Mutant forms of the enhancer-binding protein NtrC can activate transcription from solution

Using a synthetic machinery to improve carbon yield with acetylphosphate as the core

In microbial cell factory, CO2 release during acetyl-CoA production from pyruvate significantly decreases the carbon atom economy. Here, we construct and optimize a synthetic carbon conserving pathway named as Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase Cycle with Trifunctional PhosphoKetolase (SCTPK) in Escherichia coli. This cycle relies on a generalist phosphoketolase Xfspk and converts glucose into the stoichiometric amounts of acetylphosphate (AcP). Furthermore, genetic circuits responding to AcP positively or negatively are created. Together with SCTPK, they constitute a gene-metabolic oscillator that regulates Xfspk and enzymes converting AcP into valuable chemicals in response to intracellular AcP level autonomously, allocating metabolic flux rationally and improving the carbon atom economy of bioconversion process. Using this synthetic machinery, mevalonate is produced with a yield higher than its native theoretical yield, and the highest titer and yield of 3-hydroxypropionate via malonyl-CoA pathway are achieved. This study provides a strategy for improving the carbon yield of microbial cell factories.

Dynamics of the Escherichia coli proteome in response to nitrogen starvation and entry into the stationary phase

Nitrogen is needed for the biosynthesis of biomolecules including proteins and nucleic acids. In the absence of fixed nitrogen prokaryotes such as E. coli immediately ceases growth. Ammonium is the preferred nitrogen source for E. coli supporting the fastest growth rates. Under conditions of ammonium limitation, E. coli can use alternative nitrogen sources to supply ammonium ions and this reprogramming is led by the induction of the NtrC regulon. Here we used label free proteomics to determine the dynamics of E. coli proteins expression in response to ammonium starvation in both the short (30min) and the longer (60min) starvation. Protein abundances and post-translational modifications confirmed that activation of the NtrC regulon acts as the first line of defense against nitrogen starvation. The ribosome inactivating protein Rmf was induced shortly after ammonium exhaustion and this was preceded by induction of other ribosome inactivating proteins such as Hpf and RaiA supporting the hypothesis that ribosome shut-down is a key process during nitrogen limitation stress. The proteomic data revealed that growth arrest due to nitrogen starvation correlates with the accumulation of proteins involved in DNA condensation, RNA and protein catabolism and ribosome hibernation. Collectively, these proteome adaptations will result in metabolic inactive cells which are likely to exhibit multidrug tolerance.

DNA recognition by a σ(54) transcriptional activator from Aquifex aeolicus

Transcription initiation by bacterial σ(54)-polymerase requires the action of a transcriptional activator protein. Activators bind sequence-specifically upstream of the transcription initiation site via a DNA-binding domain (DBD). The structurally characterized DBDs from activators all belong to the Fis (factor for inversion stimulation) family of helix-turn-helix DNA-binding proteins. We report here structures of the free and DNA-bound forms of the DBD of NtrC4 (4DBD) from Aquifex aeolicus, a member of the NtrC family of σ(54) activators. Two NtrC4-binding sites were identified upstream (-145 and -85bp) from the start of the lpxC gene, which is responsible for the first committed step in lipid A biosynthesis. This is the first experimental evidence for σ(54) regulation in lpxC expression. 4DBD was crystallized both without DNA and in complex with the -145-binding site. The structures, together with biochemical data, indicate that NtrC4 binds to DNA in a manner that is similar to that of its close homolog, Fis. The greater sequence specificity for the binding of 4DBD relative to Fis seems to arise from a larger number of base-specific contacts contributing to affinity than for Fis.

Interplay among Pseudomonas syringae HrpR, HrpS and HrpV proteins for regulation of the type III secretion system

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, a plant pathogenic gram-negative bacterium, employs the type III secretion system (T3SS) to cause disease in tomato and Arabidopsis and to induce the hypersensitive response in nonhost plants. The expression of T3SS is regulated by the HrpL extracytoplasmic sigma factor. Expression of HrpL is controlled by transcriptional activators HrpR and HrpS and negative regulator HrpV. In this study, we analysed the organization of HrpRS and HrpV regulatory proteins and interplay between them. We identified one key residue I26 in HrpS required for repression by HrpV. Substitution of I26 in HrpS abolishes its interaction with HrpV and impairs interactions between HrpS and HrpR and the self-association of HrpS. We show that HrpS self-associates and can associate simultaneously with HrpR and HrpV. We now propose that HrpS has a central role in the assembly of the regulatory HrpRSV complex. Deletion analysis of HrpR and HrpS proteins showed that C-terminal parts of HrpR and HrpS confer determinants indispensable for their self-assembly.

Determination of the self-association residues within a homomeric and a heteromeric AAA+ enhancer binding protein

The σ(54)-dependent transcription in bacteria requires specific activator proteins, bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP), members of the AAA+ (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) protein family. The bEBPs usually form oligomers in order to hydrolyze ATP and make open promoter complexes. The bEBP formed by HrpR and HrpS activates transcription from the σ(54)-dependent hrpL promoter responsible for triggering the Type Three Secretion System in Pseudomonas syringae pathovars. Unlike other bEBPs that usually act as homohexamers, HrpR and HrpS operate as a highly co-dependent heterohexameric complex. To understand the organization of the HrpRS complex and the HrpR and HrpS strict co-dependence, we have analyzed the interface between subunits using the random and directed mutagenesis and available crystal structures of several closely related bEBPs. We identified key residues required for the self-association of HrpR (D32, E202 and K235) with HrpS (D32, E200 and K233), showed that the HrpR D32 and HrpS K233 residues form interacting pairs directly involved in an HrpR-HrpS association and that the change in side-chain length at position 233 in HrpS affects self-association and interaction with the HrpR and demonstrated that the HrpS D32, E200 and K233 are not involved in negative regulation imposed by HrpV. We established that the equivalent residues K30, E200 and E234 in a homo-oligomeric bEBP, PspF, are required for the subunit communication and formation of an oligomeric lock that cooperates with the ATP γ-phosphate sensing PspF residue R227, providing insights into their roles in the heteromeric HrpRS co-complex.

Structure, function, and tethering of DNA-binding domains in σ⁵⁴ transcriptional activators

We compare the structure, activity, and linkage of DNA-binding domains (DBDs) from σ(54) transcriptional activators and discuss how the properties of the DBDs and the linker to the neighboring domain are affected by the overall properties and requirements of the full proteins. These transcriptional activators bind upstream of specific promoters that utilize σ(54)-polymerase. Upon receiving a signal the activators assemble into hexamers, which then, through adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis, drive a conformational change in polymerase that enables transcription initiation. We present structures of the DBDs of activators nitrogen regulatory protein C 1 (NtrC1) and Nif-like homolog 2 (Nlh2) from the thermophile Aquifex aeolicus. The structures of these domains and their relationship to other parts of the activators are discussed. These structures are compared with previously determined structures of the DBDs of NtrC4, NtrC, ZraR, and factor for inversion stimulation. The N-terminal linkers that connect the DBDs to the central domains in NtrC1 and Nlh2 were studied and found to be unstructured. Additionally, a crystal structure of full-length NtrC1 was solved, but density of the DBDs was extremely weak, further indicating that the linker between ATPase and DBDs functions as a flexible tether. Flexible linking of ATPase and DBDs is likely necessary to allow assembly of the active hexameric ATPase ring. The comparison of this set of activators also shows clearly that strong dimerization of the DBD only occurs when other domains do not dimerize strongly.

Nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli: putting molecular data into a systems perspective

We present a comprehensive overview of the hierarchical network of intracellular processes revolving around central nitrogen metabolism in Escherichia coli. The hierarchy intertwines transport, metabolism, signaling leading to posttranslational modification, and transcription. The protein components of the network include an ammonium transporter (AmtB), a glutamine transporter (GlnHPQ), two ammonium assimilation pathways (glutamine synthetase [GS]-glutamate synthase [glutamine 2-oxoglutarate amidotransferase {GOGAT}] and glutamate dehydrogenase [GDH]), the two bifunctional enzymes adenylyl transferase/adenylyl-removing enzyme (ATase) and uridylyl transferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (UTase), the two trimeric signal transduction proteins (GlnB and GlnK), the two-component regulatory system composed of the histidine protein kinase nitrogen regulator II (NRII) and the response nitrogen regulator I (NRI), three global transcriptional regulators called nitrogen assimilation control (Nac) protein, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), and cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (Crp), the glutaminases, and the nitrogen-phosphotransferase system. First, the structural and molecular knowledge on these proteins is reviewed. Thereafter, the activities of the components as they engage together in transport, metabolism, signal transduction, and transcription and their regulation are discussed. Next, old and new molecular data and physiological data are put into a common perspective on integral cellular functioning, especially with the aim of resolving counterintuitive or paradoxical processes featured in nitrogen assimilation. Finally, we articulate what still remains to be discovered and what general lessons can be learned from the vast amounts of data that are available now.

Expanding the boolean logic of the prokaryotic transcription factor XylR by functionalization of permissive sites with a protease-target sequence

The σ54-dependent prokaryotic regulator XylR implements a one-input/one-output actuator that transduces the presence of the aromatic effector m-xylene into transcriptional activation of the cognate promoter Pu. Such a signal conversion involves the effector-mediated release of the intramolecular repression of the N-terminal A domain on the central C module of XylR. On this background, we set out to endow this regulator with additional signal-sensing capabilities by inserting a target site of the viral protease NIa in permissive protein locations that once cleaved in vivo could either terminate XylR activity or generate an effector-independent, constitutive transcription factor. To find optimal protein positions to this end, we saturated the xylR gene DNA with a synthetic transposable element designed for randomly delivering in-frame polypeptides throughout the sequence of any given protein. This Tn5-based system supplies the target gene with insertions of a selectable marker that can later be excised, leaving behind the desired (poly) peptides grafted into the protein structure. Implementation of such knock-in-leave-behind (KILB) method to XylR was instrumental to produce a number of variants of this transcription factor (TF) that could compute in vivo two inputs (m-xylene and protease) into a single output following a logic that was dependent on the site of the insertion of the NIa target sequence in the TF. Such NIa-sensitive XylR specimens afforded the design of novel regulatory nodes that entered protease expression as one of the signals recognized in vivo for controlling Pu. This approach is bound to facilitate the functionalization of TFs and other proteins with new traits, especially when their forward engineering is made difficult by, for example, the absence of structural data.

The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized activators of σ54-dependent transcription

Bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBPs) are transcriptional activators that assemble as hexameric rings in their active forms and utilize ATP hydrolysis to remodel the conformation of RNA polymerase containing the alternative sigma factor σ(54). We present a comprehensive and detailed summary of recent advances in our understanding of how these specialized molecular machines function. The review is structured by introducing each of the three domains in turn: the central catalytic domain, the N-terminal regulatory domain, and the C-terminal DNA binding domain. The role of the central catalytic domain is presented with particular reference to (i) oligomerization, (ii) ATP hydrolysis, and (iii) the key GAFTGA motif that contacts σ(54) for remodeling. Each of these functions forms a potential target of the signal-sensing N-terminal regulatory domain, which can act either positively or negatively to control the activation of σ(54)-dependent transcription. Finally, we focus on the DNA binding function of the C-terminal domain and the enhancer sites to which it binds. Particular attention is paid to the importance of σ(54) to the bacterial cell and its unique role in regulating transcription.

A specificity determinant for phosphorylation in a response regulator prevents in vivo cross-talk and modification by acetyl phosphate

Bacterial two-component systems (TCSs) sense stimuli and transduce signals intracellularly through phosphotransfer between cognate histidine kinases (HKs) and response regulators (RRs) to alter gene expression or behavioral responses. Without high phosphotransfer specificity between cognate HKs and RRs, cross-phosphorylation or cross-talk between different TCSs may occur and diminish responses to appropriate stimuli. Some mechanisms to reduce cross-talk involve HKs controlling levels of cognate RR phosphorylation. Conceivably, some RRs may have evolved HK-independent strategies to insulate themselves from cross-talk with acetyl phosphate (AcP) or other small phosphodonor metabolites. Initial steps in flagellar biosynthesis in Campylobacter jejuni stimulate phosphotransfer from the FlgS HK to the FlgR RR to promote σ(54)-dependent flagellar gene expression. We discovered that the FlgR C-terminal domain (CTD), which commonly functions as a DNA-binding domain in the NtrC RR family, is a specificity determinant to limit in vivo cross-talk from AcP. FlgR lacking the CTD (FlgR(ΔCTD)) used FlgS or AcP as an in vivo phosphodonor and could be reprogrammed in ΔflgS mutants to respond to cellular nutritional status via AcP levels. Even though exclusive AcP-mediated activation of FlgR(ΔCTD) promoted WT flagellar gene expression, proper flagellar biosynthesis was impaired. We propose that the FlgR CTD prevents phosphotransfer from AcP so that FlgR is solely responsive to FlgS to promote proper flagellar gene expression and flagellation. In addition to mechanisms limiting cross-talk between noncognate HKs and RRs, our work suggests that RRs can possess domains that prevent in vivo cross-talk between RRs and the endogenous metabolite AcP to ensure signaling specificity.

VasH is a transcriptional regulator of the type VI secretion system functional in endemic and pandemic Vibrio cholerae

The gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae is the etiological agent of cholera, a disease characterized by the release of high volumes of watery diarrhea. Many medically important proteobacteria, including V. cholerae, carry one or multiple copies of the gene cluster that encodes the bacterial type VI secretion system (T6SS) to confer virulence or interspecies competitiveness. Structural similarity and sequence homology between components of the T6SS and the cell-puncturing device of T4 bacteriophage suggest that the T6SS functions as a molecular syringe to inject effector molecules into prokaryotic and eukaryotic target cells. Although our understanding of how the structural T6SS apparatus assembles is developing, little is known about how this system is regulated. Here, we report on the contribution of the activator of the alternative sigma factor 54, VasH, as a global regulator of the V. cholerae T6SS. Using bioinformatics and mutational analyses, we identified domains of the VasH polypeptide that are essential for its ability to initiate transcription of T6SS genes and established a universal role for VasH in endemic and pandemic V. cholerae strains.

Essential roles of three enhancer sites in sigma54-dependent transcription by the nitric oxide sensing regulatory protein NorR

The bacterial activator protein NorR binds to enhancer-like elements, upstream of the promoter site, and activates σ⁵⁴-dependent transcription of genes that encode nitric oxide detoxifying enzymes (NorVW), in response to NO stress. Unique to the norVW promoter in Escherichia coli is the presence of three enhancer sites associated with a binding site for σ⁵⁴-RNA polymerase. Here we show that all three sites are required for NorR-dependent catalysis of open complex formation by σ⁵⁴-RNAP holoenzyme (Eσ⁵⁴). We demonstrate that this is essentially due to the need for all three enhancers for maximal ATPase activity of NorR, energy from which is used to remodel the closed Eσ⁵⁴ complex and allow melting of the promoter DNA. We also find that site-specific DNA binding per se promotes oligomerisation but the DNA flanking the three sites is needed to further stabilise the functional higher order oligomer of NorR at the enhancers.

Regulation and action of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein AAA+ domains

Bacterial EBPs (enhancer-binding proteins) play crucial roles in regulating cellular responses to environmental changes, in part by providing efficient control over sigma(54)-dependent gene transcription. The AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activites) domain of the EBPs, when assembled into a ring, uses energy from ATP binding, hydrolysis and product release to remodel the sigma(54)-RNAP (RNA polymerase) holoenzyme so that it can transition from closed to open form at promoter DNA. The assembly, and hence activity, of these ATPases are regulated by many different signal transduction mechanisms. Recent advances in solution scattering techniques, when combined with high-resolution structures and biochemical data, have enabled us to obtain mechanistic insights into the regulation and action of a subset of these sigma(54) activators: those whose assembly into ring form is controlled by two-component signal transduction. We review (i) experimental considerations of applying the SAXS (small-angle X-ray scattering)/WAXS (wide-angle X-ray scattering) technique, (ii) distinct regulation mechanisms of the AAA+ domains of three EBPs by similar two-component signal transduction receiver domains, and (iii) major conformational changes and correlated sigma(54)-binding activity of an isolated EBP AAA+ domain in the ATP hydrolysis cycle.

Requirements for ATP binding and hydrolysis in RecA function in Escherichia coli

RecA is essential for recombination, DNA repair and SOS induction in Escherichia coli. ATP hydrolysis is known to be important for RecA's roles in recombination and DNA repair. In vitro reactions modelling SOS induction minimally require ssDNA and non-hydrolyzable ATP analogues. This predicts that ATP hydrolysis will not be required for SOS induction in vivo. The requirement of ATP binding and hydrolysis for SOS induction in vivo is tested here through the study of recA4159 (K72A) and recA2201 (K72R). RecA4159 is thought to have reduced affinity for ATP. RecA2201 binds, but does not hydrolyse ATP. Neither mutant was able to induce SOS expression after UV irradiation. RecA2201, unlike RecA4159, could form filaments on DNA and storage structures as measured with RecA-GFP. RecA2201 was able to form hybrid filaments and storage structures and was either recessive or dominant to RecA(+), depending on the ratio of the two proteins. RecA4159 was unable to enter RecA(+) filaments on DNA or storage structures and was recessive to RecA(+). It is concluded that ATP hydrolysis is essential for SOS induction. It is proposed that ATP binding is essential for storage structure formation and ability to interact with other RecA proteins in a filament.

Analysis of the Campylobacter jejuni FlgR response regulator suggests integration of diverse mechanisms to activate an NtrC-like protein

Flagellar motility in Campylobacter jejuni mediates optimal interactions with human or animal hosts. Sigma(54) and the FlgSR two-component system are necessary for the expression of many C. jejuni flagellar genes. The FlgR response regulator is homologous to the NtrC family of transcriptional activators. These regulators usually contain an N-terminal receiver domain, a central domain that interacts with sigma(54) and hydrolyzes ATP, and a DNA-binding C-terminal domain. Most often, phosphorylation of the receiver domain influences its inherent ability to either positively or negatively control the activity of the regulator. In this study, we performed genetic and biochemical analyses to understand how FlgR activity is controlled to culminate in the expression of sigma(54)-dependent flagellar genes. Our data suggest that the FlgR receiver domain has the capacity for both positive and negative regulation in controlling the activation of the protein. Analysis of the C-terminal domain of FlgR revealed that it lacks a DNA-binding motif and is not required for sigma(54)-dependent flagellar gene expression. Further analysis of FlgR lacking the C-terminal domain indicates that this protein is partially functional in the absence of the cognate sensor kinase, FlgS, but its activity is still dependent on the phosphorylated residue in the receiver domain, D51. We hypothesize that the C-terminal domain may not function to bind DNA but may ensure the specificity of the phosphorylation of FlgR by FlgS. Our results demonstrate that FlgR activation mechanisms are unusual among characterized NtrC-like proteins and emphasize that various means are utilized by the NtrC family of proteins to control the transcription of target genes.

Insights into the complex regulation of rpoS in Borrelia burgdorferi

Co-ordinated regulation of gene expression is required for the transmission and survival of Borrelia burgdorferi in different hosts. The sigma factor RpoS (sigma(S)), as regulated by RpoN (sigma(54)), has been shown to regulate key virulence factors (e.g. OspC) required for these processes. As important, multiple signals (e.g. temperature, pH, cell density, oxygen) have been shown to increase the expression of sigma(S)-dependent genes; however, little is known about the signal transduction mechanisms that modulate the expression of rpoS. In this report we show that: (i) rpoS has a sigma(54)-dependent promoter that requires Rrp2 to activate transcription; (ii) Rrp2Delta123, a constitutively active form of Rrp2, activated sigma(54)-dependent transcription of rpoS/P-lacZ reporter constructs in Escherichia coli; (iii) quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) experiments with reporter cat constructs in B. burgdorferi indicated that Rrp2 activated transcription of rpoS in an enhancer-independent fashion; and finally, (iv) rpoN is required for cell density- and temperature-dependent expression of rpoS in B. burgdorferi, but histidine kinase Hk2, encoded by the gene immediately upstream of rrp2, is not essential. Based on these findings, a model for regulation of rpoS has been proposed which provides mechanisms for multiple signalling pathways to modulate the expression of the sigma(S) regulon in B. burgdorferi.

Transcriptional specificity of RpoN1 and RpoN2 involves differential recognition of the promoter sequences and specific interaction with the cognate activator proteins

The four RpoN factors of Rhodobacter sphaeroides are functionally specialized. In this bacterium, RpoN1 and RpoN2 are specifically required for the transcription of the nitrogen fixation and flagellar genes, respectively. Analysis of the promoter sequences recognized by each of these RpoN proteins revealed some significant differences. To investigate the functional relevance of these differences, the flagellar promoter fliOp was sequentially mutagenized to resemble the nitrogen fixation promoter nifUp. Our results indicate that the promoter sequences recognized by these sigma factors have diverged enough so that particular positions of the promoter sequence are differentially recognized. In this regard, we demonstrate that the identity of the -11-position is critical for promoter discrimination by RpoN1 and RpoN2. Accordingly, purified RpoN proteins with a deletion of Region I, which has been involved in the recognition of the -11-position, did not show differential binding of fliOp and nifUp promoters. Substitution of the flagellar enhancer region located upstream fliOp by the enhancer region of nifUp allowed us to demonstrate that RpoN1 and RpoN2 interact specifically with their respective activator protein. In conclusion, two different molecular mechanisms underlie the transcriptional specialization of these sigma factors.

The structural basis for regulated assembly and function of the transcriptional activator NtrC

In two-component signal transduction, an input triggers phosphorylation of receiver domains that regulate the status of output modules. One such module is the AAA+ ATPase domain in bacterial enhancer-binding proteins that remodel the sigma(54) form of RNA polymerase. We report X-ray solution scattering and electron microscopy structures of the activated, full-length nitrogen-regulatory protein C (NtrC) showing a novel mechanism for regulation of AAA+ ATPase assembly via the juxtaposition of the receiver domains and ATPase ring. Accompanying the hydrolysis cycle that is required for transcriptional activation, we observed major order-disorder changes in the GAFTGA loops involved in sigma(54) binding, as well as in the DNA-binding domains.

The flagellar hierarchy of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is controlled by the concerted action of two enhancer-binding proteins

The expression of the bacterial flagellar genes follows a hierarchical pattern. In Rhodobacter sphaeroides the flagellar genes encoding the hook and basal body proteins are expressed from sigma54-dependent promoters. This type of promoters is always regulated by transcriptional activators that belong to the family of the enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs). We searched for possible EBPs in the genome of R. sphaeroides and mutagenized two open reading frames (ORFs) (fleQ and fleT), which are in the vicinity of flagellar genes. The resulting mutants were non-motile and could only be complemented by the wild-type copy of the mutagenized gene. Transcriptional fusions showed that all the flagellar sigma54-dependent promoters with exception of fleTp, required both transcriptional activators for their expression. Interestingly, transcription of the fleT operon is only dependent on FleQ, and FleT has a negative effect. Both activators were capable of hydrolysing ATP, and were capable of promoting transcription from the flagellar promoters at some extent. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays suggest that only FleQ interacts with DNA whereas FleT improves binding of FleQ to DNA. A four-tiered flagellar transcriptional hierarchy and a regulatory mechanism based on the intracellular concentration of both activators and differential enhancer affinities are proposed.

Novel substitutions in the sigma54-dependent activator DctD that increase dependence on upstream activation sequences or uncouple ATP hydrolysis from transcriptional activation

Sinorhizobium meliloti DctD is an activator of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme and member of the AAA+ superfamily of ATPases. DctD uses energy released from ATP hydrolysis to stimulate the isomerization of a closed promoter complex to an open complex. DctD binds to upstream activation sequences (UAS) and contacts the closed complex through DNA looping to activate transcription, but the UAS is not essential for activation if DctD is expressed at higher than normal levels. Introduction of specific substitutions within or near the conserved ESELFG motif in the C3 region of a truncated, constitutively active form of DctD produced several mutant forms of the protein that had increased dependence on the UAS for activation. Removing the DNA-binding domain from one UAS-dependent mutant and from one activation-deficient mutant significantly increased transcriptional activation, indicating that the DNA-binding domain interfered with the activities of these mutant proteins. A UAS-dependent mutant with a P315L substitution in the C6 region was identified from a genetic screen. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of conserved amino acid residues around Pro-315 produced two additional UAS-dependent mutants as well as several mutants that failed to activate transcription but retained ATPase activity. In contrast to the two mutant proteins with substitutions in the C3 region, removal of the DNA-binding domain from the mutant proteins with substitutions in the C6 region did not stimulate their activity. The residues in the C6 region that were altered are in a probable hinge region between the alpha/beta and alpha-helical subdomains of the AAA+ domain. The alpha-helical subdomain contains the sensor II helix that has been implicated in other AAA+ proteins as sensing changes in the nucleotide during the hydrolysis cycle. Substitutions in the hinge region may have abolished nucleotide sensing by interfering with subdomain interactions, altering the relative orientation of the sensor II helix or interfering with oligomerization of the protein.

Helicobacter pylori FlgR is an enhancer-independent activator of sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Helicobacter pylori FlgR activates transcription with sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme (sigma54-holoenzyme) from at least five flagellar operons. Activators of sigma54-holoenzyme generally bind enhancer sequences located >70 bp upstream of the promoter and contact sigma54-holoenzyme bound at the promoter through DNA looping to activate transcription. H. pylori FlgR lacks the carboxy-terminal DNA-binding domain present in most sigma54-dependent activators. As little as 42 bp of DNA upstream of the flaB promoter and 26 bp of DNA sequence downstream of the transcriptional start site were sufficient for efficient FlgR-mediated expression from a flaB'-'xylE reporter gene in H. pylori, indicating that FlgR does not use an enhancer to activate transcription. Other examples of sigma54-dependent activators that lack a DNA-binding domain include Chlamydia trachomatis CtcC and activators from the other Chlamydia spp. whose genomes have been sequenced. FlgR from Helicobacter hepaticus and Campylobacter jejuni, which are closely related to H. pylori, appear to have carboxy-terminal DNA-binding domains, suggesting that the loss of the DNA-binding domain from H. pylori FlgR occurred after the divergence of these bacterial species. Removal of the amino-terminal regulatory domain of FlgR resulted in a constitutively active form of the protein that activated transcription from sigma54-dependent genes in Escherichia coli. The truncated FlgR protein also activated transcription with E. coli sigma54-holoenzyme in an in vitro transcription assay.

Purification and characterization of the AAA+ domain of Sinorhizobium meliloti DctD, a sigma54-dependent transcriptional activator

Activators of sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme couple ATP hydrolysis to formation of an open complex between the promoter and RNA polymerase. These activators are modular, consisting of an N-terminal regulatory domain, a C-terminal DNA-binding domain, and a central activation domain belonging to the AAA+ superfamily of ATPases. The AAA+ domain of Sinorhizobium meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D (DctD) is sufficient to activate transcription. Deletion analysis of the 3' end of dctD identified the minimal functional C-terminal boundary of the AAA+ domain of DctD as being located between Gly-381 and Ala-384. Histidine-tagged versions of the DctD AAA+ domain were purified and characterized. The DctD AAA+ domain was significantly more soluble than DctD(Delta(1-142)), a truncated DctD protein consisting of the AAA+ and DNA-binding domains. In addition, the DctD AAA+ domain was more homogeneous than DctD(Delta(1-142)) when analyzed by native gel electrophoresis, migrating predominantly as a single high-molecular-weight species, while DctD(Delta(1-142)) displayed multiple species. The DctD AAA+ domain, but not DctD(Delta(1-142)), formed a stable complex with sigma54 in the presence of the ATP transition state analogue ADP-aluminum fluoride. The DctD AAA+ domain activated transcription in vitro, but many of the transcripts appeared to terminate prematurely, suggesting that the DctD AAA+ domain interfered with transcription elongation. Thus, the DNA-binding domain of DctD appears to have roles in controlling the oligomerization of the AAA+ domain and modulating interactions with sigma54 in addition to its role in recognition of upstream activation sequences.

DpiA binding to the replication origin of Escherichia coli plasmids and chromosomes destabilizes plasmid inheritance and induces the bacterial SOS response

The dpiA and dpiB genes of Escherichia coli, which are orthologs of genes that regulate citrate uptake and utilization in Klebsiella pneumoniae, comprise a two-component signal transduction system that can modulate the replication of and destabilize the inheritance of pSC101 and certain other plasmids. Here we show that perturbed replication and inheritance result from binding of the effector protein DpiA to A+T-rich replication origin sequences that resemble those in the K. pneumoniae promoter region targeted by the DpiA ortholog, CitB. Consistent with its ability to bind to A+T-rich origin sequences, overproduction of DpiA induced the SOS response in E. coli, suggesting that chromosomal DNA replication is affected. Bacteria that overexpressed DpiA showed an increased amount of DNA per cell and increased cell size-both also characteristic of the SOS response. Concurrent overexpression of the DNA replication initiation protein, DnaA, or the DNA helicase, DnaB-both of which act at A+T-rich replication origin sequences in the E. coli chromosome and DpiA-targeted plasmids-reversed SOS induction as well as plasmid destabilization by DpiA. Our finding that physical and functional interactions between DpiA and sites of replication initiation modulate DNA replication and plasmid inheritance suggests a mechanism by which environmental stimuli transmitted by these gene products can regulate chromosomal and plasmid dynamics.

Roles for the C-terminal region of sigma 54 in transcriptional silencing and DNA binding

Twenty-one conserved positively charged and aromatic amino acids between residues 331 and 462 of sigma 54 were changed to alanine, and the mutant proteins were studied by transcription, band shift analysis, and footprinting in vitro. A small segment corresponding to the rpoN box was found to be most important for binding duplex DNA. Two amino acids, 52 residues apart, were found to be critical for maintaining transcriptional silencing in the absence of activator. These two activator bypass mutants and several other mutants failed to bind the type of fork junction DNA thought to be required to maintain silencing. The two bypass mutants showed a binding pattern to DNA probes that was unique, both in comparison to other C-terminal mutants and to previously known N-terminal bypass mutants. On this basis, a model is proposed for the role of the C terminus and the N terminus of sigma 54 in enhancer-dependent transcription.

Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein

Protein actions are usually discussed in terms of static structures, but function requires motion. We find a strong correlation between phosphorylation-driven activation of the signaling protein NtrC and microsecond time-scale backbone dynamics. Using nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation, we characterized the motions of NtrC in three functional states: unphosphorylated (inactive), phosphorylated (active), and a partially active mutant. These dynamics are indicative of exchange between inactive and active conformations. Both states are populated in unphosphorylated NtrC, and phosphorylation shifts the equilibrium toward the active species. These results support a dynamic population shift between two preexisting conformations as the underlying mechanism of activation.

The novel sigma54- and sigma28-dependent flagellar gene transcription hierarchy of Vibrio cholerae

The human pathogen Vibrio cholerae is a highly motile organism by virtue of a polar flagellum. Flagellar transcriptional regulatory factors have been demonstrated to contribute to V. cholerae virulence, but the role these factors play in the transcription hierarchy controlling flagellar synthesis has been unclear. The flagellar genes revealed by the V. cholerae genome sequence are located in three large clusters, with the exception of the motor genes, which are found in three additional locations. It had previously been demonstrated that the alternative sigma factor sigma54 and the sigma54-dependent activators FlrA and FlrC are necessary for flagellar synthesis. The V. cholerae genome sequence revealed the presence of a fliA gene, which is predicted to encode the alternative flagellar sigma factor sigma28. A V. cholerae DeltafliA mutant strain is non-motile, and synthesizes a truncated flagellum. Vibrio cholerae FliA complements both V. cholerae and Salmonella typhimurium fliA mutants for motility, consistent with its function as an alternative flagellar sigma factor. Analysis of lacZ transcriptional fusions of the V. cholerae flagellar promoters in both V. cholerae and S. typhimurium identified sigma28-, sigma54-, FlrA- and FlrC-dependent promoters, as well as promoters that were independent of all these factors. Our results support a model of V. cholerae flagellar gene transcription as a novel hierarchy composed of four classes of genes. Class I is composed solely of the gene encoding the sigma54-dependent activator FlrA, which along with the sigma54-holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase activates expression of Class II genes. These genes include structural components of the MS ring, switch and export apparatus, as well as the genes encoding both FliA and FlrC. FlrC, along with sigma54-holoenzyme, activates expression of Class III genes, which include basal body, hook and filament genes. Finally, sigma28-holoenzyme activates expression of Class IV genes, which include additional filament genes as well as motor genes. Thus, this novel V. cholerae flagellar hierarchy has incorporated elements from both the sigma54-dependent Caulobacter crescentus polar flagellar hierarchy and the sigma28-dependent S. typhimurium peritrichous flagellar hierarchy.

High local protein concentrations at promoters: strategies in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells

The speed of chemical reactions is proportional to the concentration of molecules involved. Since proteins catalyze most of the essential reactions inside a living cell, their concentration should be as high as possible. An economical way to achieve this is through the establishment of small cell compartments. We propose that within these compartments, two types of local concentration effects are at work. (1) With local concentration type I reactions, multimeric proteins bound to a specific DNA sequence have an increased local concentration for a second DNA site sufficiently close-by, or for proteins bound to such a site. (2) For type II effects, DNA can be used as a scaffold to build unique nucleoprotein complexes that would otherwise not exist free in solution. These complexes are proficient in establishing longer-range interactions with similarly unique complexes located far away on the genome. We discuss the consequences of these local concentration effects in the light of the markedly different sizes of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells and of their genomes.

Mechanism for a transcriptional activator that works at the isomerization step

Transcriptional activators in prokaryotes have been shown to stimulate different steps in the initiation process including the initial binding of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to the promoter and a postbinding step known as the isomerization step. Evidence suggests that activators that affect initial binding can work by a cooperative binding mechanism by making energetically favorable contacts with RNAP, but the mechanism by which activators affect the isomerization step is unclear. A well-studied example of an activator that normally exerts its effect exclusively on the isomerization step is the bacteriophage lambda cI protein (lambdacI), which has been shown genetically to interact with the C-terminal region of the final sigma(70) subunit of RNAP. We show here that the interaction between lambdacI and final sigma can stimulate transcription even when the relevant portion of final sigma is transplanted to another subunit of RNAP. This activation depends on the ability of lambdacI to stabilize the binding of the transplanted final sigma moiety to an ectopic -35 element. Based on these and previous findings, we discuss a simple model that explains how an activator's ability to stabilize the binding of an RNAP subdomain to the DNA can account for its effect on either the initial binding of RNAP to a promoter or the isomerization step.

Promoter opening by sigma(54) and sigma(70) RNA polymerases: sigma factor-directed alterations in the mechanism and tightness of control

Transcription control at the melting step is not yet understood. Here, band shift, cross-linking, and transcription experiments on diverse DNA probes were used with two bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzymes that differ in how they regulate melting. Data indicated that both sigma(54) and sigma(70) holoenzymes assume a default closed form that cannot establish single-strand binding. Upon activation the enzymes are converted to an open form that can bind simultaneously to the upstream fork junction and to the melted transcription start site. The key difference is that sigma(54) imposes tighter regulation by creating a complex molecular switch at -12/-11; the current data show that this switch can be thrown by activator. In this case an ATP-bound enhancer protein causes sigma(54) to alter its cross-linking pattern near -11 and also causes a reorganization of holoenzyme: DNA interactions, detected by electrophoretic mobility-shift assay. At a temperature-dependent sigma(70) promoter, elevated temperature alone can assist in triggering conformational changes that enhance the engagement of single-strand DNA. Thus, the two sigma factors modify the same intrinsic opening pathway to create quite different mechanisms of transcriptional regulation.

Phosphorylation-induced signal propagation in the response regulator ntrC

The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC is a well-studied response regulator in a two-component regulatory system. The amino (N)-terminal receiver domain of NtrC modulates the function of its adjacent output domain, which activates transcription by the sigma(54) holoenzyme. When a specific aspartate residue in the receiver domain of NtrC is phosphorylated, the dimeric protein forms an oligomer that is capable of ATP hydrolysis and transcriptional activation. A chemical protein cleavage method was used to investigate signal propagation from the phosphorylated receiver domain of NtrC, which acts positively, to its central output domain. The iron chelate reagent Fe-BABE was conjugated onto unique cysteines introduced into the N-terminal domain of NtrC, and the conjugated proteins were subjected to Fe-dependent cleavage with or without prior phosphorylation. Phosphorylation-dependent cleavage, which requires proximity and an appropriate orientation of the peptide backbone to the tethered Fe-EDTA, was particularly prominent with conjugated NtrC(D86C), in which the unique cysteine lies near the top of alpha-helix 4. Cleavage occurred outside the receiver domain itself and on the partner subunit of the derivatized monomer in an NtrC dimer. The results are commensurate with the hypothesis that alpha-helix 4 of the phosphorylated receiver domain of NtrC interacts with the beginning of the central domain for signal propagation. They imply that the phosphorylation-dependent interdomain and intermolecular interactions between the receiver domain of one subunit and the output domain of its partner subunit in an NtrC dimer precede-and may give rise to-the oligomerization needed for transcriptional activation.

General nitrogen regulation of nitrate assimilation regulatory gene nasR expression in Klebsiella oxytoca M5al

Klebsiella oxytoca can assimilate nitrate and nitrite by using enzymes encoded by the nasFEDCBA operon. Expression of the nasF operon is controlled by general nitrogen regulation (Ntr) via the NtrC transcription activator and by pathway-specific nitrate and nitrite induction via the NasR transcription antiterminator. This paper reports our analysis of nasR gene expression. We constructed strains bearing single-copy Phi(nasR-lacZ) operon fusions within the chromosomal rhaBAD-rhaSR locus. The expression of DeltarhaBS::[Phi(nasR-lacZ)] operon fusions was induced about 10-fold during nitrogen-limited growth. Induction was reduced in both ntrC and rpoN null mutants, indicating that Ntr control of nasR gene expression requires the NtrC and sigma(N) (sigma(54)) proteins. Sequence inspection of the nasR control region reveals an apparent sigma(N)-dependent promoter but no apparent NtrC protein binding sites. Analysis of site-specific mutations coupled with primer extension analysis authenticated the sigma(N)-dependent nasR promoter. Fusion constructs with only about 70 nucleotides (nt) upstream of the transcription initiation site exhibited patterns of beta-galactosidase expression indistinguishable from Phi(nasR-lacZ) constructs with about 470 nt upstream. Expression was independent of the Nac protein, implying that NtrC is a direct activator of nasR transcription. Together, these results indicate that nasR gene expression does not require specific upstream NtrC-binding sequences, as previously noted for argT gene expression in Salmonella typhimurium (G. Schmitz, K. Nikaido, and G. F.-L. Ames, Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:107-117, 1988).

Recruitment of RNA polymerase is a rate-limiting step for the activation of the sigma(54) promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida

The activity of the sigma(54)-promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida was examined in vitro with a DNA template lacking upstream activating sequences, such that RNA polymerase can be activated by the enhancer-binding protein XylR only from solution. Although the transcription activation pathway in this system lacked the step of integration host factor (IHF)-mediated looping of the XylR.DNA complex toward the prebound RNA polymerase, IHF still stimulated promoter activity. The positive effect of IHF became evident not only with XylR from solution, but also with other sigma(54)-dependent activators such as NtrC and NifA. Furthermore, an equivalent outcome was shown for the nonspecific DNA-binding protein HU. This stimulation of transcription in the absence of the enhancer was traced to the recruitment of RNA polymerase (i.e. increased efficiency of formation of closed complexes) brought about by IHF or HU binding. Thus, under limiting concentrations of the polymerase, the factor-mediated binding of the enzyme to Pu seems to enter a kinetic checkpoint in the system that prevents the XylR-mediated formation of an open complex.

"Switch I" mutant forms of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC that perturb the response to DNA

NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C) is a bacterial enhancer-binding protein of 469 residues that activates transcription by sigma(54)-holoenzyme. A region of its transcriptional activation (central) domain that is highly conserved among homologous activators of sigma(54)-holoenzyme-residues 206-220-is essential for interaction with this RNA polymerase: it is required for contact with the polymerase and/or for coupling the energy from ATP hydrolysis to a change in the conformation of the polymerase that allows it to form transcriptionally productive open complexes. Several mutant NtrC proteins with amino acid substitutions in this region, including NtrC(A216V) and NtrC(G219K), have normal ATPase activity but fail in transcriptional activation. We now report that other mutant forms carrying amino acid substitutions at these same positions, NtrC(A216C) and NtrC(G219C), are capable of activating transcription when they are not bound to a DNA template (non-DNA-binding derivatives with an altered helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif at the C terminus of the protein) but are unable to do so when they are bound to a DNA template, whether or not it carries a specific enhancer. Enhancer DNA remains a positive allosteric effector of ATP hydrolysis, as it is for wild-type NtrC but, surprisingly, appears to have become a negative allosteric effector for some aspect of interaction with sigma(54)-holoenzyme. The conserved region in which these amino acid substitutions occur (206-220) is equivalent to the Switch I region of a large group of purine nucleotide-binding proteins. Interesting analogies can be drawn between the Switch I region of NtrC and that of p21(ras).

The use of elements of the E. coli Ntr-system for the design of an optimized recombinant expression system for high cell density cultivations

The inducible glnA promoter 2 of the E. coli glutamine synthetase gene is suitable as an expression unit for the production of recombinant proteins at low and high cell densities. It is active when the concentration of ammonium as the sole nitrogen source in the culture medium is below 1 mM. This nitrogen regulatory system was optimized by introduction of expression cassettes consisting of additional elements of the ntr-system. These artificial constructions result in enhanced recombinant gene expression in the production phase. Furthermore, the basic recombinant protein level during the growth phase is reduced due to a tighter promoter control. A three- to four-fold higher accumulation of chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase (as reporter protein) and of anti-EGF-receptor miniantibodies was achieved by increasing the amount of the final regulator molecule NtrC approximately P via plasmidal co-expression of the ntrC gene. The introduction of a modified glnA promoter 1 inverse to glnAp2 lowered the basic activity of glnAp2 to about one half. It is assumed that under nitrogen excess conditions sigma 70-RNA polymerase binds at glnAp1 and thereby prevents most of the binding of sigma 54-RNA polymerase at glnAp2. The optimized expression systems were successfully applied in low and high cell density cultivations. In the fed-batch phase of high cell density cultivations recombinant protein formation was induced through external nitrogen limitation under FIA-controlled concentration of glucose as carbon source.

Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of NtrC with three alanine substitutions

The structure of the 20 kDa C-terminal DNA-binding domain of NtrC from Salmonella typhimurium (residues Asp380-Glu469) with alanine replacing Arg456, Asn457, and Arg461, was determined by NMR spectroscopy. NtrC is a homodimeric enhancer-binding protein that activates the transcription of genes whose products are required for nitrogen metabolism. The 91-residue C-terminal domain contains the determinants necessary for dimerization and DNA-binding of the full length protein. The mutant protein does not bind to DNA but retains many characteristics of the wild-type protein, and the mutant domain expresses at high yield (20 mg/l) in minimal medium. Three-dimensional (1)H/(13)C/(15)N triple-resonance, (1)H-(13)C-(13)C-(1)H correlation and (15)N-separated nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectroscopy experiments were used to make backbone and side-chain (1)H,(15)N, and (13)C assignments. The structures were calculated using a total of 1580 intra and inter-monomer distance and hydrogen bond restraints (88 hydrogen bonds; 44 hydrogen bond restraints), and 88 phi dihedral restraints for residues Asp400 through Glu469 in both monomers. A total of 54 ambiguous restraints (intra or inter-monomer) involving residues close to the 2-fold symmetry axis were also included. Each monomer consists of four helical segments. Helices A (Trp402-Leu414) and B (Leu421-His440) join with those of another monomer to form an antiparallel four-helix bundle. Helices C (Gln446-Leu451) and D (Ala456-Met468) of each monomer adopt a classic helix-turn-helix DNA-binding fold at either end of the protein. The backbone rms deviation for the 28 best of 40 starting structures is 0.6 (+/-0.2) A. Structural differences between the C-terminal domain of NtrC and the homologous Factor for Inversion Stimulation are discussed.

Expression of P(II) and glutamine synthetase is regulated by P(II), the ntrBC products, and processing of the glnBA mRNA in Rhodospirillum rubrum

We have studied the transcription of the glnB and glnA genes in Rhodospirillum rubrum with firefly luciferase as a reporter enzyme. Under NH(4)(+) and N(2) conditions, glnBA was cotranscribed from a weak and a strong promoter. In nitrogen-fixing cultures, activity of the latter was highly enhanced by NtrC, but transcription from both promoters occurred under both conditions. There is no promoter controlling transcription of glnA alone, supporting our proposal that the glnA mRNA is produced by processing.

Mutations affecting motifs of unknown function in the central domain of nitrogen regulatory protein C

The positive control function of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC resides in its central domain, which is highly conserved among activators of sigma54 holoenzyme. Previous studies of a small set of mutant forms specifically defective in transcriptional activation, called NtrC repressor [NtrC(Rep)] proteins, had enabled us to locate various functional determinants in the central domain. In this more comprehensive survey, the DNA encoding a major portion of the central domain was randomly mutagenized and mutated ntrC genes were introduced into the cell via multicopy expression plasmids. DNA sequencing of 95 isolates identified by a preliminary phenotypic screen revealed that the lesions in them caused 55 distinct single amino acid substitutions at 44 different positions. Assays of glnA transcription in vivo and in vitro yielded two conclusions. First, of the 41 mutant proteins that could be purified, 17 (1 known, 16 new) showed no detectable activity in either assay, thus qualifying them as true NtrC(Rep) proteins. These contained residue changes in six of the seven highly conserved regions in the central domain, including two never studied before. Second, some mutant proteins were inactive in vivo but were either marginally or fully active in vitro. Their surprising lack of activity in vivo may be accounted for by high levels of expression, which apparently decreased activation by these mutant proteins but not by wild-type NtrC (NtrCWT). Of particular interest were a subset of these proteins that exhibited greater transcriptional activation than NtrCWT at low concentrations. Their elevated activation capacities remain to be explained.

An enhancer element located downstream of the major glutamate dehydrogenase gene of Bacillus subtilis

The rocG gene of Bacillus subtilis, encoding a catabolic glutamate dehydrogenase, is transcribed by SigL (sigma(54))-containing RNA polymerase and requires for its expression RocR, a member of the NtrC/NifA family of proteins that bind to enhancer-like elements, called upstream activating sequences (UAS). Unlike the case for other sigma(54)-dependent genes, rocG has no UAS; instead, its expression depends on a sequence located 1.5 kilobases downstream of the rocG promoter, beyond the end of the rocG coding region. The same sequence also serves as the UAS for the downstream rocABC operon and can activate rocG if moved upstream of its promoter. Furthermore, the activating sequence can be moved as far as 15 kilobases downstream of the rocG promoter and still retain partial activity.

MgATP binding and hydrolysis determinants of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein

When phosphorylated, the dimeric form of nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC) of Salmonella typhimurium forms a larger oligomer(s) that can hydrolyze ATP and hence activate transcription by the sigma(54)-holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase. Studies of Mg-nucleoside triphosphate binding using a filter-binding assay indicated that phosphorylation is not required for nucleotide binding but probably controls nucleotide hydrolysis per se. Studies of binding by isothermal titration calorimetry indicated that the apparent K(d) of unphosphorylated NtrC for MgATPgammaS is 100 microM at 25 degrees C, and studies by filter binding indicated that the concentration of MgATP required for half-maximal binding is 130 microM at 37 degrees C. Filter-binding studies with mutant forms of NtrC defective in ATP hydrolysis implicated two regions of its central domain directly in nucleotide binding and three additional regions in hydrolysis. All five are highly conserved among activators of sigma(54)-holoenzyme. Regions implicated in binding are the Walker A motif and the region around residues G355 to R358, which may interact with the nucleotide base. Regions implicated in nucleotide hydrolysis are residues S207 and E208, which have been proposed to lie in a region analogous to the switch I effector region of p21(ras) and other purine nucleotide-binding proteins; residue R294, which may be a catalytic residue; and residue D239, which is the conserved aspartate in the putative Walker B motif. D239 appears to play a role in binding the divalent cation essential for nucleotide hydrolysis. Electron paramagnetic resonance analysis of Mn(2+) binding indicated that the central domain of NtrC does not bind divalent cation strongly in the absence of nucleotide.

Physical evidence for a phosphorylation-dependent conformational change in the enhancer-binding protein NtrC

The bacterial enhancer-binding protein nitrogen regulatory protein C (NtrC) activates transcription by sigma54-containing RNA polymerase in a reaction that depends on ATP hydrolysis. Phosphorylation of an aspartate residue in the N-terminal receiver domain of NtrC induces oligomerization of the protein and activates the ATPase activity, which is a function of its central output domain. To study the role of the receiver domain of NtrC, which is known to act positively, we isolated mutant forms of the protein carrying single cysteine residues and derivatized them with a sulfhydryl-specific nitroxide reagent for electron paramagnetic resonance studies. Single cysteines were placed at four positions at which we had obtained constitutive amino acid substitutions, those that yield activity without phosphorylation. In only one case, derivatized C86 in alpha-helix 4 of the receiver domain, did the motion of the side chain become dramatically slower upon phosphorylation. Importantly, derivatized NtrCD86C (NtrCD86C*) activated transcription normally. Additional experiments indicated that the spectral change observed upon phosphorylation of NtrCD86C* was due to interdomain interactions rather than a conformational change within the N-terminal domain itself. These interactions did not appear to occur within a monomer. Although it is not clear whether the spectral change seen upon phosphorylation of NtrCD86C* is due to an interaction that occurs within a dimer of NtrC or requires the formation of higher-order oligomers, the change indicated that alpha-helix 4 of the receiver domain probably plays an important role in communication with the remainder of the protein.

In vivo and in vitro activities of the Escherichia coli sigma54 transcription activator, PspF, and its DNA-binding mutant, PspFDeltaHTH

Transcription of the phage-shock protein (psp) operon in Escherichia coli is driven by a sigma54 promoter, stimulated by integration host factor and dependent on an upstream, cis-acting sequence and an activator protein, PspF. PspF belongs to the enhancer binding protein family but lacks an N-terminal regulatory domain. Purified PspF is not modified and has an ATPase activity that is increased twofold in the presence of DNA carrying the psp cis-acting sequence. Purified mutant His-tagged PspF that lacks the C-terminal DNA-binding motif has a DNA-independent ATPase activity when present at 30-fold the concentration of the wild-type protein. Both proteins oligomerize in solution in an ATP and DNA-independent manner. The wild-type activator protein, but not the DNA-binding mutant, binds specifically to the cis-acting sequence. Analysis of the sequence protected by PspF demonstrates the presence of two upstream binding sites within the sequence, UAS I and UAS II, which together constitute the psp enhancer. Protection at low protein concentrations is more pronounced and more extensive on a supercoiled DNA than on a linear template. Full expression of the psp operon upon hyperosmotic shock depends on wild-type PspF, but only partially requires the presence of the psp enhancer.

Identification of an N-terminal region of sigma 54 required for enhancer responsiveness

Sigma 54 associates with bacterial core RNA polymerase and converts it into an enhancer-responsive enzyme. Deletion of the N-terminal 40 amino acids is known to result in loss of the ability to respond to enhancer binding proteins. In this work PCR mutagenesis and genetic screens were used to identify a small patch, from amino acids 33 to 37, that is required for proper response to activator in vivo. Site-directed single point mutants within this segment were constructed and studied. Two of these were defective in responding to the enhancer binding protein in vitro. The mutants could still direct the polymerase to bind to DNA and initiate transient melting. However, they failed in directing activator-dependent formation of a heparin-stable open complex. Thus, amino acid region 33 to 37 includes critical activation response determinants. This region overlaps the larger leucine patch negative-control region, suggesting that anti-inhibition and positive activation are closely coupled events.

Contributions of the domains of the Bacillus subtilis response regulator Spo0A to transcription stimulation of the spoIIG operon

Spo0A is a response regulator that controls entry into sporulation by specifically stimulating or repressing transcription of critical developmental genes. Response regulators have at least two domains: an output transcription regulation domain and a receiver domain that inhibits the output domain. Phosphorylation of the receiver domain relieves the inhibition. We examined the in vitro transcription activation mechanism for Spo0A, phosphorylated Spo0A (Spo0A approximately P), and a deletion mutant that consists solely of the C-terminal output domain (Spo0ABD). Both Spo0A approximately P and Spo0ABD stimulated transcription from the spoIIG promoter 10-fold more efficiently than Spo0A. Spo0A approximately P and Spo0ABD induced DNA denaturation by RNA polymerase in the -10 recognition region, whereas Spo0A did not. DNase I footprint assays revealed that phosphorylation enhanced binding of intact Spo0A to the 0A boxes, while the binding of Spo0ABD was similar to that of Spo0A. Thus, activation of Spo0A by phosphorylation is not primarily due to enhanced DNA binding. The presence of a phosphorylated N terminus increased the stability of the ternary complex at the spoIIG promoter. We propose that the primary effect of phosphorylation is to expose an RNA polymerase interaction domain to promote transcription from PspoIIG.

A protein-induced DNA bend increases the specificity of a prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein

Control of transcription in prokaryotes often involves direct contact of regulatory proteins with RNA polymerase from binding sites located adjacent to the target promoter. Alternatively, in the case of genes transcribed by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the alternate sigma factor sigma54, regulatory proteins bound at more distally located enhancer sites can activate transcription via DNA looping by taking advantage of the increasing flexibility of DNA over longer distances. While this second mechanism offers a greater possible flexibility in the location of these binding sites, it is not clear how the specificity offered by the proximity of the regulatory protein and the polymerase intrinsic to the first mechanism is maintained. Here we demonstrate that integration host factor (IHF), a protein that induces a sharp bend in DNA, acts both to inhibit DNA-looping-dependent transcriptional activation by an inappropriate enhancer-binding protein and to facilitate similar activation by an appropriate enhancer-binding protein. These opposite effects have the consequence of increasing the specificity of activation of a promoter that is susceptible to regulation by proteins bound to a distal site.

CRP interacts with promoter-bound sigma54 RNA polymerase and blocks transcriptional activation of the dctA promoter

The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is an activator of sigma70-dependent transcription. Analysis of the sigma54-dependent dctA promoter reveals a novel negative regulatory function for CRP. CRP can bind to two distant sites of the dctA promoter, sites which overlap the upstream activator sequences for the DctD activator. CRP interacts with Esigma54 bound at the dctA promoter via DNA loop formation. When the CRP-binding sites are deleted, CRP still interacts in a cAMP-dependent manner with the stable Esigma54 closed complex via protein-protein contacts. CRP is able to repress activation of the dctA promoter, even in the absence of specific CRP-binding sites. CRP affects both the final level and the kinetics of activation. The establishment of the repression and its release by the NtrC activator proceed via slow processes. The kinetics suggest that CRP favours a new form of closed complex which interconverts slowly with the classical closed intermediate. Only the latter is capable of interacting with an activator to form an open promoter complex. Thus, Esigma54 promoters are responsive to CRP, a protein unrelated to sigma54 activators, and the repression exerted is the direct result of an interaction between Esigma54 and the CRP-cAMP complex.

Differential regulation of multiple flagellins in Vibrio cholerae

Vibrio cholerae, the causative agent of the human diarrheal disease cholera, is a motile bacterium with a single polar flagellum. Motility has been implicated as a virulence determinant in some animal models of cholera, but the relationship between motility and virulence has not yet been clearly defined. We have begun to define the regulatory circuitry controlling motility. We have identified five V. cholerae flagellin genes, arranged in two chromosomal loci, flaAC and flaEDB; all five genes have their own promoters. The predicted gene products have a high degree of homology to each other. A strain containing a single mutation in flaA is nonmotile and lacks a flagellum, while strains containing multiple mutations in the other four flagellin genes, including a flaCEDB strain, remain motile. Measurement of fla promoter-lacZ fusions reveals that all five flagellin promoters are transcribed at high levels in both wild-type and flaA strains. Measurement of the flagellin promoter-lacZ fusions in Salmonella typhimurium indicates that the promoter for flaA is transcribed by the sigma54 holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase while the flaE, flaD, and flaB promoters are transcribed by the sigma28 holoenzyme. These results reveal that the V. cholerae flagellum is a complex structure with multiple flagellin subunits including FlaA, which is essential for flagellar synthesis and is differentially regulated from the other flagellins.