1
|
Liang Y, Truong T, Zhu Y, Kelly RT. In-Depth Mass Spectrometry-Based Single-Cell and Nanoscale Proteomics. Methods Mol Biol 2020; 2185:159-179. [PMID: 33165848 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0810-4_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Leukemic stem cells are highly dynamic and heterogeneous. Analysis of leukemic stem cells at the single-cell level should provide a wealth of insights that would not be possible using bulk measurements. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic workflows can quantify hundreds or thousands of proteins from a biological sample and has proven invaluable for biomedical research, but samples comprising large numbers of cells are typically required due to limited sensitivity. Recent developments in sample processing, chromatographic separations, and MS instrumentation are now extending in-depth proteome profiling to single mammalian cells. Here, we describe specific techniques that increase the sensitivity of single-cell proteomics by orders of magnitude, enabling the promise of single-cell proteomics to become a reality. We anticipate such techniques can significantly advance the understanding of leukemic stem cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran Liang
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Thy Truong
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Ying Zhu
- Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
| | - Ryan T Kelly
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
- Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baskar R, Fienberg HG, Khair Z, Favaro P, Kimmey S, Green DR, Nolan GP, Plevritis S, Bendall SC. TRAIL-induced variation of cell signaling states provides nonheritable resistance to apoptosis. Life Sci Alliance 2019; 2:e201900554. [PMID: 31704709 PMCID: PMC6848270 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201900554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
TNFα-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), specifically initiates programmed cell death, but often fails to eradicate all cells, making it an ineffective therapy for cancer. This fractional killing is linked to cellular variation that bulk assays cannot capture. Here, we quantify the diversity in cellular signaling responses to TRAIL, linking it to apoptotic frequency across numerous cell systems with single-cell mass cytometry (CyTOF). Although all cells respond to TRAIL, a variable fraction persists without apoptotic progression. This cell-specific behavior is nonheritable where both the TRAIL-induced signaling responses and frequency of apoptotic resistance remain unaffected by prior exposure. The diversity of signaling states upon exposure is correlated to TRAIL resistance. Concomitantly, constricting the variation in signaling response with kinase inhibitors proportionally decreases TRAIL resistance. Simultaneously, TRAIL-induced de novo translation in resistant cells, when blocked by cycloheximide, abrogated all TRAIL resistance. This work highlights how cell signaling diversity, and subsequent translation response, relates to nonheritable fractional escape from TRAIL-induced apoptosis. This refined view of TRAIL resistance provides new avenues to study death ligands in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reema Baskar
- Cancer Biology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Harris G Fienberg
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Zumana Khair
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Patricia Favaro
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sam Kimmey
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Developmental Biology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Garry P Nolan
- Baxter Laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sylvia Plevritis
- Cancer Biology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sean C Bendall
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fernandez M, Sutterlüty-Fall H, Schwärzler C, Lemeille S, Boehncke WH, Merat R. Overexpression of the human antigen R suppresses the immediate paradoxical proliferation of melanoma cell subpopulations in response to suboptimal BRAF inhibition. Cancer Med 2017; 6:1652-1664. [PMID: 28573821 PMCID: PMC5504324 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor plasticity and the heterogeneous response of melanoma cells to targeted therapies are major limits for the long‐term efficacy of this line of therapy. Targeting tumor plasticity is theoretically possible through the modulation of the expression of RNA‐binding proteins which can affect many different compensatory mechanisms of the adaptive response of malignant cells to targeted therapies. Human antigen R (HuR) is a modulator of gene expression and a transacting factor in the mRNA‐processing machinery used in the cell stress response, and is a potential target for reducing tumor plasticity. In this experiment, we exploit the inherent heterogeneous response of the A375 melanoma line to suboptimal BRAF inhibition as a model of immediate adaptive response. We first observe that HuR overexpression can prevent the heterogeneous response and thus the immediate paradoxical proliferation induced by low‐doses vemurafenib treatment. We then use single‐cell mass cytometry to characterize subpopulations, including those that paradoxically proliferate, based on their proliferation rate and the expression patterns of markers involved in the reversible adaptive resistance to BRAF inhibition and/or recognized as HuR targets involved in cell cycle regulation. Under suboptimal BRAF inhibition, HuR overexpression affects these subpopulations and their expression pattern with contrasting responses depending on their proliferation rate: faster‐proliferating vemurafenib‐sensitive or ‐resistant subpopulations showed higher death tendency and reduced size, and slower‐proliferating subpopulations showed an attenuated resistant expression response and their paradoxical proliferation was inhibited. These observations pave the way to new therapeutic strategies for preventing the heterogeneous response of tumors to targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marylise Fernandez
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Christoph Schwärzler
- Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sylvain Lemeille
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Wolf-Henning Boehncke
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Dermatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rastine Merat
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, University of Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Dermatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stern AD, Rahman AH, Birtwistle MR. Cell size assays for mass cytometry. Cytometry A 2016; 91:14-24. [PMID: 27768827 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Mass cytometry offers the advantage of allowing the simultaneous measurement of a greater number parameters than conventional flow cytometry. However, to date, mass cytometry has lacked a reliable alternative to the light scatter properties that are commonly used as a cell size metric in flow cytometry (forward scatter intensity-FSC). Here, we report the development of two plasma membrane staining assays to evaluate mammalian cell size in mass cytometry experiments. One is based on wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) staining and the other on Osmium tetroxide (OsO4 ) staining, both of which have preferential affinity for cell membranes. We first perform imaging and flow cytometry experiments to establish a relationship between WGA staining intensity and traditional measures of cell size. We then incorporate WGA staining in mass cytometry analysis of human whole blood and show that WGA staining intensity has reproducible patterns within and across immune cell subsets that have distinct cell sizes. Lastly, we stain PBMCs or dissociated lung tissue with both WGA and OsO4 ; mass cytometry analysis demonstrates that the two staining intensities correlate well with one another. We conclude that both WGA and OsO4 may be used to acquire cell size-related parameters in mass cytometry experiments, and expect these stains to be broadly useful in expanding the range of parameters that can be measured in mass cytometry experiments. © 2016 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan D Stern
- Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, 10029
| | - Adeeb H Rahman
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, 10029.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Human Immune Monitoring Core, New York, New York, 10029
| | - Marc R Birtwistle
- Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, 10029
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Imaging reveals complex structures and dynamic interactive processes, located deep inside the body, that are otherwise difficult to decipher. Numerous imaging modalities harness every last inch of the energy spectrum. Clinical modalities include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and light-based methods [endoscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT)]. Research modalities include various light microscopy techniques (confocal, multiphoton, total internal reflection, superresolution fluorescence microscopy), electron microscopy, mass spectrometry imaging, fluorescence tomography, bioluminescence, variations of OCT, and optoacoustic imaging, among a few others. Although clinical imaging and research microscopy are often isolated from one another, we argue that their combination and integration is not only informative but also essential to discovering new biology and interpreting clinical datasets in which signals invariably originate from hundreds to thousands of cells per voxel.
Collapse
|