1
|
Hoshikawa K, Fujita S, Renhu N, Ezura K, Yamamoto T, Nonaka S, Ezura H, Miura K. Efficient transient protein expression in tomato cultivars and wild species using agroinfiltration-mediated high expression system. PLANT CELL REPORTS 2019; 38:75-84. [PMID: 30328507 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-018-2350-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/07/2018] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
The new transient protein expression system using the pBYR2HS vector is applicable to several tomato cultivars and wild species with high level of protein expression. Innovation and improvement of effective tools for transient protein expression in plant cells is critical for the development of plant biotechnology. We have created the new transient protein expression system using the pBYR2HS vector that led to about 4 mg/g fresh weight of protein expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. In this study, we validated the adaptability of this transient protein expression system by agroinfiltration to leaves and fruits of several tomato cultivars and wild species. Although the GFP protein was transiently expressed in the leaves and fruits of all tomato cultivars and wild species, we observed species-specific differences in protein expression. In particular, GFP protein expression was higher in the leaves and fruits of Micro-Tom, Solanum pimpinellifolium (0043) and S. pimpinellifolium (0049-w1) than in those of cultivars and wild species. Furthermore, Agrobacterium with GABA transaminase enhanced transient expression in tomato fruits of Micro-Tom. Taken together with these results, our system is applicable to several tomato cultivars and species as well as a model tomato, even though characteristics are often different among tomato cultivars or species. Thus, the system is an effective, simple, and valuable tool to achieve rapid transgene expression to examine gene function in tomato plant cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Hoshikawa
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
- Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, 1-1 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8686, Japan
| | - Satoshi Fujita
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
| | - Na Renhu
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ezura
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Yamamoto
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
| | - Satoko Nonaka
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
- Tsukuba-Plant Innovation Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ezura
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan.
- Tsukuba-Plant Innovation Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan.
| | - Kenji Miura
- Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan.
- Tsukuba-Plant Innovation Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serrato-Capuchina A, Matute DR. The Role of Transposable Elements in Speciation. Genes (Basel) 2018; 9:E254. [PMID: 29762547 PMCID: PMC5977194 DOI: 10.3390/genes9050254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the phenotypic and molecular mechanisms that contribute to genetic diversity between and within species is fundamental in studying the evolution of species. In particular, identifying the interspecific differences that lead to the reduction or even cessation of gene flow between nascent species is one of the main goals of speciation genetic research. Transposable elements (TEs) are DNA sequences with the ability to move within genomes. TEs are ubiquitous throughout eukaryotic genomes and have been shown to alter regulatory networks, gene expression, and to rearrange genomes as a result of their transposition. However, no systematic effort has evaluated the role of TEs in speciation. We compiled the evidence for TEs as potential causes of reproductive isolation across a diversity of taxa. We find that TEs are often associated with hybrid defects that might preclude the fusion between species, but that the involvement of TEs in other barriers to gene flow different from postzygotic isolation is still relatively unknown. Finally, we list a series of guides and research avenues to disentangle the effects of TEs on the origin of new species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Serrato-Capuchina
- Biology Department, Genome Sciences Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
| | - Daniel R Matute
- Biology Department, Genome Sciences Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
SGT1 is required in PcINF1/SRC2-1 induced pepper defense response by interacting with SRC2-1. Sci Rep 2016; 6:21651. [PMID: 26898479 PMCID: PMC4761932 DOI: 10.1038/srep21651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PcINF1 was previously found to induce pepper defense response by interacting with SRC2-1, but the underlying mechanism remains uninvestigated. Herein, we describe the involvement of SGT1 in the PcINF1/SRC2-1-induced immunity. SGT1 was observed to be up-regulated by Phytophthora capsici inoculation and synergistically transient overexpression of PcINF1/SRC2-1 in pepper plants. SGT1-silencing compromised HR cell death, blocked H2O2 accumulation, and downregulated HR-associated and hormones-dependent marker genes’ expression triggered by PcINF1/SRC2-1 co-overexpression. The interaction between SRC2-1 and SGT1 was found by the yeast two hybrid system and was further confirmed by bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation analyses. The SGT1/SRC2-1 interaction was enhanced by transient overexpression of PcINF1 and Phytophthora capsici inoculation, and SGT1-silencing attenuated PcINF1/SRC2-1 interaction. Additionally, by modulating subcellular localizations of SRC2-1, SGT1, and the interacting complex of SGT1/SRC2-1, it was revealed that exclusive nuclear targeting of the SGT1/SRC2-1 complex blocks immunity triggered by formation of SGT1/SRC2-1, and a translocation of the SGT1/SRC2-1 complex from the plasma membrane and cytoplasm to the nuclei upon the inoculation of P. capsici. Our data demonstrate that the SGT1/SRC2-1 interaction, and its nucleocytoplasmic partitioning, is involved in pepper’s immunity against P. capsici, thus providing a molecular link between Ca2+ signaling associated SRC2-1 and SGT1-mediated defense signaling.
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu ZQ, Qiu AL, Shi LP, Cai JS, Huang XY, Yang S, Wang B, Shen L, Huang MK, Mou SL, Ma XL, Liu YY, Lin L, Wen JY, Tang Q, Shi W, Guan DY, Lai Y, He SL. SRC2-1 is required in PcINF1-induced pepper immunity by acting as an interacting partner of PcINF1. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY 2015; 66:3683-98. [PMID: 25922484 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Elicitins are elicitors that can trigger hypersensitive cell death in most Nicotiana spp., but their underlying molecular mechanism is not well understood. The gene Phytophthora capsici INF1 (PcINF1) coding for an elicitin from P. capsici was characterized in this study. Transient overexpression of PcINF1 triggered cell death in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and was accompanied by upregulation of the hypersensitive response marker, Hypersensitive Induced Reaction gene 1 (HIR1), and the pathogenesis-related genes SAR82, DEF1, BPR1, and PO2. A putative PcINF1-interacting protein, SRC2-1, was isolated from a pepper cDNA library by yeast two-hybrid screening and was observed to target the plasma membrane. The interaction between PcINF1 and SRC2-1 was confirmed by bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation. Simultaneous transient overexpression of SRC2-1 and PcINF1 in pepper plants triggered intensive cell death, whereas silencing of SRC2-1 by virus-induced gene silencing blocked the cell death induction of PcINF1 and increased the susceptibility of pepper plants to P. capsici infection. Additionally, membrane targeting of the PcINF1-SRC2-1 complex was required for cell death induction. The C2 domain of SRC2-1 was crucial for SRC2-1 plasma membrane targeting and the PcINF1-SRC2-1 interaction. These results suggest that SRC2-1 interacts with PcINF1 and is required in PcINF1-induced pepper immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-qin Liu
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Ai-lian Qiu
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Lan-ping Shi
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Jin-sen Cai
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Xue-ying Huang
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Sheng Yang
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Bo Wang
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Lei Shen
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Mu-kun Huang
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Shao-liang Mou
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Xiao-Ling Ma
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Yan-yan Liu
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Lin Lin
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Jia-yu Wen
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Qian Tang
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Wei Shi
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - De-yi Guan
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Yan Lai
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| | - Shui-lin He
- National Education Minster Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Comprehensive Utilization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China College of Crop Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fry WE, Birch PRJ, Judelson HS, Grünwald NJ, Danies G, Everts KL, Gevens AJ, Gugino BK, Johnson DA, Johnson SB, McGrath MT, Myers KL, Ristaino JB, Roberts PD, Secor G, Smart CD. Five Reasons to Consider Phytophthora infestans a Reemerging Pathogen. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 105:966-81. [PMID: 25760519 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-15-0005-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans has been a named pathogen for well over 150 years and yet it continues to "emerge", with thousands of articles published each year on it and the late blight disease that it causes. This review explores five attributes of this oomycete pathogen that maintain this constant attention. First, the historical tragedy associated with this disease (Irish potato famine) causes many people to be fascinated with the pathogen. Current technology now enables investigators to answer some questions of historical significance. Second, the devastation caused by the pathogen continues to appear in surprising new locations or with surprising new intensity. Third, populations of P. infestans worldwide are in flux, with changes that have major implications to disease management. Fourth, the genomics revolution has enabled investigators to make tremendous progress in terms of understanding the molecular biology (especially the pathogenicity) of P. infestans. Fifth, there remain many compelling unanswered questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W E Fry
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - P R J Birch
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - H S Judelson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - N J Grünwald
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - G Danies
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - K L Everts
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - A J Gevens
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - B K Gugino
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - D A Johnson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - S B Johnson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - M T McGrath
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - K L Myers
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - J B Ristaino
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - P D Roberts
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - G Secor
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - C D Smart
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kamoun S, Furzer O, Jones JDG, Judelson HS, Ali GS, Dalio RJD, Roy SG, Schena L, Zambounis A, Panabières F, Cahill D, Ruocco M, Figueiredo A, Chen XR, Hulvey J, Stam R, Lamour K, Gijzen M, Tyler BM, Grünwald NJ, Mukhtar MS, Tomé DFA, Tör M, Van Den Ackerveken G, McDowell J, Daayf F, Fry WE, Lindqvist-Kreuze H, Meijer HJG, Petre B, Ristaino J, Yoshida K, Birch PRJ, Govers F. The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2015; 16:413-34. [PMID: 25178392 PMCID: PMC6638381 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 462] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Oomycetes form a deep lineage of eukaryotic organisms that includes a large number of plant pathogens which threaten natural and managed ecosystems. We undertook a survey to query the community for their ranking of plant-pathogenic oomycete species based on scientific and economic importance. In total, we received 263 votes from 62 scientists in 15 countries for a total of 33 species. The Top 10 species and their ranking are: (1) Phytophthora infestans; (2, tied) Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis; (2, tied) Phytophthora ramorum; (4) Phytophthora sojae; (5) Phytophthora capsici; (6) Plasmopara viticola; (7) Phytophthora cinnamomi; (8, tied) Phytophthora parasitica; (8, tied) Pythium ultimum; and (10) Albugo candida. This article provides an introduction to these 10 taxa and a snapshot of current research. We hope that the list will serve as a benchmark for future trends in oomycete research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophien Kamoun
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vleeshouwers VGAA, Oliver RP. Effectors as Tools in Disease Resistance Breeding Against Biotrophic, Hemibiotrophic, and Necrotrophic Plant Pathogens. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2015; 2015:40-50. [PMID: 27839074 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-10-13-0313-ta.testissue] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
One of most important challenges in plant breeding is improving resistance to the plethora of pathogens that threaten our crops. The ever-growing world population, changing pathogen populations, and fungicide resistance issues have increased the urgency of this task. In addition to a vital inflow of novel resistance sources into breeding programs, the functional characterization and deployment of resistance also needs improvement. Therefore, plant breeders need to adopt new strategies and techniques. In modern resistance breeding, effectors are emerging as tools to accelerate and improve the identification, functional characterization, and deployment of resistance genes. Since genome-wide catalogues of effectors have become available for various pathogens, including biotrophs as well as necrotrophs, effector-assisted breeding has been shown to be successful for various crops. "Effectoromics" has contributed to classical resistance breeding as well as for genetically modified approaches. Here, we present an overview of how effector-assisted breeding and deployment is being exploited for various pathosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivianne G A A Vleeshouwers
- 1 Wageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Oliver
- 2 Australian Centre for Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogens, Curtin University, Perth WA 6845, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vleeshouwers VGAA, Oliver RP. Effectors as Tools in Disease Resistance Breeding Against Biotrophic, Hemibiotrophic, and Necrotrophic Plant Pathogens. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2015; 2015:17-27. [PMID: 27839075 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-10-13-0313-cr.testissue] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
One of most important challenges in plant breeding is improving resistance to the plethora of pathogens that threaten our crops. The ever-growing world population, changing pathogen populations, and fungicide resistance issues have increased the urgency of this task. In addition to a vital inflow of novel resistance sources into breeding programs, the functional characterization and deployment of resistance also needs improvement. Therefore, plant breeders need to adopt new strategies and techniques. In modern resistance breeding, effectors are emerging as tools to accelerate and improve the identification, functional characterization, and deployment of resistance genes. Since genome-wide catalogues of effectors have become available for various pathogens, including biotrophs as well as necrotrophs, effector-assisted breeding has been shown to be successful for various crops. "Effectoromics" has contributed to classical resistance breeding as well as for genetically modified approaches. Here, we present an overview of how effector-assisted breeding and deployment is being exploited for various pathosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivianne G A A Vleeshouwers
- 1 Wageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Oliver
- 2 Australian Centre for Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogens, Curtin University, Perth WA 6845, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saubeau G, Gaillard F, Legentil L, Nugier-Chauvin C, Ferrières V, Andrivon D, Val F. Identification of three elicitins and a galactan-based complex polysaccharide from a concentrated culture filtrate of Phytophthora infestans efficient against Pectobacterium atrosepticum. Molecules 2014; 19:15374-90. [PMID: 25264828 PMCID: PMC6270706 DOI: 10.3390/molecules191015374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2014] [Revised: 09/10/2014] [Accepted: 09/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The induction of plant immunity by Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) constitutes a powerful strategy for crop protection. PAMPs indeed induce general defense responses in plants and thus increase plant resistance to pathogens. Phytophthora infestans culture filtrates (CCFs) are known to induce defense responses and decrease the severity of soft rot due to Pectobacterium atrosepticum in potato tubers. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize the active compounds from P. infestans filtrate. The filtrate was fractionated by gel filtration, and the protection effects against P. atrosepticum and the ability to induce PAL activity were tested for each fraction. The fraction active in protection (F1) also induced PAL activity, as did the whole filtrate. Three elicitins (INF1, INF4 and INF5) were identified in F1b, subfraction of F1, by MALDI-TOF-MS and MS/MS analyses. However, deproteinized F1b still showed biological activity against the bacterium, revealing the presence of an additional active compound. GC-MS analyses of the deproteinized fraction highlighted the presence of a galactan-based complex polysaccharide. These experiments demonstrate that the biological activity of the CCF against P. atrosepticum results from a combined action of three elicitins and a complex polysaccharide, probably through the activation of general defense responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fanny Gaillard
- CNRS-Université Pierre et Marie Curie, FR2424, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Roscoff-Cedex 29682, France.
| | - Laurent Legentil
- Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6226, 11 Allée de Beaulieu, CS 50837, Rennes Cedex 7 35708, France.
| | - Caroline Nugier-Chauvin
- Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6226, 11 Allée de Beaulieu, CS 50837, Rennes Cedex 7 35708, France.
| | - Vincent Ferrières
- Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6226, 11 Allée de Beaulieu, CS 50837, Rennes Cedex 7 35708, France.
| | | | - Florence Val
- Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1349 IGEPP, Rennes F-35000, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Randall E, Young V, Sierotzki H, Scalliet G, Birch PRJ, Cooke DEL, Csukai M, Whisson SC. Sequence diversity in the large subunit of RNA polymerase I contributes to Mefenoxam insensitivity in Phytophthora infestans. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2014; 15:664-76. [PMID: 24521429 PMCID: PMC6638662 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Phenylamide fungicides have been widely used for the control of oomycete-incited plant diseases for over 30 years. Insensitivity to this chemical class of fungicide was recorded early in its usage history, but the precise protein(s) conditioning insensitivity has proven difficult to determine. To determine the genetic basis of insensitivity and to inform strategies for the cloning of the gene(s) responsible, genetic crosses were established between Mefenoxam sensitive and intermediate insensitive isolates of Phytophthora infestans, the potato late blight pathogen. F1 progeny showed the expected semi-dominant phenotypes for Mefenoxam insensitivity and suggested the involvement of multiple loci, complicating the positional cloning of the gene(s) conditioning insensitivity to Mefenoxam. Instead, a candidate gene strategy was used, based on previous observations that the primary effect of phenylamide compounds is to inhibit ribosomal RNA synthesis. The subunits of RNA polymerase I (RNApolI) were sequenced from sensitive and insensitive isolates and F1 progeny. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) specific to insensitive field isolates were identified in the gene encoding the large subunit of RNApolI. In a survey of field isolates, SNP T1145A (Y382F) showed an 86% association with Mefenoxam insensitivity. Isolates not showing this association belonged predominantly to one P. infestans genotype. The transfer of the 'insensitive' allele of RPA190 to a sensitive isolate yielded transgenic lines that were insensitive to Mefenoxam. These results demonstrate that sequence variation in RPA190 contributes to insensitivity to Mefenoxam in P. infestans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Randall
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krajaejun T, Lerksuthirat T, Garg G, Lowhnoo T, Yingyong W, Khositnithikul R, Tangphatsornruang S, Suriyaphol P, Ranganathan S, Sullivan TD. Transcriptome analysis reveals pathogenicity and evolutionary history of the pathogenic oomycete Pythium insidiosum. Fungal Biol 2014; 118:640-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2014.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Revised: 12/03/2013] [Accepted: 01/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
12
|
Vleeshouwers VGAA, Oliver RP. Effectors as tools in disease resistance breeding against biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic plant pathogens. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2014; 27:196-206. [PMID: 24405032 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-10-13-0313-ia] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
One of most important challenges in plant breeding is improving resistance to the plethora of pathogens that threaten our crops. The ever-growing world population, changing pathogen populations, and fungicide resistance issues have increased the urgency of this task. In addition to a vital inflow of novel resistance sources into breeding programs, the functional characterization and deployment of resistance also needs improvement. Therefore, plant breeders need to adopt new strategies and techniques. In modern resistance breeding, effectors are emerging as tools to accelerate and improve the identification, functional characterization, and deployment of resistance genes. Since genome-wide catalogues of effectors have become available for various pathogens, including biotrophs as well as necrotrophs, effector-assisted breeding has been shown to be successful for various crops. "Effectoromics" has contributed to classical resistance breeding as well as for genetically modified approaches. Here, we present an overview of how effector-assisted breeding and deployment is being exploited for various pathosystems.
Collapse
|
13
|
Draffehn AM, Li L, Krezdorn N, Ding J, Lübeck J, Strahwald J, Muktar MS, Walkemeier B, Rotter B, Gebhardt C. Comparative transcript profiling by SuperSAGE identifies novel candidate genes for controlling potato quantitative resistance to late blight not compromised by late maturity. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2013; 4:423. [PMID: 24294214 PMCID: PMC3827546 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Accepted: 10/05/2013] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Resistance to pathogens is essential for survival of wild and cultivated plants. Pathogen susceptibility causes major losses of crop yield and quality. Durable field resistance combined with high yield and other superior agronomic characters are therefore, important objectives in every crop breeding program. Precision and efficacy of resistance breeding can be enhanced by molecular diagnostic tools, which result from knowledge of the molecular basis of resistance and susceptibility. Breeding uses resistance conferred by single R genes and polygenic quantitative resistance. The latter is partial but considered more durable. Molecular mechanisms of plant pathogen interactions are elucidated mainly in experimental systems involving single R genes, whereas most genes important for quantitative resistance in crops like potato are unknown. Quantitative resistance of potato to Phytophthora infestans causing late blight is often compromised by late plant maturity, a negative agronomic character. Our objective was to identify candidate genes for quantitative resistance to late blight not compromised by late plant maturity. We used diagnostic DNA-markers to select plants with different field levels of maturity corrected resistance (MCR) to late blight and compared their leaf transcriptomes before and after infection with P. infestans using SuperSAGE (serial analysis of gene expression) technology and next generation sequencing. We identified 2034 transcripts up or down regulated upon infection, including a homolog of the kiwi fruit allergen kiwellin. 806 transcripts showed differential expression between groups of genotypes with contrasting MCR levels. The observed expression patterns suggest that MCR is in part controlled by differential transcript levels in uninfected plants. Functional annotation suggests that, besides biotic and abiotic stress responses, general cellular processes such as photosynthesis, protein biosynthesis, and degradation play a role in MCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid M. Draffehn
- Department Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologne, Germany
| | - Li Li
- Department Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologne, Germany
| | | | - Jia Ding
- Department Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologne, Germany
| | - Jens Lübeck
- Saka-Pflanzenzucht GmbH & Co. KGWindeby, Germany
| | | | - Meki S. Muktar
- Department Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologne, Germany
| | - Birgit Walkemeier
- Department Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologne, Germany
| | | | - Christiane Gebhardt
- Department Plant Breeding and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yoshida K, Schuenemann VJ, Cano LM, Pais M, Mishra B, Sharma R, Lanz C, Martin FN, Kamoun S, Krause J, Thines M, Weigel D, Burbano HA. The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. eLife 2013; 2:e00731. [PMID: 23741619 PMCID: PMC3667578 DOI: 10.7554/elife.00731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 213] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Accepted: 05/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans, the cause of potato late blight, is infamous for having triggered the Irish Great Famine in the 1840s. Until the late 1970s, P. infestans diversity outside of its Mexican center of origin was low, and one scenario held that a single strain, US-1, had dominated the global population for 150 years; this was later challenged based on DNA analysis of historical herbarium specimens. We have compared the genomes of 11 herbarium and 15 modern strains. We conclude that the 19th century epidemic was caused by a unique genotype, HERB-1, that persisted for over 50 years. HERB-1 is distinct from all examined modern strains, but it is a close relative of US-1, which replaced it outside of Mexico in the 20th century. We propose that HERB-1 and US-1 emerged from a metapopulation that was established in the early 1800s outside of the species' center of diversity. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00731.001.
Collapse
|
15
|
Yoshida K, Schuenemann VJ, Cano LM, Pais M, Mishra B, Sharma R, Lanz C, Martin FN, Kamoun S, Krause J, Thines M, Weigel D, Burbano HA. The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. eLife 2013. [PMID: 23741619 DOI: 10.7554/elife.00731.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans, the cause of potato late blight, is infamous for having triggered the Irish Great Famine in the 1840s. Until the late 1970s, P. infestans diversity outside of its Mexican center of origin was low, and one scenario held that a single strain, US-1, had dominated the global population for 150 years; this was later challenged based on DNA analysis of historical herbarium specimens. We have compared the genomes of 11 herbarium and 15 modern strains. We conclude that the 19th century epidemic was caused by a unique genotype, HERB-1, that persisted for over 50 years. HERB-1 is distinct from all examined modern strains, but it is a close relative of US-1, which replaced it outside of Mexico in the 20th century. We propose that HERB-1 and US-1 emerged from a metapopulation that was established in the early 1800s outside of the species' center of diversity. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00731.001.
Collapse
|
16
|
Vetukuri RR, Åsman AKM, Tellgren-Roth C, Jahan SN, Reimegård J, Fogelqvist J, Savenkov E, Söderbom F, Avrova AO, Whisson SC, Dixelius C. Evidence for small RNAs homologous to effector-encoding genes and transposable elements in the oomycete Phytophthora infestans. PLoS One 2012; 7:e51399. [PMID: 23272103 PMCID: PMC3522703 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2012] [Accepted: 10/31/2012] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans is the oomycete pathogen responsible for the devastating late blight disease on potato and tomato. There is presently an intense research focus on the role(s) of effectors in promoting late blight disease development. However, little is known about how they are regulated, or how diversity in their expression may be generated among different isolates. Here we present data from investigation of RNA silencing processes, characterized by non-coding small RNA molecules (sRNA) of 19-40 nt. From deep sequencing of sRNAs we have identified sRNAs matching numerous RxLR and Crinkler (CRN) effector protein genes in two isolates differing in pathogenicity. Effector gene-derived sRNAs were present in both isolates, but exhibited marked differences in abundance, especially for CRN effectors. Small RNAs in P. infestans grouped into three clear size classes of 21, 25/26 and 32 nt. Small RNAs from all size classes mapped to RxLR effector genes, but notably 21 nt sRNAs were the predominant size class mapping to CRN effector genes. Some effector genes, such as PiAvr3a, to which sRNAs were found, also exhibited differences in transcript accumulation between the two isolates. The P. infestans genome is rich in transposable elements, and the majority of sRNAs of all size classes mapped to these sequences, predominantly to long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons. RNA silencing of Dicer and Argonaute genes provided evidence that generation of 21 nt sRNAs is Dicer-dependent, while accumulation of longer sRNAs was impacted by silencing of Argonaute genes. Additionally, we identified six microRNA (miRNA) candidates from our sequencing data, their precursor sequences from the genome sequence, and target mRNAs. These miRNA candidates have features characteristic of both plant and metazoan miRNAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh R Vetukuri
- Department of Plant Biology and Forest Genetics, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ketelaar T, Meijer HJG, Spiekerman M, Weide R, Govers F. Effects of latrunculin B on the actin cytoskeleton and hyphal growth in Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Genet Biol 2012; 49:1014-22. [PMID: 23036581 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2012] [Revised: 09/14/2012] [Accepted: 09/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The actin cytoskeleton is conserved in all eukaryotes, but its functions vary among different organisms. In oomycetes, the function of the actin cytoskeleton has received relatively little attention. We have performed a bioinformatics study and show that oomycete actin genes fall within a distinct clade that is divergent from plant, fungal and vertebrate actin genes. To obtain a better understanding of the functions of the actin cytoskeleton in hyphal growth of oomycetes, we studied the actin organization in Phytophthora infestans hyphae and the consequences of treatment with the actin depolymerising drug latrunculin B (latB). This revealed that latB treatment causes a concentration dependent inhibition of colony expansion and aberrant hyphal growth. The most obvious aberrations observed upon treatment with 0.1 μM latB were increased hyphal branching and irregular tube diameters whereas at higher concentrations latB (0.5 and 1 μM) tips of expanding hyphae changed into balloon-like shapes. This aberrant growth correlated with changes in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton. In untreated hyphae, staining with fluorescently tagged phalloidin revealed two populations of actin filaments: long, axially oriented actin filament cables and cortical actin filament plaques. Two hyphal subtypes were recognized, one containing only plaques and the other containing both cables and plaques. In the latter, some hyphae had an apical zone without actin filament plaques. Upon latB treatment, the proportion of hyphae without actin filament cables increased and there were more hyphae with a short apical zone without actin filament plaques. In general, actin filament plaques were more resilient against actin depolymerisation than actin filament cables. Besides disturbing hyphal growth and actin organization, actin depolymerisation also affected the positioning of nuclei. In the presence of latB, the distance between nuclei and the hyphal tip decreased, suggesting that the actin cytoskeleton plays a role in preventing the movement of nuclei towards the hyphal tip.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijs Ketelaar
- Laboratory of Cell Biology, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Orsomando G, Brunetti L, Pucci K, Ruggeri B, Ruggieri S. Comparative structural and functional characterization of putative protein effectors belonging to the PcF toxin family from Phytophthora spp. Protein Sci 2011; 20:2047-59. [PMID: 21936011 PMCID: PMC3302648 DOI: 10.1002/pro.742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2011] [Revised: 09/02/2011] [Accepted: 09/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The PcF Toxin Family (Pfam 09461) includes the characterized phytotoxic protein PcF from Phytophthora cactorum, as well as several predicted protein effectors from other Phytophthora species recently identified by comparative genomics. Here we provide first evidence that such 'putatives', recombinantly expressed in bacteria and purified to homogeneity, similarly to PcF, can trigger defense-related responses on tomato, that is leaf withering and phenylalanine ammonia lyase induction, although with various degrees of effectiveness. In addition, structural prediction by computer-aided homology modeling and subsequent structural/functional comparison after rational engineering of the disulfide-structured protein fold by site-directed mutagenesis, highlighted the surface-exposed conserved amino acid stretch SK(E/C)C as a possible structural determinant responsible for the differential phytotoxicity within this family of cognate protein effectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Silverio Ruggieri
- Dipartimento Patologia Molecolare e Terapie Innovative, Sezione Biochimica, Università Politecnica delle MarcheVia Ranieri 67, Ancona 60131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hamilton JP, Neeno-Eckwall EC, Adhikari BN, Perna NT, Tisserat N, Leach JE, Lévesque CA, Buell CR. The Comprehensive Phytopathogen Genomics Resource: a web-based resource for data-mining plant pathogen genomes. Database (Oxford) 2011; 2011:bar053. [PMID: 22120664 PMCID: PMC3225079 DOI: 10.1093/database/bar053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The Comprehensive Phytopathogen Genomics Resource (CPGR) provides a web-based portal for plant pathologists and diagnosticians to view the genome and trancriptome sequence status of 806 bacterial, fungal, oomycete, nematode, viral and viroid plant pathogens. Tools are available to search and analyze annotated genome sequences of 74 bacterial, fungal and oomycete pathogens. Oomycete and fungal genomes are obtained directly from GenBank, whereas bacterial genome sequences are downloaded from the A Systematic Annotation Package (ASAP) database that provides curation of genomes using comparative approaches. Curated lists of bacterial genes relevant to pathogenicity and avirulence are also provided. The Plant Pathogen Transcript Assemblies Database provides annotated assemblies of the transcribed regions of 82 eukaryotic genomes from publicly available single pass Expressed Sequence Tags. Data-mining tools are provided along with tools to create candidate diagnostic markers, an emerging use for genomic sequence data in plant pathology. The Plant Pathogen Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) database is a resource for pathogens that lack genome or transcriptome data sets and contains 131 755 rDNA sequences from GenBank for 17 613 species identified as plant pathogens and related genera. Database URL: http://cpgr.plantbiology.msu.edu.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Hamilton
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Eric C. Neeno-Eckwall
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Bishwo N. Adhikari
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Nicole T. Perna
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ned Tisserat
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jan E. Leach
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C. André Lévesque
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C. Robin Buell
- Department of Plant Biology, 178 Wilson Lane, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA, Department of Genetics, 4434 Genetics-Biotech Center BLDG, 425 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Plant Science C129, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523–1177, USA, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave., ON, K1A 0C6 and Department of Biology, Carleton University, ON, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Expressed sequence tags reveal genetic diversity and putative virulence factors of the pathogenic oomycete Pythium insidiosum. Fungal Biol 2011; 115:683-96. [PMID: 21724174 DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2011] [Revised: 04/29/2011] [Accepted: 05/02/2011] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Oomycetes are unique eukaryotic microorganisms that share a mycelial morphology with fungi. Many oomycetes are pathogenic to plants, and a more limited number are pathogenic to animals. Pythium insidiosum is the only oomycete that is capable of infecting both humans and animals, and causes a life-threatening infectious disease, called "pythiosis". In the majority of pythiosis patients life-long handicaps result from the inevitable radical excision of infected organs, and many die from advanced infection. Better understanding P. insidiosum pathogenesis at molecular levels could lead to new forms of treatment. Genetic and genomic information is lacking for P. insidiosum, so we have undertaken an expressed sequence tag (EST) study, and report on the first dataset of 486 ESTs, assembled into 217 unigenes. Of these, 144 had significant sequence similarity with known genes, including 47 with ribosomal protein homology. Potential virulence factors included genes involved in antioxidation, thermal adaptation, immunomodulation, and iron and sterol binding. Effectors resembling pathogenicity factors of plant-pathogenic oomycetes were also discovered, such as, a CBEL-like protein (possible involvement in host cell adhesion and hemagglutination), a putative RXLR effector (possibly involved in host cell modulation) and elicitin-like (ELL) proteins. Phylogenetic analysis mapped P. insidiosum ELLs to several novel clades of oomycete elicitins (ELIs), and homology modeling predicted that P. insidiosum ELLs should bind sterols. Most of the P. insidiosum ESTs showed homology to sequences in the genome or EST databases of other oomycetes, but one putative gene, with unknown function, was found to be unique to P. insidiosum. The EST dataset reported here represents the first steps in identifying genes of P. insidiosum and beginning transcriptome analysis. This genetic information will facilitate understanding of pathogenic mechanisms of this devastating pathogen.
Collapse
|
21
|
Grenville-Briggs LJ, Avrova AO, Hay RJ, Bruce CR, Whisson SC, van West P. Identification of appressorial and mycelial cell wall proteins and a survey of the membrane proteome of Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Biol 2010; 114:702-23. [PMID: 20943180 DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2010] [Revised: 05/10/2010] [Accepted: 06/05/2010] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Proteins embedded in the cell wall and plasma membrane of filamentous oomycetes and fungi provide a means by which these organisms can interact with their local environment. However, cell wall and membrane proteins have often proved difficult to isolate using conventional proteomic techniques. Here we have used liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to facilitate rapid and sensitive quantification of the cell wall proteome. We report the use of LC-MS/MS to identify differentially regulated proteins from the cell walls of three different lifecycle stages of the oomycete plant pathogen Phytophthora infestans: non-sporulating vegetative mycelium, sporulating mycelium, and germinating cysts with appressoria. We have also used quantitative real-time RT-PCR to confirm that the transcripts corresponding to some of these proteins, namely those identified in cell walls of germinating cysts with appressoria, accumulate differentially throughout the lifecycle. These proteins may, therefore, be important for pre-infective development and early pathogenicity. Up to 31 covalently and non-covalently bound cell wall-associated proteins were identified. All of the proteins identified in germinating cysts with appressoria, and several of those from mycelial fractions, were classified as putative effector or pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) molecules, including members of the CBEL family, the elicitin family, the crinkler (CRN) family and two transglutaminases. Thus, the cell wall of P. infestans may represent an important reservoir for surface-presented, apoplastic effectors or defence activation molecules. Proteins predicted to be cell surface proteins included IPI-B like proteins, mucins, cell wall-associated enzymes and annexin family members. Additionally we identified up to 27 membrane-associated proteins from Triton X-114 phase partitioned mycelial membrane preparations, producing the first inventory of oomycete membrane-associated proteins. Four of these proteins are small Rab-type G-proteins and several are associated with secretion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Grenville-Briggs
- Aberdeen Oomycete Laboratory, University of Aberdeen, Institute of Medical Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang L, Li P, Brutnell TP. Exploring plant transcriptomes using ultra high-throughput sequencing. Brief Funct Genomics 2010; 9:118-28. [PMID: 20130067 DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elp057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultra high-throughput sequencing (UHTS) technologies offer the potential to interrogate transcriptomes in detail that has traditionally been restricted to single gene surveys. For instance, it is now possible to globally define transcription start sites, polyadenylation signals, alternative splice sites and generate quantitative data on gene transcript accumulation in single tissues or cell types. These technologies are thus paving the way for whole genome transcriptomics and will undoubtedly lead to novel insights into plant development and biotic and abiotic stress responses. However, several challenges exist to making this technology broadly accessible to the plant research community. These include the current need for a computationally intensive analysis of data sets, a lack of standardized alignment and formatting procedures and a relatively small number of analytical software packages to interpret UHTS outputs. In this review we summarize recent findings from UHTS and discuss potential opportunities and challenges for broad adoption of these technologies in the plant science community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Wang
- Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
One of the hallmarks of bacterial survival is their ability to adapt rapidly to changing environmental conditions. Niche adaptation is a response to the signals received that are relayed, often to regulators that modulate gene expression. In the post-genomic era, DNA microarrays are used to study the dynamics of gene expression on a global scale. Numerous studies have used Pseudomonas aeruginosa--a Gram-negative environmental and opportunistic human pathogenic bacterium--as the model organism in whole-genome transcriptome analysis. This paper reviews the transcriptome studies that have led to immense advances in our understanding of the biology of this intractable human pathogen. Comparative analysis of 23 P. aeruginosa transcriptome studies has led to the identification of a unique set of genes that are signal specific and a core set that is differentially regulated. The 303 genes in the core set are involved in bacterial homeostasis, making them attractive therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Balasubramanian
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Science, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Oh SK, Young C, Lee M, Oliva R, Bozkurt TO, Cano LM, Win J, Bos JI, Liu HY, van Damme M, Morgan W, Choi D, Van der Vossen EA, Vleeshouwers VG, Kamoun S. In planta expression screens of Phytophthora infestans RXLR effectors reveal diverse phenotypes, including activation of the Solanum bulbocastanum disease resistance protein Rpi-blb2. THE PLANT CELL 2009; 21:2928-47. [PMID: 19794118 PMCID: PMC2768934 DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.068247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 249] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2009] [Revised: 08/01/2009] [Accepted: 09/08/2009] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans is predicted to secrete hundreds of effector proteins. To address the challenge of assigning biological functions to computationally predicted effector genes, we combined allele mining with high-throughput in planta expression. We developed a library of 62 infection-ready P. infestans RXLR effector clones, obtained using primer pairs corresponding to 32 genes and assigned activities to several of these genes. This approach revealed that 16 of the 62 examined effectors cause phenotypes when expressed inside plant cells. Besides the well-studied AVR3a effector, two additional effectors, PexRD8 and PexRD36(45-1), suppressed the hypersensitive cell death triggered by the elicitin INF1, another secreted protein of P. infestans. One effector, PexRD2, promoted cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana and other solanaceous plants. Finally, two families of effectors induced hypersensitive cell death specifically in the presence of the Solanum bulbocastanum late blight resistance genes Rpi-blb1 and Rpi-blb2, thereby exhibiting the activities expected for Avrblb1 and Avrblb2. The AVRblb2 family was then studied in more detail and found to be highly variable and under diversifying selection in P. infestans. Structure-function experiments indicated that a 34-amino acid region in the C-terminal half of AVRblb2 is sufficient for triggering Rpi-blb2 hypersensitivity and that a single positively selected AVRblb2 residue is critical for recognition by Rpi-blb2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Keun Oh
- Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University-Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691
- Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
| | - Carolyn Young
- Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University-Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691
| | - Minkyoung Lee
- Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University-Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691
| | - Ricardo Oliva
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Joe Win
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hsin-Yin Liu
- Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University-Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691
| | | | - William Morgan
- Department of Biology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691
| | - Doil Choi
- Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
| | | | | | - Sophien Kamoun
- Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University-Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
López-Calcagno PE, Moreno J, Cedeño L, Labrador L, Concepción JL, Avilán L. Cloning, expression and biochemical characterization of mitochondrial and cytosolic malate dehydrogenase from Phytophthora infestans. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 113:771-81. [PMID: 19249364 DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2008] [Revised: 01/26/2009] [Accepted: 02/18/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The genes of the mitochondrial and cytosolic malate dehydrogenase (mMDH and cMDH) of Phytophthora infestans were cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli as active enzymes. The catalytic properties of these proteins were determined: both enzymes have a similar specific activity. In addition, the natural mitochondrial isoenzyme was semi-purified from mycelia and its catalytic properties determined: the recombinant mitochondrial isoform behaved as the natural enzyme. A phylogenetic analysis indicated that mMDH, present in all stramenopiles studied, can be useful to study the relationships between these organisms. MDH with the conserved domain MDH_cytoplasmic_cytosolic is absent in some stramenopiles as well as in fungi. This enzyme seems to be less related within the stramenopile group. The Phytophthora cMDHs have an insertion of six amino acids that is also present in the stramenopile cMDHs studied, with the exception of Thalassiosira pseudonana cMDH, and is absent in other known eukaryotic cMDHs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Analysis of the Pythium ultimum transcriptome using Sanger and Pyrosequencing approaches. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:542. [PMID: 19014603 PMCID: PMC2612028 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2008] [Accepted: 11/15/2008] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pythium species are an agriculturally important genus of plant pathogens, yet are not understood well at the molecular, genetic, or genomic level. They are closely related to other oomycete plant pathogens such as Phytophthora species and are ubiquitous in their geographic distribution and host rage. To gain a better understanding of its gene complement, we generated Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) from the transcriptome of Pythium ultimum DAOM BR144 (= ATCC 200006 = CBS 805.95) using two high throughput sequencing methods, Sanger-based chain termination sequencing and pyrosequencing-based sequencing-by-synthesis. Results A single half-plate pyrosequencing (454 FLX) run on adapter-ligated cDNA from a normalized cDNA population generated 90,664 reads with an average read length of 190 nucleotides following cleaning and removal of sequences shorter than 100 base pairs. After clustering and assembly, a total of 35,507 unique sequences were generated. In parallel, 9,578 reads were generated from a library constructed from the same normalized cDNA population using dideoxy chain termination Sanger sequencing, which upon clustering and assembly generated 4,689 unique sequences. A hybrid assembly of both Sanger- and pyrosequencing-derived ESTs resulted in 34,495 unique sequences with 1,110 sequences (3.2%) that were solely derived from Sanger sequencing alone. A high degree of similarity was seen between P. ultimum sequences and other sequenced plant pathogenic oomycetes with 91% of the hybrid assembly derived sequences > 500 bp having similarity to sequences from plant pathogenic Phytophthora species. An analysis of Gene Ontology assignments revealed a similar representation of molecular function ontologies in the hybrid assembly in comparison to the predicted proteomes of three Phytophthora species, suggesting a broad representation of the P. ultimum transcriptome was present in the normalized cDNA population. P. ultimum sequences with similarity to oomycete RXLR and Crinkler effectors, Kazal-like and cystatin-like protease inhibitors, and elicitins were identified. Sequences with similarity to thiamine biosynthesis enzymes that are lacking in the genome sequences of three Phytophthora species and one downy mildew were identified and could serve as useful phylogenetic markers. Furthermore, we identified 179 candidate simple sequence repeats that can be used for genotyping strains of P. ultimum. Conclusion Through these two technologies, we were able to generate a robust set (~10 Mb) of transcribed sequences for P. ultimum. We were able to identify known sequences present in oomycetes as well as identify novel sequences. An ample number of candidate polymorphic markers were identified in the dataset providing resources for phylogenetic and diagnostic marker development for this species. On a technical level, in spite of the depth possible with 454 FLX platform, the Sanger and pyro-based sequencing methodologies were complementary as each method generated sequences unique to each platform.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Oomycete pathogens of plants and animals are related to marine algae and have evolved mechanisms to avoid or suppress host defences independently of other groups of pathogens, such as bacteria and fungi. They cause many destructive diseases affecting crops, forests and aquaculture. The development of genomic resources has led to a dramatic increase in our knowledge of the effectors used by these pathogens to suppress host defences. In particular, a huge, rapidly diverging superfamily of effectors with 100-600 members per genome has been identified. Proteins in this family use the N-terminal motifs RxLR and dEER to cross the host plasma cell membrane autonomously. Once inside the host cell, the proteins suppress host defence signalling. The importance of this effector family is underlined by the fact that plants have evolved intracellular defence receptors to detect the effectors and trigger a rapid counter-attack. The mechanisms by which the effector enter host cells, and by which they suppress host defences, remain to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett M Tyler
- Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, One Washington Street, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0477, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bouzidi MF, Parlange F, Nicolas P, Mouzeyar S. Expressed Sequence Tags from the oomycete Plasmopara halstedii, an obligate parasite of the sunflower. BMC Microbiol 2007; 7:110. [PMID: 18062809 PMCID: PMC2242796 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2006] [Accepted: 12/06/2007] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sunflower downy mildew is a major disease caused by the obligatory biotrophic oomycete Plasmopara halstedii. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying its pathogenicity. In this study we used a genomics approach to gain a first insight into the transcriptome of P. halstedii. Results To identify genes from the obligatory biotrophic oomycete Plasmopara halstedii that are expressed during infection in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) we employed the suppression subtraction hybridization (SSH) method from sunflower seedlings infected by P. halstedii. Using this method and random sequencing of clones, a total of 602 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) corresponding to 230 unique sequence sets were identified. To determine the origin of the unisequences, PCR primers were designed to amplify these gene fragments from genomic DNA isolated either from P. halstedii sporangia or from Helianthus annuus. Only 145 nonredundant ESTs which correspond to a total of 373 ESTs (67.7%) proved to be derived from P. halstedii genes and that are expressed during infection in sunflower. A set of 87 nonredundant sequences were identified as showing matches to sequences deposited in public databases. Nevertheless, about 7% of the ESTs seem to be unique to P. halstedii without any homolog in any public database. Conclusion A summary of the assignment of nonredundant ESTs to functional categories as well as their relative abundance is listed and discussed. Annotation of the ESTs revealed a number of genes that could function in virulence. We provide a first glimpse into the gene content of P. halstedii. These resources should accelerate research on this important pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Fouad Bouzidi
- UMR 1095 INRA-UBP "Amélioration et Santé des Plantes", Université Blaise Pascal, 24, Avenue des Landais 63177 Aubière Cedex, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Torto-Alalibo TA, Tripathy S, Smith BM, Arredondo FD, Zhou L, Li H, Chibucos MC, Qutob D, Gijzen M, Mao C, Sobral BWS, Waugh ME, Mitchell TK, Dean RA, Tyler BM. Expressed sequence tags from phytophthora sojae reveal genes specific to development and infection. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2007; 20:781-93. [PMID: 17601166 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-20-7-0781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Six unique expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries were generated from four developmental stages of Phytophthora sojae P6497. RNA was extracted from mycelia, swimming zoospores, germinating cysts, and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cv. Harosoy tissues heavily infected with P. sojae. Three libraries were created from mycelia growing on defined medium, complex medium, and nutrient-limited medium. The 26,943 high-quality sequences obtained clustered into 7,863 unigenes composed of 2,845 contigs and 5,018 singletons. The total number of P. sojae unigenes matching sequences in the genome assembly was 7,412 (94%). Of these unigenes, 7,088 (90%) matched gene models predicted from the P. sojae sequence assembly, but only 2,047 (26%) matched P. ramorum gene models. Analysis of EST frequency from different growth conditions and morphological stages revealed genes that were specific to or highly represented in particular growth conditions and life stages. Additionally, our results indicate that, during infection, the pathogen derives most of its carbon and energy via glycolysis of sugars in the plant. Sequences identified with putative roles in pathogenesis included avirulence homologs possessing the RxLR motif, elicitins, and hydrolytic enzymes. This large collection of P. sojae ESTs will serve as a valuable public genomic resource.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy A Torto-Alalibo
- Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tian M, Win J, Song J, van der Hoorn R, van der Knaap E, Kamoun S. A Phytophthora infestans cystatin-like protein targets a novel tomato papain-like apoplastic protease. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2007; 143:364-77. [PMID: 17085509 PMCID: PMC1761951 DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.090050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2006] [Accepted: 10/24/2006] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
There is emerging evidence that the proteolytic machinery of plants plays important roles in defense against pathogens. The oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans, the agent of the devastating late blight disease of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and potato (Solanum tuberosum), has evolved an arsenal of protease inhibitors to overcome the action of host proteases. Previously, we described a family of 14 Kazal-like extracellular serine protease inhibitors from P. infestans. Among these, EPI1 and EPI10 bind and inhibit the pathogenesis-related (PR) P69B subtilisin-like serine protease of tomato. Here, we describe EPIC1 to EPIC4, a new family of P. infestans secreted proteins with similarity to cystatin-like protease inhibitor domains. Among these, the epiC1 and epiC2 genes lacked orthologs in Phytophthora sojae and Phytophthora ramorum, were relatively fast-evolving within P. infestans, and were up-regulated during infection of tomato, suggesting a role during P. infestans-host interactions. Biochemical functional analyses revealed that EPIC2B interacts with and inhibits a novel papain-like extracellular cysteine protease, termed Phytophthora Inhibited Protease 1 (PIP1). Characterization of PIP1 revealed that it is a PR protein closely related to Rcr3, a tomato apoplastic cysteine protease that functions in fungal resistance. Altogether, this and earlier studies suggest that interplay between host proteases of diverse catalytic families and pathogen inhibitors is a general defense-counterdefense process in plant-pathogen interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miaoying Tian
- Department of Plant Pathology , The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Judelson HS. Genomics of the plant pathogenic oomycete Phytophthora: insights into biology and evolution. ADVANCES IN GENETICS 2007; 57:97-141. [PMID: 17352903 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2660(06)57003-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The genus Phytophthora includes many destructive pathogens of plants. Although having "fungus-like" appearances, Phytophthora species reside in a eukaryotic kingdom separate from that of true fungi. Distinct strategies are therefore required to study and defend against Phytophthora. Large sequence databases have recently been developed for several species, and tools for functional genomics have been enhanced. This chapter will review current progress in understanding the genome and transcriptome of Phytophthora, and provide examples of how genomics resources are advancing molecular studies of pathogenesis, development, transcription, and evolution. A better understanding of these remarkable pathogens should lead to new approaches for managing their diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard S Judelson
- Department of Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Cell Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wang Z, Wang Y, Chen X, Shen G, Zhang Z, Zheng X. Differential screening reveals genes differentially expressed in low- and high-virulence near-isogenic Phytophthora sojae lines. Fungal Genet Biol 2006; 43:826-39. [PMID: 16870480 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2006] [Revised: 06/01/2006] [Accepted: 06/01/2006] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
To explore the molecular mechanisms involved in virulence variations in Phytophthora sojae, the low-virulence isolate PS2 was inoculated successively on a resistant soybean (Glycine max) cultivar. After 14 successive inoculations, a high-virulence progeny, termed PS2-vir, was obtained and demonstrated to exhibit lower oospore production. DNA fingerprinting revealed no large-scale DNA differences in PS2 and PS2-vir. A suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) approach was developed to investigate differences in gene expression between PS2 and PS2-vir in the early stages of soybean infection. Of the 323 sequences chosen for examination, 74 putative unigenes were identified that exhibit high expression in PS2-vir. These sequences are predicted to encode proteins involved in energy production, protein biosynthesis, cell signaling, cell-wall biogenesis, and transcription regulation. Ten clones were selected for temporal expression analysis using RT-PCR based on the results of the dot-blot screens. The possible genetic mechanisms involved in these phenomena are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziying Wang
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Govers F, Gijzen M. Phytophthora genomics: the plant destroyers' genome decoded. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2006; 19:1295-301. [PMID: 17153913 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-19-1295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
The year 2004 was an exciting one for the Phytophthora research community. The United States Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (JGI) completed the draft genome sequence of two Phytophthora species, Phytophthora sojae and Phytophthora ramorum. In August of that year over 50 people gathered at JGI in Walnut Creek, California, for an annotation jamboree and searched for the secrets and surprises that the two genomes have in petto. This culminated in a paper in Science in September of this year describing the highlights of the sequencing project and emphasizing the power of having the genome sequences of two closely related organisms. This MPMI Focus issue on Phytophthora genomics contains a number of more specialized manuscripts centered on gene annotation and genome organization, and complemented with manuscripts that rely on genomics resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francine Govers
- Laboratory of Phytopathology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Binnenhaven 5, NL-6709 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jiang RHY, Govers F. Nonneutral GC3 and retroelement codon mimicry in Phytophthora. J Mol Evol 2006; 63:458-72. [PMID: 16955239 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-005-0211-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2005] [Accepted: 05/20/2006] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Phytophthora is a genus entirely comprised of destructive plant pathogens. It belongs to the Stramenopila, a unique branch of eukaryotes, phylogenetically distinct from plants, animals, or fungi. Phytophthora genes show a strong preference for usage of codons ending with G or C (high GC3). The presence of high GC3 in genes can be utilized to differentiate coding regions from noncoding regions in the genome. We found that both selective pressure and mutation bias drive codon bias in Phytophthora. Indicative for selection pressure is the higher GC3 value of highly expressed genes in different Phytophthora species. Lineage specific GC increase of noncoding regions is reminiscent of whole-genome mutation bias, whereas the elevated Phytophthora GC3 is primarily a result of translation efficiency-driven selection. Heterogeneous retrotransposons exist in Phytophthora genomes and many of them vary in their GC content. Interestingly, the most widespread groups of retroelements in Phytophthora show high GC3 and a codon bias that is similar to host genes. Apparently, selection pressure has been exerted on the retroelement's codon usage, and such mimicry of host codon bias might be beneficial for the propagation of retrotransposons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rays H Y Jiang
- Laboratory of Phytopathology, Plant Sciences Group, and Graduate School of Experimental Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Binnenhaven 5, NL-6709 PD, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Takenaka S, Nakamura Y, Kono T, Sekiguchi H, Masunaka A, Takahashi H. Novel elicitin-like proteins isolated from the cell wall of the biocontrol agent Pythium oligandrum induce defence-related genes in sugar beet. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2006; 7:325-339. [PMID: 20507450 DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00340.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY We previously reported that cell wall protein fractions (CWPs) of the biocontrol agent Pythium oligandrum have elicitor properties in sugar beet and wheat. Here we have examined the effect of treatment with the D-type of CWP, a fraction that contains two major forms (POD-1 and POD-2), on the induction of defence-related genes in sugar beet. Using PCR-based cDNA library subtraction, we identified five genes that were highly expressed in response to CWP treatment. The five genes are probably of oxalate oxidase-like germin (OxOLG), glutathione S-transferase (GST), 5-enol-pyruvylshikimate-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and aspartate aminotransferase (AAT). In addition, we purified and characterized POD-1 and POD-2 and found that POD-1 induced all five genes, whereas POD-2 induced three of the genes, but not OxOLG or GST. A sugar beet bioassay indicated that CWP, POD-1 and POD-2 are each sufficient to induce resistance to sugar beet seedling disease caused by Aphanomyces cochlioides. Although carbohydrate analyses indicated that POD proteins were glycoproteins with similar carbohydrate compositions, containing approximately 15.0% carbohydrate by weight, their peptide portions have elicitor activity. Furthermore, cDNAs of POD-1 and POD-2 proteins were cloned, and the deduced amino acid sequences were found to be 82.9% identical. Characterization of their molecular structures indicated that they have an elicitin domain followed by a C-terminal domain with a high frequency of Ser, Thr, Ala and Pro, which is structurally similar to class III elicitins. However, phylogenetic analysis with 22 representative elicitin and elicitin-like proteins showed that POD-1 and POD-2 are distinct from previously defined elicitin and elicitin-like proteins. Therefore, POD-1 and POD-2 are novel oomycete cell wall elicitin-like glycoproteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigehito Takenaka
- Memuro Upland Farming Research Station, National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Shinsei, Memuro-cho, Kasaigun, Hokkaido 082-0071, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kanneganti TD, Huitema E, Cakir C, Kamoun S. Synergistic interactions of the plant cell death pathways induced by Phytophthora infestans Nepl-like protein PiNPP1.1 and INF1 elicitin. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2006; 19:854-63. [PMID: 16903351 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-19-0854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Cell death plays a ubiquitous role in plant-microbe interactions, given that it is associated with both susceptible and resistance interactions. A class of cell death-inducing proteins, termed Nepl-like proteins (NLPs), has been reported in bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes. These proteins induce nonspecific necrosis in a variety of dicotyledonous plants. Here, we describe three members of the NLP family from the oomycete Phytophthora infestans (PiNPP1.1, PiNPP1.2, and PiNPP1.3). Using agroinfection with a binary Potato virus X vector, we showed that PiNPP1.1 induces cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana and the host plant tomato. Expression analyses indicated that PiNPP1.1 is up-regulated during late stages of infection of tomato by P. infestans. We compared PiNPP1.1 necrosis-inducing activity to INF1 elicitin, a well-studied protein that triggers the hypersensitive response in Nicotiana spp. Using virus-induced gene silencing, we showed that the cell death induced by PiNPP1.1 is dependent on the ubiquitin ligase-associated protein SGT1 and the heat-shock protein HSP90. In addition, cell death triggered by PiNPP1.1 but not that by INF1 was dependent on the defense-signaling proteins COI1, MEK2, NPR1, and TGA2.2, suggesting distinct signaling requirements. Combined expression of PiNPP1.1 and INF1 in N. benthamiana resulted in enhanced cell death, suggesting synergistic interplay between the two cell-death responses. Altogether, these results point to potentially distinct but interacting cell-death pathways induced by PiNPP1.1 and INF1 in plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti
- Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH 44691, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Iida Y, Ohara T, Tsuge T. Identification of genes up-regulated during conidiation of Fusarium oxysporum through expressed sequence tag analysis. Fungal Genet Biol 2006; 43:179-89. [PMID: 16480905 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2005] [Revised: 11/10/2005] [Accepted: 11/30/2005] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Fusarium oxysporum produces three kinds of asexual spores, microconidia, macroconidia, and chlamydospores. F. oxysporum produces microconidia and macroconidia in carboxymethyl cellulose-added liquid medium (CMCLM) and exhibits vegetative growth without conidiation in complete liquid medium (CLM). The cDNA libraries were constructed using mRNAs from CLM and CMCLM cultures. A total of 1288 and 1353 clones from CLM (vegetative growth) and CMCLM (conidiation) libraries, respectively, were sequenced, and 641 and 626 unique genes were identified. Of these unique genes, only 130 ( approximately 20%) were common in the two libraries, indicating different patterns of gene expression during vegetative growth and conidiation. The expression levels of 496 CMCLM-specific genes were compared during vegetative growth and conidiation by cDNA dot-blot differential hybridization and real-time quantitative PCR analyses, and 42 genes were identified to display >5-fold increases in mRNA abundance during conidiation. These genes provide ideal candidates for further studies directed at understanding fungal conidiogenesis and its molecular regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichiro Iida
- Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Guo J, Jiang RHY, Kamphuis LG, Govers F. A cDNA-AFLP based strategy to identify transcripts associated with avirulence in Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Genet Biol 2006; 43:111-23. [PMID: 16455274 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2005] [Revised: 11/22/2005] [Accepted: 11/23/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Expression profiling using cDNA-AFLP is commonly used to display the transcriptome of a specific tissue or developmental stage. Here, cDNA-AFLP was used to identify transcripts in a segregating F1 population of Phytophthora infestans, the oomycete pathogen that causes late blight. To find transcripts derived from putative avirulence (Avr) genes germinated cyst cDNA from F1 progeny with defined avirulence phenotypes was pooled and used in a bulked segregant analysis (BSA). Over 30,000 transcript derived fragments (TDFs) were screened resulting in 99 Avr-associated TDFs as well as TDFs with opposite pattern. With 142 TDF sequences homology searches and database mining was carried out. cDNA-AFLP analysis on individual F1 progeny revealed 100% co-segregation of four TDFs with particular AVR phenotypes and this was confirmed by RT-PCR. Two match the same P. infestans EST with unknown sequence and this is a likely candidate for Avr4. The other two are associated with the Avr3b-Avr10-Avr11 locus. This combined cDNA-AFLP/BSA strategy is an efficient approach to identify Avr-associated transcriptome markers that can complement positional cloning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Guo
- Plant Sciences Group, Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, Binnenhaven 5, NL-6709 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Foti M, Granucci F, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Dendritic cell interactions and cytokine production. ERNST SCHERING RESEARCH FOUNDATION WORKSHOP 2006:61-80. [PMID: 16329646 DOI: 10.1007/3-540-37673-9_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The dendritic cell lineage comprises cells at various stages of functional maturation that are able to induce and regulate the immune response against antigens and thus function as initiators of protective immunity. The signals that determine the given dendritic cell functions depend mostly on the local microenvironment and on the interaction between dendritic cells and microorganisms. These interactions are complex and very different from one pathogen to another; nevertheless, both shared and unique responses have been observed using global genomic analyses. In this review, we have focused on the study of host-pathogen interactions using a genome-wide transcriptional approach with a focus on cytokine family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Foti
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Biotechnology Bioscience, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Soanes DM, Talbot NJ. Comparative genomic analysis of phytopathogenic fungi using expressed sequence tag (EST) collections. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2006; 7:61-70. [PMID: 20507428 DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00317.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY We describe the analysis of 57 727 unique expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from 15 species of phytopathogenic and three species of saprophytic fungi. This resource is held within the COGEME phytopathogen EST database (http://cogeme.ex.ac.uk/). Comparative analysis was performed to investigate the differences between pathogenic and free-living fungi based on a substantial collection of expressed gene sequences and available, completed fungal genome sequences. We report that the expressed gene inventories of pathogenic fungi were not significantly more similar to each other than to those of free-living filamentous fungi. As expected, however, filamentous fungi as a group share more sequences in common than with the free-living yeast species Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Interestingly, ESTs of the obligate biotrophic fungus Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei were more dissimilar to those of all other fungal species assessed, having a lower number of sequences in common with filamentous ascomycetes studied to date and also possessing a larger proportion of unisequences of unknown function. Our analysis of ESTs in the COGEME database enabled identification of a set of functional groups of genes that are more highly represented in the genomes of pathogenic fungi than non-pathogenic species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M Soanes
- School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Win J, Kanneganti TD, Torto-Alalibo T, Kamoun S. Computational and comparative analyses of 150 full-length cDNA sequences from the oomycete plant pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Genet Biol 2006; 43:20-33. [PMID: 16380277 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2005] [Revised: 10/05/2005] [Accepted: 10/05/2005] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans is a devastating phytopathogenic oomycete that causes late blight on tomato and potato. Recent genome sequencing efforts of P. infestans and other Phytophthora species are generating vast amounts of sequence data providing opportunities to unlock the complex nature of pathogenesis. However, accurate annotation of Phytophthora genomes will be a significant challenge. Most of the information about gene structure in these species was gathered from a handful of genes resulting in significant limitations for development of ab initio gene-calling programs. In this study, we collected a total of 150 bioinformatically determined near full-length cDNA (FLcDNA) sequences of P. infestans that were predicted to contain full open reading frame sequences. We performed detailed computational analyses of these FLcDNA sequences to obtain a snapshot of P. infestans gene structure, gauge the degree of sequence conservation between P. infestans genes and those of Phytophthora sojae and Phytophthora ramorum, and identify patterns of gene conservation between P. infestans and various eukaryotes, particularly fungi, for which genome-wide translated protein sequences are available. These analyses helped us to define the structural characteristics of P. infestans genes using a validated data set. We also determined the degree of sequence conservation within the genus Phytophthora and identified a set of fast evolving genes. Finally, we identified a set of genes that are shared between Phytophthora and fungal phytopathogens but absent in animal fungal pathogens. These results confirm that plant pathogenic oomycetes and fungi share virulence components, and suggest that eukaryotic microbial pathogens that share similar lifestyles also share a similar set of genes independently of their phylogenetic relatedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Win
- Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
The oomycetes form a phylogenetically distinct group of eukaryotic microorganisms that includes some of the most notorious pathogens of plants. Oomycetes accomplish parasitic colonization of plants by modulating host cell defenses through an array of disease effector proteins. The biology of effectors is poorly understood but tremendous progress has been made in recent years. This review classifies and catalogues the effector secretome of oomycetes. Two classes of effectors target distinct sites in the host plant: Apoplastic effectors are secreted into the plant extracellular space, and cytoplasmic effectors are translocated inside the plant cell, where they target different subcellular compartments. Considering that five species are undergoing genome sequencing and annotation, we are rapidly moving toward genome-wide catalogues of oomycete effectors. Already, it is evident that the effector secretome of pathogenic oomycetes is more complex than expected, with perhaps several hundred proteins dedicated to manipulating host cell structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophien Kamoun
- Department of Plant Pathology, Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Posada-Buitrago ML, Frederick RD. Expressed sequence tag analysis of the soybean rust pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Fungal Genet Biol 2005; 42:949-62. [PMID: 16291502 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2004] [Revised: 05/05/2005] [Accepted: 06/10/2005] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Soybean rust is caused by the obligate fungal pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi Sydow. A unidirectional cDNA library was constructed using mRNA isolated from germinating P. pachyrhizi urediniospores to identify genes expressed at this physiological stage. Single pass sequence analysis of 908 clones revealed 488 unique expressed sequence tags (ESTs, unigenes) of which 107 appeared as multiple copies. BLASTX analysis identified 189 unigenes with significant similarities (Evalue<10(-5)) to sequences deposited in the NCBI non-redundant protein database. A search against the NCBI dbEST using the BLASTN algorithm revealed 32 ESTs with high or moderate similarities to plant and fungal sequences. Using the Expressed Gene Anatomy Classification, 31.7% of these ESTs were involved in primary metabolism, 14.3% in gene/protein expression, 7.4% in cell structure and growth, 6.9% in cell division, 4.8% in cell signaling/cell communication, and 4.8% in cell/organism defense. Approximately 29.6% of the identities were to hypothetical proteins and proteins with unknown function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Lucia Posada-Buitrago
- USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, 1301 Ditto Avenue, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jiang RHY, Tyler BM, Whisson SC, Hardham AR, Govers F. Ancient Origin of Elicitin Gene Clusters in Phytophthora Genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2005; 23:338-51. [PMID: 16237208 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The genus Phytophthora belongs to the oomycetes in the eukaryotic stramenopile lineage and is comprised of over 65 species that are all destructive plant pathogens on a wide range of dicotyledons. Phytophthora produces elicitins (ELIs), a group of extracellular elicitor proteins that cause a hypersensitive response in tobacco. Database mining revealed several new classes of elicitin-like (ELL) sequences with diverse elicitin domains in Phytophthora infestans, Phytophthora sojae, Phytophthora brassicae, and Phytophthora ramorum. ELIs and ELLs were shown to be unique to Phytophthora and Pythium species. They are ubiquitous among Phytophthora species and belong to one of the most highly conserved and complex protein families in the Phytophthora genus. Phylogeny construction with elicitin domains derived from 156 ELIs and ELLs showed that most of the diversified family members existed prior to divergence of Phytophthora species from a common ancestor. Analysis to discriminate diversifying and purifying selection showed that all 17 ELI and ELL clades are under purifying selection. Within highly similar ELI groups there was no evidence for positively selected amino acids suggesting that purifying selection contributes to the continued existence of this diverse protein family. Characteristic cysteine spacing patterns were found for each phylogenetic clade. Except for the canonical clade ELI-1, ELIs and ELLs possess C-terminal domains of variable length, many of which have a high threonine, serine, or proline content suggesting an association with the cell wall. In addition, some ELIs and ELLs have a predicted glycosylphosphatidylinositol site suggesting anchoring of the C-terminal domain to the cell membrane. The eli and ell genes belonging to different clades are clustered in the genomes. Overall, eli and ell genes are expressed at different levels and in different life cycle stages but those sharing the same phylogenetic clade appear to have similar expression patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rays H Y Jiang
- Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Torto-Alalibo T, Tian M, Gajendran K, Waugh ME, van West P, Kamoun S. Expressed sequence tags from the oomycete fish pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica reveal putative virulence factors. BMC Microbiol 2005; 5:46. [PMID: 16076392 PMCID: PMC1192801 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-5-46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2005] [Accepted: 08/02/2005] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The oomycete Saprolegnia parasitica is one of the most economically important fish pathogens. There is a dramatic recrudescence of Saprolegnia infections in aquaculture since the use of the toxic organic dye malachite green was banned in 2002. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying pathogenicity in S. parasitica and other animal pathogenic oomycetes. In this study we used a genomics approach to gain a first insight into the transcriptome of S. parasitica. Results We generated 1510 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from a mycelial cDNA library of S. parasitica. A total of 1279 consensus sequences corresponding to 525944 base pairs were assembled. About half of the unigenes showed similarities to known protein sequences or motifs. The S. parasitica sequences tended to be relatively divergent from Phytophthora sequences. Based on the sequence alignments of 18 conserved proteins, the average amino acid identity between S. parasitica and three Phytophthora species was 77% compared to 93% within Phytophthora. Several S. parasitica cDNAs, such as those with similarity to fungal type I cellulose binding domain proteins, PAN/Apple module proteins, glycosyl hydrolases, proteases, as well as serine and cysteine protease inhibitors, were predicted to encode secreted proteins that could function in virulence. Some of these cDNAs were more similar to fungal proteins than to other eukaryotic proteins confirming that oomycetes and fungi share some virulence components despite their evolutionary distance Conclusion We provide a first glimpse into the gene content of S. parasitica, a reemerging oomycete fish pathogen. These resources will greatly accelerate research on this important pathogen. The data is available online through the Oomycete Genomics Database [1].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy Torto-Alalibo
- Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - Miaoying Tian
- Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - Kamal Gajendran
- National Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
| | - Mark E Waugh
- National Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
| | - Pieter van West
- Aberdeen Oomycete Group, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Sophien Kamoun
- National Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grenville-Briggs LJ, van West P. The biotrophic stages of oomycete-plant interactions. ADVANCES IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY 2005; 57:217-43. [PMID: 16002014 DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2164(05)57007-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Grenville-Briggs
- Aberdeen Oomycete Group, College of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Aberdeen, Institute of Medical Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
The application of transcriptomics to study host-pathogen interactions has already brought important insights into the mechanisms of pathogenesis, and is expanding further keeping pace with the accumulation of genomic sequences of host organisms (human and economically important organisms such as food crops) and their pathogens (viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoa). In this review, we introduce SuperSAGE, a substantially improved variant of serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), as a potent tool for the transcriptomics of host-pathogen interactions. Notably, the generation of 26 bp tags in the SuperSAGE procedure allows to decipher the 'interaction transcriptome', i.e. the simultaneous monitoring of quantitative gene expression, of both a host and one of its eukaryotic pathogens. The potential of SuperSAGE tags for a rapid functional analysis of target genes is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideo Matsumura
- Iwate Biotechnology Research Center, 22-174-4 Narita, Kitakami, Iwate 024-0003, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kamoun S, Smart CD. Late Blight of Potato and Tomato in the Genomics Era. PLANT DISEASE 2005; 89:692-699. [PMID: 30791237 DOI: 10.1094/pd-89-0692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
|
50
|
Whisson SC, Avrova AO, Lavrova O, Pritchard L. Families of short interspersed elements in the genome of the oomycete plant pathogen, Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Genet Biol 2005; 42:351-65. [PMID: 15749054 DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2004] [Revised: 12/06/2004] [Accepted: 01/06/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The first known families of tRNA-related short interspersed elements (SINEs) in the oomycetes were identified by exploiting the genomic DNA sequence resources for the potato late blight pathogen, Phytophthora infestans. Fifteen families of tRNA-related SINEs, as well as predicted tRNAs, and other possible RNA polymerase III-transcribed sequences were identified. The size of individual elements ranges from 101 to 392 bp, representing sequences present from low (1) to highly abundant (over 2000) copy number in the P. infestans genome, based on quantitative PCR analysis. Putative short direct repeat sequences (6-14 bp) flanking the elements were also identified for eight of the SINEs. Predicted SINEs were named in a series prefixed infSINE (for infestans-SINE). Two SINEs were apparently present as multimers of tRNA-related units; four copies of a related unit for infSINEr, and two unrelated units for infSINEz. Two SINEs, infSINEh and infSINEi, were typically located within 400 bp of each other. These were also the only two elements identified as being actively transcribed in the mycelial stage of P. infestans by RT-PCR. It is possible that infSINEh and infSINEi represent active retrotransposons in P. infestans. Based on the quantitative PCR estimates of copy number for all of the elements identified, tRNA-related SINEs were estimated to comprise 0.3% of the 250 Mb P. infestans genome. InfSINE-related sequences were found to occur in species throughout the genus Phytophthora. However, seven elements were shown to be exclusive to P. infestans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen C Whisson
- Plant-Pathogen Interactions Program, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|