Specificity in transcriptional regulation in the absence of specific DNA binding sites: the case of T7 lysozyme

Coexpression of Tail Fiber and Tail Protein Genes of the Cyanophage PP Using a Synthetic Genomics Approach Enhances the Salt Tolerance of Synechocystis PCC 6803

Cyanophages are viruses that specifically infect cyanobacteria and are capable of regulating the population densities and seasonal distributions of cyanobacteria. However, few studies have investigated the interactions between cyanophages and heterologous hosts, owing to the inability of cyanophages to infect heterologous cyanobacterial hosts. Here, a truncated artificial cyanophage genome, Syn-P4-8, was designed and assembled that contained 18 genes for viral coat assembly proteins but not genes related to host infection or DNA replication. Syn-P4-8 was transferred into the heterologous host Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by conjugation. The growth of strain CS-02 carrying Syn-P4-8 was significantly better than that of the control strain when grown in medium containing 5% NaCl. Only two cyanophage genes, encoding the tail protein (open reading frame 25 [ORF25]) and the tail fiber protein (ORF26), were transcribed in Synechocystis PCC 6803 grown in BG11 medium supplemented with 5% NaCl. However, expression of either ORF25 or ORF26 alone could not recover this phenotype. In addition, transcriptomic analysis revealed the presence of 334 differentially expressed genes in CS-02 compared to the control strain, corresponding to 151 downregulated and 183 upregulated genes that may affect cyanobacterial salt tolerances. In this study, synthetic biology methods were used to strengthen our understanding of the interactions between cyanophage genes and heterologous hosts. IMPORTANCE We synthesized and assembled a truncated cyanophage genome called Syn-P4-8, containing 18 genes for viral coat assembly proteins, and transferred it into a nonhost strain, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, to investigate interactions between Syn-P4-8 and Synechocystis PCC 6803. We found that coexpression of tail fiber and tail protein genes enhanced the salt tolerance of Synechocystis PCC 6803.

Design and implementation of three incoherent feed-forward motif based biological concentration sensors

Synthetic biology is a useful tool to investigate the dynamics of small biological networks and to assess our capacity to predict their behavior from computational models. In this work we report the construction of three different synthetic networks in Escherichia coli based upon the incoherent feed-forward loop architecture. The steady state behavior of the networks was investigated experimentally and computationally under different mutational regimes in a population based assay. Our data shows that the three incoherent feed-forward networks, using three different macromolecular inhibitory elements, reproduce the behavior predicted from our computational model. We also demonstrate that specific biological motifs can be designed to generate similar behavior using different components. In addition we show how it is possible to tune the behavior of the networks in a predicable manner by applying suitable mutations to the inhibitory elements.

Mitochondrial transcription is regulated via an ATP "sensing" mechanism that couples RNA abundance to respiration

The information encoded in both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes must be coordinately regulated to respond to changes in cellular growth and energy states. Despite identification of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase (mtRNAP) from several organisms, little is known about mitochondrial transcriptional regulation. Studying the shift from fermentation to respiration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have demonstrated a direct correlation between in vivo changes in mitochondrial transcript abundance and in vitro sensitivity of mitochondrial promoters to ATP concentration (K(m)ATP). Consistent with the idea that the mtRNAP itself senses in vivo ATP levels, we found that transcript abundance correlates with respiration, but only when coupled to mitochondrial ATP synthesis. In addition, we characterized mutations in the mitochondrial promoter and the mtRNAP accessory factor Mtf1 that alter both in vitro K(m)ATP and in vivo transcription in response to respiratory changes. We propose that shifting cellular pools of ATP coordinately control nuclear and mitochondrial transcription.

rRNA Promoter Regulation by Nonoptimal Binding of σ Region 1.2: An Additional Recognition Element for RNA Polymerase

Regulation of transcription initiation is generally attributable to activator/repressor proteins that bind to specific DNA sequences. However, regulators can also achieve specificity by binding directly to RNA polymerase (RNAP) and exploiting the kinetic variation intrinsic to different RNAP-promoter complexes. We report here a previously unknown interaction with Escherichia coli RNAP that defines an additional recognition element in bacterial promoters. The strength of this sequence-specific interaction varies at different promoters and affects the lifetime of the complex with RNAP. Selection of rRNA promoter mutants forming long-lived complexes, kinetic analyses of duplex and bubble templates, dimethylsulfate footprinting, and zero-Angstrom crosslinking demonstrated that sigma subunit region 1.2 directly contacts the nontemplate strand base two positions downstream of the -10 element (within the "discriminator" region). By making a nonoptimal sigma1.2-discriminator interaction, rRNA promoters create the short-lived complex required for specific responses to the RNAP binding factors ppGpp and DksA, ultimately accounting for regulation of ribosome synthesis.

Evolutionary robustness of an optimal phenotype: re-evolution of lysis in a bacteriophage deleted for its lysin gene

Optimality models are frequently used to create expectations about phenotypic evolution based on the fittest possible phenotype. However, they often ignore genetic details, which could confound these expectations. We experimentally analyzed the ability of organisms to evolve towards an optimum in an experimentally tractable system, lysis time in bacteriophage T7. T7 lysozyme helps lyse the host cell by degrading its cell wall at the end of infection, allowing viral escape to infect new hosts. Artificial deletion of lysozyme greatly reduced fitness and delayed lysis, but after evolution both phenotypes approached wild-type values. Phage with a lysis-deficient lysozyme evolved similarly. Several mutations were involved in adaptation, but most of the change in lysis timing and fitness increase was mediated by changes in gene 16, an internal virion protein not formerly considered to play a role in lysis. Its muralytic domain, which normally aids genome entry through the cell wall, evolved to cause phage release. Theoretical models suggest there is an optimal lysis time, and lysis more rapid or delayed than this optimum decreases fitness. Artificially constructed lines with very rapid lysis had lower fitness than wild-type T7, in accordance with the model. However, while a slow-lysing line also had lower fitness than wild-type, this low fitness resulted at least partly from genetic details that violated model assumptions.

Multiple Roles of T7 RNA Polymerase and T7 Lysozyme During Bacteriophage T7 Infection

T7 RNA polymerase selectively transcribes T7 genes during infection but is also involved in DNA replication, maturation and packaging. T7 lysozyme is an amidase that cuts a bond in the peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall, but it also binds T7 RNA polymerase and inhibits transcription, and it stimulates replication and packaging of T7 DNA. To better understand the roles of these two proteins during T7 infection, mutants of each were constructed or selected and their biochemical and physiological behavior analyzed. The amidase activity of lysozyme is needed for abrupt lysis and release of phage particles but appears to have no role in replication and packaging. The interaction between polymerase and lysozyme stimulates both replication and packaging. Polymerase mutants that gain the ability to grow normally in the absence of an interaction with lysozyme still fail to shut down late transcription and, remarkably, have become hypersensitive to inhibition when lysozyme is able to bind. These lysozyme-hypersensitive polymerases behave without lysozyme similarly to wild-type polymerase with lysozyme: both remain longer at the promoter before establishing a lysozyme-resistant elongation complex and both increase the length of pausing when elongation complexes encounter an eight-base recognition sequence involved in DNA packaging. Replication origins contain T7 promoters, but the role of T7 RNA polymerase in initiating replication is not understood well enough to more than speculate how the lysozyme-polymerase interaction stimulates replication. Maturation and packaging is apparently initiated through interaction between prohead-terminase complexes and transcription elongation complexes paused at the sequence TATCTGT(T/A), well conserved at the right-end of the concatemer junction of T7-like phages. A model that is consistent with the structure of an elongation complex and a large body of mutational and biochemical data is proposed to explain sequence-specific pausing and potential termination at the consensus recognition sequence (C/T)ATCTGT(T/A).

T7 Lysozyme Represses T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription by Destabilizing the Open Complex during Initiation

Bacteriophage T7 lysozyme binds to T7 RNA polymerase and inhibits transcription initiation and the transition from initiation to elongation. We have investigated each step of transcription initiation to determine where T7 lysozyme has the most effect. Stopped flow and equilibrium DNA binding studies indicate that T7 lysozyme does not inhibit the formation of the preinitiation open complex (open complex in the absence of initiating nucleotide). T7 lysozyme, however, does prevent the formation of a fully open initiation complex (open complex in the presence of the initiating nucleotide). This is consistent with the results that in the presence of T7 lysozyme the rate of G ladder RNA synthesis is about 5-fold slower and the GTP Kd is about 2-fold higher, but T7 lysozyme does not inhibit the initial rate of RNA synthesis with a premelted bulge-6 promoter (bubble from -4 to +2). Neither the RNA synthesis rate nor the extent of promoter opening is restored by increasing the initiating nucleotide concentration, indicating that T7 lysozyme represses transcription by interfering with the formation of a stable and a fully open initiation bubble or by altering the structure of the DNA in the initiation complex. As a consequence of the unstable initiation bubble and/or the inhibition of the conformational changes in the N-terminal domain of T7 RNAP, T7 lysozyme causes an increased production of abortive products from 2- to 5-mer that delays the transition from the initiation to the elongation phase.

A Mutation in the Yeast Mitochondrial Core RNA Polymerase, Rpo41, Confers Defects in Both Specificity Factor Interaction and Promoter Utilization

The yeast mitochondrial RNA polymerase (RNAP) is composed of the core RNAP, Rpo41, and the mitochondrial transcription factor, Mtf1. Both are required for mitochondrial transcription, but how the two proteins interact to create a functional, promoter-selective holoenzyme is still unknown. Rpo41 is similar to the single polypeptide bacteriophage T7RNAP, which does not require additional factors for promoter-selective initiation but whose activity is modulated during infection by association with T7 lysozyme. In this study we used the co-crystal structure of T7RNAP and T7 lysozyme as a model to define a potential Mtf1 interaction surface on Rpo41, making site-directed mutations in Rpo41 at positions predicted to reside at the same location as the T7RNAP/T7 lysozyme interface. We identified Rpo41 mutant E1224A as having reduced interactions with Mtf1 in a two-hybrid assay and a temperature-sensitive petite phenotype in vivo. Although the E1224A mutant has full activity in a non-selective in vitro transcription assay, it is temperature-sensitive for selective transcription from linear DNA templates containing the 14S rRNA, COX2, and tRNAcys mitochondrial promoters. The tRNAcys promoter defect can be rescued by template supercoiling but not by addition of a dinucleotide primer. The fact that mutation of Rpo41 results in selective transcription defects indicates that the core RNAP, like T7RNAP, plays an important role in promoter utilization.

Structural transitions mediating transcription initiation by T7 RNA polymerase

During transcription initiation, RNA polymerases appear to retain promoter interactions while transcribing short RNAs that are frequently released from the complex. Upon transition to elongation, the polymerase releases promoter and forms a stable elongation complex. Little is known about the changes in polymerase conformation or polymerase:DNA interactions that occur during this process. To characterize the transitions that occur in the T7 RNA polymerase transcription complex during initiation, we prepared enzymes with Fe-BABE conjugated at 11 different positions. Addition of H(2)O(2) to transcription complexes prepared with these enzymes led to nucleic acid strand scission near the conjugate. Changes in the cleavage sites revealed a series of conformational changes and rearrangements of protein:nucleic acid contacts that mediate progression through the initiation reaction.

Kinetic and thermodynamic basis of promoter strength: multiple steps of transcription initiation by T7 RNA polymerase are modulated by the promoter sequence

Transcription initiation by T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) is regulated by the specific promoter DNA sequence that is classically divided into two major domains, the binding domain (-17 to -5) and the initiation domain (-4 to +6). The occurrence of non-consensus bases within these domains is responsible for the diversity of promoter strength, the basis of which was investigated by studying T7 promoters with changes in the promoter specificity region (-13 to -6) of the binding domain and/or the melting region (-4 to -1) of the initiation domain. The transient state kinetics and thermodynamic studies revealed that multiple steps in the pathway of transcription initiation are modulated by the promoter DNA sequence. Three base changes in the promoter specificity region at -11, -12, and -13, found in the natural phi 3.8 promoter, reduced the overall affinity of the T7 RNAP for the promoter DNA by 2-3-fold and decreased the rate of pppGpG synthesis, the first RNA product. Promoter opening is thermodynamically driven in T7 RNAP, and a single base change in the melting region (TATA to TAAA) decreased the extent of open complex generated at equilibrium. This base change in the melting region also increased the K(d) of (+1) GTP and the dissociation rate of pppGpG. Thus, transcription initiation at various T7 promoters is differentially regulated by initiating GTP concentration. The specificity and melting regions of T7 promoter DNA act both independently and synergistically to affect distinct steps of transcription initiation. Although each step in the initiation pathway is affected to a small degree by promoter sequence variations, the cumulative effect dictates the overall promoter strength.

Scanning mutagenesis reveals roles for helix n of the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase thumb subdomain in transcription complex stability, pausing, and termination

Deletions within the thumb subdomain (residues 335-408) of T7 RNA polymerase decrease elongation complex stability and processivity, but the structure of a T7RNAP initial transcription complex containing a 3-nucleotide RNA reveals no interactions between the thumb and the RNA or DNA. Modeling of a longer RNA in this structure, using a T7DNAP-primer-template structure as a guide, suggests that the phosphate ribose backbone of the RNA contacts a stretch of mostly positively charged side chains between residues 385 and 395 of helix N of the thumb. Scanning mutagenesis of this region reveals that alanine substitutions of Arg(391), Ser(393), and Arg(394) destabilize elongation complexes and that substitutions at 393 and 394 increase termination of transcripts 5 or more bases in length. The alpha-carbons of all 3 of these residues lie on the side of helix N, which faces into the template-binding cleft of the RNA polymerase, and modeling suggests that they can contact the RNA 4-5 bases away from the 3'-end. Alanine substitutions of other residues within 385-395 do not have marked effects on transcription complex stability, but alanine substitutions of Asp(388) and Tyr(385) reduce pausing and termination at the T7 concatemer junction. Both of these side chains lie on the outer side of helix N, pointing away from the template binding cleft. The thumb subdomain of T7RNAP therefore has roles both in transcription complex stabilization and in pausing and termination at the T7 concatemer junction.

Characterization of halted T7 RNA polymerase elongation complexes reveals multiple factors that contribute to stability

We have constructed a series of plasmid templates that allow T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) to be halted at defined intervals downstream from its promoter in a preserved sequence context. While transcription complexes halted at +3 to +6 are highly unstable, complexes halted at +10 to +14 dissociate very slowly and gradually lose their capacity to extend transcripts. Complexes halted at +18 and beyond dissociate more readily, but the stability of the these complexes is enhanced significantly in the presence of the next incoming nucleotide. Unexpectedly, the stability of complexes halted at +14 and beyond was found to be lower on supercoiled templates than on linear templates. To explore this further, we used synthetic DNA templates in which the nature of the non-template (NT) strand was varied. Whereas initiation complexes are less stable in the presence of a complementary NT strand, elongation complexes are more stable in the presence of a complementary NT strand, and the presence of a non-complementary NT strand (a mismatched bubble) results in even greater stability. The results suggest that the NT strand plays an important role in displacing the nascent RNA, allowing its interaction with an RNA product binding site in the RNAP. The NT strand may also contribute to stabilization by interacting directly with the enzyme. A mutant RNAP that has a deletion in the flexible "thumb" domain responds to changes in template topology in a manner that is similar to that of the wild-type (WT) enzyme, but halted complexes formed by the mutant enzyme are particularly dependent upon the presence of the NT strand for stability. In contrast, an N-terminal RNAP mutant that has a decreased capacity to bind single-stranded RNA forms halted complexes with much lower levels of stability than the WT enzyme, and these complexes are not stabilized by the presence of the NT strand. The distinct responses of the mutant RNAPs to changes in template structure indicate that the N-terminal and thumb domains have quite different functions in stabilizing the transcription complex.

Studies of promoter recognition and start site selection by T7 RNA polymerase using a comprehensive collection of promoter variants

We have examined the behavior of T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) at a set of promoter variants having all possible single base pair (bp) substitutions. The polymerase exhibits an absolute requirement for initiation with a purine and a strong preference for initiation with GTP vs ATP. Promoter variants that would require initiation at the normal start site (+1) with CTP or UTP result in a shift in initiation to +2 (with GTP). However, the choice of start site is little affected by base substitutions elsewhere in the initiation region. Furthermore, when the initiation region is shifted either one nucleotide (nt) closer or 1 nt further away from the binding region, transcription still begins the same distance downstream. These results indicate that the sequence around the start site is of little importance in start site selection and that initiation is directed a minimum distance of 5 nt downstream from the binding region. At promoters that initiate with +1 GGG, T7 RNAP synthesizes a ladder of poly(G) products as a result of slippage of the transcript on the three C residues in the template strand from +1 to +3. At promoter variants in which there is an opportunity to form a longer RNA-DNA hybrid, this G-ladder is enhanced and extended. This observation is not in agreement with recent suggestions that the RNA-DNA hybrid in the initiation complex cannot extend further than 3 bps upstream from the active site [Cheetham, G., Jeruzalmi, D., and Steitz, T. A. (1999) Nature 399, 80-83].

Insights into transcription: structure and function of single-subunit DNA-dependent RNA polymerases

Single-subunit RNA polymerases are widespread throughout prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, and also viruses. T7 RNA polymerase is one of the simplest DNA-dependent enzymes, capable of transcribing a complete gene without the need for additional proteins. During the past two years, three illuminating crystal structures of T7 RNA polymerase complexed to either T7 lysozyme, which is a transcription inhibitor, an open promoter DNA fragment or a promoter DNA fragment being transcribed into RNA at initiation have been determined. For the first time, these structures describe in detail the intricate mechanism of transcription initiation by T7 RNA polymerase, which is likely to be a general model for other related RNA polymerases.

Structure of a transcribing T7 RNA polymerase initiation complex

The structure of a T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) initiation complex captured transcribing a trinucleotide of RNA from a 17-base pair promoter DNA containing a 5-nucleotide single-strand template extension was determined at a resolution of 2.4 angstroms. Binding of the upstream duplex portion of the promoter occurs in the same manner as that in the open promoter complex, but the single-stranded template is repositioned to place the +4 base at the catalytic active site. Thus, synthesis of RNA in the initiation phase leads to accumulation or "scrunching" of the template in the enclosed active site pocket of T7 RNAP. Only three base pairs of heteroduplex are formed before the RNA peels off the template.

Mechanisms by which T7 lysozyme specifically regulates T7 RNA polymerase during different phases of transcription

Bacteriophage T7 lysozyme binds to T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) and regulates its transcription by differentially repressing initiation from different T7 promoters. This selective repression is due in part to a lysozyme-induced increase in the KNTP of the initiation complex (IC) and to intrinsically different NTP concentration requirements for efficient initiation from different T7 promoters. While lysozyme represses initiation, once the enzyme has left the promoter and formed an elongation complex (EC) it is generally resistant to the effects of lysozyme. The mechanism by which the inhibitory effects of lysozyme are largely restricted to the initiation phase of transcription is not well understood. We find that T7 lysozyme destabilizes initial transcription complexes (ITCs) and increases the rate of release of transcripts from these complexes but does not destabilize ECs. However, if the RNA:RNAP interaction proposed to be important for EC stability is disrupted by proteolysis of the RNA-binding domain or use of templates which interfere with establishment of this RNA:RNAP interaction, the EC becomes sensitive to lysozyme. Comparison of the X-ray structures of T7RNAP and of a T7RNAP:T7 lysozyme complex reveals that lysozyme causes the C terminus of the polymerase to flip out of the active site. Experiments in which carboxypeptidase A is used to probe the lysozyme-induced exposure of the C terminus reveal a large decrease in carboxypeptidase sensitivity following transcription initiation, suggesting that interactions with the 3'-end of the RNA help stabilize the active site in a functional (carboxypeptidase protected) conformation. Thus, the resistance of the EC to lysozyme appears to be due to the consecutive establishment of two sets of RNA:RNAP interactions. The first is made with the 3'-end of the RNA and helps stabilize a functional conformation of the active site, thereby suppressing the effects of lysozyme on KNTP. The second is made with a more upstream element of the RNA and keeps the EC from being destabilized by lysozyme binding.