Lights, camera, action! Capturing the spliceosome and pre-mRNA splicing with single-molecule fluorescence microscopy

RNA modifications and Prp24 coordinate Lsm2-8 binding dynamics during S. cerevisiae U6 snRNP assembly

In eukaryotes, the process of intron removal from nuclear pre-mRNA is performed by the spliceosome, a dynamic molecular machine composed of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs; U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6) and dozens of other protein splicing factors. The U6 snRNP contains the U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and the proteins Prp24 and Lsm2-8 heteroheptamer. A key feature of the snRNP is a modified U6 snRNA 3' end, which in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) contains a 3' phosphate. U6 plays an essential role in splicing, and the U6 snRNP must be completely disassembled for splicing to occur. Once splicing is finished, the snRNP must then be reassembled to participate in a subsequent splicing reaction. While splicing efficiency depends on rapid U6 snRNP assembly, this process has not yet been kinetically characterized. Here, we use colocalization single-molecule spectroscopy to dissect the kinetic pathways of yeast U6 snRNA association with the Lsm2-8 complex and their dependence on the Prp24 protein and post-transcriptional snRNA modification. In the absence of 3'-end processing, Lsm2-8 association with the RNA is highly dependent on Prp24. However, processed RNAs can rapidly recruit Lsm2-8 in the absence of Prp24. Post-transcriptional processing facilitates Lsm2-8 association, whereas the presence of Prp24 promotes both recruitment and retention of the complex. This suggests that efficient U6 snRNP assembly could depend on kinetic selection of Lsm2-8 binding to 3'-end modified or Prp24-bound U6 snRNAs in order to discriminate against association with other RNAs.

RNA Modifications and Prp24 Coordinate Lsm2-8 Binding Dynamics during S. cerevisiae U6 snRNP Assembly

In eukaryotes, the process of intron removal from nuclear pre-mRNA is performed by the spliceosome, a dynamic molecular machine composed of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs; U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6) and dozens of other protein splicing factors. The U6 snRNP contains the U6 snRNA and the proteins Prp24 and Lsm2-8 heteroheptamer. A key feature of the snRNP is a modified U6 snRNA 3' end, which in S. cerevisiae (yeast) contains a 3' phosphate. U6 plays an essential role in splicing, and the U6 snRNP must be completely disassembled for splicing to occur. Once splicing is finished, the snRNP must then be reassembled to participate in a subsequent splicing reaction. While splicing efficiency depends on rapid U6 snRNP assembly, this process has not yet been kinetically characterized. Here, we use colocalization single molecule spectroscopy (CoSMoS) to dissect the kinetic pathways of yeast U6 snRNA association with the Lsm2-8 complex and their dependence on the Prp24 protein and post-transcriptional snRNA modification. In the absence of 3' end processing, Lsm2-8 association with the RNA is highly dependent on Prp24. However, processed RNAs can rapidly recruit Lsm2-8 in Prp24's absence. Post-transcriptional processing facilitates Lsm2-8 association while the presence of Prp24 promotes both recruitment and retention of the complex. This suggests that efficient U6 snRNP assembly could depend on kinetic selection of Lsm2-8 binding to 3'-end modified or Prp24 bound U6 snRNAs in order to discriminate against association with other RNAs.

Imaging Organization of RNA Processing within the Nucleus

Within the nucleus, messenger RNA is generated and processed in a highly organized and regulated manner. Messenger RNA processing begins during transcription initiation and continues until the RNA is translated and degraded. Processes such as 5' capping, alternative splicing, and 3' end processing have been studied extensively with biochemical methods and more recently with single-molecule imaging approaches. In this review, we highlight how imaging has helped understand the highly dynamic process of RNA processing. We conclude with open questions and new technological developments that may further our understanding of RNA processing.

Blastocladiella emersonii spliceosome is regulated in response to the splicing inhibition caused by the metals cadmium, cobalt and manganese

Blastocladiella emersonii is an aquatic fungus of the phylum Blastocladiomycota, localized near the base of the fungal tree. Previous studies have shown that B. emersonii responds to heat shock and cadmium exposure inducing the transcription of a high number of genes. EST sequencing from heat shocked and cadmium exposed B. emersonii cells has shown that exposure to cadmium causes strong splicing inhibition. Despite the knowledge about splicing inhibition by cadmium, it is still unclear if other metal contaminants can cause the same response. In the present study, we have demonstrated that the effect of cadmium exposure on splicing inhibition is much stronger than that of other divalent metals such as cobalt and manganese. Data presented here also indicate that intron retention occurs randomly among the fungal transcripts, as verified by analyzing differently affected transcripts. In addition, we identified in the genome of B. emersonii the genes encoding the snRNA splicing components U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 and observed that spliceosome snRNAs are upregulated in the presence of metals, in particular snRNA U1 in cells under cadmium exposure. This observation suggests that snRNA upregulation might be a defense of the fungal cell against the metal stress condition.

Coming Together: RNAs and Proteins Assemble under the Single-Molecule Fluorescence Microscope

RNAs, across their numerous classes, often work in concert with proteins in RNA-protein complexes (RNPs) to execute critical cellular functions. Ensemble-averaging methods have been instrumental in revealing many important aspects of these RNA-protein interactions, yet are insufficiently sensitive to much of the dynamics at the heart of RNP function. Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy (SMFM) offers complementary, versatile tools to probe RNP conformational and compositional changes in detail. In this review, we first outline the basic principles of SMFM as applied to RNPs, describing key considerations for labeling, imaging, and quantitative analysis. We then sample applications of in vitro and in vivo single-molecule visualization using the case studies of pre-messenger RNA (mRNA) splicing and RNA silencing, respectively. After discussing specific insights single-molecule fluorescence methods have yielded, we briefly review recent developments in the field and highlight areas of anticipated growth.

Capturing dynamic conformational shifts in protein–ligand recognition using integrative structural biology in solution

In recent years, a dynamic view of the structure and function of biological macromolecules is emerging, highlighting an essential role of dynamic conformational equilibria to understand molecular mechanisms of biological functions. The structure of a biomolecule, i.e. protein or nucleic acid in solution, is often best described as a dynamic ensemble of conformations, rather than a single structural state. Strikingly, the molecular interactions and functions of the biological macromolecule can then involve a shift between conformations that pre-exist in such an ensemble. Upon external cues, such population shifts of pre-existing conformations allow gradually relaying the signal to the downstream biological events. An inherent feature of this principle is conformational dynamics, where intrinsically disordered regions often play important roles to modulate the conformational ensemble. Unequivocally, solution-state NMR spectroscopy is a powerful technique to study the structure and dynamics of such biomolecules in solution. NMR is increasingly combined with complementary techniques, including fluorescence spectroscopy and small angle scattering. The combination of these techniques provides complementary information about the conformation and dynamics in solution and thus affords a comprehensive description of biomolecular functions and regulations. Here, we illustrate how an integrated approach combining complementary techniques can assess the structure and dynamics of proteins and protein complexes in solution.

Splicing Factor Mutations in Myelodysplasias: Insights from Spliceosome Structures

Somatic mutations of pre-mRNA splicing factors recur among patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and related malignancies. Although these MDS-relevant mutations alter the splicing of a subset of transcripts, the mechanisms by which these single amino acid substitutions change gene expression remain controversial. New structures of spliceosome intermediates and associated protein complexes shed light on the molecular interactions mediated by 'hotspots' of the SF3B1 and U2AF1 pre-mRNA splicing factors. The frequently mutated SF3B1 residues contact the pre-mRNA splice site. Based on structural homology with other spliceosome subunits, and recent findings of altered RNA binding by mutant U2AF1 proteins, we suggest that affected U2AF1 residues also contact pre-mRNA. Altered pre-mRNA recognition emerges as a molecular theme among MDS-relevant mutations of pre-mRNA splicing factors.

The nuts and bolts of the endogenous spliceosome

The complex life of pre-mRNA from transcription to the production of mRNA that can be exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm to encode for proteins entails intricate coordination and regulation of a network of processing events. Coordination is required between transcription and splicing and between several processing events including 5' and 3' end processing, splicing, alternative splicing and editing that are major contributors to the diversity of the human proteome, and occur within a huge and dynamic macromolecular machine-the endogenous spliceosome. Detailed mechanistic insight of the splicing reaction was gained from studies of the in vitro spliceosome assembled on a single intron. Because most pre-mRNAs are multiintronic that undergo alternative splicing, the in vivo splicing machine requires additional elements to those of the in vitro machine, to account for all these diverse functions. Information about the endogenous spliceosome is emerging from imaging studies in intact and live cells that support the cotranscriptional commitment to splicing model and provide information about splicing kinetics in vivo. Another source comes from studies of the in vivo assembled spliceosome, isolated from cell nuclei under native conditions-the supraspliceosome-that individually package pre-mRNA transcripts of different sizes and number of introns into complexes of a unique structure, indicating their universal nature. Recent years have portrayed new players affecting alternative splicing and novel connections between splicing, transcription and chromatin. The challenge ahead is to elucidate the structure and function of the endogenous spliceosome and decipher the regulation and coordination of its network of processing activities. WIREs RNA 2017, 8:e1377. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1377 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.