Cross-linking between cytochrome c3 and flavodoxin from Desulfovibrio gigas

The History of Desulfovibrio gigas Aldehyde Oxidoreductase-A Personal View

A story going back almost 40 years is presented in this manuscript. This is a different and more challenging way of reporting my research and I hope it will be useful to and target a wide-ranging audience. When preparing the manuscript and collecting references on the subject of this paper-aldehyde oxidoreductase from Desulfovibrio gigas-I felt like I was travelling back in time (and space), bringing together the people that have contributed most to this area of research. I sincerely hope that I can give my collaborators the credit they deserve. This study is not presented as a chronologic narrative but as a grouping of topics, the development of which occurred over many years.

Production and characterization of a functional putidaredoxin reductase-putidaredoxin covalent complex

In the cytochrome P450cam-dependent monooxygenase system from Pseudomonas putida, putidaredoxin (Pdx) shuttles electrons between putidaredoxin reductase (Pdr) and P450cam and, thus, must form transient complexes with both partners. 1-Ethyl 3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide (EDC) was found to promote formation of stoichiometric Pdr-Pdx complexes only when carboxyl groups on Pdx were activated. The yield of the EDC-mediated cross-link depended on the Pdx variant used and the redox state of both partners, decreasing in the following order: Pdr(ox)-Pdx(ox) > Pdr(ox)-Pdx(red) > or = Pdr(red)-Pdx(red). The Pdr-Pdx C73S/C85S conjugate was purified and characterized. Compared to the equimolar mixture of intact Pdr and Pdx, the fusion protein was more efficient in electron transfer to cytochrome c and, in the presence of saturating levels of P450cam, more effectively supported camphor hydroxylation. On the basis of our results, we conclude that (i) the cross-linked complex is physiologically relevant and represents a suitable model for mechanistic studies, (ii) molecular recognition between Pdr and Pdx is redox-controlled and assisted by the Glu72(Pdx)-Lys409(Pdr) charge-charge interactions, and (iii) the high specificity of the Pdr-Pdx couple may be due to finely tuned interactions at the protein-protein interface resulting in only one strongly preferred docking orientation leading to efficient FAD-to-[2Fe-2S] electron transfer.

Effects of dimerization on protein electron transfer

In order to investigate the relationship between the rate of protein-protein electron transfer and the structure of the association complex, a dimer of the blue copper protein azurin was constructed and its electron exchange properties were determined. For this purpose, a site for covalent cross-linking was engineered by replacing the surface-exposed asparagine 42 with a cysteine. This mutation enabled the formation of disulfide-linked homo-dimers of azurin. Based on NMR line-broadening experiments, the electron self-exchange (e.s.e.) rate constant for this dimer was determined to be 4.2(+/-0.7) x 10(5)M(-1)s(-1), which is a seven-fold decrease relative to wild-type azurin. This difference is ascribed to a less accessible hydrophobic patch in the dimer. To discriminate between intramolecular electron transfer within a dimer and intermolecular electron transfer between two dimers, the e.s.e. rate constant of (Cu-Cu)-N42C dimers was compared with that of (Zn-Cu)- and (Ag-Cu)-N42C dimers. As Zn and Ag are redox inactive, the intramolecular electron transfer reaction in these latter dimers can be eliminated. The e.s.e. rate constants of the three dimers are the same and an upper limit for the intramolecular electron transfer rate of 10 s(-1) could be determined. This rate is compatible with a Cu-Cu distance of 18 A or more, which is larger than the Cu - Cu distance of 15 A observed in the wild-type crystal structure that shows two monomers that face each other with opposing hydrophobic patches. Modelling of the dimer shows that the Cu-Cu distance should be in the range of 17 A < rCu-Cu < 28 A, which is in agreement with the experimental findings. For efficient electron transfer, it appears crucial that the two molecules interact in the proper orientation. Direct cross-linking may disturb the formation of such an optimal electron transfer complex.