Phase II evaluation of 3-day topotecan with cyclophosphamide in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

A Phase I Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy Combining Topotecan plus Cyclophosphamide with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Ovarian Cancer: The ITOV 01bis Study

BACKGROUND

Dose-intensive chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been evaluated as a salvage treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer, but its benefit has not yet been demonstrated. In a previous phase I trial, we reported the feasibility of administering topotecan as a salvage regimen.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were treated with escalating doses of topotecan associated with a fixed dose of cyclophosphamide.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose was established at 9.0 mg/m2 on a 5-day regimen, analogously to what was reported for topotecan monotherapy. One toxic death from septic shock and multiorgan failure occurred. Although hematopoietic toxicities were overcome by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, superior nonhematological toxicities were observed as compared to the initial trial.

CONCLUSION

Response rates were generally short and survival rates were poor. Results of the ITOV 01bis study demonstrate that, in the setting of recurrent ovarian cancer, intensive chemotherapy based on topotecan-cyclophosphamide association is not currently clinically indicated.

Current role and future aspects of topotecan in relapsed ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths in women. It is associated with a poor prognosis, as the majority of patients present with advanced disease and relapse after radical surgery, and following chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

OBJECTIVE

To review the role of topotecan in the treatment of advanced and relapsed ovarian cancer, and the efficacy and safety of novel dosing regimens and formulations of topotecan. It will also discuss further options of combination of topotecan with other cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The authors searched for relevant references in the MEDLINE database and in congress abstracts of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

RESULTS

Topotecan is an established second-line therapy for advanced and relapsed ovarian cancer; a regimen of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day 1-5 has been approved in the USA and many other western countries. Topotecan is well tolerated; associated haematological toxicity is generally manageable, reversible and non-cumulative. A number of alternative dosing regimens and formulations have been investigated in an attempt to improve the toxicity profile of topotecan without compromising anti-tumour activity. A novel oral formulation of topotecan has shown clinical promise in patients with advanced and relapsed disease. Administration of i.v. topotecan on a weekly basis produced encouraging results in several phase II trials, with less haematological toxicity and similar response rates to the day 1-5 regimen. Also, recent early studies demonstrate that topotecan is effective in combination with several other therapeutic agents in the relapsed setting.

CONCLUSION

The peer-reviewed literature reports that topotecan is an effective, well tolerated treatment option for relapsed ovarian cancer.

Topotecan for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapeutic agents such as topotecan can be used to treat ovarian cancer. The effects of using topotecan as a therapeutic agent have not been previously been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of topotecan for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (Issue 4, 2006); Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group (CGCRG) Specialised Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2006); MEDLINE (January 1990 to 27 July 2006); EMBASE (January 1990 to 27 July 2006); The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) database (to 1 August 2006); CBM (Chinese Biomedical Database) (January 1990 to 27 July 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which randomized patients with ovarian cancer to single or combined use of topotecan versus interventions without topotecan, or different remedies of topotecan.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted and analysed data.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies including 1323 participants were eligible for this review (Gordon 2004a; Gore 2001a; Gore 2002; Hoskins 1998; Huinink 2004; Placido 2004) All studies, as reported, were identified as being of poor methodological quality. Topotecan had comparable effectiveness to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), (16.1 weeks versus 17.0 weeks; p = 0.095). Overall survival (OS) time was similar in participants using PLD compared with topotecan (56.7 weeks versus 60 weeks; p = 0.341). Topotecan was more hematologically toxic compared with paclitaxel or PLD, relative risks (RRs) of hematological events: ranged from 1.03 to 14.46 and 1.73 to 27.12 respectively. A 21-day cycle of topotecan was more toxic than a 42-day cycle (RRs of hematological and non-hematological events ranged from 1.03 to 8). Intravenous and oral topotecan had comparable toxicity. Topotecan delayed progression more effectively compared with paclitaxel (23.1 weeks versus 14 weeks, p = 0.0021). Participants were more likely to respond to topotecan on a 21-day cycle as opposed to a 42-day cycle (RR 7.23, 95% CI 0.94 to 55.36). Small tumor diameter, sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with better prognosis. Small sample size, methodological flaws and poor reporting of the included trials made measurement bias of the trials difficult to assess.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan appears to have a similar level of effectiveness as paclitaxel and PLD, though with different patterns of side effects. Larger, well-designed RCTs are required in order to define an optimal regime.

Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial

PURPOSE

Relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma patients still have a poor prognosis. This phase-II trial assessed a new topotecan containing chemotherapy approach in patients with active disease.

METHODS

Chemotherapy consisted of topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)/day 168-h continuous infusion), cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2)/day 1-h-infusion days 1-7 starting 6 h prior to topotecan), and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)/day 1-h-infusion days 8-10). Patients with relapsed neuroblastoma were scheduled for six cycles, untreated patients for two cycles followed by standard high-risk treatment.

RESULTS

Main toxicity observed during 153 cycles were grade 3-4 leukopenia (97% of cycles), thrombocytopenia (92%), neutropenic fever (52%), and mucositis (10%). No treatment related fatal toxicity occurred. Complete or partial response was achieved in 19 of 31 (61%) evaluable relapsed patients and 8 of 11 (72%) untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide is tolerable and effective in relapsed and untreated neuroblastoma. Myelotoxicity is the main side effect but seems justified in view of the encouraging response rates. A randomized phase-III trial in primary disease has been commenced.

Hepatotoxicity of Chemotherapy

The selection of an antineoplastic regimen for an oncology patient is based first on the availability of effective drugs and then on a balancing of potential treatment-related toxicities with the patient's clinical condition and associated comorbidities. Liver function abnormalities are commonly observed in this patient population and identifying their etiology is often difficult. Immunosuppression, paraneoplastic phenomena, infectious diseases, metastases, and poly-pharmacy may cloud the picture. While criteria for standardizing liver injury have been established, dose modifications often rely on empiric clinical judgment. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of hepatotoxic manifestations for the most common chemotherapeutic agents is essential. We herein review the hepatotoxicity of commonly used antineoplastic agents and regimens.

Antitumor activity of poly(ethylene glycol)-camptothecin conjugate: the inhibition of tumor growth in vivo

Antitumor effect of poly(ethylene glycol)-camptothecin conjugate (PEG-CPT) was studied in the nude mouse model of human colon cancer xenografts. The animals were treated intravenously with 15 mg/kg of camptothecin (CPT) or PEG-CPT conjugate at equivalent CPT dose. Antitumor activity, apoptosis induction and caspase-dependent signaling pathways were studied 12, 24, 48 and 96 h after single injection. In addition, pharmacokinetics, tumor distribution and accumulation of PEG polymer labeled with green fluorescence protein (GFP) were studied. The data obtained showed that the conjugation of low molecular weight anticancer drug CPT with low solubility to high molecular weight water-soluble PEG polymer provides several advantages over the native drug. First, the conjugation improves drug pharmacokinetics in the blood and tumor. Second, such conjugation provides passive tumor targeting by the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect, increasing drug concentration in the tumor. Third, the coupling increases the bioavailability of CPT, induces apoptosis in tumor and, therefore, enhances anticancer activity of PEG-CPT. Thus, the use of macromolecular conjugate provided passive tumor targeting of the drug, improved pharmacokinetics and increased the stability of the drug during circulation. It offered better uptake by the targeted tumor cells and substantially enhanced apoptosis and antitumor activity of the conjugated drug in the tumor and decreased apoptosis in liver and kidney as compared with the native drug. All these characteristics make PEG-CPT conjugate an attractive anticancer drug for the effective chemotherapy of solid tumors.

Outcome of ATP-based tumor chemosensitivity assay directed chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We wished to evaluate the clinical response following ATP-Tumor Chemosensitivity Assay (ATP-TCA) directed salvage chemotherapy in a series of UK patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The results are compared with that of a similar assay used in a different country in terms of evaluability and clinical endpoints.

METHODS

From November 1998 to November 2001, 46 patients with pre-treated, advanced ovarian cancer were given a total of 56 courses of chemotherapy based on in-vitro ATP-TCA responses obtained from fresh tumor samples or ascites. Forty-four patients were evaluable for results. Of these, 18 patients had clinically platinum resistant disease (relapse < 6 months after first course of chemotherapy). There was evidence of cisplatin resistance in 31 patients from their first ATP-TCA. Response to treatment was assessed by radiology, clinical assessment and tumor marker level (CA 125).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 59% (33/56) per course of chemotherapy, including 12 complete responses, 21 partial responses, 6 with stable disease, and 15 with progressive disease. Two patients were not evaluable for response having received just one cycle of chemotherapy: if these were excluded the response rate is 61%. Fifteen patients are still alive. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months per course of chemotherapy; median overall survival (OAS) for each patient following the start of TCA-directed therapy was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval 7.9-12.8 months).

CONCLUSION

The results show similar response rates to previous studies using ATP-TCA directed therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. The assay shows high evaluability and this study adds weight to the reproducibility of results from different centres.

Surgery and salvage chemotherapy for Chinese women with recurrent advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective case-control study

The objective of this paper is to clarify the role of cytoreductive surgery and salvage chemotherapy in the management of recurrent advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (RAEOC) and to identify factors affecting disease recurrence. One hundred sixty seven patients with RAEOC treated at the Cancer Hospital of Fudan University between January 1986 and December 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method with difference in survival estimated by the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were identified by the Cox stepwise regression model and variants associated with disease recurrence were determined using logistic stepwise regression methods. The median age was 52 (range 27-72) years. Sixty (35.9%) patients underwent re-debulking surgery, 23 of them with residual disease </=1 cm. There was a significant difference in survival between optimal and suboptimal groups, with an estimated median survival of 18 and 13 months, respectively (P = 0.021, chi2 = 9.42). When patients with suboptimal surgical results were compared to those with chemotherapy alone, there was a significant difference in median survival, 13 vs. 16 months (P = 0.0364, chi2 = 4.38). Residual disease after primary surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and salvage chemotherapy was a predictor of survival identified by Cox regression analysis, but secondary cytoreductive surgery did not reach a level of statistical significance (P = 0.0561). Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that age, first-line chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the size of residual disease after primary surgical cytoreduction were factors affecting disease recurrence. We conclude that patients with RAEOC benefit from optimal secondary surgical cytoreduction. Should the recurrence not be optimally cytoreduced by surgery, alternative salvage chemotherapy is best for RAEOC.

Hepatotoxicity of chemotherapy

The selection of a chemotherapeutic regimen for the oncology patient is based on a thorough assessment of potential hazards relating to the patient's clinical condition and the toxicities of chemotherapy. Liver function abnormalities are commonly seen in this patient population and deducing their aetiology may be difficult. Immunosuppression, paraneoplastic phenomena, infectious disease, metastases and polypharmacy may all confound the clinical picture. While criteria for standardising liver injury have been established, dose modifications often rely on empirical clinical judgement. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of hepatotoxic manifestations for the most common chemotherapeutic agents is essential. This article reviews the hepatotoxicity of commonly utilised antineoplastic agents.