Conformational changes of neuromedin B and delta sleep-inducing peptide induced by their interaction with lipid membranes as revealed by spectroscopic techniques and molecular dynamics simulation

Recognition of GPCRs by Peptide Ligands and Membrane Compartments theory: Structural Studies of Endogenous Peptide Hormones in Membrane Environment

One of the largest family of cell surface proteins, G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate virtually all known physiological processes in mammals. With seven transmembrane segments, they respond to diverse range of extracellular stimuli and represent a major class of drug targets. Peptidergic GPCRs use endogenous peptides as ligands. To understand the mechanism of GPCR activation and rational drug design, knowledge of three-dimensional structure of receptor–ligand complex is important. The endogenous peptide hormones are often short, flexible and completely disordered in aqueous solution. According to “Membrane Compartments Theory”, the flexible peptide binds to the membrane in the first step before it recognizes its receptor and the membrane-induced conformation is postulated to bind to the receptor in the second step. Structures of several peptide hormones have been determined in membrane-mimetic medium. In these studies, micelles, reverse micelles and bicelles have been used to mimic the cell membrane environment. Recently, conformations of two peptide hormones have also been studied in receptor-bound form. Membrane environment induces stable secondary structures in flexible peptide ligands and membrane-induced peptide structures have been correlated with their bioactivity. Results of site-directed mutagenesis, spectroscopy and other experimental studies along with the conformations determined in membrane medium have been used to interpret the role of individual residues in the peptide ligand. Structural differences of membrane-bound peptides that belong to the same family but differ in selectivity are likely to explain the mechanism of receptor selectivity and specificity of the ligands. Knowledge of peptide 3D structures in membrane environment has potential applications in rational drug design.

[Interaction of delta sleep-inducing peptide and its analogues with cellular membranes: a structure-function analysis]

The possibility of a correlation between the membrane properties of the delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP) and its analogues and their biological activity in vivo was examined by a comparative study of the membrane effects of these peptides. The peptides exhibiting biological activity in vivo were shown to cause a statistically reliable disordering of lipids in thrombocyte plasma membranes similar to the effect of DSIP. The membrane effect of the D-Val2, D-Tyr2, and Tyr1, Pro2 analogues of DSIP had the same bimodal dose dependence characteristic of natural DSIP. Only a slight nonspecific lipid disordering was registered for Trp-Asp-Ala-Ser-Gly-Glu, a biologically inactive hexapeptide analogue. These results indicate a correlation between the biological activity of the peptides during in vivo tests and their membrane properties in vitro. The structure-function relationship was studied within the group of DSIP analogues examined in vitro. The DSIP modeling effect, especially pronounced under the action of stress factors, was suggested to be directly associated with the ability of DSIP to change the dynamic structure of biological membranes.

Delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP): a still unresolved riddle

Delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP) was isolated from rabbit cerebral venous blood by Schoenenberger-Monnier group from Basel in 1977 and initially regarded as a candidate sleep-promoting factor. However, the link between DSIP and sleep has never been further characterized, in part because of the lack of isolation of the DSIP gene, protein and possible related receptor. Thus the hypothesis regarding DSIP as a sleep factor is extremely poorly documented and still weak. Although DSIP itself presented a focus of study for a number of researchers, its natural occurrence and biological activity still remains obscure. DSIP structure is different from any other known representative of the various peptide families. In this mini-review we hypothesize the existence of a DSIP-like peptide(s) that is responsible (at least partly) for DSIP-like immunoreactivity and DSIP biological activity. This assumption is based on: (i) a highly specific distribution of DSIP-like immunoreactivity in the neurosecretory hypothalamic nuclei of various vertebrate species that are not particularly relevant for sleep regulation, as revealed by the histochemical studies of the Geneva group (Charnay et al.); (ii) a large spectrum of DSIP biological activity revealed by biochemical and physiological studies in vitro; (iii) significant slow-wave sleep (SWS) promoting activity of certain artificial DSIP structural analogues (but not DSIP itself!) in rabbits and rats revealed by our early studies; and (iv) significant SWS-promoting activity of a naturally occurring dermorphin-decapeptide that is structurally similar to DSIP (in five of the nine positions) and the sleep-suppressing effect of its optical isomer, as revealed in rabbits. Potential future studies are outlined, including natural synthesis and release of this DSIP-like peptide and its role in neuroendocrine regulation.

Effect of a Decapeptide (VPDLLADLLK) on the Phase Transition of Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine Lipid Bilayer

VPDLLADLLK is a synthetic decapeptide, which shows a difference in conformation in various environments. Circular dichroism spectral studies show that it exists in an unordered conformation in the aqueous phase, and in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) lipid bilayer, it exhibits an alpha-helical structure. The membrane property modification due to the peptide incorporation has been studied by using differential scanning calorimetry and fluorescence spectroscopy. With incorporation of the peptide the average steady-state anisotropy of DPH in the membrane decreases slightly in the gel state but remains more or less the same in the liquid crystalline state. The peptide incorporation causes a shift in the phase-transition temperature from 23 to 26 degrees C for 15 mol% and 29 degrees C for 30 mol% of the peptide, which is accompanied by a decrease in the sharpness and a broadening of the DSC thermogram. This preferential stabilization of the more ordered gel phase by the peptide could be due to the hydrophobic mismatch between the length of the peptide and the length of the hydrophobic segment of the DMPC bilayer. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Solution structure of neuromedin B by (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

The solution structure of neuromedin B (NMB) was investigated using two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in membrane-mimicking environments. NMB adopts a relaxed helical conformation from Trp(4) to Met(10) in 50% aqueous 2,2, 2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) solution and in 150 mM SDS micelles. Sidechain atoms of the three residues, Trp(4), His(8) and Phe(9) orient toward the same direction and these residues might play a key role on interacting with hydrophobic acyl chains of the phospholipids in the membrane. NOESY experiments performed on NMB in non-deuterated SDS micelle show that aromatic ring protons of Trp(4) and Phe(9) residues are in close contact with methylene protons of SDS micelles. In addition, proton longitudinal relaxation data proved that the interactions between NMB with SDS micelle are characterized as extrinsic interaction. Trp(4) and Phe(9) seem to be important in interaction with receptor and this agrees with the previous studies of structure-activity relationship (Howell, D.C. et al. (1996) Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 48, 522-531). These conformational features might be helpful in understanding the molecular mechanism of the function of NMB and developing the efficient drugs.