES cell-equivalent cells derived from somatic cells by the introduction of core reprogramming factors. ES and iPS cells are important sources for understanding basic biology and for generating therapeutic cells for clinical applications. Tribbles homolog 2 (Trib2) functions as a scaffold in signaling pathways. However, the relevance of Trib2 to the pluripotency of ES and iPS cells is unknown. In the present study, we elucidated the importance of Trib2 in maintaining pluripotency in mouse ES cells and in generating iPS cells from somatic cells through the reprogramming process. Trib2 expression decreased as ES cells differentiated, and Trib2 knockdown in ES cells changed their colony morphology while reducing the activity of alkaline phosphatase and the expression of the pluripotency marker genes Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Klf4. Trib2 directly interacted with Oct4 and elevated Oct4 promoter activity. During the generation of iPS cells, Trib2 knockdown decreased the reprogramming efficiency of mouse embryonic fibroblasts, whereas Trib2 overexpression significantly increased their reprogramming efficiency. In summary, our results suggest that Trib2 is important for maintaining self-renewal in ES cells and for pluripotency induction during the reprogramming process.

The Role of Pontin and Reptin in Cellular Physiology and Cancer Etiology

Pontin (RUVBL1, TIP49, TIP49a, Rvb1) and Reptin (RUVBL2, TIP48, TIP49b, Rvb2) are highly conserved ATPases of the AAA+ (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) superfamily and are involved in various cellular processes that are important for oncogenesis. First identified as being upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer, their overexpression has since been shown in multiple cancer types such as breast, lung, gastric, esophageal, pancreatic, kidney, bladder as well as lymphatic, and leukemic cancers. However, their exact functions are still quite unknown as they interact with many molecular complexes with vastly different downstream effectors. Within the nucleus, Pontin and Reptin participate in the TIP60 and INO80 complexes important for chromatin remodeling. Although not transcription factors themselves, Pontin and Reptin modulate the transcriptional activities of bona fide proto-oncogenes such as MYC and β-catenin. They associate with proteins involved in DNA damage repair such as PIKK complexes as well as with the core complex of Fanconi anemia pathway. They have also been shown to be important for cell cycle progression, being involved in assembly of telomerase, mitotic spindle, RNA polymerase II, and snoRNPs. When the two ATPases localize to the cytoplasm, they were reported to promote cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Due to their various roles in carcinogenesis, it is not surprising that Pontin and Reptin are proving to be important biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of various cancers. They are also current targets for the development of new therapeutic anticancer drugs.

Advances in stem cell proteomics

Stem cells are at the basis of organismal development, characterized by their potential to differentiate towards specific lineages upon receiving proper signals. To understand the molecular principles underlying gain and loss of pluripotency, proteomics plays an increasingly important role owing to technical developments in mass spectrometry and implementation of innovative biochemical approaches. Here we review how quantitative proteomics has been used to investigate protein expression, localization, interaction and modification in stem cells both in vitro and in vivo, thereby complementing other omics approaches to study fundamental properties of stem cell plasticity.

Effects of mechanical stimulation on the reprogramming of somatic cells into human-induced pluripotent stem cells

Background

Mechanical stimuli play important roles in the proliferation and differentiation of adult stem cells. However, few studies on their effects on induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been published.

Methods

Human dermal fibroblasts were seeded onto flexible membrane-bottom plates, and infected with retrovirus expressing the four reprogramming factors OCT4, SOX2, KLF, and c-MYC (OSKM). The cells were subjected to equiaxial stretching (3% or 8% for 2, 4, or 7 days) and seeded on feeder cells (STO). The reprogramming into iPSCs was evaluated by the expression of pluripotent markers, in vitro differentiation into three germ layers, and teratoma formation.

Results

Equiaxial stretching enhanced reprogramming efficiency without affecting the viral transduction rate. iPSCs induced by transduction of four reprogramming factors and application of equiaxial stretching had characteristics typical of iPSCs in terms of pluripotency and differentiation potentials.

Conclusions

This is the first study to show that mechanical stimuli can increase reprogramming efficiency. However, it did not enhance the infection rate, indicating that mechanical stimuli, defined as stretching in this study, have positive effects on reprogramming rather than on infection. Additional studies should evaluate the mechanism underlying the modulation of reprogramming of somatic cells into iPSCs.

Recruitment of Pontin/Reptin by E2f1 amplifies E2f transcriptional response during cancer progression

Changes in gene expression during tumorigenesis are often considered the consequence of de novo mutations occurring in the tumour. An alternative possibility is that the transcriptional response of oncogenic transcription factors evolves during tumorigenesis. Here we show that aberrant E2f activity, following inactivation of the Rb gene family in a mouse model of liver cancer, initially activates a robust gene expression programme associated with the cell cycle. Slowly accumulating E2f1 progressively recruits a Pontin/Reptin complex to open the chromatin conformation at E2f target genes and amplifies the E2f transcriptional response. This mechanism enhances the E2f-mediated transactivation of cell cycle genes and initiates the activation of low binding affinity E2f target genes that regulate non-cell-cycle functions, such as the Warburg effect. These data indicate that both the physiological and the oncogenic activities of E2f result in distinct transcriptional responses, which could be exploited to target E2f oncogenic activity for therapy.

E2F transcription factors are primarily known for the regulation of the cell cycle and are often dysregulated in cancer. Here, the authors show that during cancer progression E2F1 recruits a Pontin/Reptin complex to E2F target genes to open chromatin and increase E2F transcriptional response.