Antihistamines in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Present knowledge and future perspectives

Development of small molecules to target the IgE:FcεRI protein-protein interaction in allergies

The protein-protein interaction (PPI) between IgE and its high-affinity receptor (FcεRI) is a key component of the allergic response. Inhibiting the IgE:FcεRI PPI is an attractive strategy for therapeutic intervention and the development of allergy treatments. This PPI has been validated as a viable target by the monoclonal anti-IgE antibody omalizumab (Xolair(®)), which has demonstrated clinical efficacy when prescribed to treat moderate-to-severe asthma and hay fever, but small molecules would be a more convenient form of treatment. Cyclic peptides, small proteins and a natural product have all been developed to target the IgE:FcεRI PPI, and these will be discussed in this review. Targeting the IgE:FcεRI complex with small molecules presents various challenges, some of which are inherent in all PPI targets but some of which are unique to this system, which presents great opportunities for the development of new therapeutics for the treatment of allergies.

[The new insight into the pathogenic unity of the upper and lower airways]

Between the upper and the lower respiratory tracts exists a link. Numerous epidemiological, immunological studies and clinical observations suggest the pathogenic unity of the upper and lower airways. The most important observations regarding the nose-lung interaction is rhinitis and asthma. The inflammatory process in the nose is the same as in the bronchi, clinically defined as rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, asthma, bronchial hyperreactivity, allergy, viral infections. The strict link between the rhinosinusitis and asthma implies new possibility of influencing one of the two complaints by treating the other one with an integrated therapy (pharmacotherapy, endonasal microsurgery).

Effect of tecastemizole on pulmonary and cutaneous allergic inflammatory responses

BACKGROUND

Tecastemizole, a major metabolite of astemizole, is a potent and selective H1 receptor antagonist. Evidence suggests that this and certain other H1 receptor antagonists may possess anti-inflammatory effects that are, in some cases, independent of H1 receptor antagonism. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of tectastemizole in models of allergic inflammation.

METHODS

Effects of tecastemizole were assessed in a murine model of allergic lung inflammation, in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) responses in guinea-pig skin and in in vitro assays measuring endothelial adhesion molecule expression and leucocyte-endothelial adhesion.

RESULTS

Tecastemizole inhibited antigen-induced eosinophil recruitment to the lungs of allergic mice in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, combination of a sub-effective dose of tecastemizole, combined with a sub-effective dose of dexamethasone inhibited eosinophil accumulation in this model. Plasma extravasation in PCA reactions was inhibited by tecastemizole, although by a mechanism that would appear to be H1 receptor-dependent. Cytokine-induced endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression, as well as mononuclear cell adhesion to human umbilical vein endothelial cells was inhibited by tecastemazole in a manner independent of H1 receptor antagonism.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that tecastemizole may have H1 receptor-independent effects in inhibiting late-phase inflammatory responses, while acute responses appear to be inhibited in a H1 receptor-dependent manner. Furthermore, our data suggest an important potential steroid-sparing role for such drugs in the treatment of allergic inflammatory conditions.

Comparison of HPLC and CE methods for the determination of cetirizine dihydrochloride in human plasma samples

Two methods, capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), for analysis of cetirizine dihydrochloride in small sample volumes of human plasma were compared. The CE and HPLC assays were developed and validated by analyzing a series of plasma samples containing cetirizine dihydrochloride in different concentrations using these two methods. The extraction procedure is simple and no complicated purification steps or derivatization are required. The analysis time in the HPLC method was shorter than that in the CE method, but solvent consumption was considerably lower in the CE method. The calibration curve was linear to at least 10-1000 ng/mL both for CE and HPLC with r(2) = 0.9993 and r(2) = 0.9994, respectively. The detection limits for cetirizine dihydrochloride were 3 and 5 ng/mL with CE and HPLC (a UV detector was applied in the both cases), respectively. Both methods were selective, robust and specific, allowing reliable quantification of cetirizine dihydrochloride, and could be useful for clinical and biomedical investigations.

Cetirizine: a review of its use in allergic disorders

Cetirizine is a selective, second-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist, with a rapid onset, a long duration of activity and low potential for interaction with drugs metabolised by the hepatic cytochrome P450 system. Cetirizine was generally more effective than other H1 receptor antagonists at inhibiting histamine-induced wheal and flare responses. Cetirizine is an effective and well tolerated agent for the treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in adult, adolescent and paediatric patients. In adults with these allergic disorders, cetirizine was as effective as conventional dosages of ebastine (SAR, PAR, CIU), fexofenadine (SAR), loratadine (SAR, CIU) or mizolastine (SAR). This agent was significantly more effective, and with a more rapid onset of action, than loratadine in 2-day studies in environmental exposure units (SAR). In paediatric patients, cetirizine was as at least as effective as chlorphenamine (chlorpheniramine) [SAR], loratadine (SAR, PAR) and oxatomide (CIU) in the short term, and more effective than oxatomide and ketotifen (PAR) in the long term. Cetirizine was effective in reducing symptoms of allergic asthma in adults and reduced the relative risk of developing asthma in infants with atopic dermatitis sensitised to grass pollen or house dust mite allergens. It had a corticosteroid-sparing effect in infants with severe atopic dermatitis and was effective in ameliorating reactions to mosquito bites in adults. Cetirizine was well tolerated in adults, adolescents and paediatric patients with allergic disorders. In adult, adolescent and paediatric patients aged 2-11 years, the incidence of somnolence with cetirizine was dose related and was generally similar to that with other second-generation H1 receptor antagonists. Although, its sedative effect was greater than that of fexofenadine in some clinical trials and that of loratadine or fexofenadine in a postmarketing surveillance study. In infants aged 6-24 months, the tolerability profile of cetirizine was similar to that of placebo. Cetirizine did not have any adverse effects on cognitive function in adults, or cognitive function, behaviour or achievement of psychomotor milestones in paediatric patients. Cetirizine was not associated with cardiotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Cetirizine is well established in the treatment of symptoms of SAR, PAR or CIU. It demonstrated a corticosteroid-sparing effect and reduced the relative risk of developing asthma in sensitised infants with atopic dermatitis. Cetirizine was effective in the treatment of allergic cough and mosquito bites; however, its precise role in these indications has yet to be clearly established. On the basis of its favourable efficacy and tolerability profile and rapid onset of action, cetirizine provides an important option for the treatment of a wide range of allergic disorders.

Desloratadine: an update of its efficacy in the management of allergic disorders

Desloratadine (Clarinex, Neoclarityn, Aerius, Azomyr, Opulis, Allex), the principal metabolite of loratadine, is itself an orally active, nonsedating, peripheral histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist. It is indicated in the US and Europe for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). It has a rapid onset of effect, efficacy throughout a 24-hour dosage interval, and sustained efficacy in these allergic conditions, as demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials of up to 6 weeks' duration in adult and adolescent patients. At present, there are no published direct comparisons of desloratadine and other H(1)-antihistamines; however, the principal, potential clinical advantages of desloratadine over late-generation H(1)-antihistamines are the drug's decongestant activity, which has been corroborated in several studies of patients with allergic rhinitis, and its anti-inflammatory effects. Indeed, the decongestant activity of desloratadine did not differ from that of pseudoephedrine in a trial in patients with SAR, and in patients with SAR and coexisting asthma, desloratadine reduced asthma symptoms and beta(2)-agonist use, and improved forced expiratory flow in 1 second. However, these issues warrant further study. Desloratadine is generally well tolerated. The overall incidence of adverse events in adults, adolescents and children was not significantly different to that with placebo, and similar proportions of desloratadine or placebo recipients reported events such as pharyngitis, dry mouth, myalgia, somnolence, dysmenorrhoea or fatigue. Desloratadine does not cause sedation or prolong the corrected QT (QTc) interval, can be administered without regard to concurrent intake of food and grapefruit juice, and appears to have negligible potential for drug interactions mediated by several metabolic systems.

CONCLUSION

Although comparative studies with second-generation and other recently developed H(1)-antihistamines are needed to define the drug's clinical profile more clearly, desloratadine can be expected to claim a prominent place in the management of allergic disorders in general, and in the amelioration of specific symptoms of allergy (e.g. nasal congestion) in patients with such disorders.