Hypophosphataemia after intravenous iron therapy with ferric carboxymaltose—Real world experience from a tertiary centre in the UK

Cost-utility analysis of ferric derisomaltose versus ferric carboxymaltose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and iron deficiency anemia in England

AIMS

Anemia is the most common extraintestinal complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with approximately half of cases caused by iron deficiency (ID). Intravenous iron is the preferred ID anemia (IDA) treatment where oral iron is contraindicated, ineffective or not tolerated, or where ID correction is urgent. The objective was to evaluate the cost-utility of ferric derisomaltose (FDI) versus ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in patients with IBD and IDA in England, in whom IV iron treatment is preferred.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A patient-level simulation model was developed, capturing quality of life (QoL) differences based on SF-36v2 data from the PHOSPHARE-IBD randomized controlled trial, monitoring and incidence of post-infusion hypophosphatemia, and number of iron infusions required. Analyses were conducted over a five-year time horizon from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) perspective, with healthcare provider and societal perspectives adopted in separate analyses. Future costs and effects were discounted at 3.5% per annum and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

FDI increased quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.075 QALYs versus FCM from 2.57 QALYs to 2.65 QALYs per patient. Patients receiving FDI required 1.63 fewer iron infusions over the five-year time horizon, driving infusion-related cost savings of GBP 496 per patient (GBP 2,188 versus GBP 1,692) from the DHSC perspective. Costs of monitoring and treating hypophosphatemia after FCM were GBP 226, yielding total savings of GBP 722 per patient (GBP 2,414 versus GBP 1,692) over the five-year time horizon. FDI also led to reduced costs versus FCM in the societal and provider analyses and was therefore the dominant intervention across all three perspectives.

LIMITATIONS

The analysis did not capture patient adherence, hypophosphatemic osteomalacia, or fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed that FDI improved patient QoL and reduced direct healthcare expenditure versus FCM in patients with IBD and IDA in England.

[Hypophosphatemia after injectable iron treatments in adults: Comparison between ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose]

Hypophosphatemia is a recognized side effect of treatment of iron deficiency anemias with injectable iron. We analyzed 35 clinical trials that used ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) or iron sucrose (IS). Hypophosphatemia prevalence ranged from 0 to 91.7%. FCM-induced a significant (P<0.001) greater hypophosphatemia prevalence and phosphatemia decrease than IS (52.0% [95% CI: 42.2-61.8%] vs. 7.7% [95% CI: -2.8 to 18.2%] and -1.12mmol/L [95% CI: -1.36 to -0.89mmol/L] vs. -0.13mmol/L [95% CI: -0.59 to 0.32mmol/L]). FCM-induced hypophosphatemia was dose-dependent. The nadir of hypophosphatemia was reached in almost all studies after 7 and 14days. Hypophosphatemia persisted at the end of the study in 53.8% of the reported studies that used FCM and lasted up to 6months. FCM-induced an increase in intact circulating fibroblast growth factor 23 and in renal phosphorus excretion while serum 1-25 dihydroxyvitamin D was decreased. Risk factors for hypophosphatemia after FCM therapy were low basal circulating phosphate or ferritin, low body weight, high glomerular filtration rate, serum parathyroid hormone or hemoglobin and age, whereas renal insufficiency was associated with a lower risk. In conclusion, hypophosphatemia is common after treatment with injectable iron, FCM being associated with a higher risk than IS and with disorders of phosphocalcium metabolism. Monitoring of blood phosphate and 1-25 dihydroxyvitamin D could be considered during FCM therapy.

High-Dose Intravenous Iron with Either Ferric Carboxymaltose or Ferric Derisomaltose: A Benefit-Risk Assessment

The intravenous iron formulations ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and ferric derisomaltose (FDI) offer the possibility of administering a large amount of iron in one infusion. This results in faster correction of anemia and the formulations being better tolerated than oral iron formulations. This triad of logistic advantages, improved patient convenience, and fast correction of anemia explains the fact that intravenous iron formulations nowadays are frequently prescribed worldwide in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia. However, these formulations may result in hypophosphatemia by inducing a strong increase in active fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), a hormone that stimulates renal phosphate excretion. This effect is much more pronounced with FCM than with FDI, and therefore the risk of developing hypophosphatemia is remarkably higher with FCM than with FDI. Repeated use of FCM may result in severe osteomalacia, which is characterized by bone pain, Looser zones (pseudofractures), and low-trauma fractures. Intravenous iron preparations are also associated with other adverse effects, of which hypersensitivity reactions are the most important and are usually the result of a non-allergic complement activation on nanoparticles of free labile iron-Complement Activation-Related Pseudo-Allergy (CARPA). The risk on these hypersensitivity reactions can be reduced by choosing a slow infusion rate. Severe hypersensitivity reactions were reported in < 1% of prospective trials and the incidence seems comparable between the two formulations. A practical guideline has been developed based on baseline serum phosphate concentrations and predisposing risk factors, derived from published cases and risk factor analyses from trials, in order to establish the safe use of these formulations.

Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Ferric Derisomaltose Compared to Iron Sucrose for Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease With and Without Heart Failure

Ferric derisomaltose (FDI) is an intravenous (IV) high-dose iron formulation approved in the US for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adults who are intolerant of/have had an unsatisfactory response to oral iron, or who have non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD). FERWON-NEPHRO was a randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a single infusion of FDI 1,000 mg versus up to 5 doses of iron sucrose (IS) 200 mg (recommended cumulative dose, 1,000 mg) over 8 weeks in patients with NDD-CKD and iron deficiency anemia. Of 1,525 patients included in the safety analysis, 244 (16%) had a history of heart failure (HF). Overall, the rate of serious or severe hypersensitivity reactions was low and did not differ between treatment groups. Cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were reported for 9.4% of patients who had HF and 4.2% who did not. Time to first cardiovascular AE was longer following administration of FDI compared with IS (hazard ratio: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.92]; p=0.0185), a difference that was similar in patients with or without HF (p=0.908 for interaction). Patients achieved a faster hematological response (assessed by changes in hemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and increase in transferrin saturation) with FDI versus IS. In conclusion, in patients with NDD-CKD, a single infusion of FDI was safe, well tolerated, and was associated with fewer cardiovascular AEs and a faster hematological response, compared to multiple doses of IS. These effects were similar for patients with and without HF.

Newer formulations of intravenous iron: a review of their chemistry and key safety aspects - hypersensitivity, hypophosphatemia, and cardiovascular safety

Introduction: The newest intravenous (IV) iron products show an improved safety profile over predecessors, allowing for the rapid administration of relatively high doses. Ferric derisomaltose (FDI; also known as iron isomaltoside), ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), and ferumoxytol (FER), are successful treatments for iron deficiency (Europe; FDI and FCM) and iron deficiency anemia (US; FDI, FCM, and FER).Areas covered: This review focusses on the chemistry and structure of FDI, FCM, and FER, and on three key aspects of IV iron safety: (1) hypersensitivity; (2) hypophosphatemia and sequelae; (3) cardiovascular safety.Expert opinion: Although the safety of modern IV iron has improved, immediate infusion reactions and the development of hypophosphatemia must be appreciated and recognized by those who prescribe and administer IV iron. Immediate infusion reactions can occur with any IV iron and are usually mild; severe reactions - particularly anaphylaxis - are extremely rare. The recognition and appropriate management of infusion reactions is an important consideration to the successful administration of IV iron. Severe, persistent, hypophosphatemia is a specific side effect of FCM. No cardiovascular safety signal has been identified for IV iron. Ongoing trials in heart failure will provide additional long-term efficacy and safety data.

Improving the safety of intravenous iron treatments for patients with chronic kidney disease

Introduction: Iron-deficiency anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common and has prognostic, financial, and quality of life implications. Intravenous (IV) iron is a key intervention for optimal management, however, ongoing safety concerns exist. Area covered: The potential side effects associated with IV iron use are addressed as we review the most recent studies. Hypersensitivity reactions and true anaphylaxis are indeed rare with a greater understanding of the nature of labile iron and 'Fishbane' reactions. Hypophosphatemia appears commoner with certain IV iron preparations, however its significance in CKD requires exploration. The long-standing questions regarding oxidative stress and the potential susceptibility to infections and worsening cardiovascular morbidity are discussed. Iron overload secondary to repeat IV iron infusions is plausible, however, a number of guidelines limit and strictly guide prescription. Expert opinion: The past decade has improved our understanding of IV iron administration safety in patients with CKD. Third generation IV iron compounds have minimized hypersensitivity reactions while allowing high doses to be administered safely and rapidly in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients. However, differences in safety profiles such as hypophosphatemia require further study and therapy should be tailored to the individual. Clinicians should feel confident in using IV iron therapy.