Intra- and perioperative complications associated with tandem and colpostat application for cervix cancer

The MRI-guided two adaptive brachytherapy fractions versus one adaptive brachytherapy fraction in one application for the cervical cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively compared the clinical and toxicity outcomes for the cervical cancer of the MRI-guided two adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) fractions versus one IGABT fraction in one application.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with cervical cancer received external beam radiotherapy combined with or without concurrent chemotherapy, which was followed by the IGABT. The IGABT in 63 patients had one IGABT in each application (Arm 1), while in the other 57 patients, at least one treatment was two continuous IGABT every other day in one application (Arm 2). Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), progression free survival (PFS), local control (LC) were analyzed. Brachytherapy-related toxicities were evaluated, which included pain, dizziness, nausea/vomiting, fever/infection, blood loss during the removal of applicator and needles, the deep venous thrombosis, and other acute toxicities. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTC-AE 5.0) was used to evaluate the incidence and severity of toxicities of the urinary system, lower digestive system, and reproduction system. Kaplan-Meier and the Log-rank test were used to analyze the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time of the patients in Arm 1 and Arm 2 was 23.5 and 12.0 months, respectively. The overall treatment time was significantly shorter in Arm 2 than Arm 1 (60 vs. 64 d; P = 0.017). The OS, CSS, PFS, and LC in Arm1 and Arm 2 was 77.8% vs. 86.0% (P = 0.632), 77.8% vs. 87.7% (P = 0.821), 68.3% vs. 70.2% (P = 0.207), and 92.1% vs. 94.7% (P = 0.583), respectively. The highest NRS of the pain during brachytherapy waiting period (2.22 ± 1.84 vs. 3.02 ± 1.65; P < 0.001) and at the time of the removal of the applicator (4.69 ± 1.49 vs. 5.30 ± 1.18; P < 0.001) in the patients who received one hybrid intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) in one application and two continuous IC/ISBT every other day in one application were significantly different. So far four patients with grade 3 late toxicities have been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrated that the two continuous IGABT every other day in one application is a logistically applicable, safe, and effective treatment strategy that could shorten the overall treatment time and reduce the medical cost, comparing with the one IGABT in one application.

A phase III randomised trial of trans-abdominal ultrasound in improving application quality and dosimetry of intra-cavitary brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

Intra-cavitary brachytherapy (ICB) remains an integral part of radiotherapy treatment in cervical cancer. Two-dimensional X ray point-based planning remains common and blind insertion leads to uterine perforations and higher toxicity. We conducted a randomised controlled trial of using trans-abdominal ultrasound in performing ICB to reduce perforation and organ at risk doses.

PATIENT AND METHODS

The present study is a phase III open label randomised controlled trial of ultrasound guided ICB conducted on invasive cervical cancer patients. Patients were randomised by a simple computer-generated randomization chart into Arm A (No Ultrasound guidance) and Arm B (ICB with ultrasound guidance). The uterine perforation rates, tandem length change rates, bladder doses, rectal dose and procedure times were compared. Fischer exact test was used to compare the arms and p value <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were randomised. With US assistance, the uterine perforation rate was 1.25% (n = 1). In the non-US assistance arm the perforation rate was 12.5% (n = 10) (p = 0.005). Mean time to complete the entire procedure was significantly shortened from 26 min to 19 min favouring the US arm (p = 0.001). Dosimetric assessment between the two groups showed significant decrease in dose received by the various organs at risk with US assistance.

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms significant improvement in application quality as well as dosimetry with reduction in procedure time. Trans-Abdominal US should be routinely used for ICB procedures, particularly in resource limited settings.

Incidence of Suboptimal Applicator Placement and the Resulting Dosimetric Impact in Image-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy

Aim

With the advent of computed tomography (CT)-based brachytherapy, it is possible to view the appropriate placement of the applicator within the uterine canal and detect uterine perforation. In this study, the incidence of suboptimal placement of the intracavitary applicator and the resulting dosimetric impact were analyzed and compared with a similar set of ideal applicator placement.

Materials and Methods

CT datasets of 282 (141 patients) high dose rate brachytherapy insertions between January and April 2016 were analyzed. The target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were contoured as per the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie European Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology guidelines. The position of the applicator in the uterine cavity was analyzed for each application.

Results

The suboptimal insertion rate was 11.7%. There were 26 perforations and 7 subserosal insertions. The most common site of perforation was through the posterior wall of the uterus (42.4%). Fundus perforation and anterior wall perforation were seen in 24.2% and 12.1% of patients, respectively. The average dose to 90% of the target volume (D90 to high-risk clinical target volume) was the highest (9.15 Gy) with fundal perforation. Average dose to 2 cc (D2cc) bladder was highest for fundus perforation (7.65 Gy). The average dose received by 2 cc of rectum (D2cc) was highest (4.49 Gy) with posterior wall perforation. The average D2cc of the sigmoid was highest with anterior perforation (3.18 Gy).

Conclusion

In order to achieve better local control and to decrease doses to OAR, it is important to perform a technically accurate applicator placement. A cost-effective, real-time image guidance modality like ultrasound is recommended for all insertions to ensure optimal applicator insertion.

Clinical and dosimetric consequences of imperfect applicator insertion in cervical cancer brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This study analyzes clinical consequences and dosimetric variations after imperfect brachytherapy insertions. It examines treatment decisions after such insertions in patients having difficult anatomy, which leads to good subsequent insertions with acceptable dose volume parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed images of all insertions performed during last one year and sorted faulty ones out. Clinical outcome was assessed, analyzing original treatment records. Repeat three-dimensional planning using identical dose-optimization-technique compared their dosimetry. Statistical analysis using SPSS^®-Statistics-software included Fisher's-exact-test to analyze predisposing factors for faulty insertions and predictive factors for subsequent satisfactory insertion. Friedman test was used to compare dose-volume-effects of normalization.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 292 brachytherapy plans revealed imperfect insertions, including thirteen perforations (4.5%). Lack of pre-planning, obstructing mass, narrow vagina, acute anteversion of uterus, and multi-parity were significant (p ≤ 0.05) predisposing factors for atypical insertions. Satisfactory optimization was possible after correcting acute anteflexion or positioning tandem in retroverted direction in uncorrectable retroverted uterus. Dose normalization at point A shifted optimized dose from contoured volume to point of normalization, often undesirably. This difference, however, was statistically not significant (p = 0.121). In patients having obstructing mass, subsequent insertions were perfect, and dose volume parameters were acceptable only when full prescribed dose was delivered to at least 60% volume of the mass after a faulty insertion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-planning by imaging is suggested in all cases of brachytherapy. Insertion of adequate length of tandem aligned to uterine axis is warranted for adequate tumor coverage. Whenever detected, acute anteflexion and mobile retroversion should be corrected. Tandem inserted in retroverted direction in uncorrectable retroverted uterus generates acceptable dose volume parameters. In cases with obstructive cervical mass, good subsequent insertion is possible with acceptable dose volume parameters, if planned dose can be delivered to its 60% volume.

Intraoperative sonographic guidance for intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

To describe the role and benefits of intraoperative sonographic (US) guidance in intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

METHODS

The data of 142 patients who received tandem-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer between January 2010 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. US guidance was carried out for tandem selection and appropriate application. The complications and applicator conformity were assessed with planning CT.

RESULTS

Intracavitary brachytherapy was performed under US guidance for 412 insertions in 113 consecutive patients with cervical cancer. Before we started to use US guidance, applications were done in 29 patients: uterine perforation occurred in two patients (6.9%), the tandem length was short in two patients (6.9%), the tandem length was long in four patients (13.8%), and tandem was in myometrium in three patients (10.3%). We then decided to use US guidance routinely. With US guidance, only 1 of 113 patients had uterine perforation (0.9%), tandem length was short in only one patient (0.9%), and tandem was in myometrium in one patient (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time US provided safe and effective guidance for intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer resulting in decreased rates of perforations and misplacement of applicators. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 46:8-13, 2018.

Routine use of ultrasound guided tandem placement in intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer - a South Indian institutional experience

PURPOSE

Intracavitary brachytherapy necessitates the insertion of a tandem applicator through the cervical os into the uterine cavity. Blind insertion of the tandem may result in suboptimal tandem placement. This decreases the control of the tumor locally and may result in uterine perforation. Although routine real time ultrasound guided tandem placement has shown better results, it is seldom practised. The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of routine real-time intraoperative trans-abdominal ultrasound guided tandem placement in intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective single institutional study conducted from April 2013 to May 2015. A total of 96 patients of locally advanced cervical cancer were treated with routine ultrasound guided brachytherapy amounting to a total of 282 intracavitary applications.

RESULTS

In 78 of the study patients, the cervical os could be easily identified visually, which was then confirmed with ultrasound guidance. In another 12 patients, though the os could be identified visually, uterine sounding was only possible under ultrasound guidance. In another 4 patients, the cervical os could not be identified visually as the cervix was flushed with vagina and ultrasound guidance was necessary for accurate os identification. In 2 of the study patients, intraoperative ultrasound helped in identifying the patients suitable for interstitial brachytherapy rather than intracavitary brachytherapy. Out of the 96 study patients, the length of the uterine canal changed in 15 patients during the subsequent brachytherapy application.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure is strongly advocated for proper placement of the tandem applicator and to avoid perforations. It is an accurate, fast, easily available, and cost-effective method. Hence, it can be incorporated in intracavitary applications for cervical cancers even in the developing countries where cost, accessibility, and time are important issues.

Uterine perforation and its dosimetric implications in cervical cancer high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Purpose

To retrospectively assess the incidence of sub-serosal and uterine perforation of intra-uterine tandem in intracavitary high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer, and to evaluate its dosimetric implications on computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning.

Material and methods

Computed tomography images and brachytherapy plans of cervical cancer patients treated from February 2006 to December 2012 were reviewed for sub-optimal implants (sub-serosal and uterine perforation), and their correlation with cancer FIGO stage and patients’ age. For each patient, the plans showing sub-optimal insertion of intra-uterine tandem were analyzed and compared to plans with adequate insertion. The difference in dose coverage of clinical-target-volume (CTV) and variation of the dose delivered to organs-at-risk (OARs) rectum and bladder were evaluated.

Results

A total of 231 brachytherapy plans for 82 patients were reviewed. We identified 12 (14.6%) patients and 14 (6%) applications with uterine perforation, and 12 (14.6%) patients and 20 (8.6%) applications with sub-serosal insertion of tandem. Data analysis showed that advanced stage correlates with higher incidence of sub-optimal implants (p = 0.005) but not the age (p = 0.18). Dose-volume-histograms (DVHs) analysis showed large variations for CTV dose coverage: D₉₀ significantly decreased with average of –115.7% ± 134.9% for uterine perforation and –65.2% ± 82.8% for sub-serosal insertion (p = 0.025). The rectum and bladder dose assessed by D_2cc increased up to 70.3% and 43.8%, respectively, when sub-optimal insertion of uterine tandem occurred.

Conclusions

We report a low incidence of uterine perforation and sub-serosal insertion of uterine tandem in intracavitary HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer. However, the effects on treatment plan dosimetry can be considerably detrimental. Therefore, we recommend image-guided insertion, at least for the challenging cases.

Acute complications following intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy in uterine cancer

Purpose

Almost 30% of malignancies in women of developing countries are gynecological and brachytherapy is an integral part of management of these patients. Reports of complications (both acute and late) of high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy are sparse in world literature due to relatively small number of gynecological malignancies, particularly in advanced stage, in developed countries. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is gaining popularity in developing countries due to scientific and economic reasons. Here we are reporting our experience regarding acute complications of intracavitary brachytherapy (events occurring within 30 days of insertion needing hospitalization or death) and their causes to improve the quality of management, so that the already low incidence of acute complications can be further reduced.

Material and methods

From February 2004 to December 2012, a total of 1947 patients with uterine cancer were treated by HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in the Department of Radiotherapy, of a tertiary cancer centre of a developing country, 86% of them were cervical cancer and 14% endometrial cancer. Excluding the post-operative patients, a total of 4285 insertions were done in 1527 patients with intact uterus (eligible for analysis) and acute complications were analyzed.

Results

Out of 4285 intracavitary brachytherapy insertions in gynecological malignancy patients, only 12 mortality and 239 morbidity instances needing hospitalization were documented and most of them were in cervical carcinoma patients.

Conclusions

Our results have indicated that acute complications can be minimized by pre-treatment management of co-morbidities, decreasing the time of operative lithotomy position and bed rest, avoidance of ‘conscious sedation’ in selected cases etc. Routine post insertion CT scan if done in all patients in all insertions, then only, uterine perforations can be detected early and prompt management can reduce both the mortality and morbidity to a great extent.

Uterine perforation - 5-year experience in 3-D image guided gynaecological brachytherapy at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

BACKGROUND

Accurate applicator placement is a precondition for the success of gynaecological brachytherapy (BT). Unrecognized uterine perforation can lead to bleeding, infection, high doses to pelvic organs and underdosage of the target volume, resulting in acute morbidity, long-term complications and reduced chance of cure. We aimed to assess the incidence and clinical characteristics of our cases with uterine perforation, review their management and impact on the treatment course.

PATINETS AND METHODS

In all patients, treated with utero-vaginal image guided BT for gynaecological cancer between January 2006 and December 2011, the CT/MR images with the applicator in place were reviewed. The incidence of uterine perforations was recorded. Clinical factors that may have predisposed to increased risk of perforation were recorded. Management of perforations and their impact on treatment course was assessed.

RESULTS

219 patients (428 applications) were suitable for analysis. Uterine perforation was found in 13 (3.0%) applications in 10 (4.6%) patients. The most frequent perforation site was posterior uterine wall (n = 9), followed by anterior wall (n = 2) and fundus (n = 2). All cases were managed conservatively, without complications. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered in 8 cases. In 4 patients, abdominal and/or transrectal ultrasound (US) guidance was used on subsequent applications for applicator insertion; adequate applicator placement was achieved and treatment completed as planned in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

3D imaging for BT planning enables accurate identification of uterine perforations. The incidence of perforations at our department is one of the lowest reported in the literature. US guidance of applicator insertion is useful and feasible, allowing to complete the planned treatment even in challenging cases.

Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance During Intracavitary Brachytherapy Applicator Placement in Cervical Cancer: The University of Alabama at Birmingham Experience

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the University of Alabama at Birmingham experience with routine intraoperative ultrasound (IUS)–guided tandem placement for cervical cancer.

Methods

Between 1999 and 2008, 243 cervical cancer patients underwent IUS-guided tandem placement. One hundred thirty-nine patients received low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and 104 received high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Three hundred fifty-six IUS-guided procedures were performed. Clinical and imaging data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate complications requiring reinsertion of tandem placement in the context of IUS.

Results

All 243 cervical cancer patients completed intracavitary brachytherapy. Five (1.4%) of 356 IUS-guided applicator placements resulted in uterine perforation. All of these patients underwent successful tandem insertion on the second attempt, and no significant clinical sequelae occurred. Intraoperative ultrasound enabled direct uterine visualization and facilitated real-time feedback for selection of a suitable tandem length and curvature; no suboptimal placements requiring return to the operating room occurred (excluding perforation).

Conclusions

In this large series, IUS guidance substantially increased the rate of successful applicator placement and diminished the rate of uterine perforation relative to historical controls. We strongly recommend the use of IUS guidance during operative intrauterine tandem placement for cervical cancer.

Should uterine tandem applicators ever be placed without ultrasound guidance? No: a brief report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Brachytherapy is an integral component of the curative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Optimal applicator placement is associated with improvements in local control and treatment-related toxicity. Uterine perforation by the tandem is common and often undetected by orthogonal radiographs. The role of ultrasound in guiding tandem placement remains controversial.

METHODS

A 55-year-old woman with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB cervix cancer underwent placement of a Fletcher-Suit-Delcos tandem and ovoids applicator. Postoperative computed tomography was used for treatment planning.

RESULTS

The applicator appeared to be appropriately placed on clinical exam and orthogonal radiographs. Postoperative computed tomography revealed the tandem had perforated the anterior uterine wall. In a second procedure, the tandem was placed correctly under intraoperative ultrasonography.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of the literature finds a relatively high rate of uterine perforation of the uterus that is undetected by orthogonal radiographs or clinical examination. Multiple reports support the use of real-time ultrasound for patients with especially challenging anatomy. As this report illustrates, uterine perforation is possible in any patient. Therefore, routine real-time ultrasonography should be considered for all uterine tandem insertions.

Ultrasound-guided tandem placement for low-dose-rate brachytherapy in advanced cervical cancer minimizes risk of intraoperative uterine perforation

OBJECTIVES

Tandem placement as part of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy boost for cervical cancer may be complicated by uterine perforation. The objective of this study was to describe a 10-year experience of using intraoperative ultrasound guidance in an attempt to minimize the risk of uterine perforation.

METHODS

Operative and inpatient records were reviewed to identify cases in which intraoperative ultrasound guidance was employed in order to assist tandem placement, and to determine whether clinical or radiographic findings subsequently suggested uterine perforation. Demographic factors were collected in order to determine the baseline risk of perforation within this population.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2008, 71 patients underwent 110 ultrasound-guided placements of tandem applicators. The median age was 48 (range, 26-88) years, and 20% were older than 60 years. Disease stage was FIGO IB1 (n = 10), IB2 (n = 13), IIA (n = 4), IIB (n = 19), IIIA (n = 2), IIIB (n = 16), IVA (n = 5) and IVB (n = 2). The median gravidity was 3 (range 1-10) and median parity was 3 (range 0-10). Seven patients had a preimplant history of pelvic infection, four had a history of intrauterine contraceptive device use, and 10 had a prior history of Cesarean section delivery. Only one patient experienced infection that may have been attributable to tandem placement-associated uterine perforation. At median survivor follow-up of 34 months, 19 patients had died. The estimated 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates for the entire population were 60% and 66%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the present population, intraoperative ultrasound guidance of tandem placement was associated with no confirmed cases of uterine perforation.

Prospective comparison of clinical and computed tomography assessment in detecting uterine perforation with intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix

Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential component of radical treatment for cervix cancer. Uterine perforation is a potential complication of intrauterine applicator (tandem) insertion. Postprocedure pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely performed at this center. The objective of this study was to prospectively compare radiation oncologists' (RO) clinical impression of satisfactory tandem placement with actual tandem placement as determined from pelvic CT. Patients with cervix cancer undergoing low-dose rate BT from April 2003 to December 2005 were prospectively identified. After tandem placement, patients were brought to the radiotherapy department for pelvic imaging (plain films and CT). Prior to viewing imaging, the RO specified whether they were concerned vs not concerned about uterine perforation. The CT was then reviewed to determine actual tandem placement (perforation vs no perforation). One hundred twenty-four sequential tandem insertions were performed in 114 patients and eligible for analysis. The incidence of CT detected uterine perforation was 13.7% (17/124). Physician concern, age greater than or equal to 60, and tumor size were significant predictors of uterine perforation (P < 0.0001, P= 0.0019, and P= 0.0016, respectively). The overall sensitivity and specificity for physician concern was 52.9% and 84.1%, respectively. CT detected perforation in 8.2% (8/98) of insertions where the RO was clinically confident of correct tandem placement. Pelvic CT was a useful modality to accompany clinical assessment in identifying uterine perforation in cervix BT. As a low but potentially clinical significant number of perforations identified on CT were not suspected clinically, we recommend acquiring pelvic imaging in all patients following tandem insertion to ensure intrauterine tandem positioning.

Tandem application with transvaginal ultrasound guidance

PURPOSE

Intrauterine tandem placement can be difficult in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. A prospective study was planned to investigate transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) guidance for intrauterine tandem insertions in the treatment of cervix cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1997 and January 2002, TVU was used after pelvic external beam radiotherapy in 48 cervical cancer patients with a high complication risk because the cervical canal orifice could not be identified and/or the patients could not undergo hysterometry. The TVU findings were graded as 1-4, with a higher number indicating greater difficulty in implantation. The tandem was inserted using the guidance of the TVU findings. Tandem application difficulties were graded in accordance with the number of implantation trials. The relations between tandem applicability and possible factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

By TVU, the difficulties in tandem insertion were graded as Grade 1 in 5 cases, Grade 2 in 23 cases, Grade 3 in 17 cases, and Grade 4 in 3 cases. The tandem was inserted in 19 patients on the first try, 12 patients on the second try, 12 patients on the third try, and 2 patients on the fourth try. However, the cervical canal could not be opened in 3 patients. Factors such as median age, stage, chemotherapy, diameter of the tandem applicators, time between external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, and the rate of tumor regression were not statistically significant. The ultrasound grade (p = 0.02) and diameter of the tandem applicator (p = 0.007) were statistically significant. Perforation and sepsis were not observed.

CONCLUSION

TVU guidance before brachytherapy has a positive contributory effect in reducing the morbidity rate of patients considered high risk.

One versus two intracavitary brachytherapy applications in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of early stage cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive radiation therapy (RT) with one versus two low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICB) applications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1983 and 1993, 140 stage IB-IIA patients underwent whole-pelvis RT (WPRT) and ICB. Prior to 1988, 56 patients (40%) received two ICB applications. After 1988, our policy was modified and subsequently 84 (60%) patients underwent one application. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, outcome, and complications of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The groups were balanced in terms of race, hemoglobin level, histology, grade, treatment duration, chemotherapy, and follow-up. The single-application group, however, had more stage IB disease, had small (< or =4 cm) tumors, and received higher WPRT and lower point A doses. Overall, the two groups had similar 5-year local control (P = 0.83) and disease-free (P = 0.23) and cause-specific (P = 0.29) survival rates. Moreover, no differences were seen when analyzed by tumor size or stage. On multivariate analysis, the number of applications was not correlated with recurrence (P = 0.59, hazard rate = 1.1, 95% confidence interval = 0.6-2.2). Chronic complications were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our nonselected comparison of one versus two ICB applications in early-stage cervical cancer patients reveals comparable outcomes and complication rates for the two approaches. These results support the use of a single application in early-stage patients undergoing definitive RT.

Acute problems during low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence and severity of problems arising during the hospitalization of cervical carcinoma patients undergoing low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (ICB).

METHODS

One hundred seventy ICB implants in 128 cervical carcinoma patients undergoing curative radiation therapy were reviewed. All events during the hospitalization requiring physician evaluation and/or intervention were scored as a "problem" and divided into 10 categories (fever/infection, pain, gastrointestinal, renal, pulmonary, cardiac, dermatologic, gynecologic, endocrinologic, psychiatric). Problems were scored as mild (no significant morbidity, therapy not discontinued), moderate (therapy discontinued but no significant morbidity), or severe (significant morbidity or mortality). Patient and treatment factors were correlated with acute problems.

RESULTS

Forty-two implants (24.7%) were associated with acute problems (95% minor, 5% moderate, 0% severe). The most common types were fever/infection (14.1%) and gastrointestinal problems (5. 9%). Other problem types occurred in <3% of implants. No patient or treatment factor including age, comorbid disease, weight, implant duration, or anesthesia type was significantly correlated with acute problems. Patients who developed acute problems had a survival (P = 0.21) and risk of late sequelae (P = 0.74) similar to those of patients without acute problems.

CONCLUSION

Problems occur during the hospitalization in approximately one-quarter of cervical carcinoma patients undergoing low-dose-rate ICB. However, most are minor and do not result in morbidity, require discontinuation of therapy, or adversely impact on outcome.

Perioperative morbidity and mortality of high-dose-rate gynecologic brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the 30-day morbidity and mortality rates for patients with an intact uterus undergoing high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, and to assess risk factors which may predict for these potentially life-threatening complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From August 1989 to December 1994, 128 cervical and 41 medically inoperable endometrial cancer patients were treated with 5 outpatient weekly HDR brachytherapy insertions. Patients with cervical cancer also were treated with external beam radiotherapy. Acute events that resulted in either hospitalization (morbidity) or death (mortality) within 30 days of the implant were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall there were 16 acute events in 169 patients (9.5%). The overall morbidity and mortality rates for the cervical and endometrial patients were 5.5%, 1.6%, 7.3%, and 9.8%, respectively. The following factors were significant by univariate analysis: age per decade, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), significant medical history, diagnosis of cervical vs. endometrial cancer, and mean time exceeding 160 minutes for the procedure. Since age was the most significant predictive factor (p = 0.0003), bivariate analyses were performed by adjusting for age. In these analyses only ASA and KPS maintained significance, while a positive medical history was of borderline significance (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

The morbidity and mortality rates observed in gynecologic patients selected for HDR brachytherapy were similar to low-dose-rate, but higher than other HDR reports. Reasons for this include a higher risk population, especially those with medically inoperable endometrial cancer. In the cervical cancer patients, some of the complications may have also been a result of the external beam portion of the radiation. In order to minimize the acute complications observed in the present HDR brachytherapy system, the following changes have been implemented: appropriate patient selection, anesthesiology involvement to monitor conscious sedation for high-risk patients, external beam radiotherapy alone in patients at extremely high risk, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, use of intraoperative ultrasound, shorter duration in the brachytherapy suite, and preradiation treatment plans (plans executed prior to the insertion) if applicable. Finally, this analysis suggests that these procedures should be performed in a hospital-based setting where appropriate support is available.