5-Doxylstearate-induced displacement of phencyclidine from its low-affinity binding sites on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Mode of cembranoid action on embryonic muscle acetylcholine receptor

The mechanism of eupalmerin acetate (EUAC) actions on the embryonic muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in BC3H-1 cells was studied by using whole-cell and single-channel patch-clamp current measurements. With whole-cell currents, EUAC did not act as an agonist on this receptor. Coapplication of 30 microM EUAC with 50 microM, 100 microM, or 500 microM carbamoylcholine (CCh) reversibly inhibited the current amplitude, whereas, with 20 microM CCh, current was increased above control values in the presence of EUAC. EUAC concentration curves (0.01-40 microM) obtained with 100 microM and 500 microM CCh displayed slope coefficients, n(H), significantly smaller than one, suggesting that EUAC bound to several sites with widely differing affinities on the receptor molecule. The apparent rate of receptor desensitization in the presence of EUAC and CCh was either slower than or equal to that obtained with CCh alone. The major finding from single-channel studies was that EUAC did not affect single-channel conductance or the ability of CCh to interact with the receptor. Instead, EUAC acted by increasing the channel closing rate constant. The results are not consistent with the competitive model for EUAC inhibition, with the sequential open-channel block model, or with inhibition by increased desensitization. The data are best accounted for by a model in which EUAC acts by closed-channel block at low concentrations, by positive modulation at intermediate concentrations, and by negative allosteric modulation of the open channel at high concentrations.

Molecular mechanisms and binding site locations for noncompetitive antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are pentameric proteins that belong to the Cys-loop receptor superfamily. Their essential mechanism of functioning is to couple neurotransmitter binding, which occurs at the extracellular domain, to the opening of the membrane-spanning cation channel. The function of these receptors can be modulated by structurally different compounds called noncompetitive antagonists. Noncompetitive antagonists may act at least by two different mechanisms: a steric and/or an allosteric mechanism. The simplest idea representing a steric mechanism is that the antagonist molecule physically blocks the ion channel. On the other hand, there exist distinct allosteric mechanisms. For example, noncompetitive antagonists may bind to the receptor and stabilize a nonconducting conformational state (e.g., resting or desensitized state), and/or increase the receptor desensitization rate. Barbiturates, dissociative anesthetics, antidepressants, and neurosteroids have been shown to inhibit nicotinic receptors by allosteric mechanisms and/or by open- and closed-channel blockade. Receptor modulation has proved to be highly complex for most noncompetitive antagonists. Noncompetitive antagonists may act by more than one mechanism and at distinct sites in the same receptor subtype. The binding site location for one particular molecule depends on the conformational state of the receptor. The mechanisms of action and binding affinities of noncompetitive antagonists differ among nicotinic receptor subtypes. Knowledge of the structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the location of its noncompetitive antagonist binding sites, and the mechanisms of inhibition will aid the design of new and more efficacious drugs for treatment of neurological diseases.

Unique general anesthetic binding sites within distinct conformational states of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

General anesthesia is a complex behavioral state provoked by the pharmacological action of a broad range of structurally different hydrophobic molecules called general anesthetics (GAs) on receptor members of the genetically linked ligand-gated ion channel (LGIC) superfamily. This superfamily includes nicotinic acetylcholine (AChRs), type A and C gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAAR and GABACR), glycine (GlyR), and type 3 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3R) receptors. This review focuses on recent advances in the localization of GA binding sites on conformationally and compositionally distinct AChRs. The experimental evidence outlined in this review suggests that: 1. Several neuronal-type AChRs might be targets for the pharmacological action of distinct GAs. 2. The molecular components of a specific GA binding site on a certain receptor subtype are different from the structural determinants of the locus for the same GA on a different receptor subtype. 3. There are unique binding sites for distinct GAs in the same receptor protein. 4. A GA can activate, potentiate, or inhibit an ion channel, indicating the existence of more than one binding site for the same GA. 5. The affinity of a specific GA depends on the conformational state of the receptor. 6. GAs inhibition channels by at least two mechanisms, an open-channel-blocking and/or an allosteric mechanism. 7. Certain GAs may inhibit AChR function by competing for the agonist binding sites or by augmenting the desensitization rate.

Noncompetitive antagonist binding sites in the torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion channel. Structure-activity relationship studies using adamantane derivatives

We used a series of adamantane derivatives to probe the structure of the phencyclidine locus in either the resting or desensitized state of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Competitive radioligand binding and photolabeling experiments using well-characterized noncompetitive antagonists such as the phencyclidine analogue [piperidyl-3,4-(3)H(N)]-N-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]-3,4-piperidine ([(3)H]TCP), [(3)H]ethidium, [(3)H]tetracaine, [(14)C]amobarbital, and 3-(trifluoromethyl)-3-(m-[(125)I]iodophenyl)diazirine ([(125)I]TID) were performed. Thermodynamic and structure-function relationship analyses yielded the following results. (1) There is a good structure-function relationship for adamantane amino derivatives inhibiting [(3)H]TCP or [(3)H]tetracaine binding to the resting AChR. (2) Since the same derivatives inhibit neither [(14)C]amobarbital binding nor [(125)I]TID photoincorporation, we conclude that these positively charged molecules preferably bind to the TCP locus, perhaps interacting with alphaGlu(262) residues at position M2-20. (3) The opposite is true for the neutral molecule adamantane, which prefers the TID (or barbiturate) locus instead of the TCP site. (4) The TID site is smaller and more hydrophobic (it accommodates neutral molecules with a maximal volume of 333 +/- 45 A(3)) than the TCP locus, which has room for positively charged molecules with volumes as large as 461 A(3) (e.g., crystal violet). This supports the concept that the resting ion channel is tapering from the extracellular mouth to the middle portion. (5) Finally, although both the hydrophobic environment and the size of the TCP site are practically the same in both states, there is a more obvious cutoff in the desensitized state than in the resting state, suggesting that the desensitization process constrains the TCP locus. A plausible location of neutral and charged adamantane derivatives is shown in a model of the resting ion channel.

Characterization of the dizocilpine binding site on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Although the dissociative anesthetic dizocilpine [(+)-MK-801] inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) function in a noncompetitive manner, the location of the dizocilpine binding site(s) has yet to be clearly established. Thus, to characterize the binding site for dizocilpine on the AChR we examined 1) the dissociation constant (K(d)) and stoichiometry of [(3)H]dizocilpine binding; 2) the displacement of dizocilpine radioligand binding by noncompetitive inhibitors (NCIs) and conversely dizocilpine displacement of fluorescent and radiolabeled NCIs from their respective high-affinity binding sites on the AChR; and 3) photoaffinity labeling of the AChR using (125)I-dizocilpine. The results establish that one high-affinity (K(d) = 4.8 microM) and several (3-6) low-affinity (K(d) = approximately 140 microM) binding sites exist for dizocilpine on the desensitized and resting AChR, respectively. The binding of the fluorescent NCIs ethidium, quinacrine, and crystal violet as well as [(3)H]thienylcyclohexylpiperidine was inhibited by dizocilpine on desensitized AChRs. However, Schild-type analyses indicate that only the inhibition of quinacrine in the desensitized state seems to be mediated by a mutually exclusive action. Photoaffinity labeling of the AChR by (125)I-dizocilpine was primarily restricted to the alpha1 subunit and subsequent mapping revealed that the principal sites of labeling are localized to the M4 (approximately 70%) and M1 (30%) transmembrane domains. Collectively, the data indicate that the high-affinity dizocilpine binding site is not located in the lumen of the ion channel but probably near the quinacrine binding locus at a nonluminal domain in the AChR desensitized state.