Effects of L1 blockade on sensory axon outgrowth and pathfinding in the chick hindlimb

To Stick or Not to Stick: The Multiple Roles of Cell Adhesion Molecules in Neural Circuit Assembly

Precise wiring of neural circuits is essential for brain connectivity and function. During development, axons respond to diverse cues present in the extracellular matrix or at the surface of other cells to navigate to specific targets, where they establish precise connections with post-synaptic partners. Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) represent a large group of structurally diverse proteins well known to mediate adhesion for neural circuit assembly. Through their adhesive properties, CAMs act as major regulators of axon navigation, fasciculation, and synapse formation. While the adhesive functions of CAMs have been known for decades, more recent studies have unraveled essential, non-adhesive functions as well. CAMs notably act as guidance cues and modulate guidance signaling pathways for axon pathfinding, initiate contact-mediated repulsion for spatial organization of axonal arbors, and refine neuronal projections during circuit maturation. In this review, we summarize the classical adhesive functions of CAMs in axonal development and further discuss the increasing number of other non-adhesive functions CAMs play in neural circuit assembly.

Trans-Axonal Signaling in Neural Circuit Wiring

The development of neural circuits is a complex process that relies on the proper navigation of axons through their environment to their appropriate targets. While axon–environment and axon–target interactions have long been known as essential for circuit formation, communication between axons themselves has only more recently emerged as another crucial mechanism. Trans-axonal signaling governs many axonal behaviors, including fasciculation for proper guidance to targets, defasciculation for pathfinding at important choice points, repulsion along and within tracts for pre-target sorting and target selection, repulsion at the target for precise synaptic connectivity, and potentially selective degeneration for circuit refinement. This review outlines the recent advances in identifying the molecular mechanisms of trans-axonal signaling and discusses the role of axon–axon interactions during the different steps of neural circuit formation.

Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor Type 3 Regulates Neuronal Growth Cone Sensitivity to Guidance Signals

During neurodevelopment, the growth cone deciphers directional information from extracellular guidance cues presented as shallow concentration gradients via signal amplification. However, it remains unclear how the growth cone controls this amplification process during its navigation through an environment in which basal cue concentrations vary widely. Here, we identified inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP₃) receptor type 3 as a regulator of axonal sensitivity to guidance cues in vitro and in vivo. Growth cones lacking the type 3 subunit are hypersensitive to nerve growth factor (NGF), an IP₃-dependent attractive cue, and incapable of turning toward normal concentration ranges of NGF to which wild-type growth cones respond. This is due to globally, but not asymmetrically, activated Ca²⁺ signaling in the hypersensitive growth cones. Remarkably, lower NGF concentrations can polarize growth cones for turning if IP₃ receptor type 3 is deficient. These data suggest a subtype-specific IP₃ receptor function in sensitivity adjustment during axon navigation.

•

IP₃ receptor type 3 (IP₃R3) controls axonal sensitivity to IP₃-based guidance cues

•

IP₃R3^−/− growth cones are not attracted to NGF due to global Ca²⁺ responses

•

Lower NGF concentrations can polarize IP₃R3^−/− growth cones for attractive turning

•

NGF knockdown in vivo can revert abnormal trajectory of IP₃R3^−/− axons

Sensory axons inhibit motor axon regeneration in vitro

During mammalian embryonic development sensory and motor axons interact as an integral part of the pathfinding process. During regeneration, however, little is known of their interactions with one another. It is thus possible that sensory axons might influence motor axon regeneration in ways not currently appreciated. To explore this possibility we have developed an organotypic model of post-natal nerve regeneration in which sensory and motor axons are color-coded by modality. Motor axons that express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and sensory axons that express red fluorescent protein (RFP) are blended within a three-dimensional segment of peripheral nerve. This nerve is then transected, allowing axons to interact with one another as they grow out on a collagen/laminin gel that is initially devoid of directional cues. Within hours it is apparent that sensory axons extend more rapidly than motor axons and precede them during the early stages of regeneration, the opposite of their developmental order. Motor axons thus enter an environment already populated with sensory axons, and they adhere to these axons throughout most of their course. As a result, motor axon growth is reduced dramatically. Physical delay of sensory regeneration, allowing motor axons to grow ahead, restores normal motor growth; direct axonal interactions on the gel, rather than some other aspect of the model, are thus responsible for motor inhibition. Potential mechanisms for this inhibition are explored by electroporating siRNA to the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and the L1 adhesion molecule (L1CAM) into dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) to block expression of these molecules by regenerating sensory axons. Although neither maneuver improved motor regeneration, the results were consistent with early receptor-mediated signaling among axons rather than physical adhesion as the mechanism of motor inhibition in this model.

L1 cell adhesion molecule as a potential therapeutic target in murine models of endometriosis using a monoclonal antibody approach

Background/Aims

The neural cell adhesion molecule L1CAM is a transmembrane glycoprotein abnormally expressed in tumors and previously associated with cell proliferation, adhesion and invasion, as well as neurite outgrowth in endometriosis. Being an attractive target molecule for antibody-based therapy, the present study assessed the ability of the monoclonal anti-L1 antibody (anti-L1 mAb) to impair the development of endometriotic lesions invivo and endometriosis-associated nerve fiber growth.

Methods and Results

Endometriosis was experimentally induced in sexually mature B6C3F1 (n=34) and CD-1 nude (n=21) mice by autologous and heterologous transplantation, respectively, of endometrial fragments into the peritoneal cavity. Transplantation was confirmed four weeks post-surgery by invivo magnetic resonance imaging and laparotomy, respectively. Mice were then intraperitoneally injected with anti-L1 mAb or an IgG isotype control antibody twice weekly, over a period of four weeks. Upon treatment completion, mice were sacrificed and endometrial implants were excised, measured and fixed. Endometriosis was histologically confirmed and L1CAM was detected by immunohistochemistry. Endometriotic lesion size was significantly reduced in anti-L1-treated B6C3F1 and CD-1 nude mice compared to mice treated with control antibody (P<0.05). Accordingly, a decreased number of PCNA positive epithelial and stromal cells was detected in autologously and heterologously induced endometriotic lesions exposed to anti-L1 mAb treatment. Anti-L1-treated mice also presented a diminished number of intraperitoneal adhesions at implantation sites compared with controls. Furthermore, a double-blind counting of anti-neurofilament L stained nerves revealed significantly reduced nerve density within peritoneal lesions in anti-L1 treated B6C3F1 mice (P=0.0039).

Conclusions

Local anti-L1 mAb treatment suppressed endometriosis growth in B6C3F1 and CD-1 nude mice and exerted a potent anti-neurogenic effect on induced endometriotic lesions invivo. The findings of this preliminary study in mice provide a strong basis for further testing in invivo models.

Npn-1 contributes to axon-axon interactions that differentially control sensory and motor innervation of the limb

The initiation, execution, and completion of complex locomotor behaviors are depending on precisely integrated neural circuitries consisting of motor pathways that activate muscles in the extremities and sensory afferents that deliver feedback to motoneurons. These projections form in tight temporal and spatial vicinities during development, yet the molecular mechanisms and cues coordinating these processes are not well understood. Using cell-type specific ablation of the axon guidance receptor Neuropilin-1 (Npn-1) in spinal motoneurons or in sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), we have explored the contribution of this signaling pathway to correct innervation of the limb. We show that Npn-1 controls the fasciculation of both projections and mediates inter-axonal communication. Removal of Npn-1 from sensory neurons results in defasciculation of sensory axons and, surprisingly, also of motor axons. In addition, the tight coupling between these two heterotypic axonal populations is lifted with sensory fibers now leading the spinal nerve projection. These findings are corroborated by partial genetic elimination of sensory neurons, which causes defasciculation of motor projections to the limb. Deletion of Npn-1 from motoneurons leads to severe defasciculation of motor axons in the distal limb and dorsal-ventral pathfinding errors, while outgrowth and fasciculation of sensory trajectories into the limb remain unaffected. Genetic elimination of motoneurons, however, revealed that sensory axons need only minimal scaffolding by motor axons to establish their projections in the distal limb. Thus, motor and sensory axons are mutually dependent on each other for the generation of their trajectories and interact in part through Npn-1-mediated fasciculation before and within the plexus region of the limbs.

L1, beta1 integrin, and cadherins mediate axonal regeneration in the embryonic spinal cord

Embryonic birds and mammals are capable of axon regeneration after spinal cord injury, but this ability is lost during a discrete developmental transition. We recently showed that changes within maturing neurons, as opposed to changes solely in the spinal cord environment, significantly restrict axon regeneration during development. The developmental changes within neurons that limit axon regeneration remain unclear. One gap in knowledge is the identity of the adhesive receptors that embryonic neurons use to extend axons in the spinal cord. Here we test the roles of L1/NgCAM, beta1 integrin, and cadherins, using a coculture system in which embryonic chick brainstem neurons regenerate axons into an explant of embryonic spinal cord. By in vivo and in vitro methods, we found that brainstem neurons reduce axonal expression of L1 as they mature. Disrupting either L1 or beta1 integrin function individually in our coculture system partially inhibited growth of brainstem axons in spinal cords, while disrupting cadherin function alone had no effect. However, when all three adhesive receptors were blocked simultaneously, axon growth in the spinal cord was reduced by 90%. Using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization we show that during the period when neurons lose their regenerative capacity they reduce expression of mRNA for N-cadherin, and reduce axonal L1/NgCAM protein through a post-transcriptional mechanism. These data show that embryonic neurons use L1/NgCAM, beta1 integrin, and cadherin receptors for axon regeneration in the embryonic spinal cord, and raise the possibility that a reduced expression of these essential receptors may contribute to the low-regenerative capacity of older neurons.

Role of N-cadherin in Schwann cell precursors of growing nerves

In the present paper, we determine the localization and developmental regulation of N-cadherin in embryonic rat nerves and examine the role of N-cadherin in this system. We also identify a major transition in the architecture of embryonic nerves and relating it to N-cadherin expression. We find that in early embryonic nerves, N-cadherin is primarily expressed in Schwann cell precursors. Pronounced expression is seen at distal nerve fronts where these cells associate with growth cones, and the proximal nerve ends, in boundary cap cells. Unexpectedly, N-cadherin is downregulated as precursors generate Schwann cells, coinciding with the time at which most axons make target connections. Therefore, glial N-cadherin expression is essentially restricted to the period of axon outgrowth. We also provide evidence that N-cadherin supports the formation of contacts between Schwann cell precursors and show that these cells are a favorable substrate for axon growth, unlike N-cadherin-negative Schwann cells. Induction of N-cadherin expression in Schwann cells by neuregulin-1 restores their ability to form contacts and support axon growth. Finally, we show that the loss of glial N-cadherin during embryonic nerve development is accompanied by a transformation of nerve architecture, involving the appearance of endoneurial connective tissue space, fibroblasts, Schwann cell basal lamina, and blood vessels. Because N-cadherin is likely to promote the extensive glial contacts typical of the compact embryonic nerve, we suggest that N-cadherin loss at the time of Schwann cell generation allows endoneurial space to appear between the glial cells, a development that eventually permits the extensive interactions between connective tissue and individual axon-Schwann cell units necessary for myelination.

Invariant mantling of growth cones by Schwann cell precursors characterize growing peripheral nerve fronts

Little is known about the cytoarchitecture of growth fronts in developing mammalian nerves. We report here the first quantitative, ultrastructural analysis of growth cones (GCs) and their immediate cellular and tissue environment at tips of growing nerves that are nearing their targets in fore limbs of E14 rat embryos. Schwann cell precursor (SCP) marker, p75 neurotrophin receptor, and growth cone marker, SCG10, were used to identify nerve fronts, respectively. Using confocal 3D reconstructions and immunoelectron microscopy, we found that growth cone and Schwann cell precursor migrate together at the nerve front, where growth cone contact adjacent growth cone and Schwann cell precursor with similar frequency. Schwann cell precursor are extensively connected by adherens junctions and form elaborate scaffolds that enmantle growth cone at nerve fronts, so that 80% of the nerve front surface is covered by Schwann cell precursor. Although they interdigitate in complex ways among growth cone, the total contact area between growth cone and glial membranes is remarkably constant among the 100 growth fronts analyzed. In contrast to this consistency, other growth cone contacts varied markedly from front to front such that the frequencies of GC-GC contacts are increasing proportional to their decreasing contacts with mesenchymal tissue. Thus, at the nerve front, it is the Schwann cell precursor that are most exposed to extracellular environment while forming a surprisingly invariant substrate for advancing growth cone. This study shows for the first time that Schwann cell precursor are close and consistent cellular companions of growth cone in their approach to their final targets in the developing limb and suggests a previously unappreciated role for Schwann cell precursor in growth cone advance through the limb mesenchyme.

Binding partners L1 cell adhesion molecule and the ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) proteins are involved in development and the regenerative response to injury of hippocampal and cortical neurons

Regeneration of the adult central nervous system may require recapitulation of developmental events and therefore involve the re-expression of developmentally significant proteins. We have investigated whether the L1 cell adhesion molecule, and its binding partner, the ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) proteins are involved in the neuronal regenerative response to injury. Hippocampal and cortical neurons were cultured in vitro on either an L1 substrate or poly-L-lysine, and ERM and other neuronal proteins were localized immunocytochemically both developmentally and following neurite transection of neurons maintained in long-term culture. Activated ERM was localized to growth cones up to 7 days in vitro but relatively mature cultures (21 days in vitro) were devoid of active ERM proteins. However, ERM proteins were localized to the growth cones of sprouting neuronal processes that formed several hours after neurite transection. In addition, the L1 substrate, relative to poly-L-lysine, resulted in significantly longer regenerative neurites, as well as larger growth cones with more filopodia. Furthermore, neurons derived from the cortex formed significantly longer post-injury neurite sprouts at 6 h post-injury than hippocampal derived neurons grown on both substrates. We have demonstrated that L1 and the ERM proteins are involved in the neuronal response to injury, and that neurons derived from the hippocampus and cortex may have different post-injury regenerative neurite sprouting abilities.

Ectoderm removal prevents cutaneous nerve formation and perturbs sensory axon growth in the chick hindlimb

Target tissues are thought to provide important cues for growing axons, yet there is little direct evidence that they are essential for axonal pathfinding. Here we examined whether target ectoderm is necessary for the formation of cutaneous nerves, and for the normal growth and guidance of cutaneous axons as they first enter the limb plexus. To do this, we removed a patch of ectoderm from the chick hindlimb at various times during early axon outgrowth. We find there is a critical period when cutaneous nerve formation requires target ectoderm. When the ectoderm is absent during this time, axons progress into the limb more slowly and, although a few sensory axons occasionally diverge a short distance from the plexus, they do not form a discrete nerve that travels to the skin. A few days later, when the nerve pattern is mature, axons normally destined for the 'deprived' cutaneous nerve are not segregated appropriately within the plexus. Some cutaneous axons are instead misdirected along an inappropriate cutaneous nerve, while others have seemingly failed to reach their correct target, or a suitable alternative, and died. These results demonstrate that the target ectoderm is necessary for normal sensory axon growth and guidance in the hindlimb.