Phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and mitoxantrone in patients with persistent ovarian cancer

A comparison of primary intraperitoneal chemotherapy to consolidation intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally resected advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare survival outcomes for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received primary intravenous/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) chemotherapy to those who received IV followed by consolidation (treatment given to patients in remission) IP chemotherapy.

METHODS

Data were analyzed and compared for all patients with stage III-IV EOC who underwent optimal primary cytoreduction (residual disease ≤ 1 cm) followed by cisplatin-based consolidation IP chemotherapy (1/2001-12/2005) or primary IV/IP chemotherapy (1/2005-7/2011).

RESULTS

We identified 224 patients; 62 (28%) received IV followed by consolidation IP chemotherapy and 162 (72%) received primary IV/IP chemotherapy. The primary IP group had significantly more patients with serous tumors. The consolidation IP group had a significantly greater median preoperative platelet count, CA-125, and amount of ascites. There were no differences in residual disease at the end of cytoreduction between both groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was greater for the primary IP group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (23.7 months vs 19.7 months; HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.06; p=0.11). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly greater for the primary IP group (78.8 months vs 57.5 months; HR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83; p=0.004). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, the difference in PFS was not significant (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56-1.11; p=0.17), while the difference in OS remained significant (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, primary IV/IP chemotherapy was associated with improved OS compared to IV followed by consolidation IP chemotherapy in patients with optimally cytoreduced advanced EOC.

Prognostic factors for patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy after second-look assessment: results of long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim was to determine the long-term outcome for patients with FIGO stage IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) treated with intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy after second-look assessment.

METHODS

By using data from a retrospective cohort of 433 patients who received IP therapy after second-look assessment after primary surgery and initial systemic therapy for EOC between 1984 and 1998 at our institution, all FIGO stage IIIC and IV patients were identified. Standard statistical methods were used.

RESULTS

Overall, 297 patients met study criteria (246 stage IIIC; 51 stage IV). The median survival for patients with stage IV disease was 34 months compared with 42 months for patients with stage IIIC disease (P=.02). The only significant predictor of overall survival in patients with stage IV disease was the presence of gross residual disease at initiation of IP therapy (P=.027). When comparing stage IV patients with and without pleural effusions to all stage IIIC patients, there was a significant trend toward improved survival in the patients with pleural effusions only compared with other stage IV patients (P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged overall survival was observed in patients with no gross residual disease at the time of IP chemotherapy initiation. When compared with similarly treated stage IIIC patients, stage IV patients with malignant pleural effusions appear to have a better outcome than those with other sites of metastasis. Future prospective trials should evaluate the use of IP therapy for patients with stage IV EOC by virtue of malignant pleural effusions only who responded to initial systemic therapy.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature

The use of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been advocated in different settings of patients with ovarian cancer. Cisplatin is the drug of choice because of its high response rate and minimal local toxicity. This treatment can be given to women with small residual disease after second look, with surgically assessed complete response rates of approximately 30%, and with a prolonged survival in small subset of patients. However, the use of IP chemotherapy as consolidation treatment of pathologically complete responders after first-line systemic chemotherapy has not been definitively evaluated in a phase III trial. There is much debate in the literature both for and against the use of IP chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. The recent Cochrane meta-analyses of eight randomized trials enrolling 1819 patients has shown that first-line IP chemotherapy improves progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with minimal residual disease after initial surgery. However, the potential for catheter-related complications, abdominal pain with infusion, and toxicities needs to be taken into consideration for decision making in each individual woman. Rectosigmoidal surgery can be associated with gross contamination of the operative field, and in this case, the catheter placement should not be performed during primary surgery but should be delayed to 3 weeks later. Patients should be provided with information on the survival and toxicity for both IP and systemic treatments, as well as practical information about the administration of each regimen, so that they may be involved in the decision-making process.

Principles and practice of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been studied for years to improve the survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Recently, the result of Gynecologic Oncology Group 172 trial comparing IP versus intravenous administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy was published, demonstrating the improvement of survival benefit in favor of the IP arm. This trial is the third trial that showed a survival benefit on IP chemotherapy. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Gynecologic Oncology Group have done a meta-analysis on the results of these three US trials and other phase III trials of IP versus intravenous chemotherapy, and significant improvement of survival was shown with IP therapy. Based on this meta-analysis, NCI has released a clinical announcement encouraging the gynecological oncology community to consider IP chemotherapy as the standard treatment for optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer patients. However, there still are controversial issues regarding the use of IP chemotherapy. It is important to understand how IP chemotherapy works to solve those issues in the future. In this review article, we discuss the principles and clinical aspects of IP chemotherapy and also discuss the current problems and future perspectives in IP chemotherapy.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is based on sound pharmacological principles and is technically feasible. There is mounting evidence, bolstered by a recent randomized trial, that in certain patients, this route of delivery may be superior to traditional intravenous chemotherapy. This review explores the background and pharmacokinetic principles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, the recent evidence supporting an intraperitoneal approach, and some of the logistical and technical challenges involved.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been evaluated in several settings. Most phase I and II data came from second-line treatment of ovarian cancer, and there have been a few series, including one recent phase III trial, exploring intraperitoneal consolidation. The greatest impact among recent studies will be from a large, intergroup phase III trial evaluating intraperitoneal therapy in the front-line setting. This study will probably change the dialogue of standard treatment for optimally cytoreduced, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

SUMMARY

Based on recent findings, intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be considered for the front-line treatment of women with minimal residual advanced ovarian cancer. Efforts should continue to facilitate the integration of intraperitoneal treatment into mainstream practice, and future trials should be designed to address lingering controversy surrounding this route of treatment.

Intraperitoneal cisplatin with intraperitoneal gemcitabine in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a phase I/II Trial

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to determine the dose and schedule of i.p. cisplatin with i.p. gemcitabine in patients with persistent disease at second-look assessment, the toxicity of this regimen, and the time to treatment failure and overall survival.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed a Phase I/II evaluation of i.p. cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 with planned gemcitabine at 500, 750, 1000, or 1250 mg/m(2) i.p. on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day schedule for four courses. Eligible patients completed surgical cytoreduction followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. They had second-look assessment showing microscopic or macroscopic (< or =1 cm) disease, followed by i.p. port placement.

RESULTS

The Phase I dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 thrombocytopenia at day 15 on dose level 1 (n = 5). The protocol was amended, and the Phase II portion accrued to 30 patients, who were given i.p. cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and gemcitabine at 500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 on a 21-day schedule for four courses. Nine patients were removed from the study: one each for hypersensitivity, cellulitis, and i.p. port malfunction; two for progression of disease; and four for renal toxicity. Other toxicities included grade 3 nausea (7%) and transient grade 3 neuropathy (3%). Grade 1 or 2 neuropathy was frequently seen (80%). Five patients (17%) returned to the operating room at a median of 6 months (range, 1-20 months) after i.p. therapy for evaluation of abdominal pain; two patients had recurrence, and all had areas of fibrous tissue with encasement of the bowel. In two patients, the fibrous tissue was causing partial bowel obstruction. No other patients had symptoms prompting surgical exploration. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies showed a median area under the curve (AUC) i.p. of 3041 h. micro M (range, 676-5702 h. micro M) and AUC in plasma of 4.0 h. micro M (range, 0.92-8.2 h. micro M) reached between 120 and 240 min; the pharmacological advantage was 759-fold (range, 217-1415-fold) for i.p. versus plasma drug levels. The mean residence time of gemcitabine with i.p. administration was 4.7 h. The median time to progression of the intent to treat population was 15.93 months (95% confidence interval, 9.13-25.9 months), with a median overall survival of 43.5 months [95% confidence interval, (34.66- infinity)]. No statistical differences were seen with respect to overall survival if patients were grouped in terms of optimal debulking or not (median not reached versus 34.8 months, respectively; P = 0.16) or whether visible disease was present or not at the start of i.p. therapy (34.8 versus 47.7 months; P = 0.47). With regard to time to treatment failure, a statistical difference favored patients with optimal versus nonoptimal primary debulking (25.2 versus 10.2 months, respectively; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The median time to treatment failure and overall survival of 15.9 months and 43.5 months, respectively, are consistent with our historical data in patients receiving i.p. platinum-based regimens for consolidation. The fibrotic changes seen in explored patients suggest local toxicity of this combination. The absolute benefit of i.p. consolidation requires randomized trials to assess efficacy.

Anthracyclines in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to present a summary of the pharmacology of anthracyclines as well as to review the results of clinical trials including patients with gynecologic malignancies treated with anthracycline-based therapy.

METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE literature search of relevant clinical trials for the scope of this review that evaluated anthracycline-based therapy in gynecologic malignancies.

RESULTS

Doxorubicin has established activity in carcinomas that arise in the ovary, uterine cervix, and endometrium as well as in uterine sarcomas. However, doxorubicin has structural characteristics that limit its efficacy and safety. Newer anthracyclines with distinct structure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity profiles have been developed to overcome the limitations of doxorubicin and to further exploit the activity of anthracyclines. Epirubicin is characterized by a structural formula that confers similar cytotoxic antitumor activity with fewer associated side effects than its analogue. Most recently, pegylated liposomal formulations, with distinct pharmacokinetic properties and a favorable toxicity profile, have shown antitumor activity as salvage therapy in ovarian cancer. Intraperitoneal mitoxantrone is also associated with activity in ovarian cancer; however, its clinical use is limited by the severity of local adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of anthracyclines in the management of advanced gynecologic malignancies is important as part of first-line therapy or as a salvage approach. Newer anthracycline agents such as epirubicin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin are associated with a more favorable toxicity profile. Clinical trials are under way to further explore the role of newer anthracycline-based regimens as first-line or salvage treatment in gynecologic malignancies.

Intraperitoneal mitoxantrone: a feasibility and pharmacokinetic study

Fractionated doses have been advocated to prevent chemoperitonitis after intraperitoneal infusion of mitoxantrone. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of various origin underwent surgery, including intestinal resections, with minimal residual disease. Peritoneal mitoxantrone in 1000 ml/m(2) saline was planned on the first post-operative day in groups of four patients (5 mg/m(2) for 3 and 5 days, 7.5 mg/m(2) for 3 and 4 days, 10 mg/m(2) for 2-4 days, if possible). Due to dose-limiting myelosuppression, only one and three patients received the 7.5-mg 4-day and 10-mg 3-day regimens, respectively. A total of 20 patients were consequently treated. Neither major complications nor severe pain were observed. Pharmacokinetics were completed on the 1st day in five 5-mg and five 10-mg patients, on the 5th day in three 5-mg patients, and on the 3rd day in one 10-mg patient. On the 1st day, mean peritoneal peak concentrations of mitoxantrone resulted 1.45 +/-0.56 (range 0.48-1.9) and 1.9+/-0.85 (range 1.27-3.13) microg/ml in the 5-mg and 10-mg patients, respectively. Mean dialysate/plasma exposure (AUC) ratio was 115. Even in patients with sutures, early post-operative fractionated intraperitoneal mitoxantrone appears feasible and safe, with a high local advantage, for up to 5 days of treatment and a maximum tolerated total dose of 20-25 mg/m(2).

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma: results of long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

To determine long-term survival and predictors of recurrence in a retrospective cohort of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records were reviewed of 433 patients who received IP therapy for ovarian cancer between 1984 and 1998; follow-up data were available for 411 patients. IP therapy was provided as consolidation therapy (n = 89), or for treatment of persistent (n = 310) or recurrent (n = 12) disease after surgery and initial systemic therapy; therapy usually consisted of platinum-based combination therapy. Statistical analysis included tests for associations between potential prognostic factors, and between prognostic factors and survival. Survival probabilities were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods, and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated by a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 52 years (range, 25 to 76 years). Distribution by stage and grade was as follows: stage I, 7; II, 24; III, 342; IV, 52; not available (NA), 8; and grade 1, 30; 2, 99; and 3, 289; NA, 15. The median survival from initiation of IP therapy by residual disease was none, 8.7 years; microscopic, 4.8 years; less than 1 cm, 3.3 years; more than 1 cm, 1.2 years. In a multivariate analysis, the only significant predictors of long-term survival were grade and size of residual disease at initiation of IP therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged survival was observed in selected patients receiving IP platinum-based therapy. It is not possible to determine the contribution of IP therapy to survival in this study. A relationship between size of disease at the initiation of IP therapy and long-term survival was demonstrated.

Complications associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy catheters

PURPOSE

The goal of this work was to determine the complication rate and any predisposing risk factors associated with subcutaneous intraperitoneal (ip) catheters used in the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 301 patients who had a subcutaneous Bardport catheter placed for administration of ip chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan--Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) from December 1989 to May 1997.

RESULTS

Thirty (10%) patients were identified as having catheter-related complications, with 19 (6.3%) experiencing inflow obstruction and 11 (3.6%) experiencing infection. Only 21 of 301 (7%) required cessation of chemotherapy prior to its expected completion, with 14 (4.6%) occurring in the malfunction group and 7 (2.3%) in the infection group. Three hundred thirteen patients received an ip catheter; however, 12 patients who received their ip chemotherapy elsewhere were excluded when determining the complication rate. Overall, 218 of 313 (69.6%) catheters were placed at the time of laparotomy, 61 of 313 (19.5%) catheters were placed at the time of laparoscopy, and 34 of 313 (10.9%) were placed as a separate procedure. In the malfunction group, 18 of 19 (94.7%) patients had their catheters placed at the time of laparotomy, none were placed at the time of laparoscopy, and 1 of 19 (5.3%) was placed as a separate procedure. In the infection group, 8 of 11 (72.7%) catheters were placed at laparotomy, 2 of 11 (18.3%) were placed at the time of laparoscopy, and 1 of 11 (9.0%) was placed as a separate procedure. Complications occurred in 3 of 54 (5.5%) patients who received platinum alone, 11 of 134 (8.2%) who received platinum in combination, 2 of 43 (4.7%) who received paclitaxel alone, 13 of 61 (21.3%) who received mitoxantrone alone or in combination, and 1 of 9 (11.1%) who received other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous ip catheters are associated with a lower rate of catheter-related complications than previously reported, perhaps due in part to both avoiding insertion of ip catheters at the time of bowel surgery and placing ip catheters at the time of laparoscopy.

Intraperitoneal cisplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer patients with a positive second look

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the role and safety of intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin and intravenous (IV) paclitaxel in platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer patients who were found to have small-volume disease (<1 cm) at the time of their second-look procedure.

METHODS

In a retrospective review, 32 patients with small-volume disease had an IP Bardport catheter placed at the time of second look at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (1995-1998). Patients received IP cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks and either IV paclitaxel (135 mg/ m(2)) every 3 weeks or IV paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for a maximum of five cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (75%) of 32 patients received IP cisplatin/IV paclitaxel every 3 weeks and 8 (25%) received IP cisplatin every 3 weeks with weekly IV paclitaxel. Seven (21.9%) of 32 patients required interruption of treatment secondary to neuropathy. Of these, 4 (15.6%) were changed to another IV chemotherapeutic agent, and 3 (9.3%) required discontinuation of IV paclitaxel only. Two (6%) patients required IP port removal secondary to malfunction and were changed to IV therapy and 1 (3%) requested discontinuation of IP therapy secondary to abdominal pain. Median follow-up was 19 months (mean, 20.1 months; range, 6-36 months). Progression of disease after completion of IP therapy was documented by clinical exam, abnormal CT, and/or rising CA-125 levels. The median progression-free interval was 13 months (mean, 15.1 months; range, 2-33 months). Median overall survival was 27 months (mean, 34.2 months; range, 10-42 months). At the time of review, 13 (40.6%) of the 32 patients were alive with disease, 7 (21.9%) were without evidence of disease, and 12 (37.5%) were dead of disease.

CONCLUSION

IP cisplatin in combination with IV paclitaxel appears to be no more effective than other reported regimens as second-line therapy for patients with persistent small-volume disease. Neurotoxicity is dose limiting, and the combination cannot be recommended for the routine care of persistent peritoneal cancers.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

From a theoretical viewpoint, intraperitoneal therapy (IP) in patients with ovarian cancer, a malignancy which remains mainly confined to the peritoneal cavity, is logical. Over the past decades this approach has evolved into a therapeutic strategy for a selected group of patients. Data available at present suggest a beneficiary role (for IP therapy) as first-line treatment in patients with small residual disease and possibly following initial reduction of tumor load by systemic chemotherapy. The theoretical basis, the present status of IP therapy in different settings, pharmacology, factors limiting its clinical utility and future directions are reviewed.

Dose-intensive approaches to ovarian cancer

Increasing the total dose or the dose intensity of platinum does not improve survival in women with ovarian cancer. High-dose chemotherapy with hematologic support has not been shown to be more effective than standard-dose chemotherapy. Regional dose intensity, through intraperitoneal chemotherapy, may have a role in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Further studies are needed to identify the optimal combination of agents, in addition to a platinum and a taxane, to be used in primary therapy for ovarian cancer.