Predegenerated nerve allografts versus fresh nerve allografts in nerve repair

Donor nerve axotomy and axonal regeneration after end-to-side neurorrhaphy in a rodent model

OBJECTIVE In this study, the authors used a surgical model of end-to-side neurorrhaphy between a nerve graft and a donor tibial nerve in adult rats to investigate the optimal conditions for axonal regeneration induced by the donor nerve. They also assessed the importance of a more favorable pathway using a predegenerated nerve graft to attract regenerating axons to regrow into the graft and then directing and improving their growth toward the target in comparison with results obtained with a fresh nerve graft. METHODS End-to-side neurorrhaphy was performed between a nerve graft and a donor tibial nerve. The nerve graft was obtained from the left tibial nerve, which was either freshly removed or predegenerated 1 week prior to neurorrhaphy. The donor right tibial nerve was injured by epineurium removal alone, injured by epineurium removal with cross section of 20% or 50% of the total axons at the coaptation site, or left intact. The animals were followed postoperatively for a 6-week period, and outcomes were evaluated by optical microscopy and retrograde labeling to detect the regenerated primary sensory neurons located in the lumbar dorsal root ganglia and spinal motor neurons located in the lumbar spinal ventral horn. RESULTS At the end of the follow-up period, no regenerating axons were observed in the nerve grafts when the donor nerve was left intact, and very few axons were detected when the donor nerve was injured by epineurium removal alone. However, numerous regenerating axons appeared in the grafts when the donor nerve was axotomized, and the greatest number was achieved with a 50% cross section axotomized nerve. In the rats with a 50% cross section of the donor nerve, better nerve-like morphology of the grafts was observed, without connective adhesions. When a predegenerated nerve graft was used, more regenerating axons were attracted and elongated with a more regular shape and improved myelination. CONCLUSIONS Axonal regrowth into a nerve graft depends on axotomy of the donor nerve after end-to-side neurorrhaphy. More efficient attraction and an improved structure of the regenerating axons were achieved when a predegenerated nerve graft was used. Furthermore, a nerve graft may require a certain number of regenerating axons to maintain a nerve-like morphology.

Nerve allografts and conduits in peripheral nerve repair

Since the last update on nerve conduits and allograft in 2000, investigations have established the efficacy of these alternatives to autograft in the repair of small sensory neural gaps. However, limited insights into the biology of the regenerating nerve continue to preclude intelligent conduit design. Ongoing discoveries in neuroscience and biomaterial engineering hold promise for the eventual development of allograft and conduits with potential of surpassing nerve autografts in clinical efficacy. In this review, we summarize the history, recent advances, and emerging developments in nerve conduits and allograft.

Return of motor function after segmental nerve loss in a rat model: comparison of autogenous nerve graft, collagen conduit, and processed allograft (AxoGen)

BACKGROUND

An effective alternative to nerve autograft is needed to minimize morbidity and solve limited-availability issues. We hypothesized that the use of processed allografts and collagen conduits would allow recovery of motor function that is equivalent to that seen after the use of autografts.

METHODS

Sixty-five Lewis rats were divided into three experimental groups. In each group, a unilateral 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was repaired with nerve autograft, allograft treated by AxoGen Laboratories, or a 2.0-mm-inner-diameter collagen conduit. The animals were studied at twelve and sixteen weeks postoperatively. Evaluation included bilateral measurement of the tibialis anterior muscle force and muscle weight, electrophysiology, assessment of ankle contracture, and peroneal nerve histomorphometry. Muscle force was measured with use of our previously described and validated method. Results were expressed as a percentage of the values on the contralateral side. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) corrected by the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple range test was used for statistical investigation (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

At twelve weeks, the mean muscle force (and standard deviation), as compared with that on the contralateral (control) side, was 45.2% ± 15.0% in the autograft group, 43.4% ± 18.0% in the allograft group, and 7.0% ± 9.2% in the collagen group. After sixteen weeks, the recovered muscle force was 65.5% ± 14.1% in the autograft group, 36.3% ± 15.7% in the allograft group, and 12.1% ± 16.0% in the collagen group. Autograft was statistically superior to allograft and the collagen conduit at sixteen weeks with regard to all parameters except histomorphometric characteristics (p < 0.05). The collagen-group results were inferior. All autograft-group outcomes improved from twelve to sixteen weeks, with the increase in muscle force being significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of autograft resulted in better motor recovery than did the use of allograft or a collagen conduit for a short nerve gap in rats. A longer evaluation time of sixteen weeks after segmental nerve injuries in rats would be beneficial as more substantial muscle recovery was seen at that time.

EXPERIMENTAL NERVE GRAFTING — TOWARDS FUTURE SOLUTIONS OF A CLINICAL PROBLEM

Restoration of function following complete nerve injuries with subsequent nerve repair is still not satisfactory and in many cases poor, especially when a gap has to be bridged by a graft. In such situations, there may be insufficient access to autologous graft material. Alternatives have to be developed and a close collaboration between basic scientists and clinicians is required. In the present article, current studies on experimental nerve grafts are discussed and some new alternatives to autologous nerve grafts are reviewed.

Endoscopically assisted sural nerve harvest for upper extremity posttraumatic nerve defects: an evaluation of functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injuries in the upper extremity often require interposition of sural nerve grafts for reconstruction. Due to the poor donor-site appearance with standard techniques, and the potential for trauma to the nerve because of poor visualization during the harvest when the stepladder technique is used, the endoscope has been employed for nerve harvest.

METHODS

From January of 1997 until December of 2003, 15 patients with an average age of 27.5 years with posttraumatic upper limb nerve defects of the ulnar, median, or posterior interosseous nerves (crush, cutting, or avulsion injuries) underwent reconstruction with endoscopically harvested sural nerve. The nerves were harvested using atraumatic techniques under video monitor visualization. The functional results of sensation and motor function were assessed using British Medical Research Council scales.

RESULTS

All patients regained at least cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, with most regaining two-point discrimination (nine patients achieved S3+). Two patients achieved complete recovery (S4). The 11 patients with motor nerve involvement achieved between M1+ and M5 after the initial reconstruction. Eight patients required a total of one immediate and nine secondary procedures to achieve the final outcome. The procedures included tenolysis (three patients), intrinsic tendon transfers (four patients), and opponensplasty (three patients). At the 4-year mean follow-up, grip power was M5 in 13 patients (86.7 percent) and M4 in two patients (13.3 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Upper extremity sensory and motor nerve defects can be reconstructed with interposition of endoscopically harvested sural nerve grafts. The procedure is reliable, quick, and atraumatic, and results in reasonable motor and sensory recovery.

Pre-degenerated nerve shows enhanced regeneration after incremental elongation in rats

Following nerve degeneration, we investigated effects of linear elongation on subsequent nerve regeneration in a total of 92 Wistar rats (weight 380-430 g). The nerve was ligated at the midthigh and then elongated incrementally by a total of 15 mm by leg lengthening at a rate of 3 or 5 mm/day. Seven days after initiation of nerve elongation, the external fixator was removed and normal leg length was restored with internal fixation. Then a 10 mm nerve segment at the ligature site was excised, and the nerve was repaired with sutures (group D). At 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after nerve suturing, we examined transverse semi-thin nerve sections compared with group I (severed and repaired after leg lengthening without a nerve ligature) and control group (severed and repaired without leg lengthening). After lengthening at 3 mm/day, nerve regeneration in group D was enhanced at 4 weeks. After lengthening at 5 mm/day, nerve regeneration in group D also was enhanced at 6 and 8 weeks. Pre-degenerated nerve showed better regeneration after suturing than intact nerve. Elongation holds promise as an alternative to nerve grafting in treatment of nerve injury.

Functional assessment in the rat by ground reaction forces

Although the rat sciatic nerve model is used extensively in the investigation of repair techniques, and a variety of evaluation methods utilized to assess the results, a means to measure directly and accurately the return of function in these animals is absent. Histologic, histomorphometric, and electrophysiologic methods can be reliable indicators of nerve regeneration but do not correlate to functional recovery. The purposes of this study were to develop apparatus to continuously measure ground reaction forces (GRF) and use GRF parameters in the assessment of gait parameters in normal rats preoperatively and following peripheral nerve severance and repair. Three neurorrhaphy methods: direct sciatic nerve repair, direct tibial nerve repair and double sciatic nerve repair simulating autograft, as well as a non-repaired tibial nerve transection were evaluated. The testing apparatus was designed to measure the spontaneous and voluntary effort of the rat with objective data. Three orthogonal components - vertical, craniocaudal (braking and propulsion), and mediolateral - of the ground reaction force were measured. Preoperative data showed that vertical forces were comparable among the four limbs but propulsion and braking forces displayed significant differences. At 12 weeks, functional recovery was most evident in the direct tibial nerve repair group and absent in the non-repaired tibial defect group. Direct sciatic nerve repairs and sciatic nerve grafts resulted in lesser degrees of improvement. Results indicated that the propulsive force is the optimal GRF parameter for evaluating recovery of useful function.