Design of CytR regulated, cAMP-CRP dependent class II promoters in Escherichia coli: RNA polymerase-promoter interactions modulate the efficiency of CytR repression

Flexible Target Recognition of the Intrinsically Disordered DNA-Binding Domain of CytR Monitored by Single-Molecule Fluorescence Spectroscopy

The intrinsically disordered DNA-binding domain of cytidine repressor (CytR-DBD) folds in the presence of target DNA and regulates the expression of multiple genes in E. coli. To explore the conformational rearrangements in the unbound state and the target recognition mechanisms of CytR-DBD, we carried out single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) measurements. The smFRET data of CytR-DBD in the absence of DNA show one major and one minor population assignable to an expanded unfolded state and a compact folded state, respectively. The population of the folded state increases and decreases upon titration with salt and denaturant, respectively, in an apparent two-state manner. The peak FRET efficiencies of both the unfolded and folded states change continuously with denaturant concentration, demonstrating the intrinsic flexibility of the DNA-binding domain and the deviation from a strict two-state transition. Remarkably, the CytR-DBD exhibits a compact structure when bound to both the specific and nonspecific DNA; however, the peak FRET efficiencies of the two structures are slightly but consistently different. The observed conformational heterogeneity highlights the potential structural changes required for CytR to bind variably spaced operator sequences.

ChIP-exo interrogation of Crp, DNA, and RNAP holoenzyme interactions

Numerous in vitro studies have yielded a refined picture of the structural and molecular associations between Cyclic-AMP receptor protein (Crp), the DNA motif, and RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme. In this study, high-resolution ChIP-exonuclease (ChIP-exo) was applied to study Crp binding in vivo and at genome-scale. Surprisingly, Crp was found to provide little to no protection of the DNA motif under activating conditions. Instead, Crp demonstrated binding patterns that closely resembled those generated by σ⁷⁰. The binding patterns of both Crp and σ⁷⁰ are indicative of RNAP holoenzyme DNA footprinting profiles associated with stages during transcription initiation that occur post-recruitment. This is marked by a pronounced advancement of the template strand footprint profile to the +20 position relative to the transcription start site and a multimodal distribution on the nontemplate strand. This trend was also observed in the familial transcription factor, Fnr, but full protection of the motif was seen in the repressor ArcA. Given the time-scale of ChIP studies and that the rate-limiting step in transcription initiation is typically post recruitment, we propose a hypothesis where Crp is absent from the DNA motif but remains associated with RNAP holoenzyme post-recruitment during transcription initiation. The release of Crp from the DNA motif may be a result of energetic changes that occur as RNAP holoenzyme traverses the various stable intermediates towards elongation complex formation.

Mechanism of Antiactivation at the Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP σN-Dependent PatzT Promoter

PatzT is an internal promoter of the atzRSTUVW operon that directs the synthesis of AtzT, AtzU, AtzV, and AtzW, components of an ABC-type cyanuric acid transport system. PatzT is σ(N) dependent, activated by the general nitrogen control regulator NtrC with the assistance of protein integration host factor (IHF), and repressed by the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) AtzR. We have used a variety of in vivo and in vitro gene expression and protein-DNA interaction assays to assess the mechanisms underlying AtzR-dependent repression of PatzT Here, we show that repression only occurs when AtzR and NtrC interact simultaneously with the PatzT promoter region, indicating that AtzR acts as an antiactivator to antagonize activation by NtrC. Furthermore, repression requires precise rotational orientation of the AtzR and NtrC binding sites, strongly suggesting protein-protein interaction between the two proteins on the promoter region. Further exploration of the antiactivation mechanism showed that although AtzR-dependent repression occurs prior to open complex formation, AtzR does not alter the oligomerization state of NtrC or inhibit NtrC ATPase activity when bound to the PatzT promoter region. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that PatzT-bound AtzR interacts with NtrC to prevent the coupling of NtrC-mediated ATP hydrolysis with the remodeling of the interactions between E-σ(N) and PatzT that lead to open complex formation.

IMPORTANCE

Here, we describe a unique mechanism by which the regulatory protein AtzR prevents the activation of the σ(N)-dependent promoter PatzT Promoters of this family are always positively regulated, but there are a few examples of overlapping negative regulation. The mechanism described here is highly unconventional and involves an interaction between the repressor and activator proteins to prevent the action of the repressor protein on the RNA polymerase-promoter complex.

Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Acts as a Transcription Regulator in Response to Stresses in Deinococcus radiodurans

The cyclic AMP receptor protein family of transcription factors regulates various metabolic pathways in bacteria, and also play roles in response to environmental changes. Here, we identify four homologs of the CRP family in Deinococcus radiodurans, one of which tolerates extremely high levels of oxidative stress and DNA-damaging reagents. Transcriptional levels of CRP were increased under hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) treatment during the stationary growth phase, indicating that CRPs function in response to oxidative stress. By constructing all CRP single knockout mutants, we found that the dr0997 mutant showed the lowest tolerance toward H₂O₂, ultraviolet radiation, ionizing radiation, and mitomycin C, while the phenotypes of the dr2362, dr0834, and dr1646 mutants showed slight or no significant differences from those of the wild-type strain. Taking advantage of the conservation of the CRP-binding site in many bacteria, we found that transcription of 18 genes, including genes encoding chromosome-partitioning protein (dr0998), Lon proteases (dr0349 and dr1974), NADH-quinone oxidoreductase (dr1506), thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (dr2531), the DNA repair protein UvsE (dr1819), PprA (dra0346), and RecN (dr1447), are directly regulated by DR0997. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses showed that certain genes involved in anti-oxidative responses, DNA repair, and various cellular pathways are transcriptionally attenuated in the dr0997 mutant. Interestingly, DR0997 also regulate the transcriptional levels of all CRP genes in this bacterium. These data suggest that DR0997 contributes to the extreme stress resistance of D. radiodurans via its regulatory role in multiple cellular pathways, such as anti-oxidation and DNA repair pathways.

Transcriptional mechanisms for differential expression of outer membrane cytochrome genes omcA and mtrC in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

Background

Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 is capable of reducing extracellular electron acceptors, such as metals and electrodes, through the Mtr respiratory pathway, which consists of the outer membrane cytochromes OmcA and MtrC and associated proteins MtrA and MtrB. These proteins are encoded in the mtr gene cluster (omcA-mtrCAB) in the MR-1 chromosome.

Results

Here, we investigated the transcriptional mechanisms for the mtr genes and demonstrated that omcA and mtrC are transcribed from two upstream promoters, P_omcA and P_mtrC, respectively. In vivo transcription and in vitro electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that a cAMP receptor protein (CRP) positively regulates the expression of the mtr genes by binding to the upstream regions of P_omcA and P_mtrC. However, the expression of omcA and mtrC was differentially regulated in response to culture conditions; specifically, the expression from P_mtrC was higher under aerobic conditions than that under anaerobic conditions with fumarate as an electron acceptor, whereas expression from P_omcA exhibited the opposite trend. Deletion of the region upstream of the CRP-binding site of P_omcA resulted in a significant increase in promoter activity under aerobic conditions, demonstrating that the deleted region is involved in the negative regulation of P_omcA.

Conclusions

Taken together, the present results indicate that transcription of the mtr genes is regulated by multiple promoters and regulatory systems, including the CRP/cAMP-dependent regulatory system and yet-unidentified negative regulators.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0406-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The cooperative binding energetics of CytR and cAMP receptor protein support a quantitative model of differential activation and repression of CytR-regulated class III Escherichia coli promoters

cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and CytR mediate positive and negative control of nine genes in Escherichia coli, most of which are involved in nucleoside catabolism and recycling. Five promoters share a common architecture in which tandem CRP sites flank an intervening CytR operator (CytO). CytR and CRP bind cooperatively to these promoters to form a three-protein, DNA-bound complex that controls activation and repression, the levels of which vary markedly among the promoters. To understand the specific combinatorial control mechanisms that are responsible for this outcome, we have used quantitative DNase I footprinting to generate individual site isotherms for each site of protein-DNA interaction. The intrinsic affinities of each transcription factor for its respective site and the specific patterns of cooperativity and competition underlying the molecular interactions at each promoter were determined by a global analysis of these titration data. Here we present results obtained for nupGP and tsxP2, adding to results published previously for deoP2, udpP, and cddP. These data allowed us to correlate the reported levels of activation, repression, and induction with the ligation states of these five promoters under physiologically relevant conditions. A general pattern of transcriptional regulation emerges that allows for complex patterns of regulation in this seemingly simple system.

Multiple conformations of the cytidine repressor DNA-binding domain coalesce to one upon recognition of a specific DNA surface

The cytidine repressor (CytR) is a member of the LacR family of bacterial repressors with distinct functional features. The Escherichia coli CytR regulon comprises nine operons whose palindromic operators vary in both sequence and, most significantly, spacing between the recognition half-sites. This suggests a strong likelihood that protein folding would be coupled to DNA binding as a mechanism to accommodate the variety of different operator architectures to which CytR is targeted. Such coupling is a common feature of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, including the LacR family repressors; however, there are no significant structural rearrangements upon DNA binding within the three-helix DNA-binding domains (DBDs) studied to date. We used nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to characterize the CytR DBD free in solution and to determine the high-resolution structure of a CytR DBD monomer bound specifically to one DNA half-site of the uridine phosphorylase (udp) operator. We find that the free DBD populates multiple distinct conformations distinguished by up to four sets of NMR peaks per residue. This structural heterogeneity is previously unknown in the LacR family. These stable structures coalesce into a single, more stable udp-bound form that features a three-helix bundle containing a canonical helix-turn-helix motif. However, this structure differs from all other LacR family members whose structures are known with regard to the packing of the helices and consequently their relative orientations. Aspects of CytR activity are unique among repressors; we identify here structural properties that are also distinct and that might underlie the different functional properties.

An unusual pattern of CytR and CRP binding energetics at Escherichia coli cddP suggests a unique blend of class I and class II mediated activation

Two transcription factors, CRP and CytR, mediate positive and negative control of nine cistrons involved in nucleoside catabolism and recycling in Escherichia coli. The ability of multiple transcription factors to combine in different ways to confer differential gene regulation is of significant interest in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic gene regulation. Analysis of cooperative interactions between CytR and CRP at the deoP2 and udpP promoters has implicated the importance of promoter architecture in controlling repression and induction. These studies have also identified competition between CytR and CRP as an additional contributor to differential regulation. The pattern and energetics of CytR and CRP interactions at the cdd promoter, the most strongly activated of the CytR-regulated promoters, have been delineated using DNase I footprinting. Surprisingly, CRP has greater affinity for the promoter proximal site at cddP, CRP1, than for the distal site, CRP2, in contrast to promoters studied previously. This difference is a major contributor to unusually high CRP-mediated activation of cddP. Additionally, while cytidine binding to CytR nearly eliminates the pairwise interactions between CytR and CRP bound at CRP1, it has little effect on pairwise cooperativity between CytR and CRP bound at CRP2 or as a consequence on the overall cooperativity of the three-protein complex in which CRP is bound to both sites. The effect of cytidine binding on cooperativity differs between the three promoters studied thus far. We propose that the different patterns of interaction reflect the spacing between CytR half-sites and the location of the CytR operator in relation to the two CRP sites.

Medium- to large-sized xylo-oligosaccharides are responsible for xylanase induction in Prevotella bryantii B14

Experiments were done to define the nature of the xylan-derived induction signal for xylanase activity, and evaluate which xylanase genes among the three known ones (xynA, xynB and xynC) are induced by the presence of xylan in Prevotella bryantii B(1)4. During the later stages of exponential growth on glucose, addition of 0.05 % water-soluble xylan (WS-X) stimulated xylanase formation within 30 min. Xylose, xylobiose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, xylopentaose, arabinose and glucuronic acid all failed to induce the xylanase activity. An acid-ethanol-soluble fraction of WS-X (approximate degree of polymerization 30) enhanced the activity significantly, whereas the acid-ethanol-insoluble fraction had no effect, unless first digested by the cloned P. bryantii XynC xylanase. These results indicate that medium- to large-sized xylo-oligosaccharides are responsible for induction. The transcription of all three known xylanase genes from P. bryantii was upregulated coordinately by addition of WS-X. There have been relatively few investigations into the regulation of xylanase activity in bacteria, and it appears to be unique that medium- to large-sized xylo-oligosaccharides are responsible for induction.

A Role for the Interdomain Linker Region of the Escherichia coli CytR Regulator in Repression Complex Formation

Regulatory complexes formed by the CytR repressor protein and the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) prevent transcription initiation from several promoters in Escherichia coli. The formation of the complexes is mediated by protein-DNA interactions and protein-protein interactions between the two regulators. Interestingly, co-binding with CRP has a profound effect on the configuration of the DNA-binding targets preferred by CytR. When binding to DNA by itself, CytR binds preferentially to two octamer repeats in direct or inverted orientation, and separated by 2 bp. However, in the presence of CRP, CytR recognizes inverted repeats separated by 10-13 bp, or direct repeats separated by 1 bp. A fixed orientation of at least one CytR octamer repeat in close proximity to a CRP-binding target is a common architectural feature at promoters optimised for repression complex formation. These observations suggest that CRP alters the DNA-binding mode of CytR. Here, we have investigated the CRP-induced changes in CytR by protein footprinting and alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Our data suggest that a flexible interdomain linker region in CytR, connecting the DNA-binding domain to the dimerization domain allows the repressor protein to interact with DNA-binding sites in a highly relaxed manner, as shown previously, and plays an active role in transcription regulation. Thus, the interactions between CRP, CytR and DNA within the repression complex appear to be more extensive than anticipated. The results support and extend the view that the high degree of adaptability observed in the CytR/CRP regulatory system is obtained though multiple adjustable interactions between the implicated factors.

Thermodynamics of E. coli cytidine repressor interactions with DNA: distinct modes of binding to different operators suggests a role in differential gene regulation

Interactions between the Escherichia coli cytidine repressor protein (CytR) and its operator sites at the different promoters that comprise the CytR regulon, play an important role in the regulation of these promoters. The natural operators are palindromes separated by variable length central spacers (0-9 bp). We have suggested that this variability affects the flexibility of CytR-DNA contacts, thereby affecting the critical protein-protein interactions between CytR and the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) that underlie differential repression and activation of CytR-regulated genes. To assess this hypothesis, we investigated the thermodynamics of CytR binding to the natural operator sequences found in udpP and deoP2. To separate effects due to spacing from effects due to the differing sequences of the recognition half-sites of these two operators, we also investigated CytR binding to artificial hybrid operators, in which the half-site sequences of udpP and deoP2 were exchanged. Thermodynamic parameters, DeltaS(o), DeltaH(o) and DeltaC(o)(p), were determined by van't Hoff analysis of CytR binding, monitored by changes in the steady-state fluorescence anisotropy of dye-conjugated, operator-containing oligonucleotides. Large differences in thermodynamics were observed that depend primarily on the central spacer rather than the sequences of the recognition half-sites. Binding to operators with deoP2 spacing results in a very large, negative DeltaC(o)(p). Association is strongly favored enthalpically and strongly disfavored entropically at ambient temperature. By contrast, binding to operators with udpP spacing results in a small, negative DeltaC(o)(p). Association is weakly favored both enthalpically and entropically at ambient temperature. A difference of such magnitude in DeltaDeltaC(o)(p) has not been reported previously for specific binding of a transcription factor to different sites. The identical salt dependence of CytR binding to deoP2 and udpP operators indicates that ion-dependent processes do not contribute significantly to this difference. Thus, the different thermodynamic effects appear to reflect distinctly different modes of site-specific DNA binding. We discuss similarities to operator binding by CytR homologs among LacI family repressors, and we consider how different CytR binding modes might affect interactions with other components of the gene regulatory machinery that contribute to differential gene regulation.

Repression of deoP2 in Escherichia coli by CytR: conversion of a transcription activator into a repressor

In the deoP2 promoter of Escherichia coli, a transcription activator, cAMP-CRP, binds at two sites, centered at -41.5 and -93.5 from the start site of transcription, while a repressor, CytR, binds to a space between the two cAMP-CRP complexes. The mechanisms for the cAMP-CRP-mediated transcription activation and CytR-mediated transcription repression were investigated in vitro using purified components. We classified the deoP2 promoter as a class II cAMP-CRP-dependent promoter, primarily by the action of cAMP-CRP at the downstream site. Interestingly, we also found that deoP2 carries an "UP-element" immediately upstream of the downstream cAMP-CRP site. The UP-element overlaps with the DNA site for CytR. However, it was observed that CytR functions with the RNA polymerase devoid of the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit as well as with intact RNA polymerase. The mechanism of repression by CytR proposed in this study is that the cAMP-CRP bound at -41.5 undergoes an allosteric change upon direct interaction with CytR such that it no longer maintains a productive interaction with the N-terminal domain of alpha, but instead acts as a repressor to interfere with RNA polymerase acting on deoP2.

Mechanisms of transcriptional repression

Transcriptional repressors are usually viewed as proteins that bind to promoters in a way that impedes subsequent binding of RNA polymerase. Although this repression mechanism is found at several promoters, there is a growing list of repressors that inhibit transcription initiation in other ways. For example, several repressors allow the simultaneous binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter, but interfere with subsequent events of the initiation process, eventually inhibiting transcription initiation. The recent increase in the number of repressors for which the repression mechanism has been characterized in detail has shown an amazing variety of strategies to repress transcription initiation. It is not surprising to find that the repression mechanism used is usually exquisitely adapted to the characteristics of the promoter and of the repressor involved.

Identification of the subunit of cAMP receptor protein (CRP) that functionally interacts with CytR in CRP-CytR-mediated transcriptional repression

At promoters of the Escherichia coli CytR regulon, the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) interacts with the repressor CytR to form transcriptionally inactive CRP-CytR-promoter or (CRP)(2)-CytR-promoter complexes. Here, using "oriented heterodimer" analysis, we show that only one subunit of the CRP dimer, the subunit proximal to CytR, functionally interacts with CytR in CRP-CytR-promoter and (CRP)(2)-CytR-promoter complexes. Our results provide information about the architecture of CRP-CytR-promoter and (CRP)(2)-CytR-promoter complexes and rule out the proposal that masking of activating region 2 of CRP is responsible for the transcriptional inactivity of the complexes.

Role of multiple CytR binding sites on cooperativity, competition, and induction at the Escherichia coli udp promoter

The CytR repressor fulfills dual roles as both a repressor of transcription from promoters of the Escherichia coli CytR regulon and a co-activator in some circumstances. Transcription is repressed by a three-protein complex (cAMP receptor protein (CRP)-CytR-CRP) that is stabilized by cooperative interactions between CRP and CytR. However, cooperativity also means that CytR can recruit CRP and, by doing so, can act as a co-activator. The central role of cooperativity in regulation is highlighted by the fact that binding of the inducer, cytidine, to CytR is coupled to CytR-CRP cooperativity; this underlies the mechanism for induction. Similar interactions at the different promoters of the CytR regulon coordinate expression of the transport proteins and enzymes required for nucleoside catabolism but also provide differential expression of these genes. A fundamental question in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic gene regulation is how combinatorial mechanisms of this sort regulate differential expression. Recently, we showed that CytR binds specifically to multiple sites in the E. coli deoP promoter, thereby providing competition for CRP binding to CRP operator site 1 (CRP1) and CRP2 as well as cooperativity. The effect of the competition at this promoter is to negate the role of CytR in recruiting CRP. Here, we have used quantitative footprint and mobility shift analysis to investigate CRP and CytR binding to the E. coli udp promoter. Here too, we find that CytR both cooperates and competes for CRP binding. However, consistent with both the distribution of CytR recognition motifs in the sequence of the promoter and the regulation of the promoter, the competition is limited to CRP2. When cytidine binds to CytR, the effect on cooperativity is very different at the udp promoter than at the deoP2 promoter. Cooperativity with CRP at CRP1 is nearly eliminated, but the effect on CytR-CRP2 cooperativity is negligible. These results are discussed in relation to the current structural model of CytR in which the core, inducer-binding domain is tethered to the helix-turn-helix, DNA-binding domain via flexible peptide linkers.

Some repressors of bacterial transcription

For a long time, repression of transcription in Escherichia coli was thought to be generally caused by one repressor binding to one operator. Recent work has indicated the frequent presence of auxiliary operators and helper proteins. The recent solution of the X-ray structures of Lac and Pur repressors were breakthroughs; yet, it has become painfully clear that important aspects of repression are still not understood.

DNA-binding characteristics of the Escherichia coli CytR regulator: a relaxed spacing requirement between operator half-sites is provided by a flexible, unstructured interdomain linker

The Escherichia coli CytR regulator belongs to the LacI family of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins and prevents CRP-mediated transcription in the CytR regulon. Unlike the other members of this protein family, CytR binds with only modest affinity to its operators and transcription repression thus relies on the formation of nucleoprotein complexes with the cAMP-CRP complex. Moreover, CytR exhibits a rotational and translational flexibility in operator binding that is unprecedented in the LacI family. In this report we examined the effect of changing the spacing between CytR half-operators on CytR regulation in vivo and on CytR binding in vitro. Maximum repression was seen with the short spacing variants: repression peaks when the half-operators lie on the same face of the DNA helix. Repression was retained for most spacing variants with centre separations of half-operators < or = 3 helical turns. Our data confirm and extend the view that CytR is a highly flexible DNA binder that can adapt many different conformations for co-operative binding with CRP. Furthermore, limited proteolysis of radiolabelled CytR protein showed that the interdomain linker connecting the DNA binding domains and the core part of CytR does not become structured upon DNA binding. We conclude that CytR does not use hinge alpha-helices for minor groove recognition. Rather, CytR possesses a highly flexible interdomain linker that allows it to form complexes with CRP at promoters with quite different architecture.