The use of recombinant human erythropoietin to prevent carboplatin-induced anemia

Response and prediction of response to recombinant human erythropoietin in patients with solid tumors and platinum-associated anemia

Objective. Anemia is commonly observed in tumor patients and may be worsened by the concomitant administration of chemotherapy with platinum. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) is able to improve the chemotherapy-associated anemia and the quality of life in patients with solid tumors. The most effective dose, route, and frequency of administration of rhEPO in anemic cancer patients has not yet been determined.

The purpose of this review is to describe the results obtained up to now concerning the response and prediction of response to rhEPO in anemic patients with solid tumors undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy. In particular, the renal function conditions in this patient group were examined.

Data sources. The literature was reviewed through a MEDLINE search covering 1987 to 1997. Relevant articles were additionally obtained by the systematic examination of article references. We searched the following terms: rhEPO, tumor, anemia, cisplatin, carboplatin, and renal failure.

Study Selection. The current literature was reviewed with regard to both the pathophysiology of platinum-induced anemia and the clinical use, indications, and dosage of rhEPO in anemic tumor patients undergoing platinum therapy. Particular attention was directed to the prediction criteria of this drug.

Conclusions. The rhEPO response rates in patients with solid tumors and platinum-associated anemia vary widely in the current literature and range from 36% to 82%. Unfortunately, no strong predictor of response can be recommended at the present time. Clinical studies support findings concerning a reduction in renal function parameters and a blunted erythropoietin response in patients with platinum-induced anemia. It is possible that a baseline serum erythropoietin concentration in conjunction with the serum creatinine concentration or the creatinine clearance value can serve as a prognostic indicator for rhEPO therapy response in this patient group.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ESAs to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004. We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE and other databases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review, 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the first update and to November 2011 for the current update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients receiving or not receiving anti-cancer therapy that compared the use of ESAs (plus transfusion if needed).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. One review author assessed quality assessment and extracted data, a second review author checked for correctness.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review includes a total of 91 trials with 20,102 participants. Use of ESAs significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (risk ratio (RR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.68, 70 trials, N = 16,093). On average, participants in the ESAs group received one unit of blood less than the control group (mean difference (MD) -0.98; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.78, 19 trials, N = 4,715). Haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving ESAs (RR 3.93; 95% CI 3.10 to 3.71, 31 trials, N = 6,413). There was suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve Quality of Life (QoL). There was strong evidence that ESAs increase mortality during active study period (hazard ratio (HR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29, 70 trials, N = 15,935) and some evidence that ESAs decrease overall survival (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, 78 trials, N = 19,003). The risk ratio for thromboembolic complications was increased in patients receiving ESAs compared to controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.74; 57 trials, N = 15,498). ESAs may also increase the risk for hypertension (fixed-effect model: RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.56; random-effects model: RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.33, 31 trials, N = 7,228) and thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42; 21 trials, N = 4,507). There was insufficient evidence to support an effect of ESA on tumour response (fixed-effect RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06, 15 trials, N = 5,012).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESAs reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions but increase the risk for thromboembolic events and deaths. There is suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve QoL. Whether and how ESAs affects tumour control remains uncertain. The increased risk of death and thromboembolic events should be balanced against the potential benefits of ESA treatment taking into account each patient's clinical circumstances and preferences. More data are needed for the effect of these drugs on quality of life and tumour progression. Further research is needed to clarify cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathways of the effects of ESAs on thrombogenesis and their potential effects on tumour growth.

Roles of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Various Patient Settings

Objective:

To provide clinical information on intravenous iron products and their role in chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis, oncology, critical illness, and heart failure.

Data Sources:

Intravenous iron products information, national clinical practice guidelines, and the latest primary literature available were reviewed. PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched from January 2000-December 2009.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All FDA-approved intravenous iron products information, available national clinical practice guidelines, and primary literature were included.

Data Synthesis:

Iron deficiency is common in patients with CKD, dialysis, oncology, critical illness, and heart failure. Routine supplementation with intravenous iron therapy is indicated in patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis; however, its role in oncology, critical illness, and heart failure is not clearly defined. Assessing patients for iron deficiency, evaluating their status, and knowing the risks of adverse events are important in determining the roles of intravenous iron therapy in each setting. If patients are initiated on intravenous iron, they must be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of adverse drug reactions, as well as clinical worsening. Additionally, intravenous iron must be discontinued upon resolution of iron deficiency.

Conclusions:

The importance of intravenous iron therapy is well established in patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis, who have iron deficiency. Its roles in oncology, critical illness, and heart failure should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Parenteral iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for chemotherapy-induced anemia

Purpose. To discuss the clinical issues we addressed in the development of our institutional guidelines regarding the assessment of iron stores for cancer- and treatment-related anemia and the administration of parenteral iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

Data sources. Studies published from January 1995 to August 2007 were identified by computer searches of Medline and hand searching of bibliographies of the articles identified via the computer searches. The current clinical practice guidelines were identified by computer searches of the web sites for national professional organizations that represent health care professionals who treat patients with cancer.

Results of data analysis. Hematopoietic responses demonstrate that epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa provide similar outcomes for patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA); however, up to 50% of patients receiving these agents fail to adequately respond. Functional iron deficiency defined as a state of iron-restricted erythropoiesis is likely the primary contributor to the lack of response. Hematopoietic responses following ESA therapy with parenteral iron are substantially higher compared to response with no or oral iron.

Conclusions. Iron stores should be assessed in all patients with cancer- or treatment-related anemia and parenteral iron should be administered to patients receiving ESA therapy to improve hematopoietic response. A unique algorithm that summarizes our institutional guidelines to assess iron stores and administer parenteral iron with ESA therapy in patients with CIA is included. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2008) 14: 5—22.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo), darbepoetin (Darbepo) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of Epo or Darbepo to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE and other data bases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review and 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients that compared the use of Epo/Darbepo (plus transfusion if needed) with observation until red blood cell transfusion was required.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review included a total of 57 trials with 9,353 patients. Of these, 27 trials with 3,287 adults were also included in the first Cochrane Review. Thirty trials with 6,066 patients were added during the update process. Use of Epo/Darbepo significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.68, 42 trials, n = 6,510). On average participants in the Epo/Darbepo group received one unit of blood less than the control group (WMD -1.05; 95% CI -1.32 to -0.78, 14 trials, n = 2,353). For participants with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving Epo/Darbepo (RR 3.43; 95% CI 3.07 to 3.84, 22 trials, n = 4,307). There was suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve Quality of Life (QoL). The relative risk for thrombo embolic complications was increased in patients receiving Epo/Darbepo compared to controls (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.06; 35 trials, n = 6,769). Uncertainties remain whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response (fixed effect RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23, 13 trials, n = 2,833; random effects: RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.26) or overall survival (unadjusted and adjusted data: HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.18; 42 trials, n = 8,167).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is consistent evidence that administration of Epo/Darbepo reduces the relative risk for blood transfusions and the number of units transfused in cancer patients. For patients with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL (mild anaemia) there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo improves haematological response. There is suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve QoL. However, there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo increases the relative risk for thrombo embolic complications. Whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response and overall survival remains uncertain.

Management of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents: doubts, certainties, and concerns

The management of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents presents many unresolved issues. We reviewed the literature relating to epoetin alfa (Eprex)/Epypo); Ortho Biotech/Janssen-Cilag, High Wycombe, United Kingdom, http://www.orthobiotech.co.uk; Procrit); Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., Bridgewater, NJ, http://www.orthobiotech.com), epoetin beta (NeoRecormon); Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland, http://www.roche.com), and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp); Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, http://www.amgen.com) highlighting the results of published clinical trials, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Studies were identified through MEDLINE and the bibliographies of relevant articles. Epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, and darbepoetin alfa have differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. They are all effective at reducing transfusion requirements and improving health-related quality-of-life parameters, irrespective of tumor response. A direct comparison between epoetin alfa and darbe poetin alfa is based on limited evidence, which does not allow definitive conclusions about relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness. No predictive factors for response to erythropoietic agents have been validated in prospective trials. The most consistent adverse events are thrombotic and may occur irrespective of an increase in hemoglobin. Recent research indicates that the erythropoietin receptor is expressed in several cancer cell lines, raising the concern of possible stimulation of tumor cell growth by these drugs. Studies on the cost-effectiveness of erythropoietins, particularly compared with transfusion therapy, have been challenging to conduct and analyze and have generated ambiguous results. The use of erythropoietins needs to be optimized in terms of cost-effectiveness, and issues surrounding safety need to be clarified. A stronger methodology for clinical studies and the design of new, randomized, clinical trials is a major priority.

Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology

Anemia resulting from cancer, or its treatment, is an important clinical problem increasingly treated with the recombinant hematopoietic growth factor erythropoietin. To address uncertainties regarding indications and efficacy, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology developed an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of epoetin in patients with cancer. The guideline panel found good evidence to recommend use of epoetin as a treatment option for patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia with a hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL. Use of epoetin for patients with less severe anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dL but never below 10 g/dL) should be determined by clinical circumstances. Good evidence from clinical trials supports the use of subcutaneous epoetin thrice weekly (150 U/kg tiw) for a minimum of 4 weeks. Less strong evidence supports an alternative weekly (40,000 U/wk) dosing regimen, based on common clinical practice. With either administration schedule, dose escalation should be considered for those not responding to the initial dose. In the absence of response, continuing epoetin beyond 6 to 8 weeks does not appear to be beneficial. Epoetin should be titrated once the hemoglobin concentration reaches 12 g/dL. Evidence from one randomized controlled trial supports use of epoetin for patients with anemia associated with low-risk myelodysplasia not receiving chemotherapy; however, there are no published high-quality studies to support its use for anemia in other hematologic malignancies in the absence of chemotherapy. Therefore, for anemic patients with hematologic malignancies, it is recommended that physicians initiate conventional therapy and observe hematologic response before considering use of epoetin.

Prediction of the need for red cell transfusion in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients undergoing platinum-based treatment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a predictive algorithm for the likelihood of red blood cell transfusion in women with ovarian cancer undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients in this analysis came from two phase III studies conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic Oncology Group of platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer patients, SWOG 8412 and SWOG 8501/GOG 104. The probability of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion was modeled as a function of stage of disease, age, weight, creatinine clearance, hemoglobin (Hb) prior to the start of therapy, the platinum agent administered (i.e., cisplatin vs carboplatin), and the route of drug administration (i.e., intravenous vs intraperitoneal).

RESULTS

Overall, 16% of patients developed at least grade 3 anemia (Hb < 8 g/dL) during primary chemotherapy, with 2% experiencing grade 4 anemia (Hb < 6.5 g/dL). PRBC transfusions were administered to 32% of patients. Factors that were determined to be predictive of PRBC transfusions were age and baseline Hb. In patients with bulky stage III or stage IV disease, the odds of transfusion increased by 66% for each 10-year increase in age and by 65% for each 1 g/dL decrease in baseline hemoglobin. Thus a patient aged 65 with a baseline Hb of 10.5 g/dL has approximately a 40% chance of transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Older ovarian cancer patients (>65 years) with low baseline Hb levels (<10.5) at initiation of platinum-based chemotherapy are likely to become more anemic during treatment and should be considered for prophylactic erythropoietin therapy as an alternative to transfusion.

Erythropoietin: a paradigm for the development of practice guidelines

Erythropoietin (EPO) is an endogenous hormone produced in the kidney that regulates red blood cell production within the body. Since the cloning and first clinical introduction of recombinant erythropoietin (epoetin) in the late 1980s indications and usage of epoetin have expanded significantly. It is estimated that as many as one third of patients with substantial anemia (hemoglobin less than 10.0 g/dL) resulting from chemotherapy for cancer are treated with epoetin. Though use of epoetin may avoid the inconvenience and infectious risk of blood transfusions, it is expensive and its benefit in some clinical scenarios has been modest. Like many new technologies, strong evidence suggesting situations where the benefit is high has lagged behind its adoption by patients and practitioners. As well, epoetin is expensive and third party payers do not always reimburse it. Research suggests there is considerable variation in epoetin usage in practice. To provide guidance to hematology/oncology specialists regarding use of epoetin, the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) proposed that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) fund an evidence review by one of the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) that would be used to develop evidence-based guidelines for members of the society. This review highlights principles of evidence-based medicine, distills and appraises the evidence in the published literature that supports the use of epoetin, and presents evidence-based recommendations for use of epoetin in situations where benefit is substantiated by high-quality studies. As well, this review addresses some of the difficulties of performing clinical research in this area, provocative research findings that will require further study, and suggestions regarding epoetin in those areas where further strong evidence has yet to be developed.

Epoetin treatment of anemia associated with cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Epoetin treatment offers an attractive but costly alternative to red blood cell transfusion for managing anemia associated with cancer therapy. The goal of this review is to facilitate more efficient use of epoetin by 1) quantifying the effects of epoetin on the likelihood of transfusion and on quality of life in patients with cancer treatment-related anemia and 2) evaluating whether outcomes are superior when epoetin treatment is initiated at higher hemoglobin thresholds. Two independent reviewers followed a prospective protocol for identifying studies. Outcomes data were combined with the use of a random-effects meta-analysis model. Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials that minimized patient exclusions were defined as higher quality for sensitivity analysis; randomized but unblinded trials and trials with excessive exclusions were included in the meta-analysis but were defined as lower quality. Twenty-two trials (n = 1927) met inclusion criteria, and 12 (n = 1390) could be combined for estimation of odds of transfusion. Epoetin decreased the percentage of patients transfused by 9%-45% in adults with mean baseline hemoglobin concentrations of 10 g/dL or less (seven trials; n = 1080), by 7%-47% in those with hemoglobin concentrations greater than 10 g/dL but less than 12 g/dL (seven trials; n = 431), and by 7%-39% in those with hemoglobin concentrations of 12 g/dL or higher (five trials; n = 308). In sensitivity analysis, the combined odds ratio for transfusion in epoetin-treated patients as compared with controls was 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.33 to 0.62) in higher quality studies and 0.14 (95% CI = 0.06 to 0.31) in lower quality studies. The number of patients needed to treat to prevent one transfusion is 4.4 for all studies, 5.2 for higher quality studies, and 2.6 for lower quality studies. Only studies with mean baseline hemoglobin concentrations of 10 g/dL or less reported statistically significant effects of epoetin treatment on quality of life; quality-of-life data were insufficient for meta-analysis. No studies addressed epoetin's effects on anemia-related symptoms. We conclude that epoetin reduces the odds of transfusion for cancer patients undergoing therapy. Evidence is insufficient to determine whether initiating epoetin earlier spares more patients from transfusion or results in better quality of life than waiting until hemoglobin concentrations decline to nearly 10 g/dL.

Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women

A substantial proportion of all women dying from gynaecological malignancies are aged >75 years. Many reports have indicated that the survival of these patients is decreased compared with younger patients. Differences in biological behaviour, stage of the disease at presentation, and reluctance to undergo aggressive treatment with its associated morbidity are among the factors thought to be responsible for this difference in outcomes. However, investigations also indicate that elderly patients may receive less surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment without obvious clinical rationale. This overview is aimed at providing a guideline of chemotherapy appropriate for patients with epithelial ovarian, uterine (corpus and cervix), and vulvar cancer, aged 70 to 75 years and over. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of drug treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients aged between 70 and 75 years with a good performance status can be treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Carboplatin, either in combination or as a single-agent, may offer advantages in patients aged >75 years and in those with a poor performance status. For patients with early recurrence there is no standard treatment, but several cytostatic and hormonal agents can be used with palliative intent. Patients with a late recurrence are probably best retreated with a platinum-based regimen. In metastatic endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy is the first choice in tumours expressing a progesterone receptor. Poorly differentiated tumours infrequently respond to endocrine therapy. In this situation, and for patients with tumours that have become resistant to hormonal manipulation, platinum-based chemotherapy may be used. The use of carboplatin-based regimens seems preferable in elderly patients, particularly in those with a decreased performance status. The usefulness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer is limited. In case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the use of single agent (low-dose) cisplatin should be balanced against best supportive care. Although overall chemoradiation seems superior than radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients needs further investigation. Chemoradiation might also be considered in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. However, treatment-related morbidity can be considerable and randomised studies are lacking to prove a survival benefit. Our understanding of the tolerance and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients is still incomplete due to a paucity of trials that specifically focus on this subset of patients. However, there appears no argument to withhold chemotherapy based purely on age.

The Effect of Hematopoietic Growth Factors on Platelet Aggregability

We compared the in vitro effect of thrombopoietin (TPO) on platelet aggregation to other hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs): granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G- CSF), granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM- CSF), interleukin-3 (IL-3), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and erythro poietin (EPO). The platelet aggregation response of the venous blood of eight volunteers with differing aggregation patterns was characterized by a platelet aggregation (PA) score that provided numerical assessment of an individual's platelet ag gregation tendency to adenosine diphosphate (ADP). The method for analysis of the data included constructing regres sion lines for each participant's PA score versus the HGF con centration (range of 0.5 nG/mL to 100 nG/mL) and calculating the regression coefficients for the slope and the Y axis inter cept. We demonstrated that the proposed method resulted in accurate assessment of the HGF effect or lack of it on the platelet aggregation response. Within the concentration range evaluated, the influence of IL-6 and G-CSF on platelet aggrega bility was insignificant and the effects of GM-CSF and IL-3 were almost undetectable. In contrast, the potentiating effect of TPO on platelet activation was dose dependent with significant enhancement for all responder types. The concentrations of TPO utilized in our in vitro experiments were in pathophysi ological range, indicating that its impact on platelet aggregation may have clinical relevance, and that monitoring platelet func tion in conjunction with TPO treatment might be advisable. Investigation of the possible synergistic effect of HGF combi nations is warranted.

Enhanced radiosensitivity in experimental tumours following erythropoietin treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

The radiosensitivity of solid tumours in anaemic rats treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO, epoetin beta) was studied. Anaemia was induced by a single dose of carboplatin (45 mg kg(-1) i.v.), resulting in a reduction in the haemoglobin concentration by 30%. In a second group, the development of anaemia was prevented by rhEPO (1000 IU kg(-1)) administered s.c. three times per week starting 6 days before the carboplatin application. Three days after carboplatin treatment, DS-sarcomas were implanted subcutaneously onto the hind foot dorsum. Neither carboplatin nor rhEPO treatment influenced tumour growth rate. Five days after implantation, tumours were irradiated with a single non-curative dose (10 Gy), resulting in a growth delay with a subsequent regrowth of the tumours. In the rhEPO-treated group, the growth delay lasted significantly longer (9.5 days vs. 4.5 days) and the regrowth was slower (6.0 days vs. 4.1 days) compared with the anaemic group. These data suggest that the correction of chemotherapy-induced anaemia by rhEPO (epoetin beta) treatment increases tumour radiosensitivity, presumably as a result of an improved oxygen supply to tumour tissue.

Controlled multicentre study of the influence of subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin on anaemia and transfusion dependency in patients with ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

This randomised controlled multicentre trial evaluated the effectiveness of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in preventing anaemia and reducing the need for blood or erythrocyte transfusion in 122 ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were randomly allocated to receive rhEPO 150 U/kg or 300 U/kg subcutaneously, three times a week, or open control. Patients also received up to 6 cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin, alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 39.4% of patients in the control group received at least one blood transfusion, compared with 9.2% of patients treated with rhEPO. Patients treated with rhEPO experienced a significantly longer time to first erythrocyte transfusion than the control group and were less likely to experience nadir haemoglobin levels < 10 g/dl (P < 0.001 and < 0.05, respectively). A haemoglobin decrease < 1 g/dl during the first chemotherapy cycle, as well as a low baseline serum erythropoietin concentration, predicted a low transfusion need in rhEPO-treated patients but not in controls. During the study, 103 patients suffered at least one adverse event, but no serious, and only nine non-serious adverse events were considered possibly related to rhEPO therapy. These results indicate that treatment with rhEPO prevents anaemia, it reduces the need for blood or rhEPO erythrocyte transfusion in patients with ovarian cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, and it is well tolerated. A starting dose of 150 U/kg of rhEPO, three times a week, may be recommended.

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in the management of anemia and fatigue associated with solid tumors

The anemia that is most common in patients with solid tumors is the anemia of chronic disease, which probably occurs because of im paired production and a diminished response to serum erythropoietin (EPO). A number of trials evaluating recombinant human EPO in anemic cancer patients with a variety of solid tumors have demonstrated effective response rates, with increases in hemoglobin (Hb) concentra tion and reduction or elimination of transfusion requirements. The anemia of certain solid tu mors (eg, lung cancer, prostate cancer) appears to respond better to recombinant human EPO therapy than does the anemia associated with other cancers (eg, colon cancer). Both tumor response and increases in Hb concentrations are important factors in improving the quality of life of patients. The greatest contributor to improved quality of life appears to be the nor malization of Hb levels.

Erythropoietin treatment under polychemotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study

In order to examine the influence of erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on serum hemoglobin levels, transfusion requirements, and quality of life in patients with gynecologic malignancies under polychemotherapy and chronic tumor anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dl), we performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial. Between October 1992 and October 1993, 35 patients from 5 gynecologic departments were entered into this trial. Inclusion criteria were hemoglobin level <11 g/dl, ferritin level >29 ng/ml, stool negative for occult blood, and life expectancy for more than 3 months. Patients received either 150 U/kg body wt rHuEPO (Erypo by Cilag-Janssen) sc three times a week for 12 weeks (n = 23) or a placebo (n = 12). If the hemoglobin levels of the 4th, 8th, or 12th week were >2 g/dl above the baseline value and/or >12 g/dl, the patient was classified as a responder. Patients who required blood transfusions (hemoglobin <8 g/dl, erythrocytes <3 x 10(6)/ml, or clinical symptoms of anemia) were classified as nonresponders. A nonvalidated quality of life questionnaire was completed by the patient at the beginning of the treatment and then every fourth week before receiving chemotherapy. In the rHuEPO group 56.6% of the patients responded to the treatment (chi2 = 10.79, P = 0.001) and only 5 patients (21.7%) required blood transfusions, whereas 8 of 12 patients in the placebo group (66.6%) had to be transfused (chi2 = 6.81, P = 0.009). Quality of life did not differ significantly between the rHuEPO group and the placebo group of patients. Within the rHuEPO group those patients that responded showed a significant increase in physical activity after response in comparison to the preresponsive phase (P = 0.02, paired t test). We therefore concluded that rHuEPO significantly increases serum hemoglobin levels and decreases transfusions requirements while maintaining quality of life in patients with gynecological malignancies who are undergoing polychemotherapy.

Cost comparison of recombinant human erythropoietin and blood transfusion in cancer chemotherapy-induced anemia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) with that of blood transfusion in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia from a healthcare system perspective.

DESIGN

A decision analytic model. Baseline estimates were obtained from a review of clinical trials data and economic evaluation studies.

SUBJECTS

Secondary data analyses of patients with advanced malignancies, excluding hematologic malignancies and metastasized solid tumors.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either leukocyte-depleted packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or rHuEPO 150 units/kg s.c. three times per week for 6 months (24 wk). After 6 weeks, if rHuEPO recipients did not display a response, they received rHuEPO 300 units/kg s.c. three times weekly for the duration of therapy. If rHuEPO recipients still exhibited no response, they were given blood transfusions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For a treatment period of 24 weeks, approximately 64% of rHuEPO recipients responded at an average expected cost of $12971 per patient. One hundred percent of transfusion recipients responded at a cost of $481; this resulted in a cost savings of $8490. Variation of response rates for rHuEPO or PRBCs did not appreciably lower costs. Lower rHuEPO dosages and higher numbers of transfused units of PRBCs yielded approximately equivalent costs; however, these strategies may not be clinically prudent.

CONCLUSIONS

From a healthcare system cost and outcome perspective, blood transfusion is the preferred strategy for chemotherapy-induced anemia. However, rHuEPO may be considered an effective blood-sparing alternative for patients with non-stem cell disorders. Future cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to assess more completely both the clinical and quality-of-life benefits rHuEPO may contribute to individual patients' lives and to society overall.

Hematopoietic growth factors and the treatment of tumor-associated anemias

Erythropoietin, alone or in combination with colony-stimulating factors, is a promising agent in the treatment of patients with cancer-related 'anemia of chronic disorders', chemo/radiotherapy-induced anemia, or anemia due to myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative syndromes. In the first two groups, at least half of the patients can be expected to respond to erythropoietin alone, with an average response delay of about 4 weeks and maximal responses at weekly doses of approximately 1000 U/kg. In myelodysplastic syndromes, only 10-20% of patients respond to conventional doses of erythropoietin, but doses exceeding 1000 U/kg weekly in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor yield response rates of about 40%. Although these results show that hematopoietic growth factors can be used successfully to treat cancer-related anemias, economic constraints preclude their use at the present time.