Development and intralaboratory evaluation of an in vitro human cell-based test to aid ocular irritancy assessments

Approaches to Safety Evaluation of Baby Wipes

Disposable baby wipes manufactured by Procter & Gamble, soft sheets bearing lotion that is balanced to maintain natural skin pH, are convenient for cleaning the diaper area and a quick cleanup on baby’s face and hands.

Therapeutic nanoemulsions in ophthalmic drug administration: Concept in formulations and characterization techniques for ocular drug delivery

The eye is the specialized part of the body and is comprised of numerous physiological ocular barriers that limit the drug absorption at the action site. Regardless of various efforts, efficient topical ophthalmic drug delivery remains unsolved, and thus, it is extremely necessary to advance the contemporary treatments of ocular disorders affecting the anterior and posterior cavities. Nowadays, the advent of nanotechnology-based multicomponent nanoemulsions for ophthalmic drug delivery has gained popularity due to the enhancement of ocular penetrability, improve bioavailability, increase solubility, and stability of lipophilic drugs. Nanoemulsions offer the sustained/controlled drug release and increase residence time which depend on viscosity, compositions, and stabilization process, etc.; hence, decrease the instillation frequency and improve patient compliance. Further, due to the nanosized of nanoemulsions, the sterilization process is easy as conventional solutions and cause no blur vision. The review aims to summarizes the various ocular barriers, manufacturing techniques, possible mechanisms to the retention and deep penetration into the eye, and appropriate excipients with their under-lying selection principles to prevent destabilization of nanoemulsions. This review also discusses the characterization parameters of ocular drug delivery to spike the interest of those contemplating a foray in this field. Here, in short, nanoemulsions are abridged with concepts to design clinically advantageous ocular drug delivery.

Methyl Green-Pyronine Staining of Porcine Organotypic Skin Explant Cultures: An Alternative Model for Screening for Skin Irritants

We describe a new alternative method for screening for skin irritants by using fresh intact porcine skin biopsies. Test chemicals were applied to the epidermis of the biopsies, which were then incubated for different times in tissue culture medium at 37°C and with 5% carbon dioxide. A decrease in epidermal keratinocyte RNA staining, visualised in frozen sections by using a modified methyl-green pyronine (MGP) staining procedure, was employed as a marker of irritancy. If a decrease in epidermal RNA was observed after incubation for 4 hours (strong irritant), the chemical had an MGP score of 3; if after incubation for 24 hours (moderate irritant), the MGP score was 2; and if after incubation for 48 hours (weak irritant), the MGP score was 1. If no keratinocyte cytotoxicity was observed after incubation for 48 hours, the chemical was classified as non-irritant (MGP score = 0). At least three ears were used per chemical. The average MGP score was used to classify the chemical. Based on the MGP score for 20% sodium dodecyl sulphate, chemicals classified as strong or moderate irritants by using the MGP test were grouped together as category R38 chemicals. Weak irritants or non-irritants were not classified (NC). The MGP staining correctly identified 23 of 25 skin irritants for which reference data were available.

Soaps and Detergents: Alternatives to Animal Eye Irritation Tests

An extensive computer search was conducted, and a comprehensive overview of the current status of alternatives to animal eye irritation tests was obtained. A search of Medline and Toxline databases (1988 to present) was supplemented with references from sources regarding in vitro eye irritation. Particular attention was paid to soap and detergent products and related ingredients. Eighty-five references are included in the review; the in vitro assays are categorized, and their predictive values for assessing acute ocular irritation are evaluated and compared with the Draize rabbit eye irritation assay and with each other. The present review shows that the increased activity of scientists from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies has resulted in substantial progress in developing alternative in vitro procedures and that a number of large, interlaboratory evaluations and international workshops have assisted in the selection process. However, none of these methodologies has obtained acceptance for regulatory classification purposes. Conclusions drawn from this review include that (a) no single in vitro assay is considered capable of replacing the Draize eye irritation test; (b) the chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) or the hen egg test-chorio-allantoic membrane test (HET-CAM), the chicken or bovine enucleated eye test, the neutral red and plasminogen activation assays for cytotoxicity, and the silicon microphysiometer appear to have the greatest potential as screening tools for eye irritation; and (c) choosing a specific assay or series of assays will depend on the type of agent tested and the impact of false-negative or false-positive results. New assays will continue to be developed and should be included in future evaluations, when sufficient data are available.

Comparison of in vitro and in vivo phototoxicity tests with S-(-)-10,11-dihydroxyfarnesic acid methyl ester produced by Beauveria bassiana KACC46831

Beauveria bassiana is a fungi that is well-known for demonstrating a resistance to environmental change. To confirm whether S-(-)-10,11-dihydroxyfarnesic acid methyl ester (DHFAME) produced by Beauveria bassiana KACC46831 causes phototoxicity when used for cosmetic purposes due to its anti-tyrosinase activity, we conducted in vitro and in vivo phototoxicity tests. There were no significant changes or damage observed in the compound-treated group with regards to skin phototoxicity, while 8-methoxypsoralen, which served as a positive control, induced toxic effects. The in vitro 3T3 neutral red uptake assay, an alternative assessment, was used for further confirmation of the phototoxicity. The results showed that DHFAME did not exhibit phototoxicity at the designated concentrations, with or without UV irradiation in the 3T3 cells. These results indicated that the methyl ester produced by Beauveria bassiana KACC46831 does not induce phototoxicity in the skin. Therefore, the results of the present study indicate that DHFAME shows potential for use as a cosmetic ingredient that does not cause skin phototoxicity.

Evaluation of eye irritation by S-(-)-10,11-dihydroxyfarnesic acid methyl ester secreted by Beauveria bassiana CS1029

The aim of this study was to investigate whether S-(-)-10,11-dihydroxyfarnesic acid methyl ester produced by cell subtype Beauveria bassiana CS1029 causes acute toxicity when used for cosmetic purposes by performing an eye irritation test. New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits were treated with a 100 mg/dose of S-(-)-10,11-dihydroxyfarnesic acid methyl ester according to standard procedure guidelines. No significant changes in terms of ocular lesions of the cornea, turbidity of the cornea, swelling of the eyelid or ocular discharge were observed in the methyl ester-treated groups, while sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, a positive control, caused severe toxicity. The anatomical and pathological observations indicate that the methyl ester produced by Beauveria bassiana CS1029 did not induce eye irritation in the lenses of the rabbits. The data suggest that the methyl ester evaluated in this study has promising potential as a cosmetic ingredient that does not irritate the eye.

The Performance of the Tissue Equivalent Assay using the Skin(2)(TM) ZK1200 Model in the COLIPA International Validation Study on Alternatives to the Draize Eye Irritation Test

The tissue equivalent assay (TEA) (Osborne et al., 1995) was used to evaluate 55 mixed ingredients and formulations in the COLIPA International Validation Study on Alternatives to the Draize Rabbit Eye Irritation Test (Brantom et al., 1997). The TEA can be used to test all types of materials since it uses a topical application approach and is not limited to only testing liquid or soluble materials. A prediction model (PM) for the test was developed using historical eye irritation data from a total of 132 materials on which in vivo and in vitro data were available. A regression model was derived from these data and used to relate the in vitro endpoint (t(50)) obtained in the study to a Draize MMAS (modified maximum average score). This provided a measure of the predicted in vivo eye irritation scores. In the current study, two separate laboratories used the same protocol to test the same set of coded materials and the results of both laboratories were compared to the initial PM. The TEA met the reliability criteria of the validation study in reproducing the predefined PM in both laboratories, and a good relationship between predicted and observed Draize MMAS values was obtained (r=0.906 and r=0.850). Good correlations were maintained when separate analyses were made of the formulations and ingredients included in the test set. Good relationships between the in vitro endpoint and individual Draize tissue scores (r>0.8) were also exhibited. Although insufficient data were available to make an assessment of interlaboratory variation, some difference in the reproducibility of the assay was noted between the two laboratories, particularly for the highly irritating materials. However, the consistency of data was encouraging and the discrepancies seen between the laboratories suggested a sensitivity of the model to subtle differences in application techniques, and in handling and timing. Taken together, these results indicate the utility of the TEA test for these types of substances and the need to more fully address the issue of interlaboratory reproducibility.

Comparison of the toxicity of aqueous and ethanol fractions of Angelica keiskei leaf using the eye irritancy test

To determine whether aqueous and ethanol fractions of the Angelica keiskei leaf exert toxicity when used for cosmetic purposes, we performed the acute eye irritancy test. Animals were treated with sample fractions (100 mg/dose) according to standard procedure guidelines. No significant changes or damage was detected in the fraction-treated groups in terms of ocular lesions in the cornea, the size of the cornea with turbidity, swelling of the eyelid and emission discharge. However, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, a positive control, induced severe toxic symptoms. Thus, aqueous and ethanol fractions of Angelica keiskei do not appear to induce acute toxicity in the eye lens, as assessed from anatomical and pathological observations in the rabbit eye. Our results collectively suggest that aqueous and ethanol fractions show promise as cosmetic ingredients that do not cause eye toxicity.

In vitro assessment of eye irritancy using the Reconstructed Human Corneal Epithelial SkinEthic HCE model: application to 435 substances from consumer products industry

The 7th amendment of the EU Cosmetics Directive led to the ban of eye irritation testing for cosmetic ingredients in animals, effective from March 11th 2009. Over the last 20years, many efforts have been made to find reliable and relevant alternative methods. The SkinEthic HCE model was used to evaluate the in vitro eye irritancy potential of substances from a cosmetic industry portfolio. An optimized protocol based on a specific 1-h treatment and a 16-h post-treatment incubation period was first assessed on a set of 102 substances. The prediction model (PM) based on a 50% viability cut-off, allowed to draw up two classes (Irritants and Non-Irritants), with good associated sensitivity (86.2%) and specificity (83.5%). To check the robustness of the method, the evaluated set was expanded up to 435 substances. Final performances maintained a high level and were characterized by an overall accuracy value > 82% when using EU or GHS classification rules. Results showed that the SkinEthic HCE test method is a promising in vitro tool for the prediction of eye irritancy. Optimization datasets were shared with the COLIPA Eye Irritation Project Team and ECVAM experts, and reviewed as part of an ongoing progression to enter an ECVAM prospective validation study for eye irritation.

In vitro alternatives to the use of animals in ocular toxicology testing

Chemical substances, including household products, industrial chemicals, and cosmetics, must be tested for ocular toxicity or irritancy so that the public can be assured of their safety or warned of dangers associated with their use. The in vivo Draize test is the standard method used to meet this requirement; however, this test is coming under increasing criticism on scientific and ethical grounds. This has led to the development of a large number of proposed in vitro tests, some of which are routinely used to screen chemicals in toxicology laboratories. This review addresses regulations governing ocular irritancy testing and the current status of the movement toward use of alternative methods. Such methods include the use of cultured cells, hen's eggs, isolated animal eyes and corneas, human corneal epithelial cell lines, and the recently developed in vitro corneal equivalent models. The protocols for these methods are outlined, and their endpoints are described with respect to prediction of in vivo responses. The tests are evaluated in the context of the outcomes of validation studies and acceptance by regulatory agencies. While several of these tests yield useful information concerning ocular irritancy, to date, no in vitro alternative test has been validated as a replacement for the Draize test. If the goal of replacing the in vivo test while protecting the public from chemical eye injury is to be achieved, further development and improvement of alternative tests, as well as establishment of a human ocular toxicity data base, are required.

Development of a hemicornea from human primary cell cultures for pharmacotoxicology testing

We report the reconstruction and characterization of a hemicornea (epithelialized stroma), using primary human cells, for use in research and as an alternative to the use of animals in pharmacotoxicology testing. To create a stromal equivalent, keratocytes from human corneas were cultured in collagen-glycosaminoglycan-chitosan foams. Limbal stem cell-derived epithelial cells were seeded on top of these, giving rise to hemi-corneas. The epithelium appeared morphologically similar to its physiological counterpart, as shown by the basal cell expression of p63 isoforms including, in some cases, the stem cell marker p63DeltaNalpha, and the expression of keratin 3 and 14-3-3sigma in the upper cell layers. In addition, the cuboidal basal epithelial cells were anchored to a basement membrane containing collagen IV, laminin 5, and hemidesmosomes. In the stromal part, the keratocytes colonized the porous scaffold, formed a network of interconnecting cells, and synthesized an ultrastructurally organized extracellular matrix (ECM) containing collagen types I, V, and VI. Electron microscopy showed the newly synthesized collagen fibrils to have characteristic periodic striations, with diameters and interfibril spacings similar to those found in natural corneas. Compared to existing models for corneal pharmacotoxicology testing, this new model more closely approaches physiological conditions by including the inducing effects of mesenchyme and cell-matrix interactions on epithelial cell morphogenesis.

Reconstituted human corneal epithelium: a new alternative to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals and cosmetic products

The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of a new three-dimensional epithelial model cultivated from human corneal cells to replace animal testing in the assessment of eye tolerance. To this end, 65 formulated cosmetic products and 36 chemicals were tested by means of this in vitro model using a simplified toxicokinetic approach. The chemicals were selected from the ECETOC data bank and the EC/HO International validation study list. Very satisfactory results were obtained in terms of concordance with the Draize test data for the formulated cosmetic products. Moreover, the response of the corneal model appeared predictive of human ocular response clinically observed by ophthalmologists. The in vitro scores for the chemicals tested strongly correlated with their respective scores in vivo. For all the compounds tested, the response of the corneal model to irritants was similar regardless of their chemical structure, suggesting a good robustness of the prediction model proposed. We concluded that this new three-dimensional epithelial model, developed from human corneal cells, could be promising for the prediction of eye irritation induced by chemicals and complex formulated products, and that these two types of materials should be tested using a similar protocol. A simple shortening of the exposure period was required for the chemicals assumed to be more aggressively irritant to the epithelial tissues than the cosmetic formulae.

The potential of lipid emulsion for ocular delivery of lipophilic drugs

For nearly a decade, oil-in-water lipid emulsions containing either anionic or cationic droplets have been recognized as an interesting and promising ocular topical delivery vehicle for lipophilic drugs. The aim of this review is to present the potential of lipid emulsions for ocular delivery of lipophilic drugs. The review covers an update on the state of the art of incorporating the lipophilic drugs, a brief description concerning the components and the classification of lipid emulsions. The ocular fate following topical instillation, safety evaluation experiments and the applications of lipid emulsions are thoroughly discussed.

Sensory nerves, neurogenic inflammation and pain: missing components of alternative irritation strategies? A review and a potential strategy

The eyes and skin are highly innervated by sensory nerves; stimulation of these nerves by irritants may give rise to neurogenic inflammation, leading to sensory irritation and pain. Few in vitro models of neurogenic inflammation have been described in conjunction with alternative skin and eye irritation methods, despite the fact that the sensory innervation of these organs is well-documented. To date, alternative approaches to the Draize skin and eye irritation tests have proved largely successful at classifying severe irritants, but are generally poor at discriminating between agents with mild to moderate irritant potential. We propose that the development of in vitro models for the prediction of sensory stimulation will assist in the re-classification of the irritant potential of agents that are under-predicted by current in vitro strategies. This review describes the range of xenobiotics known to cause inflammation and pain through the stimulation of sensory nerves, as well as the endogenous mediators and receptor types that are involved. In particular, it focuses on the vanilloid receptor, its activators and its regulation, as these receptors function as integrators of responses to numerous noxious stimuli. Cell culture models and ex vivo preparations that have the potential to serve as predictors of sensory irritation are also described. In addition, as readily available sensory neuron cell line models are few in number, stem cell lines (with the capacity to differentiate into sensory neurons) are explored. Finally, a preliminary strategy to enable assessment of whether incorporation of a sensory component will enhance the predictive power of current in vitro eye and skin testing strategies is proposed.

An in vitro model for detecting skin irritants: methyl green-pyronine staining of human skin explant cultures

We evaluated the potential of human organotypic skin explant cultures (hOSECs) for screening skin irritants. Test chemicals were applied to the epidermis of the skin explants which were incubated for 4, 24 or 48 h in tissue culture medium. A decrease in epidermal RNA staining, visualised in frozen sections using a modified methyl-green pyronine (MGP) staining procedure, was used as a marker of irritancy. A decrease in epidermal RNA after a 4-, 24- or 48-h exposure to a certain concentration of a test chemical equated to a MGP score of 3, 2 or 1, respectively. The MGP score was 0 if there was no keratinocyte cytotoxicity after a 48-h exposure. A minimum of three donors were used per chemical and the average MGP score was used to classify the chemical as irritant or not. Chemicals with an average MGP score > or =1.5 were classified as irritants (R38), at that concentration. Chemicals with a MGP score <1.5 were not classified (NC), at that concentration. The results obtained using human skin in vitro were compared with published data obtained using cultured porcine skin, the cutaneous Draize test (from this point referred to as the "rabbit skin irritation test") and volunteer studies. There was an excellent correlation between the classification of a chemical, as R38 or NC, based on hOSEC and results of volunteer studies. The hOSEC model predicted perfectly the irritation hazard of the 22 chemicals for which volunteer data were available. The porcine OSEC correctly predicted the classification of 21 of 22 (95%) chemicals and the rabbit skin irritation test correctly predicted the classification of 14 of 15 chemicals (93%) for which data were available. In conclusion, MGP staining of human skin explant cultures can be used to predicted human skin irritancy in vivo. In addition, the data validate the use of porcine skin as an alternative to human skin for screening for dermal irritants in vitro.

Engineering cellular microenvironments to improve cell-based drug testing

Recent progress in the biology of cell adhesion is enabling cell culture models to better reproduce in vivo functions. Cues from adhesion to extracellular matrix and neighboring cells are important regulators of cell behaviors. The recent adaptation of semiconductor tools to spatially organize cells and their adhesions has enhanced our ability to engineer cell functions ex vivo. By using these tools to create more in vivo-like cultures, cell-based drug discovery and target validation could be improved. This review explores the biological advances made by these microfabrication tools and discusses how they could enable high-throughput cell-based assays.

Comparative evaluation of five in vitro tests for assessing the eye irritation potential of hair-care products

This study compared five methods, the isolated rabbit eye (IRE), bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP), EpiOcular, fluorescein leakage (FL) and neutral red release (NRR) assays, for predicting the eye irritation potential of hair-care formulations. Ten shampoo and seven conditioner formulations of known ocular irritation potential were tested. Each group included a market-acceptable formulation as a comparative benchmark. Predictions of ocular irritation were made by using classification models (IRE, BCOP and EpiOcular assays) or by direct comparison with benchmarks (IRE, EpiOcular, FL and NRR assays). The BCOP assay was less sensitive than the IRE test in discriminating between formulations of different irritation potentials, and did not perform as well as the other assays in identifying mild formulations. All of the assays appeared to be better at discriminating correctly between the shampoos than between the conditioners. The EpiOcular assay showed the closest concordance between the in vivo results and the in vitro data from cell-based assays (particularly for shampoos). The FL assay also showed a high concordance (particularly for conditioners). There was a tendency for these in vitro assays to over-predict eye irritation potential, but there was no under-prediction and they were particularly successful at identifying mild formulations. The NRR assay was less predictive with both shampoos and conditioners. The results from this comparative evaluation fully support the continued use of the IRE test as a suitable alternative to in vivo eye irritation testing in rabbits, although it also over-predicted the irritancies of several of the formulations. The value of using concurrent benchmarks (reference standards), appropriate to the materials being tested, in interpreting the data obtained from in vitro tests, was also demonstrated. Overall, the results indicate that further comparisons of the IRE, EpiOcular and FL assays are warranted using much larger numbers of test materials.

Bovine corneal stroma and epithelium reconstructed in vitro: characterisation and response to surfactants

In order to define safety profiles and proper handling procedures for new industrial products, it is essential to determine their potential for ocular irritation. The Draize test is normally employed but it involves using rabbits. There is today a great need for all researchers to limit the use of animals for laboratory experiments and to encourage the development and adoption of alternative in vitro methods to evaluate the potential toxicity of new products. This study proposes a three-dimensional model of bovine corneal stroma and epithelium that is not only easy to reproduce but may also be used in the toxicological field as an alternative to animal experimentation. The data presented here show that this model allows the growth of epithelium similar in features to in vivo epithelium. Basal cells are cube-shaped, whereas superficial areas are horizontally longer; desmosomes and 64 kDa keratin, as a marker for differentiation of corneal epithelial cells, are both expressed; the basal lamina is synthesised also. The 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was carried out on the model to evaluate the toxicity of some surfactants: benzalkonium chloride, Triton X-100, sodium dodecylsulphate and Tween 20. Since the in vitro data fit very well the results of the Draize test in vivo as reported in the literature, the three-dimensional culture may be used to predict the potential cytotoxicity of surfactants.

IRAG working group 5. Other assays. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group

As part of the Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group (IRAG) program to evaluate the state of the art in the development of alternative (non-whole animal) eye irritation tests, academic and industrial organizations were invited to submit in vitro eye irritation data generated in their laboratories to one of several working groups for review. The assays reviewed in this report (from Working Group 5. "Other Assays") were the EYTEX assay, tissue equivalent assay, a cytotoxicity assay using three-dimensional human fibroblast constructs, the Microtox assay, and other miscellaneous assays. Each submission consisted of raw data for chemicals and products tested, a description of the methodology, and an analysis (generally by regression analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient) for the performance of the in vitro test relative to its ability to predict individual ocular tissue scores or total ocular score. In vivo data were generated according to the scoring methods proposed by Draize. Working Group 5 evaluated the submissions and commented on the utility of the assays. The variability of the in vivo data made conclusions difficult in many situations. Most of these assays were deemed useful (within limited chemical classes) for screening purposes or for use in conjunction with other toxicological information.