Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in early preterm fetal growth restriction

Comparison of phase rectified signal averaging and short term variation in predicting perinatal outcome in early onset fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVES

To compare short term variation (STV) and phase rectified signal averaging (PRSA) and their association with fetal outcome in early onset fetal growth restriction (FGR).

METHODS

Data were used from a retrospective cohort study of women who were admitted for FGR and/or pre-eclampsia and who were delivered by pre-labor Cesarean section or had a fetal death before 32 weeks' gestation. Computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) registrations of the 5 days before delivery or fetal death were used for calculation of STV and PRSA. PRSA was expressed as the average acceleration capacity (AAC) and average deceleration capacity (ADC). FHR decelerations were classified visually as absent, 1-2 per hour or recurrent. Abnormality of STV and of PRSA was either analyzed as a single parameter or in combination with recurrent decelerations. Endpoints were defined as composite adverse condition at birth consisting of fetal death, low Apgar score, low umbilical pH, the need for resuscitation after birth and as major neonatal morbidity or neonatal death.

RESULTS

Included were 367 pregnancies of which 20 resulted in fetal death. An abnormal cCTG with either recurrent decelerations and/or low STV or recurrent decelerations and/or low PRSA were similarly associated with composite adverse condition at birth (n=99), but neither with major neonatal morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

PRSA and STV have similar efficacy for measuring fetal heart rate variation in early onset FGR. An increased risk of a composite adverse condition at birth is indicated by a low value of either parameter and/or the presence of recurrent decelerations.

Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major cause of stillbirth, prematurity and impaired neurodevelopment. Its etiology is multifactorial, but many cases are related to impaired placental development and dysfunction, with reduced nutrient and oxygen supply. The fetus has a remarkable ability to respond to hypoxic challenges and mounts protective adaptations to match growth to reduced nutrient availability. However, with progressive placental dysfunction, chronic hypoxia may progress to a level where fetus can no longer adapt, or there may be superimposed acute hypoxic events. Improving detection and effective monitoring of progression is critical for the management of complicated pregnancies to balance the risk of worsening fetal oxygen deprivation in utero, against the consequences of iatrogenic preterm birth. Current surveillance modalities include frequent fetal Doppler ultrasound, and fetal heart rate monitoring. However, nearly half of FGR cases are not detected in utero, and conventional surveillance does not prevent a high proportion of stillbirths. We review diagnostic challenges and limitations in current screening and monitoring practices and discuss potential ways to better identify FGR, and, critically, to identify the “tipping point” when a chronically hypoxic fetus is at risk of progressive acidosis and stillbirth.

Determination of fetal heart rate short-term variation from umbilical artery Doppler waveforms

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of using umbilical artery (UA) Doppler waveforms to measure fetal heart rate (FHR) short-term variation (STV) across gestation.

METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal study, conducted at two study sites, of 195 pregnancies considered low risk. Pulsed-wave Doppler of the UAs was performed at 4-weekly intervals, between 14 and 40 weeks of gestation, using a standardized imaging protocol. Up to 12 consecutive UA Doppler waveforms were analyzed using offline processing software. FHR STV was calculated using average R-R intervals extracted from the waveforms and baseline corrected for FHR.

RESULTS

Baseline-corrected FHR STV increased significantly with gestational age (conditional R²  = 0.37; P < 0.0001) and was correlated inversely with FHR (conditional R²  = 0.54; P < 0.0001). The STV ranged (median (interquartile range)) from 3.5 (2.9-4.1) ms at 14-20 weeks' gestation to 6.3 (4.8-7.7) ms at 34-40 weeks' gestation. The change in heart rate STV did not differ between study sites or individual sonographers.

CONCLUSIONS

UA Doppler waveforms offer a robust and feasible method to derive STV of the FHR. It should be emphasized that the UA Doppler-derived STV is not interchangeable with measurements derived with computerized cardiotocography. Accordingly, further investigations are needed to validate associations with outcome, in order to determine the value of concurrent fetal cardiovascular and heart rate evaluations that are possible with the technique described here. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.